Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2014; 46(6); 759-763; doi: 10.1111/evj.12220

Identifying optimal parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement symmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs of horses.

Abstract: Subjective evaluation of the response to diagnostic analgesia of hindlimb lameness is influenced by expectation bias. Quantification of pelvic movement with inertial measurement units is possible, but it is unclear which measure of movement symmetry best reflects the changes seen after diagnostic analgesia. Objective: To test our hypothesis that objective measures closely relating to those used for subjective visual lameness scoring (quantifying the difference between sacral upward or downward movement or between movement amplitudes of the left and right tubera coxae) would show the largest and most consistent response. Methods: Retrospective analysis of subjective and objective clinical lameness data. Methods: Thirteen horses with hindlimb lameness underwent visual lameness scoring and independent gait assessment with inertial measurement units. Established objective measures were calculated and changes before/after diagnostic analgesia regressed against the change in lameness grade. Slopes of regression lines were calculated and confidence intervals assessed. Results: All objective parameters showed variation between horses and across lameness grades. The following 3 measures documented a consistent increase in symmetry for each grade of change in lameness score: difference between sacral displacement minima; upward movement difference; and range of motion difference between the tubera coxae. Conclusions: Several pelvic parameters are suitable for objective quantification of changes after diagnostic analgesia in hindlimb-lame horses. A change of 9-13% per lameness grade can be expected. Upward movement of the tubera coxae is the most sensitive objective measure for quantifying a response to diagnostic analgesia. However, when assessed visually, this measure requires simultaneous focusing on pelvic and limb movements. Other parameters that show a similar response might be more easily perceived, requiring only assessment of tubera coxae range of motion or downward displacement of the sacrum without simultaneous focus on limb movement.
Publication Date: 2014-01-23 PubMed ID: 24329685DOI: 10.1111/evj.12220Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates optimal parameters for determining changes in horse pelvic movement symmetry in response to hindlimb diagnostic analgesia. The study finds that several pelvic measures prove useful, potentially expecting a change of 9-13% per lameness grade. Upward movement of the tubera coxae was identified as the most sensitive, among other parameters.

Objective of the Study

  • The primary aim of this research was to find the most effective and reliable method of quantifying changes in movement symmetry of a horse’s pelvis following the administration of diagnostic analgesia to the hindlimbs.
  • The research hypothesis was that objective measures that relate closely to those used in subjective visual lameness scoring would offer the most consistent and significant results.

Methodology

  • A retrospective analysis of subjective and objective clinical lameness data was conducted.
  • Thirteen horses with hindlimb lameness underwent visual scoring and independent gait assessment using inertial measurement units (devices primarily used to capture movement and orientation).
  • The pre- and post-analgesia measurements were compared, with regression lines calculated and assessed based on changes in lameness grade.

Lameness Assessment Parameters

  • The researchers calculated established objective measures such as differences in sacral displacement, upward movement, and range of motion difference between the left and right tubera coxae (part of the pelvis).
  • Sacral displacement, upward movement differences, and the range of motion of the tubera coxae documented a consistent increase in symmetry for each change in severity or grade of lameness.

Results and Conclusions

  • All evaluated parameters expressed variance between horses and across varying grades of lameness.
  • Expectations are set for a 9-13% change per lameness grade based on these parameters.
  • Among these parameters, the upward movement of the tubera coxae can be considered as the most effective objective measure to quantify response to diagnostic analgesia.
  • However, visually assessing this measure requires simultaneous focus on pelvic and limb movements. As such, other parameters that demonstrate a similar response might be more practical and convenient as they rely on a simple evaluation of the tubera coxae’s range of motion or downward displacement of the sacrum, without the need for concurrent focus on limb movement.

Cite This Article

APA
Pfau T, Spicer-Jenkins C, Smith RK, Bolt DM, Fiske-Jackson A, Witte TH. (2014). Identifying optimal parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement symmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs of horses. Equine Vet J, 46(6), 759-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12220

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 6
Pages: 759-763

Researcher Affiliations

Pfau, T
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.
Spicer-Jenkins, C
    Smith, R K
      Bolt, D M
        Fiske-Jackson, A
          Witte, T H

            MeSH Terms

            • Analgesia / veterinary
            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Hindlimb / pathology
            • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
            • Horses
            • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
            • Locomotion
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / veterinary
            • Pelvis / physiology

            Citations

            This article has been cited 12 times.
            1. St George LB, Spoormakers TJP, Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM, Roy SH, Richards J, Serra Bragança FM. Classification performance of sEMG and kinematic parameters for distinguishing between non-lame and induced lameness conditions in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1358986.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1358986pubmed: 38628939google scholar: lookup
            2. Byström A, Hardeman AM, Engell MT, Swagemakers JH, Koene MHW, Serra-Bragança FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E. Normal variation in pelvic roll motion pattern during straight-line trot in hand in warmblood horses. Sci Rep 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17117.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44223-2pubmed: 37816848google scholar: lookup
            3. Rhodin M, Smit IH, Persson-Sjodin E, Pfau T, Gunnarsson V, Björnsdóttir S, Zetterberg E, Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ, Serra Bragança F, Hernlund E. Timing of Vertical Head, Withers and Pelvis Movements Relative to the Footfalls in Different Equine Gaits and Breeds. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 7;12(21).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12213053pubmed: 36359178google scholar: lookup
            4. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 27;12(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
            5. Starke SD, May SA. Robustness of five different visual assessment methods for the evaluation of hindlimb lameness based on tubera coxarum movement in horses at the trot on a straight line. Equine Vet J 2022 Nov;54(6):1103-1113.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.13531pubmed: 34717008google scholar: lookup
            6. Marunova E, Dod L, Witte S, Pfau T. Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 3;11(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11061665pubmed: 34204921google scholar: lookup
            7. Bukhari SSUH, McElligott AG, Parkes RSV. Quantifying the Impact of Mounted Load Carrying on Equids: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11051333pubmed: 34067208google scholar: lookup
            8. Hardeman AM, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Koene MHW, Swagemakers JH, Roepstorff L, van Weeren R, Byström A. Movement asymmetries in horses presented for prepurchase or lameness examination. Equine Vet J 2022 Mar;54(2):334-346.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.13453pubmed: 33862666google scholar: lookup
            9. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
            10. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of Tree Width on Thoracolumbar and Limb Kinematics, Saddle Pressure Distribution, and Thoracolumbar Dimensions in Sports Horses in Trot and Canter. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 21;9(10).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
            11. Vertz J, Deblanc D, Rhodin M, Pfau T. Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body movement symmetry in the trotting horse. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199447.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199447pubmed: 29928020google scholar: lookup
            12. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Persson-Sjodin E, Barstow A, Forbes B, Rhodin M. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing Thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet J 2018 Jan;50(1):117-124.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.12705pubmed: 28548349google scholar: lookup