Analyze Diet
PLoS genetics2019; 15(5); e1008146; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008146

Identification and validation of genetic variants predictive of gait in standardbred horses.

Abstract: Several horse breeds have been specifically selected for the ability to exhibit alternative patterns of locomotion, or gaits. A premature stop codon in the gene DMRT3 is permissive for "gaitedness" across breeds. However, this mutation is nearly fixed in both American Standardbred trotters and pacers, which perform a diagonal and lateral gait, respectively, during harness racing. This suggests that modifying alleles must influence the preferred gait at racing speeds in these populations. A genome-wide association analysis for the ability to pace was performed in 542 Standardbred horses (n = 176 pacers, n = 366 trotters) with genotype data imputed to ~74,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Nineteen SNPs on nine chromosomes (ECA1, 2, 6, 9, 17, 19, 23, 25, 31) reached genome-wide significance (p < 1.44 x 10-6). Variant discovery in regions of interest was carried out via whole-genome sequencing. A set of 303 variants from 22 chromosomes with putative modifying effects on gait was genotyped in 659 Standardbreds (n = 231 pacers, n = 428 trotters) using a high-throughput assay. Random forest classification analysis resulted in an out-of-box error rate of 0.61%. A conditional inference tree algorithm containing seven SNPs predicted status as a pacer or trotter with 99.1% accuracy and subsequently performed with 99.4% accuracy in an independently sampled population of 166 Standardbreds (n = 83 pacers, n = 83 trotters). This highly accurate algorithm could be used by owners/trainers to identify Standardbred horses with the potential to race as pacers or as trotters, according to the genotype identified, prior to initiating training and would enable fine-tuning of breeding programs with designed matings. Additional work is needed to determine both the algorithm's utility in other gaited breeds and whether any of the predictive SNPs play a physiologically functional role in the tendency to pace or tag true functional alleles.
Publication Date: 2019-05-28 PubMed ID: 31136578PubMed Central: PMC6555539DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008146Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study identifies and validates genetic variants that predict the type of gait in Standardbred horses, which can help trainers determine whether a horse is suited to be a pacer or trotter before training begins.

Objective and Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a genomic study on Standardbred horses to identify genetic variations that could predict their ability to perform certain types of gaits. Gaits, in this context, refer to the patterns of movement of the horses. Horses can either be pacers (lateral movement) or trotters (diagonal movement).
  • Using a genome-wide association analysis, the team studied genetic details of 542 horses (176 pacers and 366 trotters) to identify genetic predictors of gait. A set of around 74,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs (variations in single base pairs in a DNA sequence) were analyzed.
  • Thereafter, genomic regions of interest were mapped through whole genome sequencing to find possible modifying effects on gait.

Results and Findings

  • Nineteen SNPs on nine different chromosomes were significantly associated with the ability to pace.
  • The combination of these genetic variations was then mapped in 659 more Standardbreds using high-throughput genetic screening, resulting in a very low error rate of 0.61%, proving the accuracy of this model’s predictions.
  • Further, an algorithm was developed using a random forest classification analysis, containing seven SNPs, that accurately predicted a horse’s gait status as a pacer or trotter with 99.1% accuracy. This algorithm was tested on another sample of 166 Standardbreds and gave an accuracy of 99.4%.

Implications and Future Research

  • The implications of this research are significant for horse trainers, owners, and breeders. Using this algorithm, they can determine the potential of a Standardbred horse to race as a pacer or a trotter before initiating any training. This could also allow breeders to fine-tune their breeding programs accordingly.
  • Further research is required to test the utility of this algorithm in other breeds and to determine if any of the SNPs identified play a functional role in determining a horse’s gait or if they tag other functional genetic alleles.

Cite This Article

APA
McCoy AM, Beeson SK, Rubin CJ, Andersson L, Caputo P, Lykkjen S, Moore A, Piercy RJ, Mickelson JR, McCue ME. (2019). Identification and validation of genetic variants predictive of gait in standardbred horses. PLoS Genet, 15(5), e1008146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008146

Publication

ISSN: 1553-7404
NlmUniqueID: 101239074
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 5
Pages: e1008146

Researcher Affiliations

McCoy, Annette M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Beeson, Samantha K
  • Veterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rubin, Carl-Johan
  • Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andersson, Leif
  • Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Caputo, Paul
  • Paul Caputo, DVM, Pompano Beach, Florida, United States of America.
Lykkjen, Sigrid
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Moore, Alison
  • Moore Equine Services, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada.
Piercy, Richard J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Mickelson, James R
  • Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
McCue, Molly E
  • Veterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.

MeSH Terms

  • Algorithms
  • Alleles
  • Animals
  • Biomarkers
  • Codon, Nonsense / genetics
  • Gait / genetics
  • Gene Frequency / genetics
  • Genetic Variation / genetics
  • Genome-Wide Association Study
  • Genotype
  • Horses / genetics
  • Locomotion / genetics
  • Mutation / genetics
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / genetics
  • Selective Breeding
  • Transcription Factors / genetics

Grant Funding

  • F30 OD023369 / NIH HHS
  • K08 AR055713 / NIAMS NIH HHS
  • T32 OD010993 / NIH HHS

Conflict of Interest Statement

I have read the journal\'s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AMM and MEM are named as inventors on a pending patent application for the predictive model described herein, submitted by the University of Minnesota.

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Andersson LS, Larhammar M, Memic F, Wootz H, Schwochow D, Rubin CJ. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice.. Nature 2012;488(7413):642–6.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11399pmc: PMC3523687pubmed: 22932389google scholar: lookup
  2. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Rendahl AK, Valberg SJ, Andersson LS, Axelsson J. Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for important traits in domestic horse breeds.. PLoS Genet 2013;9(1):e1003211.
  3. Albertsdottir E, Eriksson S, Sigurdsson A, Arnason T. Genetic analysis of 'breeding field test status' in Icelandic horses.. J Anim Breed Genet 2011;128(2):124–32.
  4. Cothran EG, MacCluer JW, Weitkamp LR, Bailey E. Genetic differentiation associated with gait within American standardbred horses.. Anim Genet 1987;18(4):285–96.
    pubmed: 3481678
  5. Zhou X, Stephens M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies.. Nat Genet 2012;44(7):821–4.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.2310pmc: PMC3386377pubmed: 22706312google scholar: lookup
  6. Consortium WTCC. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.. Nature 2007;447(7145):661–78.
    doi: 10.1038/nature05911pmc: PMC2719288pubmed: 17554300google scholar: lookup
  7. McCoy AM, Beeson SK, Splan RK, Lykkjen S, Ralston SL, Mickelson JR. Identification and validation of risk loci for osteochondrosis in standardbreds.. BMC Genomics 2016;17:41.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2385-zpmc: PMC4709891pubmed: 26753841google scholar: lookup
  8. Kim S, Kettlewell JR, Anderson RC, Bardwell VJ, Zarkower D. Sexually dimorphic expression of multiple doublesex-related genes in the embryonic mouse gonad.. Gene Expr Patterns 2003;3(1):77–82.
    pubmed: 12609607
  9. Promerova M, Andersson LS, Juras R, Penedo MC, Reissmann M, Tozaki T. Worldwide frequency distribution of the 'Gait keeper' mutation in the DMRT3 gene.. Anim Genet 2014;45(2):274–82.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12120pubmed: 24444049google scholar: lookup
  10. Spencer CC, Su Z, Donnelly P, Marchini J. Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip.. PLoS Genet 2009;5(5):e1000477.
  11. Wall JD, Pritchard JK. Haplotype blocks and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.. Nat Rev Genet 2003;4(8):587–97.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg1123pubmed: 12897771google scholar: lookup
  12. Carneiro M, Rubin CJ, Di Palma F, Albert FW, Alfoldi J, Barrio AM. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication.. Science 2014;345(6200):1074–9.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1253714pmc: PMC5421586pubmed: 25170157google scholar: lookup
  13. Woronik A, Wheat CW. Advances in finding Alba: the locus affecting life history and color polymorphism in a Colias butterfly.. J Evol Biol 2017;30(1):26–39.
    doi: 10.1111/jeb.12967pubmed: 27541292google scholar: lookup
  14. Fustier MA, Brandenburg JT, Boitard S, Lapeyronnie J, Eguiarte LE, Vigouroux Y. Signatures of local adaptation in lowland and highland teosintes from whole genome sequencing of pooled samples.. Mol Ecol 2017.
    doi: 10.1111/mec.14082pubmed: 28256021google scholar: lookup
  15. Bureau A, Dupuis J, Falls K, Lunetta KL, Hayward B, Keith TP. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests.. Genet Epidemiol 2005;28(2):171–82.
    doi: 10.1002/gepi.20041pubmed: 15593090google scholar: lookup
  16. Pan Q, Hu T, Malley JD, Andrew AS, Karagas MR, Moore JH. A system-level pathway-phenotype association analysis using synthetic feature random forest.. Genet Epidemiol 2014;38(3):209–19.
    doi: 10.1002/gepi.21794pmc: PMC4327826pubmed: 24535726google scholar: lookup
  17. Yao C, Spurlock DM, Armentano LE, Page CD Jr, VandeHaar MJ, Bickhart DM. Random Forests approach for identifying additive and epistatic single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with residual feed intake in dairy cattle.. J Dairy Sci 2013;96(10):6716–29.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6237pubmed: 23932129google scholar: lookup
  18. McCoy AM, McCue ME. Validation of imputation between equine genotyping arrays.. Anim Genet 2013.
    pmc: PMC4000747pubmed: 24164665
  19. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81(3):559–75.
    doi: 10.1086/519795pmc: PMC1950838pubmed: 17701901google scholar: lookup
  20. McCue ME, Bannasch DL, Petersen JL, Gurr J, Bailey E, Binns MM. A high density SNP array for the domestic horse and extant Perissodactyla: utility for association mapping, genetic diversity, and phylogeny studies.. PLoS Genet 2012;8(1):e1002451.
  21. Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical computing; 2015.
  22. Li MX, Yeung JM, Cherny SS, Sham PC. Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets.. Hum Genet 2012;131(5):747–56.
    doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1118-2pmc: PMC3325408pubmed: 22143225google scholar: lookup
  23. Depristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data.. Nat Genet 2011;43(5):491–8.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.806pmc: PMC3083463pubmed: 21478889google scholar: lookup
  24. Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline.. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2013;43:11 0 1–33.
  25. Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, Zoli M, Gnerre S, Imsland F. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse.. Science 2009;326(5954):865–7.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1178158pmc: PMC3785132pubmed: 19892987google scholar: lookup
  26. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.. Bioinformatics 2009;25(14):1754–60.
  27. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.. Genome Res 2010;20(9):1297–303.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110pmc: PMC2928508pubmed: 20644199google scholar: lookup
  28. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.. Fly (Austin) 2012;6(2):80–92.
    doi: 10.4161/fly.19695pmc: PMC3679285pubmed: 22728672google scholar: lookup
  29. Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a Model for Genotoxic Chemical Mutational Studies with a New Program, SnpSift.. Front Genet 2012;3:35.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00035pmc: PMC3304048pubmed: 22435069google scholar: lookup
  30. Petersen JLR, A.K., Mickelson JR, Equine Genetic Diversity Consortium, McCue ME, editor. Identification of ancestry informative markers in the domestic horse.. Plant and Animal Genome Conference XX 2012 January 14–18, 2012; San Diego, CA.
  31. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest.. R News 2002;2:18–22.
  32. Peters A, Hothorn T. ipred: Improved Predictors.. R package version 0.9–5 2015.