Analyze Diet
Reproduction, fertility, and development2011; 23(2); 364-375; doi: 10.1071/RD10124

In vivo-derived horse blastocysts show transcriptional upregulation of developmentally important genes compared with in vitro-produced horse blastocysts.

Abstract: In vitro-produced (IVP) equine blastocysts can give rise to successful pregnancies, but their morphology and developmental rate differ from those of in vivo-derived equine blastocysts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this difference at the genetic level. Suppression subtractive hybridisation (SSH) was used to construct a cDNA library enriched for transcripts preferentially expressed in in vivo-derived equine blastocysts compared with IVP blastocysts. Of the 62 different genes identified in this way, six genes involved in embryonic development (BEX2, FABP3, HSP90AA1, MOBKL3, MCM7 and ODC) were selected to confirm this differential expression by reverse transcription-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Using RT-qPCR, five genes were confirmed to be significantly upregulated in in vivo-derived blastocysts (i.e. FABP3, HSP90AA1 (both P<0.05), ODC, MOBKL3 and BEX2 (P<0.005 for all three)), confirming the results of the SSH. There was no significant difference in MCM7 expression between IVP and in vivo-derived blastocysts. In conclusion, five genes that are transcriptionally upregulated in in vivo-derived equine blastocysts compared with IVP blastocysts have been identified. Because of their possible importance in embryonic development, the expression of these genes can be used as a marker to evaluate in vitro embryo production systems in the horse.
Publication Date: 2011-01-08 PubMed ID: 21211470DOI: 10.1071/RD10124Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigated the genetic differences between horse embryos produced naturally (in vivo) and those produced in a lab (in vitro) due to observed differences in their development. Key genes active in natural embryos were identified and the findings could help improve laboratory methods of horse embryo production.

Study Purpose and Methods

The goal of this research was to investigate the differences between equine blastocysts (early-stage embryos) produced in vitro and those derived in vivo. There was a noted discrepancy between the two in terms of developmental rate and morphology. A specialized method called Suppression Subtractive Hybridisation (SSH) was applied to make a cDNA library that is concentrated with transcripts predominantly displayed in natural equine blastocysts as opposed to those created in the lab.

  • The SSH is a technique designed to find differences in gene expression. This approach works by subtracting common sequences between two samples to leave behind only the unique ones.
  • A cDNA library is the DNA equivalent of the RNA molecules present in a cell. By analyzing these, researchers can understand what genes are switched on in that cell type.

Main Findings

From the pool of unique genes, six known to be related to embryonic development were chosen for further examination through a method called reverse transcription-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

  • RT-qPCR is a laboratory technique often used in research to measure the amount of a specific RNA. This technology can indicate if a gene is more active in one sample compared to another.

Upon validation, five out of the six genes (FABP3, HSP90AA1, ODC, MOBKL3, and BEX2) were found to have significantly higher activity in natural equine blastocysts. One gene, MCM7, however, did not show any significant difference in expression levels between the two types of embryos.

Conclusion and Implications

The study findings highlight the genetic differences occurring in horse embryos depending on the method of their production – natural vs laboratory. The identified genes that are more active in natural embryos may play a key role in their development. This understanding could pave the way toward refining in vitro horse embryo production systems. Using the expression of these genes as markers, scientists could potentially evaluate and improve their in vitro methods to match more closely the natural in vivo conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Smits K, Goossens K, Van Soom A, Govaere J, Hoogewijs M, Peelman LJ. (2011). In vivo-derived horse blastocysts show transcriptional upregulation of developmentally important genes compared with in vitro-produced horse blastocysts. Reprod Fertil Dev, 23(2), 364-375. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10124

Publication

ISSN: 1031-3613
NlmUniqueID: 8907465
Country: Australia
Language: English
Volume: 23
Issue: 2
Pages: 364-375

Researcher Affiliations

Smits, Katrien
  • Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. katrien.smits@ugent.be
Goossens, Karen
    Van Soom, Ann
      Govaere, Jan
        Hoogewijs, Maarten
          Peelman, Luc J

            MeSH Terms

            • Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing / genetics
            • Animals
            • Blastocyst / metabolism
            • Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins / genetics
            • Female
            • Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
            • Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
            • HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins / genetics
            • Horses / embryology
            • Nerve Tissue Proteins / genetics
            • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
            • Ornithine Decarboxylase / genetics
            • Pregnancy
            • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
            • Up-Regulation

            Citations

            This article has been cited 2 times.
            1. Fernández-Hernández P, Marinaro F, Sánchez-Calabuig MJ, García-Marín LJ, Bragado MJ, González-Fernández L, Macías-García B. The Proteome of Equine Oviductal Fluid Varies Before and After Ovulation: A Comparative Study.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:694247.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.694247pubmed: 34422946google scholar: lookup
            2. Sadeesh EM, Fozia S, Meena K. Combined positive effect of oocyte extracts and brilliant cresyl blue stained recipient cytoplasts on epigenetic reprogramming and gene expression in buffalo nuclear transfer embryos.. Cytotechnology 2017 Apr;69(2):289-305.
              doi: 10.1007/s10616-016-0057-0pubmed: 28070808google scholar: lookup