FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Antimicrob Agents Chemother / In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other comm...
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003; 47(5); 1742-1745; doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1742-1745.2003

In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other common equine pathogens to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobials.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine in vitro activities of azithromycin (AZM), clarithromycin (CLR), and 20 other antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi and other common equine bacterial pathogens. A total of 201 bacterial isolates from various equine clinical samples were examined. CLR was more active than AZM against R. equi, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited of 0.12 and 1.0 micro g/ml, respectively. Other antimicrobial agents highly active against at least 90% of R. equi isolates in vitro included rifampin, gentamicin, and imipenem. Both AZM and CLR showed good activity against beta-hemolytic streptococci and Staphylococcus spp. AZM was more active than other macrolides against Pasteurella spp. and Salmonella enterica.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2003-04-24 PubMed ID: 12709351PubMed Central: PMC153307DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1742-1745.2003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study focuses on the effectiveness of various antimicrobial agents, including azithromycin and clarithromycin, against Rhodococcus equi, a bacterial pathogen in horses, and other common equine bacterial pathogens.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers examined the antibacterial activities of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi and other common bacterial pathogens in horses.
  • A total of 201 bacterial isolates were taken from various equine clinical samples for this study.

Findings

  • The study found that, against R. equi, clarithromycin was more active than azithromycin. This conclusion was based on the measurement of MICs (Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations), a measure of the minimum amount of an antimicrobial agent that can inhibit bacterial growth.
  • The researchers recorded MICs at which 90% of R. equi isolates were inhibited by clarithromycin and azithromycin to be 0.12 and 1.0 micro g/ml, respectively.
  • Other antimicrobial agents that the researchers found to be highly active against at least 90% of R. equi isolates in vitro (under lab conditions) included rifampin, gentamicin, and imipenem.

Activity Against Other Bacteria

  • The study also found that both azithromycin and clarithromycin showed significant antibacterial activity against beta-hemolytic streptococci and Staphylococcus spp, other common bacterial pathogens in horses.
  • Azithromycin showed more activity than other macrolides against Pasteurella spp. and Salmonella enterica, two other horse pathogens.

Implications

  • This research can help in choosing the most effective antimicrobial agent in treating bacterial infections in horses.
  • Better understanding of the effectiveness of different antimicrobials against common horse pathogens can lead to improved treatment protocols, potentially leading to better health outcomes for horses and reducing the use of ineffective antimicrobials.

Cite This Article

APA
Jacks SS, Giguère S, Nguyen A. (2003). In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other common equine pathogens to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 47(5), 1742-1745. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.5.1742-1745.2003

Publication

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
ISSN: 0066-4804
NlmUniqueID: 0315061
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 5
Pages: 1742-1745

Researcher Affiliations

Jacks, Stephanie S
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0136, USA.
Giguère, Steeve
    Nguyen, An

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
      • Azithromycin / pharmacology
      • Clarithromycin / pharmacology
      • Horses
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
      • Rhodococcus equi / drug effects

      References

      This article includes 25 references
      1. Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Hirsh DC, Baggot JD, Martin LD. Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1985 46:447-450.
        pubmed: 3994111
      2. Ainsworth DM, Eicker SW, Yeagar AE, Sweeney CR, Viel L, Tesarowski D, Lavoie JP, Hoffman A, Paradis MR, Reed SM, Erb HN, Davidow E, Nalevanko M. Associations between physical examination, laboratory, and radiographic findings and outcome and subsequent racing performance of foals with Rhodococcus equi infection: 115 cases (1984-1992).. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1998 213:510-515.
        pubmed: 9713534
      3. Arlotti M, Zoboli G, Moscatelli GL, Magnani G, Maserati R, Borghi V, Andreoni M, Libanore M, Bonazzi L, Piscina A, Ciammarughi R. Rhodococcus equi infection in HIV-positive subjects: a retrospective analysis of 24 cases.. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1996 28:463-467.
        pubmed: 8953675
      4. Bowersock TL, Salmon SA, Portis ES, Prescott JF, Robison DA, Ford CW, Watts JL. MICs of oxazolidinones for Rhodococcus equi strains isolated from humans and animals.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000 44:1367-1369.
        pmc: PMC89874pubmed: 10770781
      5. Burrows GE, Morton RJ, Fales WH. Microdilution antimicrobial susceptibilities of selected gram-negative veterinary bacterial isolates.. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1993 5:541-547.
        pubmed: 8286452
      6. Davis JL, Gardner SY, Jones SL, Schwabenton BA, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in foals after i.v. and oral dose and disposition into phagocytes.. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002 25:99-104.
        pubmed: 12000529
      7. Donisi A, Suardi MG, Casari S, Longo M, Cadeo GP, Carosi G. Rhodococcus equi infection in HIV-infected patients.. AIDS 1996 10:359-362.
        pubmed: 8728038
      8. Ensink JM, van Klingeren B, Houwers DJ, Klein WR, Vulto AG. In-vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs of bacterial isolates from horses in The Netherlands.. Equine Vet. J. 1993 25:309-313.
        pubmed: 8354217
      9. Gavan TL, Jones RN, Barry AL. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for quantitative antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing: a collaborative study.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1980 17:464-469.
        pmc: PMC283810pubmed: 7425606
      10. Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Ancarani F, Del Prete MS, Fortuna M, Scalise G. In vitro activities of polycationic peptides alone and in combination with clinically used antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999 43:2093-2096.
        pmc: PMC89425pubmed: 10428947
      11. Harvey RL, Sunstrum JC. Rhodococcus equi infection in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection.. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1991 13:139-145.
        pubmed: 2017613
      12. Hillidge CJ. Use of erythromycin-rifampin combination in treatment of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia.. Vet. Microbiol. 1987 14:337-342.
        pubmed: 3314109
      13. Hondalus MK, Mosser DM. Survival and replication of Rhodococcus equi in macrophages.. Infect. Immun. 1994 62:4167-4175.
        pmc: PMC303092pubmed: 7927672
      14. Jacks S, Giguère S, Gronwall R, Brown MP, Merritt KA. Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and concentration in body fluids and bronchoalveolar cells in foals.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001 62:1870-1875.
        pubmed: 11763173
      15. Jacks S, Giguère S, Gronwall RR, Brown MP, Merritt KA. Disposition of oral clarithromycin in foals.. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002 25:359-362.
        pubmed: 12423226
      16. Jones RN, Gavan TL, Barry AL. Evaluation of the sensititre microdilution antibiotic susceptibility system against recent clinical isolates: three-laboratory collaborative study.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1980 11:426-429.
        pmc: PMC273418pubmed: 7372803
      17. Lakritz J, Wilson WD, Marsh AE, Mihalyi JE. Pharmacokinetics of erythromycin estolate and erythromycin phosphate after intragastric administration to healthy foals.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2000 61:914-919.
        pubmed: 10951982
      18. Lakritz J, Wilson WD, Mihalyi JE. Comparison of microbiologic and high-performance liquid chromatography assays to determine plasma concentrations, pharmacokinetics, and bioavailability of erythromycin base in plasma of foals after intravenous or intragastric administration.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999 60:414-419.
        pubmed: 10211682
      19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically.. 1997 4th ed. NCCLS document M7-A4.
      20. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standards.. 1999 NCCLS document M31-A.
      21. Nordmann P, Ronco E. In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Rhodococcus equi.. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1992 29:383-393.
        pubmed: 1607327
      22. Soriano F, Fernandez-Roblas R, Calvo R, Garcia-Calvo G, Pardeiro M, Bryskier A. In-vitro antimicrobial activity of HMR 3004 (RU 64004) against erythromycin A-sensitive and -resistant Corynebacterium spp. isolated from clinical specimens.. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998 42:647-649.
        pubmed: 9848450
      23. Stratton-Phelps M, Wilson WD, Gardner IA. Risk of adverse effects in pneumonic foals treated with erythromycin versus other antibiotics: 143 cases (1986-1996).. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2000 217:68-73.
        pubmed: 10909450
      24. Sweeney CR, Sweeney RW, Divers TJ. Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in 48 foals: response to antimicrobial therapy.. Vet. Microbiol. 1987 14:329-336.
        pubmed: 3672875
      25. Whitman MS, Tunkel AR. Azithromycin and clarithromycin: overview and comparison with erythromycin.. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1992 13:357-368.
        pubmed: 1320067
      Subscribe to our newsletter
      Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.