Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2026; 13(4); 343; doi: 10.3390/vetsci13040343

In Vitro Characterization of an Equinized Anti-PD-L1 Antibody for Cancer Immunotherapy in Horses.

Abstract: Horses develop spontaneous tumors, typically in old age. Although local tumor control can be achieved using conventional therapies, systemic therapies are required to treat recurrent and/or metastatic tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-L1 antibodies, have been approved for the treatment of various tumor types in humans; however, little is known about the immunosuppressive roles of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in horses, and the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors remains to be elucidated. Previously, we reported that the rat monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody 6C11-3A11 cross-reacts with horse PD-L1 to block the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. To further develop antibodies for therapeutic purposes, their immunogenicity must be reduced to maximize efficacy and safety. To this end, we designed an equinized (equine-ized) anti-PD-L1 antibody, Eq6C11, using the complementarity-determining regions of 6C11-3A11. Eq6C11 had antigen-binding properties comparable to those of 6C11-3A11 and inhibited equine PD-L1 binding to PD-1 in a recombinant protein-based assay. Treatment with Eq6C11 significantly increased IFN-γ and IL-2 production in equine peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures, suggesting its stimulatory activity on T-cell activation. Although further studies are needed to clarify its immunogenicity and clinical activity, these results encourage further development of Eq6C11 as a candidate immune checkpoint inhibitor for cancer immunotherapy in horses.
Publication Date: 2026-04-01 PubMed ID: 42076715PubMed Central: PMC13119938DOI: 10.3390/vetsci13040343Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Overview

  • This study focuses on developing and characterizing a horse-specific (equinized) antibody that blocks PD-L1, a protein that helps tumors evade the immune system, to enhance cancer immunotherapy options for horses.

Background and Rationale

  • Horses naturally develop tumors, often in old age, and while local tumors can be treated with conventional therapies, systemic treatments are needed for recurrent or metastatic cancers.
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-L1 antibodies have proven effective in treating cancers in humans by blocking interactions that suppress the immune response, particularly the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
  • The role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in equine immune suppression is not well understood, nor is the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in horses.
  • Previous research identified a rat-derived monoclonal antibody (6C11-3A11) that can bind to and inhibit horse PD-L1, demonstrating potential for immune system activation against tumors.
  • However, using a rat antibody in horses could provoke immune reactions, reducing treatment efficacy and safety, highlighting the need for an equinized antibody version.

Development of the Equinized Antibody (Eq6C11)

  • Researchers engineered Eq6C11 by grafting the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) — the parts of the antibody responsible for antigen recognition — from the rat antibody 6C11-3A11 onto a horse antibody framework.
  • This “equinization” aimed to reduce immunogenicity and improve compatibility within the horse immune system, potentially enhancing treatment safety and effectiveness.

In Vitro Characterization of Eq6C11

  • Binding Activity: Eq6C11 retained antigen-binding properties similar to the original rat antibody, confirming that it could effectively recognize and bind to equine PD-L1.
  • Functional Assay: In tests using recombinant proteins, Eq6C11 blocked the interaction between horse PD-L1 and PD-1, a critical immune checkpoint that tumors exploit to avoid immune attack.
  • Cellular Immune Response: Treating equine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with Eq6C11 led to significant increases in the production of IFN-γ and IL-2, cytokines associated with T-cell activation and immune stimulation.

Implications and Future Directions

  • The ability of Eq6C11 to block PD-1/PD-L1 interaction and to stimulate T-cell cytokine production in vitro suggests that this equinized antibody has potential as a therapeutic immune checkpoint inhibitor for horses with cancer.
  • While these results are promising, further studies are necessary to evaluate Eq6C11’s immunogenicity in vivo (how much the horse’s immune system might recognize it as foreign) and its clinical effectiveness in treating tumors.
  • Successful development of such therapeutics could expand systemic treatment options for equine oncology, improving outcomes for horses with metastatic or recurrent tumors.

Cite This Article

APA
Horikawa T, Maekawa N, Okagawa T, Tiyamanee W, Ganbaatar O, Nakamura H, Ikehata M, Inoue M, Nakanishi T, Tachibana T, Kato Y, Yamamoto K, Suzuki Y, Murata S, Ohashi K, Konnai S. (2026). In Vitro Characterization of an Equinized Anti-PD-L1 Antibody for Cancer Immunotherapy in Horses. Vet Sci, 13(4), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13040343

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 4
PII: 343

Researcher Affiliations

Horikawa, Takeru
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Maekawa, Naoya
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Cancer Research Unit, One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Institute for Vaccine Research and Development (HU-IVReD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
Okagawa, Tomohiro
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Business Development Unit, FASMAC Co., Ltd., Atsugi 243-0021, Japan.
Tiyamanee, Wisa
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Ganbaatar, Otgontuya
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Nakamura, Hayato
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Ikehata, Mari
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Inoue, Maho
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Nakanishi, Takeshi
  • Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Division of Science and Engineering for Materials, Chemistry and Biology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan.
Tachibana, Taro
  • Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Division of Science and Engineering for Materials, Chemistry and Biology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan.
Kato, Yukinari
  • Department of Antibody Drug Development, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Yamamoto, Keiichi
  • Institute for Vaccine Research and Development (HU-IVReD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
Suzuki, Yasuhiko
  • Institute for Vaccine Research and Development (HU-IVReD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
  • Division of Bioresources, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan.
  • Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Japan.
Murata, Shiro
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Veterinary Research Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
Ohashi, Kazuhiko
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Veterinary Research Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
  • International Affairs Office, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
Konnai, Satoru
  • Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Cancer Research Unit, One Health Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
  • Institute for Vaccine Research and Development (HU-IVReD), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.
  • Veterinary Research Unit, International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan.

Grant Funding

  • JP23K23768, JP23KK0124, JP25K02162, and JP25K02163 / Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • JP223fa627005 and JP25ama121008 / Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Conflict of Interest Statement

T.O. is an employee of FASMAC Co., Ltd. and contributed to the roles shown above. The funder did not have any additional role in the study design, data interpretation, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Sundberg JP, Burnstein T, Page EH, Kirkham WW, Robinson FR. Neoplasms of equidae. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1977;170:150–152.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1977.170.02.150pubmed: 576219google scholar: lookup
  2. Pascoe RR, Summers PM. Clinical survey of tumours and tumour-like lesions in horses in south east Queensland. Equine Vet. J. 1981;13:235–239.
  3. Valentine BA. Survey of equine cutaneous neoplasia in the Pacific Northwest. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2006;18:123–126.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870601800121pubmed: 16566271google scholar: lookup
  4. Taylor S, Haldorson G. A review of equine mucocutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Equine Vet. Educ. 2013;25:374–378.
  5. Hollis AR. Management of equine sarcoids. Vet. J. 2023;291:105926.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105926pubmed: 36334801google scholar: lookup
  6. Pimenta J, Prada J, Cotovio M. Equine melanocytic tumors: A narrative review. Animals 2023;13:247.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020247pmc: PMC9855132pubmed: 36670786google scholar: lookup
  7. Littman DR. Releasing the brakes on cancer immunotherapy. Cell 2015;162:1186–1190.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.038pubmed: 26359975google scholar: lookup
  8. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:1974–1982.
    doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4358pmc: PMC4980573pubmed: 25605845google scholar: lookup
  9. Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008;26:677–704.
  10. Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat. Med. 2002;8:793–800.
    doi: 10.1038/nm730pubmed: 12091876google scholar: lookup
  11. Thompson RH, Kuntz SM, Leibovich BC, Dong H, Lohse CM, Webster WS, Sengupta S, Frank I, Parker AS, Zincke H. Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3381–3385.
    pubmed: 16585157
  12. Xu F, Feng G, Zhao H, Liu F, Xu L, Wang Q, An G. Clinicopathologic Significance and Prognostic Value of B7 Homolog 1 in Gastric Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2015;94:e1911.
    doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001911pmc: PMC4985428pubmed: 26512615google scholar: lookup
  13. Sharma P, Goswami S, Raychaudhuri D, Siddiqui BA, Singh P, Nagarajan A, Liu J, Subudhi SK, Poon C, Gant KL. Immune checkpoint therapy-current perspectives and future directions. Cell 2023;186:1652–1669.
    pubmed: 37059068
  14. Ganbaatar O, Konnai S, Okagawa T, Nojima Y, Okagawa N, Minato E, Kobayashi A, Ando R, Sasaki N, Miyakoshi D. PD-L1 expression in equine malignant melanoma and functional effects of PD-L1 blockade. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0234218.
    pmc: PMC7678989pubmed: 33216754
  15. Pimenta J, Prada J, Pires I, Cotovio M. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immunohistochemical expression in equine melanocytic tumors. Animals 2023;14:48.
    pmc: PMC10778310pubmed: 38200779
  16. Benvegnen J, De Breuyn B, Gerber V, Rottenberg S, Koch C. Immunohistochemical analysis of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in equine sarcoids. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;97:103338.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103338pubmed: 33478763google scholar: lookup
  17. Porcellato I, Mecocci S, Brachelente C, Cappelli K, Armando F, Tognoloni A, Chiaradia E, Stefanetti V, Mechelli L, Pepe M. PD-L1/PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression in equine penile squamous cell carcinomas. Animals 2021;11:2121.
    pmc: PMC8300259pubmed: 34359249
  18. Pimenta J, Prada J, Pires I, Cotovio M. Programmed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in equine sarcoids and squamous cell carcinoma. Open Vet. J. 2024;14:1476–1482.
    pmc: PMC11268900pubmed: 39055760
  19. Hwang WY, Foote J. Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies. Methods 2005;36:3–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.01.001pubmed: 15848070google scholar: lookup
  20. Maekawa N, Konnai S, Watari K, Takeuchi H, Nakanishi T, Tachibana T, Hosoya K, Kim S, Kinoshita R, Owaki R. Development of caninized anti-CTLA-4 antibody as salvage combination therapy for anti-PD-L1 refractory tumors in dogs. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1570717.
    pmc: PMC12130249pubmed: 40463388
  21. Safdari Y, Farajnia S, Asgharzadeh M, Khalili M. Antibody humanization methods—A review and update. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2013;29:175–186.
    pubmed: 24568279
  22. Morgan A, Jones ND, Nesbitt AM, Chaplin L, Bodmer MW, Emtage JS. The N-terminal end of the CH2 domain of chimeric human IgG1 anti-HLA-DR is necessary for C1q, Fc gamma RI and Fc gamma RIII binding. Immunology 1995;86:319–324.
    pmc: PMC1384012pubmed: 7490135
  23. Armour KL, Clark MR, Hadley AG, Williamson LM. Recombinant human IgG molecules lacking Fc gamma receptor I binding and monocyte triggering activities. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999;29:2613–2624.
    pubmed: 10458776
  24. Shields RL, Namenuk AK, Hong K, Meng YG, Rae J, Briggs J, Xie D, Lai J, Stadlen A, Li B. High resolution mapping of the binding site on human IgG1 for Fc gamma RI, Fc gamma RII, Fc gamma RIII, and FcRn and design of IgG1 variants with improved binding to the Fc gamma R. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:6591–6604.
    pubmed: 11096108
  25. Matsuda T, Cepko CL. Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004;101:16–22.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2235688100pmc: PMC314130pubmed: 14603031google scholar: lookup
  26. Okagawa T, Konnai S, Goto S, Sajiki Y, Ganbaatar O, Watari K, Nakamura H, Wang CX, Tachibana T, Kato Y. Development of a high-affinity anti-bovine PD-1 rabbit-bovine chimeric antibody using an efficient selection and large production system. Vet. Res. 2023;54:82.
    doi: 10.1186/s13567-023-01213-6pmc: PMC10537840pubmed: 37759311google scholar: lookup
  27. Maekawa N, Konnai S, Takagi S, Kagawa Y, Okagawa T, Nishimori A, Ikebuchi R, Izumi Y, Deguchi T, Nakajima C. A canine chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and its clinical efficacy in canine oral malignant melanoma or undifferentiated sarcoma. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8951.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09444-2pmc: PMC5567082pubmed: 28827658google scholar: lookup
  28. Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 1991;108:193–199.
    doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-dpubmed: 1660837google scholar: lookup
  29. . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. .
  30. Lewis MJ, Wagner B, Woof JM. The different effector function capabilities of the seven equine IgG subclasses have implications for vaccine strategies. Mol. Immunol. 2008;45:818–827.
  31. Wagner B. Immunoglobulins and immunoglobulin genes of the horse.. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006;30:155–164.
    doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2005.06.008pubmed: 16046236google scholar: lookup
  32. Keggan A, Freer H, Rollins A, Wagner B. Production of seven monoclonal equine immunoglobulins isotyped by multiplex analysis.. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013;153:187–193.
  33. Ford J.E., Home W.A., Gibson D.M.. Light chain isotype regulation in the horse. Characterization of Ig kappa genes.. J. Immunol. 1994;153:1099–1111.
    doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.153.3.1099pubmed: 8027543google scholar: lookup
  34. Iwai Y, Hamanishi J, Chamoto K, Honjo T. Cancer immunotherapies targeting the PD-1 signaling pathway.. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017;24:26.
    doi: 10.1186/s12929-017-0329-9pmc: PMC5381059pubmed: 28376884google scholar: lookup
  35. Deguchi T, Maekawa N, Konnai S, Owaki R, Hosoya K, Morishita K, Nakamura M, Okagawa T, Takeuchi H, Kim S. Enhanced Systemic Antitumour Immunity by Hypofractionated Radiotherapy and Anti-PD-L1 Therapy in Dogs with Pulmonary Metastatic Oral Malignant Melanoma.. Cancers 2023;15:3013.
    doi: 10.3390/cancers15113013pmc: PMC10252299pubmed: 37296981google scholar: lookup
  36. Maekawa N, Konnai S, Hosoya K, Kim S, Kinoshita R, Deguchi T, Owaki R, Tachibana Y, Yokokawa M, Takeuchi H. Safety and clinical efficacy of an anti-PD-L1 antibody (c4G12) in dogs with advanced malignant tumours.. PLoS ONE 2023;18:e0291727.
  37. Clingan P, Ladwa R, Brungs D, Harris D.L., McGrath M, Arnold S, Coward J, Fourie S, Kurochkin A, Malan D.R.. Efficacy and safety of cosibelimab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2023;11:e007637.
    doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007637pmc: PMC10582968pubmed: 37848259google scholar: lookup
  38. Moridikia A, Montazersaheb S, Molavi O. Manipulation of tumor microenvironment by induction of immunogenic cell death and immune check point inhibitors for enhancing the efficacy of cancer treatments.. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2026;196:119118.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2026.119118pubmed: 41687545google scholar: lookup
  39. Waldman A.D., Fritz J.M., Lenardo M.J.. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: From T cell basic science to clinical practice.. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2020;20:651–668.
    doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5pmc: PMC7238960pubmed: 32433532google scholar: lookup
  40. Schneider B.J., Lacchetti C, Bollin K. Management of the Top 10 Most Common Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.. JCO Oncol. Pract. 2022;18:431–444.
    doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00776pubmed: 35061502google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.