Analyze Diet
Journal of equine science2016; 27(2); 49-55; doi: 10.1294/jes.27.49

In vitro analysis of the effect of supplementation with activated charcoal on the equine hindgut.

Abstract: The present study uses in vitro analytical techniques to investigate the effect of activated charcoal on the microbial community of the equine hindgut and the metabolites they produce. Incubations were performed in Wheaton bottles using a 50 ml incubation of a high-energy feed or a low-energy feed, plus bottles with no added food source, together with five levels of activated charcoal (0, 10, 25, 50 or 100 mg per bottle) and fecal samples as a bacterial inoculum. Using this method the rate of gas production, volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations, and pH values were analyzed and found to vary depending on the addition of feed, but the activated charcoal had no effect (P>0.05) on any of these. It is already believed that the effect of activated charcoal as a control for toxic substances is at its highest in the foregut or midgut of animals, and therefore should have little impact on the hindgut. The data presented here suggest that if any of the activated charcoal does reach the hindgut, then it has no significant impact on the microbial community present, nor on the major metabolites produced, and so should not have a detrimental effect on the principal site of fermentation in the horse.
Publication Date: 2016-06-21 PubMed ID: 27330398PubMed Central: PMC4914397DOI: 10.1294/jes.27.49Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated how activated charcoal affects the microbial community in horse’s hindgut and the substances they produce, using in vitro analysis. It concluded that if any activated charcoal does reach the hindgut, it has no significant impact on the microbes present or the substances they produce.

Study Design & Methodology

  • To investigate the impact of activated charcoal on the microbial community in the hindgut of the horse and the metabolites it produces, the researchers performed incubations in Wheaton bottles.
  • The incubation consisted of two variables – a high-energy feed and a low-energy feed. They also had bottles with no added food source for control.
  • Five levels of activated charcoal were used in varying quantities – 0, 10, 25, 50 or 100 mg per bottle.
  • Fecal samples were also included in the incubation set-up to serve as a bacterial inoculum. This enabled researchers to more accurately mimic the microbial environment in the horse’s hindgut.

Study Findings & Analysis

  • The rate of gas production, levels of volatile fatty acids, ammonia concentrations, and pH values were scrutinized in these in vitro incubations.
  • The results showcased variations in these parameters depending on the type and presence of feed. However, no significant effect (P>0.05) was observed due to the activated charcoal in any of these parameters.
  • The findings reiterate previous beliefs that the potency of activated charcoal in controlling toxic substances is highest in the foregut or midgut of animals. Since it should have little impact in the hindgut, the results confirm this theory.

Conclusion & Implications

  • The researchers concluded that if any activated charcoal reaches the hindgut, it doesn’t notably affect the microbial community present there or the main metabolites they produce. This implies that it shouldn’t negatively influence the principal fermentation site in the horse.
  • This study provides valuable insights into the effects of activated charcoal on horses’ health and digestion. It could contribute to a better understanding of how various substances interact with the equine gut microbiota and affect metabolism.

Cite This Article

APA
Edmunds JL, Worgan HJ, Dougal K, Girdwood SE, Douglas JL, McEwan NR. (2016). In vitro analysis of the effect of supplementation with activated charcoal on the equine hindgut. J Equine Sci, 27(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.27.49

Publication

ISSN: 1340-3516
NlmUniqueID: 9503751
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 27
Issue: 2
Pages: 49-55

Researcher Affiliations

Edmunds, J L
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Worgan, H J
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Dougal, K
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Girdwood, S E
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Douglas, J-L
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
McEwan, N R
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.

References

This article includes 23 references
  1. Alexander F. A study of parotid salivation in the horse.. J Physiol 1966 Jun;184(3):646-56.
  2. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology.. Ecology 84: 511–525.
  3. Ben Salem H, Saghrouni L, Nefzaoui A. Attempts to deactivate tannins in fodder shrubs with physical and chemical treatments.. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 122: 109–121.
  4. Blackmore TM, Dugdale A, Argo CM, Curtis G, Pinloche E, Harris PA, Worgan HJ, Girdwood SE, Dougal K, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR. Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies.. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e75079.
  5. Blummel M, Ørskov ER. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle.. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 40: 109–119.
  6. Bond GR. The role of activated charcoal and gastric emptying in gastrointestinal decontamination: a state-of-the-art review.. Ann Emerg Med 2002 Mar;39(3):273-86.
    pubmed: 11867980doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.122058google scholar: lookup
  7. Elder GM. Activated charcoal: to give or not to give?. Int Emerg Nurs 2010 Jul;18(3):154-7.
    pubmed: 20542241doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2009.10.005google scholar: lookup
  8. Giffard CJ, Collins SB, Stoodley NC, Butterwick RF, Batt RM. Administration of charcoal, Yucca schidigera, and zinc acetate to reduce malodorous flatulence in dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001 Mar 15;218(6):892-6.
    pubmed: 11294313doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.892google scholar: lookup
  9. Hongoh Y, Yuzawa H, Ohkuma M, Kudo T. Evaluation of primers and PCR conditions for the analysis of 16S rRNA genes from a natural environment.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003 Apr 25;221(2):299-304.
    pubmed: 12725942doi: 10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00218-0google scholar: lookup
  10. Huwig A, Freimund S, Käppeli O, Dutler H. Mycotoxin detoxication of animal feed by different adsorbents.. Toxicol Lett 2001 Jun 20;122(2):179-88.
    pubmed: 11439224doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00360-5google scholar: lookup
  11. Jiang YH, Wang P, Yang HJ, Chen Y. The efficacy of bamboo charcoal in comparison with smectite to reduce the detrimental effect of aflatoxin B1 on in vitro rumen fermentation of a hay-rich feed mixture.. Toxins (Basel) 2014 Jul 10;6(7):2008-23.
    pmc: PMC4113738pubmed: 25014194doi: 10.3390/toxins6072008google scholar: lookup
  12. Kaye BM, Elliott CR, Jalim SL. Methiocarb poisoning of a horse in Australia.. Aust Vet J 2012 Jun;90(6):221-4.
  13. Laho T, Varadyova Z, Mihalikova K, Kisidayova S. Fermentation capacity of fecal microbial inocula of Przewalski horse, kulan and Chapman zebra and polysaccharide hydrolytic activities of fecal microbail constituents (ciliates and bacteria) of kulan and Chapman zebra.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 33: 143–149.
  14. McDougall EI. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva.. Biochem J 1948;43(1):99-109.
    pmc: PMC1274641pubmed: 16748377
  15. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro.. J. Agric. Sci. 93: 217–222.
  16. Neuvonen PJ, Olkkola KT. Oral activated charcoal in the treatment of intoxications. Role of single and repeated doses.. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp 1988 Jan-Dec;3(1):33-58.
    pubmed: 3285126doi: 10.1007/bf03259930google scholar: lookup
  17. Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.. J. Agric. Sci. 92: 499–503.
  18. Smisek M, Cerny S. Active carbon manufacture, properties and applications.. .
  19. Soler-Rodríguez F, Martín A, García-Cambero JP, Oropesa AL, Pérez-López M. Datura stramonium poisoning in horses: a risk factor for colic.. Vet Rec 2006 Jan 28;158(4):132-3.
    pubmed: 16443840doi: 10.1136/vr.158.4.132google scholar: lookup
  20. Stoltenow CL, Mostrom M, Stoltenow LR, Matz TE. Treatment of accidental strychnine poisoning in horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 22: 507–509.
  21. Váradyova Z, Baran M, Zelenak I. Comparison of two in vitro fermentation gas production methods using both rumen fluid and fecal inoculum from sheep.. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123–124: 81–94.
  22. Vaziri ND, Yuan J, Khazaeli M, Masuda Y, Ichii H, Liu S. Oral activated charcoal adsorbent (AST-120) ameliorates chronic kidney disease-induced intestinal epithelial barrier disruption.. Am J Nephrol 2013;37(6):518-25.
    pmc: PMC3777856pubmed: 23689670doi: 10.1159/000351171google scholar: lookup
  23. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.. J Bacteriol 1991 Jan;173(2):697-703.
    pmc: PMC207061pubmed: 1987160doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Smirnova KP, Frill MA, Warner SE, Cheney JA. Shape change in the saddle region of the equine back during trot and walk. J R Soc Interface 2024 Jun;21(215):20230644.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0644pubmed: 38916112google scholar: lookup
  2. Schmidt HP, Hagemann N, Draper K, Kammann C. The use of biochar in animal feeding. PeerJ 2019;7:e7373.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.7373pubmed: 31396445google scholar: lookup
  3. Mitchell CJ, O'Sullivan CM, Pinloche E, Wilkinson T, Morphew RM, McEwan NR. Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine 'nemabiome'. J Equine Sci 2019 Mar;30(1):1-5.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.30.1pubmed: 30944540google scholar: lookup
  4. Crotch-Harvey L, Thomas LA, Worgan HJ, Douglas JL, Gilby DE, McEwan NR. The effect of administration of fenbendazole on the microbial hindgut population of the horse. J Equine Sci 2018;29(2):47-51.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.29.47pubmed: 29991923google scholar: lookup
  5. Shaw SD, Stämpfli H. Diagnosis and Treatment of Undifferentiated and Infectious Acute Diarrhea in the Adult Horse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018 Apr;34(1):39-53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.002pubmed: 29426709google scholar: lookup