Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106182; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106182

Incidence of omphalitis in foals with different umbilical disinfection protocols.

Abstract: Omphalitis, a common umbilical disorder in foals, can lead to complications and systemic diseases. An adequate disinfection protocol of the umbilical stump after birth is recommended to prevent infection. Objective: Comparison of different disinfection solutions and their efficacy in preventing omphalitis in foals. Methods: A total of 288 clinically healthy foals were included in this prospective, blinded cohort study during the foaling seasons of 2023 and 2024 on one stud farm. Foals were randomly allocated to one of six disinfection groups. The umbilical stump was examined clinically during the first days of life and treated twice daily with either 0.5 % chlorhexidine, 1 % iodine in 90 % ethanol, 0.05 % hypochlorous acid, or one of two different "effective microorganism" products. In an additional group, 0.5 % chlorhexidine was applied once daily. Umbilical ultrasonography was performed on the second and eighth day of life. Results: Overall, 13.9 % (40/288) of foals developed omphalitis. The lowest number of omphalitis cases was observed in the hypochlorous acid group, with 4.3 % foals affected (2/47); the highest incidence occurred in the group treated with chlorhexidine once daily, with 20.8 % of foals affected (11/53). Compared to the overall incidence of 13.9 %, hypochlorous acid was the only treatment that led to a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of omphalitis (p = 0.033). All foals recovered following antibiotic treatment. Conclusions: Hypochlorous acid was associated with the lowest incidence of omphalitis and appears a promising option for umbilical disinfection.
Publication Date: 2026-10-21 PubMed ID: 42906712DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106182Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study evaluated how effective different disinfectants are in preventing omphalitis (infection of the umbilical stump) in newborn foals.
  • It compared several disinfection protocols to determine which one best reduces the risk of infection shortly after birth.

Background

  • Omphalitis is a common infection of the umbilical stump in foals that can lead to serious complications, including systemic illness.
  • Proper disinfection of the umbilical stump immediately after birth is crucial to prevent bacteria from causing infections.
  • Although several disinfectants are used in practice, there is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness in foals.

Study Objective

  • To compare the incidence of omphalitis in foals treated with different umbilical disinfection protocols.
  • To identify which disinfection solution provides the most effective protection against infection.

Methods

  • A prospective, blinded cohort study was conducted on a single stud farm across two foaling seasons (2023 and 2024).
  • A total of 288 clinically healthy newborn foals were included and randomly assigned to one of six disinfection groups.
  • Disinfection treatments included:
    • 0.5% chlorhexidine applied twice daily
    • 1% iodine in 90% ethanol applied twice daily
    • 0.05% hypochlorous acid applied twice daily
    • Two different “effective microorganism” products applied twice daily
    • 0.5% chlorhexidine applied once daily
  • The umbilical stump was examined clinically during the first days of life to monitor for signs of omphalitis.
  • Ultrasonography was performed on days 2 and 8 to assess internal umbilical structures.
  • Cases of omphalitis were treated with antibiotics, and recovery outcomes were documented.

Results

  • Overall, 13.9% (40 out of 288) of foals developed omphalitis during the study period.
  • The incidence varied by disinfection protocol:
    • Lowest incidence: 0.05% hypochlorous acid group with 4.3% (2 of 47 foals) affected.
    • Highest incidence: once-daily 0.5% chlorhexidine group with 20.8% (11 of 53 foals) affected.
    • Other groups had intermediate infection rates.
  • Statistical analysis showed only hypochlorous acid significantly lowered the incidence of omphalitis compared to the overall rate (p = 0.033).
  • All foals that developed omphalitis recovered after receiving antibiotic treatment.

Conclusions

  • Hypochlorous acid used twice daily as an umbilical disinfectant was the most effective protocol to prevent omphalitis in foals.
  • This disinfectant showed a significant reduction in infection rates compared to other common solutions like chlorhexidine and iodine.
  • Using hypochlorous acid for umbilical care could improve foal health outcomes by minimizing infection risk.
  • The study supports the adoption of hypochlorous acid as a promising disinfectant for postnatal umbilical stump care in foals.

Cite This Article

APA
Wissmann M, Vervuert I, Delarocque J, Venner M. (2026). Incidence of omphalitis in foals with different umbilical disinfection protocols. J Equine Vet Sci, 106182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106182

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106182
PII: S0737-0806(26)00415-6

Researcher Affiliations

Wissmann, M
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Marie.Wissmann@tiho-hannover.de.
Vervuert, I
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Delarocque, J
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Venner, M
  • Equine Clinic Destedt, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.