FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Journal of agromedicine2019; 25(2); 179-189; doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1656128

Inhalable and Respirable Particulate and Endotoxin Exposures in Kentucky Equine Farms.

Abstract: Adverse respiratory health effects in the agricultural industry have been linked to particulate endotoxin exposure. However, whether the endotoxin concentration is significantly correlated to the size of the particle remains an open question. To date, limited research has been conducted to assess particulate endotoxin exposures in the agricultural industry in general or the equine industry in particular. A task-based exposure assessment was conducted to characterize the endotoxin levels of inhalable and respirable particles on four Kentucky farms during the summer season. We conducted personal sampling of respirable and inhalable particles (n = 75) across all four farms and particulate endotoxin (n = 58) on two of them. Simultaneously, we collected real-time area samples across all four farms by task - , and . The endotoxin concentration of inhalable particles (geometric mean: 50.2-1,024 EU/m) was ~50 times higher than that of respirable particles (geometric mean: 1.72-19.0 EU/m). generated the lowest endotoxin concentrations for both particle sizes, while tended to produce higher concentrations. There was no significant correlation between the endotoxin and particle concentrations for each size fraction based on tasks by farm (R = 0.069 for inhalable; 0.214 for respirable). The equine workers in this study were exposed to higher endotoxin concentrations than workers in other industries, such as the swine industry. Providing exposure control guidelines and recommendations to the equine industry is necessary to reduce long-term endotoxin exposure and to prevent adverse respiratory symptoms.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-08-20 PubMed ID: 31430228PubMed Central: PMC7031016DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1656128Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines how endotoxin levels are present in inhalable and respirable particles across four horse farms in Kentucky. The study provides a detailed analysis of endotoxin concentration in different particle sizes and highlights the lack of correlation between endotoxin and particle concentrations, pushing for guidelines to prevent respiratory issues from long-term exposure.

Study Approach

  • The research focused on assessing exposure to endotoxin, a component of the outer membrane of bacteria, which when inhaled, can cause adverse respiratory health effects. The presence of endotoxin in different sizes of particulates (either inhalable or respirable) was explored.
  • A task-based exposure assessment was conducted on four Kentucky farms during summer. Personal sampling of inhalable and respirable particles was conducted across all four farms (75 samples), with particulate endotoxin analysed on two of the farms (58 samples).

Findings

  • The researchers found that the concentration of endotoxin in inhalable particles was approximately 50 times higher than in respirable particles. This suggests that larger particles may carry more endotoxins, possibly making them more harmful when inhaled.
  • Despite the observed differences in endotoxin concentration based on particle size, the study found no significant correlation between the amount of endotoxin and the concentration of particles for each size group.
  • The study identified that equine workers appeared to be exposed to higher endotoxin concentrations than workers in other industries, such as swine farming.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The findings of the study underscore the potential risk equine industry workers are exposed to concerning endotoxin inhalation. It emphasizes the need for guidelines to control exposure in this industry.
  • The researchers recommend developing measures to reduce long-term endotoxin exposure to prevent potential respiratory health issues, given the higher endotoxin concentrations observed amongst equine workers compared to other industries.

Cite This Article

APA
Hwang J, Golla V, Metwali N, Thorne PS. (2019). Inhalable and Respirable Particulate and Endotoxin Exposures in Kentucky Equine Farms. J Agromedicine, 25(2), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2019.1656128

Publication

Journal of agromedicine
ISSN: 1545-0813
NlmUniqueID: 9421530
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 179-189

Researcher Affiliations

Hwang, Jooyeon
  • Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Golla, Vijay
  • Department of Public Health, College of Health and Human Services, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Metwali, Nervana
  • Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Thorne, Peter S
  • Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Agricultural Workers' Diseases / etiology
  • Air Pollutants, Occupational / adverse effects
  • Air Pollutants, Occupational / analysis
  • Animals
  • Endotoxins / adverse effects
  • Endotoxins / analysis
  • Farmers / statistics & numerical data
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Inhalation Exposure / adverse effects
  • Inhalation Exposure / analysis
  • Kentucky
  • Occupational Exposure / adverse effects
  • Occupational Exposure / analysis
  • Particle Size
  • Particulate Matter / adverse effects
  • Particulate Matter / analysis

Grant Funding

  • P30 ES005605 / NIEHS NIH HHS
  • U54 OH007547 / NIOSH CDC HHS
  • U54OH007547 / ACL HHS

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Equine programs, 2012. nKentucky equine survey, University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment; nhttp://equine.ca.uky.edu/kyequinesurvey. Published 2012nAccessed September 12, 2015
  2. Camargo F, Coleman B, Lawrence L, Rossano M, Harvey K. Heaves in Horses. University of Kentucky Cooperative extension service ASC-172 2008.
  3. Ivester KM, Couëtil LL, Moore GE, Zimmerman NJ, Raskin RE. Environmental exposures and airway inflammation in young thoroughbred horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2014 May-Jun;28(3):918-24.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12333pmc: PMC4895475pubmed: 24773603google scholar: lookup
  4. Swanberg JE, Clouser JM, Browning SR, Westneat SC, Marsh MK. Occupational health among Latino horse and crop workers in Kentucky: the role of work organization factors.. J Agromedicine 2013;18(4):312-25.
    doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2013.826604pubmed: 24125046google scholar: lookup
  5. Kullman GJ, Thorne PS, Waldron PF, Marx JJ, Ault B, Lewis DM, Siegel PD, Olenchock SA, Merchant JA. Organic dust exposures from work in dairy barns.. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998 Jun;59(6):403-13.
    pubmed: 9670470doi: 10.1080/15428119891010668google scholar: lookup
  6. Reynolds SJ, Nakatsu J, Tillery M, Keefe T, Mehaffy J, Thorne PS, Donham K, Nonnenmann M, Golla V, O'shaughnessy P. Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.. Ann Occup Hyg 2009 Aug;53(6):585-94.
    doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep021pmc: PMC2723214pubmed: 19443852google scholar: lookup
  7. Thorne PS, Perry SS, Saito R, O'Shaughnessy PT, Mehaffy J, Metwali N, Keefe T, Donham KJ, Reynolds SJ. Evaluation of the Limulus amebocyte lysate and recombinant factor C assays for assessment of airborne endotoxin.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010 Aug;76(15):4988-95.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.00527-10pmc: PMC2916455pubmed: 20525858google scholar: lookup
  8. Gellin G, Carter C, Caldwell C. Serological Evidence of Potential Occupational Exposure to Leptospirosis in Kentucky Horse Farm Workers and Veterinarians. 140th American Public Health Association (APHA) Annual Meeting and Exposition San Francisco, CA; 2012.
  9. Samadi S, Wouters IM, Heederik DJ. A review of bio-aerosol exposures and associated health effects in veterinary practice.. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;20(2):206-21.
    pubmed: 23772565
  10. Singh U, Reponen T, Cho KJ. Airborne endotoxin and β-D-glucan in PM1 in agricultural and home environments. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 2011;11:376–386.
  11. Duquenne P, Marchand G, Duchaine C. Measurement of endotoxins in bioaerosols at workplace: a critical review of literature and a standardization issue.. Ann Occup Hyg 2013 Mar;57(2):137-72.
    doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes051pubmed: 23002277google scholar: lookup
  12. Thorne PS. Inhalation toxicology models of endotoxin- and bioaerosol-induced inflammation.. Toxicology 2000 Nov 2;152(1-3):13-23.
    doi: 10.1289/ehp.11759pubmed: 11090935google scholar: lookup
  13. . Respiratory health hazards in agriculture.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 2):S1-S76.
    pubmed: 9817727doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.supplement_1.rccm1585s1google scholar: lookup
  14. Schwartz DA, Thorne PS, Yagla SJ, Burmeister LF, Olenchock SA, Watt JL, Quinn TJ. The role of endotoxin in grain dust-induced lung disease.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995 Aug;152(2):603-8.
    pubmed: 7633714doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633714google scholar: lookup
  15. Lindsley W, Green B, Blachere F. Sampling and Characterization of Bioaerosols. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 5th edition, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH 2016; BA5–BA10.
    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165307google scholar: lookup
  16. ACGIH. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Cincinnati, Ohio; 2017.
  17. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). Workplace atmosphere - Determination of airborne endotoxins. European Standardization Committee (CEN standard EN 14031), Brussels, Belgium; 2003.
  18. Ferguson MD, Migliaccio C, Ward T. Comparison of how ambient PMc and PM2.5 influence the inflammatory potential.. Inhal Toxicol 2013 Dec;25(14):766-73.
    doi: 10.3109/08958378.2013.847993.Comparisonpmc: PMC3906723pubmed: 24304303google scholar: lookup
  19. Osornio-Vargas AR, Bonner JC, Alfaro-Moreno E, Martínez L, García-Cuellar C, Ponce-de-León Rosales S, Miranda J, Rosas I. Proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects of Mexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro are dependent on particle size and composition.. Environ Health Perspect 2003 Aug;111(10):1289-93.
    doi: 10.1289/ehp.5913pmc: PMC1241608pubmed: 12896848google scholar: lookup
  20. Schins RP, Lightbody JH, Borm PJ, Shi T, Donaldson K, Stone V. Inflammatory effects of coarse and fine particulate matter in relation to chemical and biological constituents.. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004 Feb 15;195(1):1-11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.002pubmed: 14962500google scholar: lookup
  21. Basinas I, Sigsgaard T, Kromhout H, Heederik D, Wouters IM, Schlünssen V. A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2015 Mar-Apr;25(2):123-37.
    doi: 10.1038/jes.2013.83pubmed: 24280684google scholar: lookup
  22. Attwood P, Versloot P, Heederik D, de Wit R, Boleij JS. Assessment of dust and endotoxin levels in the working environment of Dutch pig farmers: a preliminary study.. Ann Occup Hyg 1986;30(2):201-8.
    pubmed: 3752839doi: 10.1093/annhyg/30.2.201google scholar: lookup
  23. Cho KJ, Reponen T, McKay R, Dwivedi A, Adhikari A, Singh U, Shukla R, Jones S, Jones G, Grinshpun SA. Comparison of workplace protection factors for different biological contaminants.. J Occup Environ Hyg 2011 Jul;8(7):417-25.
    doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.585094pubmed: 21732855google scholar: lookup
  24. Kirychuk SP, Dosman JA, Reynolds SJ, Willson P, Senthilselvan A, Feddes JJ, Classen HL, Guenter W. Total dust and endotoxin in poultry operations: comparison between cage and floor housing and respiratory effects in workers.. J Occup Environ Med 2006 Jul;48(7):741-8.
    doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000216215.39521.3cpubmed: 16832232google scholar: lookup
  25. Swanberg JE, Clouser JM, Gan W, Mannino DM, Flunker JC. Individual and occupational characteristics associated with respiratory symptoms among Latino horse farm workers.. Am J Ind Med 2015 Jun;58(6):679-87.
    doi: 10.1002/ajim.22452pubmed: 25939676google scholar: lookup
  26. Elfman L, Riihimäki M, Pringle J, Wålinder R. Influence of horse stable environment on human airways.. J Occup Med Toxicol 2009 May 25;4:10.
    doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-4-10pmc: PMC2693518pubmed: 19467158google scholar: lookup
  27. O'Shaughnessy PT, Donham KJ, Peters TM, Taylor C, Altmaier R, Kelly KM. A task-specific assessment of Swine worker exposure to airborne dust.. J Occup Environ Hyg 2010 Jan;7(1):7-13.
    doi: 10.1080/15459620903327970pubmed: 19904655google scholar: lookup
  28. NIOSH. NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM) 0600, fourth edition: Respirable particulates not otherwise regulated gravimetric. Issue 3. 1998.
  29. NIOSH. NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM) 0500, fourth edition: Particulates not otherwise regulated total. Issue 2. 1994.
  30. Thorne PS, Mendy A, Metwali N, Salo P, Co C, Jaramillo R, Rose KM, Zeldin DC. Endotoxin Exposure: Predictors and Prevalence of Associated Asthma Outcomes in the United States.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015 Dec 1;192(11):1287-97.
    doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0251OCpmc: PMC4731700pubmed: 26258643google scholar: lookup
  31. Lee T, Harper M, Slaven JE, Lee K, Rando RJ, Maples EH. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.. Ann Occup Hyg 2011 Mar;55(2):180-91.
    doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq075pmc: PMC3037778pubmed: 21036895google scholar: lookup
  32. Samadi S, Wouters IM, Houben R, Jamshidifard AR, Van Eerdenburg F, Heederik DJ. Exposure to inhalable dust, endotoxins, beta(1->3)-glucans, and airborne microorganisms in horse stables.. Ann Occup Hyg 2009 Aug;53(6):595-603.
    doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep040pubmed: 19561032google scholar: lookup
  33. Saastamoinen M, Särkijärvi S, Hyyppä S. Reducing Respiratory Health Risks to Horses and Workers: A Comparison of Two Stall Bedding Materials.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Oct 8;5(4):965-77.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5040394pmc: PMC4693198pubmed: 26479479google scholar: lookup
  34. McClendon CJ, Gerald CL, Waterman JT. Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity: insights and implications for respiratory health.. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2015 Apr;15(2):137-44.
    doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000143pmc: PMC4783132pubmed: 25636160google scholar: lookup
  35. World Health Organization. Hazard Prevention and Control in the Work Environment: Airborne Dust. World Health Organization WHO/SDE/OEH/99.14. Geneva, Switzerland; 1999.
  36. Hwang SH, Park DU, Ha KC, Cho HW, Yoon CS. Airborne bacteria concentrations and related factors at university laboratories, hospital diagnostic laboratories and a biowaste site.. J Clin Pathol 2011 Mar;64(3):261-4.
    doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.084764pubmed: 21212058google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.