Analyze Diet
European journal of radiology open2022; 10; 100467; doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100467

Imaging techniques in veterinary medicine. Part II: Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine.

Abstract: Radiography and ultrasonography are the most used techniques in veterinary clinical practice, due to organizational, managerial and, mostly, economic reasons. However, in the last decades, Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and, to a lesser extent, Nuclear Medicine (MN) are increasingly used. As we said in the previous article, all the Diagnostic Imaging techniques are actually "indispensable" in Veterinary Medicine, where many patients do not show any symptoms.This second part describes Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance (MRI) and Nuclear Medicine techniques in Veterinary Medicine are described.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13 PubMed ID: 36570419PubMed Central: PMC9768321DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100467Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article mainly discusses the usage and benefits of advanced imaging techniques, namely, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine, in veterinary medicine.

Overview of the Research

In this research, the authors explore advanced imaging techniques that are gradually gaining prominence in veterinary medicine. Although radiography and ultrasonography remain the most frequently used due to their cost-effectiveness and simplicity, the applications of CT, MRI, and Nuclear Medicine in diagnosis and treatment are being recognized and practiced more. The essentiality of imaging for veterinary interventions, especially in cases where the patients do not exhibit overt symptoms, is underscored in this research.

Computed Tomography (CT)

  • CT scanning, a form of medical imaging procedure, uses computer-processed combinations of multiple X-ray measurements taken from different angles to produce cross-sectional images of specific areas of the scanned object, allowing the user to see inside the object without cutting.
  • This method provides more detailed information than conventional X-ray imaging. It helps to detect various diseases and assess the shape, size, density, and texture of internal organs effortlessly.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

  • MRI is a non-invasive imaging technology that uses magnetism, radio waves, and a computer to produce detailed two or three-dimensional images of the body’s interior structure.
  • It is especially beneficial in imaging soft tissues and organs like the brain, spinal cord, muscles, and heart, offering an advantage over other techniques when detailed images are required.

Nuclear Medicine

  • Nuclear Medicine involves the application of radioactive substances in the diagnosis and treatment of disease.
  • It allows doctors to see how the body functions and its structure. It differs from other imaging forms as it highlights the body functions, physiology, and structure and is an effective way to gather medical information that would otherwise be unavailable, require surgery, or necessitate more expensive diagnostic tests.

The research concludes that the adoption of these advanced imaging techniques, although at a gradual pace, holds immense promise in enhancing the scope and precision of veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
(2022). Imaging techniques in veterinary medicine. Part II: Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine. Eur J Radiol Open, 10, 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100467

Publication

ISSN: 2352-0477
NlmUniqueID: 101650225
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 100467
PII: 100467

Researcher Affiliations

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

This article includes 179 references

Citations

This article has been cited 15 times.
  1. Dimitrov R, Stamatova-Yovcheva K. MRI Anatomical Investigation of Rabbit Bulbourethral Glands. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 30;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091519pubmed: 37174556google scholar: lookup
  2. Hasegawa K, Vincek A, Evenhuis JV, Goldschmidt S, Soltero-Rivera M, Vapniarsky N, Good K, Gutierrez CJ, Arzi B. Clinical features and computed tomography findings of retrobulbar disease in cats. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1743613.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1743613pubmed: 41602625google scholar: lookup
  3. Esteves-Monteiro M, Santos J, Fontes-Sousa AP, Baptista CS. Diagnostic Imaging Features of Mammary Gland Tumors in Dogs and Cats. Animals (Basel) 2025 Dec 5;15(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15243506pubmed: 41463793google scholar: lookup
  4. Al-Kabani A, Huda B, Haddad J, Yousuf M, Bhurka F, Ajaz F, Patnaik R, Jannati S, Banerjee Y. Exploring Experimental Models of Colorectal Cancer: A Critical Appraisal from 2D Cell Systems to Organoids, Humanized Mouse Avatars, Organ-on-Chip, CRISPR Engineering, and AI-Driven Platforms-Challenges and Opportunities for Translational Precision Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2025 Jun 26;17(13).
    doi: 10.3390/cancers17132163pubmed: 40647462google scholar: lookup
  5. Libera K, Schut D, Kritsi E, van Steijn L, Dallman T, Lipman L. Detecting wing fractures in chickens using deep learning, photographs and computed tomography scanning. Poult Sci 2025 Aug;104(8):105264.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105264pubmed: 40398294google scholar: lookup
  6. de Camargo GC, Rahal SC, Abdala Junior R, da Silva JP, da Silva DS, Castiglioni MCR, Ichikawa RS, Carvalho BC. Computed Tomography and a Dental Intraoral Scanner to Generate Three-Dimensional Models of the Beaks of Three Bird Species. Vet Sci 2025 Apr 3;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040331pubmed: 40284833google scholar: lookup
  7. Nourinezhad J, Abdi A, Moarabi A, Hanafi MG, Fatahian Dehkordi RA, Tomańska A. Major Salivary Gland Examinations of the Donkey (Equus asinus) Using Sectional Anatomy, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Vet Med Sci 2025 May;11(3):e70298.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.70298pubmed: 40198540google scholar: lookup
  8. Mikić M, Lietz P, Dierig JA, Meller S, Pees M, Merhof K. Evaluation of virtual non-contrast detector-based spectral CT images in comparison to true unenhanced images in 20 rabbits. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1521986.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1521986pubmed: 40151564google scholar: lookup
  9. Turek B, Pawlikowski M, Jankowski K, Borowska M, Skierbiszewska K, Jasiński T, Domino M. Selection of density standard and X-ray tube settings for computed digital absorptiometry in horses using the k-means clustering algorithm. BMC Vet Res 2025 Mar 13;21(1):165.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04591-5pubmed: 40082938google scholar: lookup
  10. García-Real MI, Fernández-Valle E, Jiménez S, Ruiz-Fernández MJ, Castejón-Ferrer D, Montesinos-Barceló A, Ardiaca-García M, Moreno N, González-Soriano J. Pseudopus apodus Soft Tissue Anatomy Based on Comparison of Classical Dissection and Multi-Detector Computed Tomography. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 20;15(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15050615pubmed: 40075898google scholar: lookup
  11. Alshammari AH, Oshiro T, Ungkulpasvich U, Yamaguchi J, Morishita M, Khdair SA, Hatakeyama H, Hirotsu T, di Luccio E. Advancing Veterinary Oncology: Next-Generation Diagnostics for Early Cancer Detection and Clinical Implementation. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 30;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030389pubmed: 39943159google scholar: lookup
  12. Pas ML, Chantillon L, Clinquart J, Hiltrop R, Vandekerckhove L, Pardon B, Govaere J, Meesters M. Urethral obstruction in a ram with a periurethral abscess: clinical findings, diagnostic imaging and pathology. BMC Vet Res 2024 Nov 6;20(1):507.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04363-7pubmed: 39506713google scholar: lookup
  13. Tripathi G, Guha L, Kumar H. Seeing the unseen: The role of bioimaging techniques for the diagnostic interventions in intervertebral disc degeneration. Bone Rep 2024 Sep;22:101784.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101784pubmed: 39040156google scholar: lookup
  14. May JL, Garcia-Mora J, Edwards M, Rossmeisl JH. An Illustrated Scoping Review of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of Canine and Feline Brain Tumors. Animals (Basel) 2024 Mar 29;14(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14071044pubmed: 38612283google scholar: lookup
  15. Ichikawa Y, Kanemaki N, Kanai K. Breed-Specific Skull Morphology Reveals Insights into Canine Optic Chiasm Positioning and Orbital Structure through 3D CT Scan Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 7;14(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020197pubmed: 38254367google scholar: lookup