Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2022; 9; 885317; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.885317

Immobilization of Captive Kulans (Equus hemionus kulan) Without Using Ultrapotent Opioids.

Abstract: Etorphine is widely used in zoological medicine for the immobilization of large herbivores. All reported immobilization protocols for kulans use etorphine as the primary immobilizing agent. However, etorphine can trigger severe side effects and is highly toxic for humans, its availability is occasionally limited for use in wildlife medicine. Therefore, two different alpha-2 agonist-based protocols for the general anesthesia of kulans were investigated and compared with the standard etorphine immobilization. In total, 21 immobilizations were performed within the scope of routine husbandry management at the Serengeti-Park Hodenhagen. Kulans were darted using a ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam-butorphanol (KMMB) protocol (n = 8, treatment group (TG) 1), a tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine-butorphanol (TZMB) protocol (n = 7, treatment group (TG) 2), or an etorphine-acepromazine-detomidine-butorphanol (EADB) protocol (n = 6, control group). Vital parameters included heart rate, respiratory rate, arterial blood pressure (invasive), end tidal CO2 (etCO2), electromyography and core body temperature, which were all assessed every 10 min. For blood gas analysis, arterial samples were collected 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after induction. Subjective measures of quality and efficacy included quality of induction, immobilization, and recovery. Time to recumbency was longer for TG 1 (9.00 ± 1.67 min) and TG 2 (10.43 ± 1.79 min) compared to the induction times in the control group (5.33 ± 1.93 min). Treatment group protocols resulted in excellent muscle relaxation, normoxemia and normocapnia. Lower pulse rates combined with systolic arterial hypertension were detected in the alpha-2 agonist-based protocols. However, only in TZMB-immobilized kulans, sustained severe systolic arterial hypertension was observed, with significantly higher values than in the TG 1 and the normotensive control group. At 60 min following induction, medetomidine and detomidine were antagonized with atipamezole IM (5 mg/mg medetomidine or 2 mg/mg detomidine), etorphine and butorphanol with naltrexone IV (2 mg/mg butorphanol or 50 mg/mg etorphine), and midazolam and zolazepam with flumazenil IV (0.3 mg per animal). All three combinations provided smooth and rapid recoveries. To conclude, the investigated treatment protocols (KMMB and TZMB) provided a safe and efficient general anesthesia in kulans with significantly better muscle relaxation, higher respiration rates and improved arterial oxygenation compared with the immobilizations of the control group. However, the control group (EADB) showed faster recoveries. Therefore, EADB is recommended for ultra-short immobilizations (e.g., microchipping and collaring), especially with free-ranging kulans where individual recovery is uncertain, whereas the investigated treatment protocols are recommended for prolonged medical procedures on captive kulans.
Publication Date: 2022-08-10 PubMed ID: 36213408PubMed Central: PMC9536428DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.885317Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated alternative immobilization methods for Kulans, a type of large herbivore, to avoid the use of etorphine, a common and highly toxic substance with severe side effects. The study compared etorphine-based protocols with two alpha-2 agonist-based protocols, and found that these alternatives provided effective and safer anesthesia for the animals, albeit with longer recovery times.

Study Background

  • The study was motivated by the need for safer anesthesia methods for large herbivores, particularly Kulans, where current protocols are based on etorphine, a highly toxic substance with severe side effects for both the animals and humans handling it.
  • The study seeks to compare the efficiency, stability, and recovery times of two alpha-2 agonist-based anesthesia protocols (Ketamine-medetomidine-midazolam-butorphanol (KMMB) and tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine-butorphanol (TZMB)) with the standard etorphine-based protocol (etorphine-acepromazine-detomidine-butorphanol (EADB)).

Methods and Measurements

  • A total of 21 immobilizations were performed using the three different protocols. Vital parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and body temperature were assessed at regular intervals.
  • Blood gas analysis was also performed and measures of quality and efficacy, including induction, immobilization and recovery quality, were observed.

Findings

  • Results showed that the alternative alpha-2 agonist-based protocols led to longer times to recumbency (animal falling down under the effect of the drug) compared to the etorphine-based protocol, but superior muscle relaxation, normoxemia and normocapnia (normal oxygen and carbon dioxide levels).
  • Lower pulse rates and higher arterial blood pressure were observed in animals under the alternative protocols. Notably, severe arterial hypertension was observed in animals treated with the TZMB protocol.
  • All three protocols provided smooth and rapid recoveries with the administration of antagonists to reverse the effects of the immobilizing drugs.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that the alternative protocols (KMMB and TZMB) provide efficient and safer general anesthesia in Kulans with better muscle relaxation and improved oxygenation than the conventional etorphine-based protocol.
  • However, the etorphine-based protocol resulted in faster recoveries, and is hence still recommended for very short immobilizations and situations where recovery time is uncertain.
  • The alternative protocols are recommended for prolonged medical procedures on captive Kulans due to their superior safety and efficacy.

Cite This Article

APA
Bohner J, Painer J, Bakker D, Haw AJ, Rauch H, Greunz EM, Egner B, Goeritz F. (2022). Immobilization of Captive Kulans (Equus hemionus kulan) Without Using Ultrapotent Opioids. Front Vet Sci, 9, 885317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.885317

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 885317

Researcher Affiliations

Bohner, Julia
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany.
  • Serengeti-Park Department of Research, Hodenhagen, Germany.
Painer, Johanna
  • Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution (FIWI), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bakker, Denyse
  • Lammermoor Veterinary Clinic, Krugersdorp, South Africa.
Haw, Anna Jean
  • Brain Function Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Rauch, Hanna
  • Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution (FIWI), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Greunz, Eva Maria
  • Center of Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Egner, Beate
  • Veterinary Academy of Higher Learning (VAHL), Babenhausen, Germany.
Goeritz, Frank
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Kaczensky P, Bayarbaatar B, Payne J, Strindberg S, Walzer C, Batsaikhan N. A Conservation Strategy for Khulan in Mongolia: Background and Key Considerations. (2021).
  2. Matthews N, Taylor T. Anesthesia of Donkeys and Mules: How They Differ from Horses. (2002) 48.
  3. Grosenbaugh D, Reinemeyer C, Figueiredo M. Pharmacology and therapeutics in donkeys. Equine Vet Educ (2011) 23:523–30.
  4. Gaudio E, Hoffman LC, Schabort GA, Shepstone CA, Bauer G, De Benedictis GM. Evaluation of the quality of immobilization and cardiorespiratory effects of etorphine-medetomidine-azaperone combination in plains zebras (Equus quagga): a pilot study. J Zoo Wildl Med (2020) 50:988–92.
    doi: 10.1638/2018-0157pubmed: 31926533google scholar: lookup
  5. Lees P, Meredith MJ, Hillidge CJ. Actions alone and in combination of etorphine and acepromazine in the horse and the pig. Vet Res Commun (1983) 7:201–2.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02228617google scholar: lookup
  6. Plotka ED, Seal US, Eagle TC, Asa CS, Tester JR, Siniff DB. Rapid reversible immobilization of feral stallions using etorphine hydrochloride, xylazine hydrochloride and atropine sulfate. J Wildl Dis (1987) 23:471–8.
    doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-23.3.471pubmed: 3625909google scholar: lookup
  7. Stemmet GP, Meyer LC, Bruns A, Buss P, Zimmerman D, Koeppel K. Compared to etorphine-azaperone, the ketamine-butorphanol-medetomidine combination is also effective at immobilizing zebra (Equus zebra). Vet Anaesth Analg (2019) 46:466–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.01.008pubmed: 31176572google scholar: lookup
  8. Walzer C, Baumgartner R, Ganbataar O, Stauffer C. Boxing a wild horse for mongolia-tips, tricks and treats. In: Conference: Meeting of the European Association of Zoo- and Wildlife Veterinarians (EAZWV). (2004). p. 153–57.
  9. Walzer C, Kaczensky P, Oyunsaikhan G, Lengger J, Enksaikhan N, Davaa L. Capture and Anesthesia of Wild Mongolian Equids – the Przewalski's Horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) and Khulan (E. hemionus) Mongolian. J Biol Sci (2006) 4:19–28.
    doi: 10.22353/mjbs.2006.04.02google scholar: lookup
  10. Walzer C, Kaczensky P, Ganbataar O, Enksaikhan N, Stauffer C. Coming home: the return of the Przewalski's horse to the Mongolian Gobi. In: Dick G, Gusset M. editors. Building a Future for Wildlife-Zoos and Aquariums Commited to Biodiversity Conservation. (2010). p. 123–8.
  11. Walzer C. Nondomestic equids. In: West G. editor. Zoo animal and wildlife immobilization and anesthesia. Ames, Iowa: Wiley Blackwell. (2014). pp. 719–728.
  12. Plangsangmas T, Rattanathanya H, Tipkantha W, Sanannu S, Maikaew U, Thaeonoen J. Immobilization of captive plains zebras (Equus quagga) with a combination of etorphine hydrochloride, acepromazine, and xylazine hydrochloride. J Vet Med Sci (2022) 84:181–5.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0458pmc: PMC8810327pubmed: 34866094google scholar: lookup
  13. Matthews NS, Petrini KR, Wolff PL. Anesthesia of Przewalski's Horses (Equus przewalskii przewalskii) with Medetomidine/Ketamine and Antagonism with Atipamezole. J Zoo Wildl Med (1995) 26:231–6.
  14. Rosu O, Melega I, Evans AL, Arnemo JM, Küker S. Evaluation of medetomidine-ketamine for immobilization of feral horses in Romania. Front Vet Sci (2021) 8:655217.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.655217pmc: PMC8255603pubmed: 34235198google scholar: lookup
  15. Burroughs R, Hofmeyr M, Morkel P, Kock MD, Kock R, Meltzer D. Chemical immobilization- 347 individual species requirements. In: Sutton K. editor. Chemical and Physical Restraint of Wild Animals: A Training and Field Manual for African Species. (2nd edn). Greyton:IWVS. (2012) 198–201.
  16. Zeiler GE, Meyer LCR. Comparison of thiafentanil-medetomidine to etorphine medetomidine immobilisation of impalas (Aepyceros melampus). J S Afr Vet Assoc (2017) 385:1–8.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v88i0.1520pmc: PMC6138147pubmed: 28828865google scholar: lookup
  17. Rosu O, Udrescu L, Birtoiu A. Alternative chemical immobilisation in a group of captive feral horses using a homemade remote delivery system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals. Bussolengo, Italy. (2012). pp. 1–5.
  18. Rosu O, Udrescu V, Birtoiu D, Manu E. Chemical immobilisation of letea feral horses (Equus caballus) using ketamine and medetomidine. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals. Warsaw, Poland: Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Pages. (2014). p. 190–5.
  19. Wiesner H, von Hegel G. The immobilization of wild equines with STH 2130 and Tiletamine/Zolazepam. Tierarztl Prax (1990) 18:151–4.
    pubmed: 1971969
  20. Woolnough AP, Hampton JO, Campbell S, Lethbridge MR, Boardman WS, Sharp T. Field immobilization of feral ‘Judas' donkeys (Equus asinus) by remote injection of medetomidine and ketamine and antagonism with atipamezole. J Wildl Dis (2012) 48:435–43.
    doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.2.435pubmed: 22493118google scholar: lookup
  21. Van Zijll Langhout M, Caraguel CGB, Raath JP, Boardman WSJ. Evaluation of etorphine and midazolam anesthesia, and the effect of intravenous butorphanol on cardiopulmonary parameters in game-ranched white rhinoceroses (ceratotherium simum). J Zoo Wildl Med (2016) 47:827–33.
    doi: 10.1638/2015-0167.1pubmed: 27691936google scholar: lookup
  22. Pohlin F, Hooijberg EH, Buss P, Huber N, Viljoen FP, Blackhurst D. A comparison of hematological, immunological, and stress responses to capture and transport in wild white rhinoceros bulls (Ceratotherium simum simum) supplemented with azaperone or midazolam. Front Vet Sci (2020) 7:569576.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.569576pmc: PMC7606872pubmed: 33195552google scholar: lookup
  23. Kushiro T, Yamashita K, Umar MA, Maehara S, Wakaiki S, Abe R. Anesthetic and cardiovascular effects of balanced anesthesia using constant rate infusion of midazolam-ketamine-medetomidine with inhalation of oxygen-sevoflurane (MKM-OS anesthesia) in horses. J Vet Med Sci (2005) 67:379–84.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.67.379pubmed: 15876787google scholar: lookup
  24. Hubbell J, Bednarski R, Muir W. Xylazine and tiletamine-zolazepam anesthesia in horses. Am J Vet Res (1989) 50:737–42.
    pubmed: 2729719
  25. Muir W, Skarda R, Sheehan W. Evaluation of xylazine, guaifenesin, and ketamine hydrochloride for restraint in horses. Am J Vet Res (1978) 39:1274–8.
    pubmed: 697134
  26. Grimm KA, Lamont LA, Tranquilli WJ, Green SA, Robertson SA. Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. The fifth edition of Lumb and Jones Ames: Wiley Blackwell. (2015).
  27. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2019).
  28. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw (2015) 67:1–48.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
  29. Wickham H. ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. (2009). p. 213.
  30. Lenth Russell V. Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw (2016) 69:1–33.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v069.i01google scholar: lookup
  31. Buss P, Miller M, Fuller A, Haw A, Stout E, Olea-Popelka F. Post-induction butorphanol administration alters oxygen consumption to improve blood gases in etorphine-immobilized white rhinoceros. Vet Anaes Analg (2018) 45:57–67.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.03.008pubmed: 29242121google scholar: lookup
  32. Perrin KL, Denwood MJ, Grøndahl C, Nissen P, Bertelsen MF. Comparison of etorphine acepromazine and medetomidine ketamine anesthesia in captive impala (Aepyceros melampus). J Zoo Wildl Med (2015) 46:870e879.
    doi: 10.1638/2015-0114.1pubmed: 26667544google scholar: lookup
  33. Bogan JA, MacKenzie G, Snow DH. An evaluation of tranquillisers for use with etorphine as neuroleptanalgesic agents in the horse. Vet Rec (1978) 103:471–2.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103.21.471pubmed: 741607google scholar: lookup
  34. Lees P, Hillidge C. Neuroleptanalgesia and cardiovascular function in the horse. Equine Vet J (2010) 7:184–91.
  35. Schlarmann B, Görlitz BD, Wintzer HJ, Frey HH. Clinical pharmacology of an etorphine-acepromazine preparation: experiments in dogs and horses. Am J Vet Res (1973) 34:411–5.
    pubmed: 4691487
  36. Gerlach CA, Kummrow MS, Meyer LC, Zeiler GE, Stegmann GF, Buck RK. Continuous intravenous infusion anesthesia with medetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam after induction with a combination of etorphine, medetomidine, and midazolam or with medetomidine, ketamine, and butorphanol in impala (Aepyceros melampus). J Zoo Wildl Med (2017) 48:62–71.
    doi: 10.1638/2016-0010.1pubmed: 28363076google scholar: lookup
  37. Meyer LCR, Hetem RS, Mitchell D, Fuller A. Hypoxia following etorphine administration in goats (Capra hircus) results more from pulmonary hypertension than from hypoventilartion. BMC Vet Res (2015) 11:18–26.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0337-5pmc: PMC4322799pubmed: 25644810google scholar: lookup
  38. Hubbell JAE, Muir W. Oxygenation, oxygen delivery and anaesthesia in the horse. Equine Vet J (2015) 47:25–35.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12258pubmed: 24612155google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.