Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14472

Inherited non-syndromic polydactyly in a Berber and Arabian-Berber horse family.

Abstract: Supernumerary digits, or polydactyly, have been described in various species including humans, wild and domestic animals. In horses, it represents the most common congenital limb malformation, which has only been described in isolated cases or nuclear families. Molecular aetiology has not been reported. Objective: To characterise the phenotype of a non-syndromic pre-axial polydactyly in a horse family and to decipher the inheritance pattern. Methods: Retrospective study. Methods: Forty-three members of the family including a previously reported polydactyl case were recruited. Available clinical and radiographical findings from the initial case and its family members were summarised and karyotypic examinations of the horses were performed. Results: On clinical examination, eight horses (including the previously reported case) had one or two supernumerary digits on their forelimbs and one additional case was diagnosed using radiography. Additional digits were located on the medial side of the forelimbs in all nine polydactyl horses. Radiography highlighted variable expression of the defect, which was either unilateral or bilateral. Variations were observed in the number of supernumerary phalanges, the level of development of a rudimentary metacarpal bone, the individualisation of a supernumerary digit and the existence of a rudimentary hoof. All nine affected horses were related to a single stallion. Pedigree analysis revealed that the most likely inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. A more complex mode could not be ruled out. Conclusions: Restricted recruitment of the family members due to confidentiality constraints and to international dispersal of the relatives, quality of radiographs. Conclusions: We describe an equine preaxial polydactyly in a Berber and Arabian-Berber family most likely with autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance. This is the first description of an inherited non-syndromic polydactyly in horses. Background: Des doigts surnuméraires, ou polydactylie, ont été décrit chez plusieurs espèces incluant l'homme, de même que les animaux domestiques et sauvages. Chez le cheval, il s'agit de la malformation congénitale des membres la plus fréquente, ayant été décrite dans des cas isolés seulement ou au sein de familles nucléaires. Une étiologie moléculaire n'a pas encore été rapportée. Objective: Caractériser le phénotype d'une polydactylie non syndromique de type préaxial au sein d'une famille équine et identifier un mode de transmission. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude rétrospective. MÉTHODES: À partir d'un étalon Barbe polydactyle présenté à l'École Vétérinaire d'Alfort (France), 43 chevaux (8 polydactyles, 35 non‐polydactyles) de sa famille ont été recruté. Des examens cliniques, radiographiques et karyotypiques de certains chevaux de cette famille ont été faits. RÉSULTATS: Une famille équine Barde et Arabe croisé Barbe avec polydactylie préaxiale non syndromique a été identifiée. À l'examen clinique, huit chevaux ont montré un ou deux doigts surnuméraires au niveau des membres thoraciques et une jument a été diagnostiquée par radiographie. Les doigts additionnels étaient localisés du côté médial des membres thoraciques chez les 9 chevaux polydactyles. L'analyse radiographique a identifié une expression variable de ce défaut, soit unilatéral ou bilatéral. Des variations ont été observées quant au nombre de phalanges surnuméraires, pour le développement des os métacarpiens, pour l'individualisation d'un doigt surnuméraires et l'existence d'un sabot rudimentaire. L'ensemble des neuf chevaux étaient reliés au même étalon. L'analyse généalogique a révélé que le mode de transmission le plus probable était autosomique dominant avec une pénétrance incomplète et une expressivité variable. Une mode de transmission plus complexe ne peut être exclu. Unassigned: Recrutement restreint des membres de la famille due à des contraintes de confidentialité et des membres de la famille situés dans d'autres pays; qualité des radiographies. Conclusions: Nous avons découvert une polydactylie équine préaxiale chez une famille Barbe et Arabe croisé Barbe ayant le plus probablement un mode de transmission autosomique dominant avec pénétrance incomplète. À ce que nous sachions, ceci représente la toute première description de polydactylie non syndromique héréditaire chez le cheval.
Publication Date: 2025-01-24 PubMed ID: 39853805DOI: 10.1111/evj.14472Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the skeletal malformation known as polydactyly – an abnormal development resulting in extra digits – in a horse family of Berber and Arabian-Berber breeds. The study aims to characterize this non-syndromic polydactyly and understand its inheritance pattern. Findings suggest that the malformation is likely inherited in an autosomal dominant manner but with incomplete penetrance, meaning not all horses carrying the gene express the trait.

Methods and Results

  • The researchers conducted a retrospective study involving 43 members of a horse family, including one previously reported polydactyl case.
  • The clinical and radiographical findings were compiled to further understand the phenotype of the disease.
  • Of the horses studied, eight were found to have one or two supernumerary (extra) digits on their forelimbs. One additional case was diagnosed through radiography, taking the total to nine affected horses.
  • All of these polydactyl horses were related to a single stallion, suggesting a genetic contribution to the disease.
  • The radiographs highlighted the existence of variable expressions of the defect, with variations evident in the number, development, and individualization of the supernumerary phalanges, as well as the existence of a rudimentary hoof. These could be either unilateral (one side) or bilateral (both sides).

Inheritance Pattern

  • The researchers also analyzed the pedigree of the research subjects and observed that the most likely inheritance pattern of this malformation was autosomal dominant. This means the trait can be passed on by one affected parent and could manifest in the offspring even if the other parent does not carry the gene.
  • However, the effect was seen with incomplete penetrance, meaning that not every horse carrying the gene exhibited the trait. The severity of the trait’s expression also varied among the affected horses, again pointing to variable expressivity.
  • The study acknowledged that a more complex inheritance pattern could not be ruled out due to the observed variability in the expression of the trait and the number of affected horses.

Limitations and Conclusions

  • One of the limitations of the study was the restricted recruitment of the family members due to confidentiality constraints and dissemination of the family members in different locations.
  • The quality of the radiographs could also be a limiting factor as this might affect the detailed examination of the defect.
  • Despite these constraints, the study provides the first description of inherited non-syndromic polydactyly in horses, specifically in a Berber and Arabian-Berber family. The likely autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance is an important observation for future research and clinical practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Baville E, Carstanjen B, Thomas-Cancian A, Calgaro A, Bonnet N, Tiret L, Gache V, Abitbol M. (2025). Inherited non-syndromic polydactyly in a Berber and Arabian-Berber horse family. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14472

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Baville, Ella
  • Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Carstanjen, Bianca
  • Pferdepraxis, Weilheim, Germany.
Thomas-Cancian, Aurélie
  • Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Calgaro, Anne
  • Université de Toulouse, Genphyse, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Bonnet, Nathale
  • Université de Toulouse, Genphyse, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Tiret, Laurent
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil, INSERM, EFS, EnvA, IMRB Team Relaix, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Gache, Vincent
  • Université de Lyon, UCBL1 CNRS UMR5261, INSERM U1315, Institut NeuroMyoGene INMG-PNMG Team MNCA, Lyon, France.
Abitbol, Marie
  • Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
  • Université de Lyon, UCBL1 CNRS UMR5261, INSERM U1315, Institut NeuroMyoGene INMG-PNMG Team MNCA, Lyon, France.

References

This article includes 45 references
  1. Danforth CH. Morphology of the feet in polydactyl cats.. Am J Anat 1947;80:143–171.
  2. Danforth CH. Heredity of polydactyly in the cats.. J Hered 1947;38:107–112.
  3. Lettice LA, Hill AE, Devenney PS, Hill RE. Point mutations in a distant sonic hedgehog cis‐regulator generate a variable regulatory output responsible for preaxial polydactyly.. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17:978–985.
  4. Hamelin A, Begon D, Conchou F, Fusellier M, Abitbol M. Clinical characterisation of polydactyly in Maine Coon cats.. J Feline Med Surg 2017;19:382–393.
  5. Hamelin A, Conchou F, Fusellier M, Duchenij B, Vieira I, Filhol E. Genetic heterogeneity of polydactyly in Maine Coon cats.. J Feline Med Surg 2020;22:1103–1113.
  6. Park K, Kang J, Subedi KP, Ha JH, Park C. Canine polydactyl mutations with heterogeneous origin in the conserved intronic sequence of LMBR1.. Genetics 2008;179:2163–2172.
  7. Struthers J. On the development of the bones of the foot of the horse, and of digital bones generally; and on a case of polydactyly in the horse.. J Anat Physiol 1893;28:51–62.1.
  8. Ewart JC. The development of the skeleton of the limbs of the horse, with observations on polydactyly.. J Anat Physiol 1894;28:236–256.
  9. Ewart JC. The development of the skeleton of the limbs of the horse, with observations on polydactyly: part II.. J Anat Physiol 1894;28:342–369.
  10. Evans LH, Jenny J, Raker CW. Surgical correction of polydactylism in the horse.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1965;146:1405–1408.
  11. McGavin MD, Leipold HW. Attempted surgical correction of equine polydactylism.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975;166:63–64.
  12. Behrens E, Donawick WJ, Raker CW, Woodhead JS. Polydactylism in a foal.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1979;174:266–268.
  13. Crowe MW, Swerczek TW. Equine congenital defects.. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:353–358.
  14. Stanek C, Hantak E. Bilateral atavistic polydactyly in a colt and its dam.. Equine Vet J 1986;18:76–79.
  15. Barber SM. Unusual polydactylism in a foal: a case report.. Vet Surg 1990;19:203–207.
  16. Dore MA. Teratogenic polydactyly in a halfbred foal.. Vet Rec 1989;125:375–376.
  17. Bowling AT, Millon LV. Two autosomal trisomies in the horse: 64,XX,‐26,+t(26q26q) and 65,XX,+30.. Genome 1990;33:679–682.
  18. Weinhart G, Götz E, Götz HJ. Polydactyly in a foal—a case report.. Tierarztl Prax 1996;24:275–277.
  19. Carstanjen B, Abitbol M, Desbois C. Bilateral polydactyly in a foal.. J Vet Sci 2007;8:201–203.
  20. . Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®.. McKusick‐Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine. Johns Hopkins University; 2024.
  21. Bubshait DK. A review of polydactyly and its inheritance: connecting the dots.. Medicine 2022;101:e32060.
  22. Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.. Lancet 1971;2:971–972.
  23. Gray A, Marcos S, Thomas A, Lepage OM. Unilateral polydactyly in two foals.. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31:462–467.
  24. Turner AS, Colbourne CM, Easley KJ, Yovich JV. Surgical treatment of polydactylism and long term follow up in five horses.. Aust Equine Vet 1991;9(4):143–146.
  25. Sepulveda OS, Rehhof CV, Ortiz RR, Munoz LA. Polydactyly in an all four limbs in a halfbred filly in Chile.. Rev MVZ Cordoba 2011;16(2):2634–2639.
  26. Novales Duran M, Hernandez PR. Radiographic signs of polydactyly colts.. Rev Col Méd Vet Estado Lara 2013;3(5):2244–7733.
  27. Losonsky JM, Kneller SK, Pijanowski GJ. Prevalence and distribution of the first and fifth carpal bones in standardbred horses as determined by radiography.. Vet Radiol 1988;29(5):236–238.
  28. Simon V, Dyson SJ. Radiologic anatomic variation of the carpus in horses with carpal lameness and control horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51(6):601–606.
  29. Abdunnabi A, Ahmed YA, Philip CJ, Davies HMS. Morphometrical variations of the carpal bones in thoroughbreds and ponies.. Anat Histol Embryol 2011;41:139–148.
  30. Dunn IC, Paton IR, Clelland AK, Sebastian S, Johnson EJ, McTeir L. The chicken polydactyly (Po) locus causes allelic imbalance and ectopic expression of Shh during limb development.. Dev Dyn 2011;240:1163–1172.
  31. Lettice LA, Horikoshi T, Heaney SJ, van Baren MJ, van der Linde HC, Breedveld GJ. Disruption of a long‐range cis‐acting regulator for Shh causes preaxial polydactyly.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:7548–7553.
  32. Ullah A, Umair M, Majeed AI, Abdullah JA, Ahmad W. A novel homozygous sequence variant in GLI1 underlies first case of autosomal recessive pre‐axial polydactyly.. Clin Genet 2019;95:540–541.
  33. Radhakrishna U, Bornholdt D, Scott HS, Patel UC, Rossier C, Engel H. The phenotypic spectrum of GLI3 morphopathies includes autosomal dominant preaxial polydactyly type‐IV and postaxial polydactyly type‐A/B; no phenotype prediction from the position of GLI3 mutations.. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:645–655.
  34. Maas SA, Suzuki T, Fallon JF. Identification of spontaneous mutations within the long‐range limb‐specific Sonic hedgehog enhancer (ZRS) that alter Sonic hedgehog expression in the chicken limb mutants oligozeugodactyly and silkie breed.. Dev Dyn 2011;240:1212–1222.
  35. Umair M, Bilal M, Ali RH, Alhaddad B, Ahmad F, Abdullah. Whole‐exome sequencing revealed a nonsense mutation in STKLD1 causing non‐syndromic pre‐axial polydactyly type A affecting only upper limb.. Clin Genet 2019;96:134–139.
  36. Petit F, Jourdain AS, Holder‐Espinasse M, Keren B, Andrieux J, Duterque‐Coquillaud M. The disruption of a novel limb cis‐regulatory element of SHH is associated with autosomal dominant preaxial polydactyly‐hypertrichosis.. Eur J Hum Genet 2016;24:37–43.
  37. Jin JY, Wu PF, Luo FM, Guo BB, Zeng L, Fan LL. GLIS family zinc finger 1 was first linked with preaxial polydactyly I in humans by stepwise genetic analysis.. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;9:781388.
  38. Potuijt JWP, Baas M, Sukenik‐Halevy R, Douben H, Nguyen P, Venter DJ. A point mutation in the pre‐ZRS disrupts sonic hedgehog expression in the limb bud and results in triphalangeal thumb‐polysyndactyly syndrome.. Genet Med 2018;20:1405–1413.
  39. Lettice LA, Heaney SJ, Purdie LA, Li L, de Beer P, Oostra BA. A long‐range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly.. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:1725–1735.
  40. Zhu J, Mackem S. John Saunders' ZPA, Sonic hedgehog and digit identity – how does it really all work?. Dev Biol 2017;429:391–400.
  41. Suzuki T. How is digit identity determined during limb development?. Dev Growth Differ 2013;55:130–138.
  42. Zeller R, López‐Ríos J, Zuniga A. Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis.. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:845–858.
  43. Niida Y, Togi S, Ura H. Molecular bases of human malformation syndromes involving the SHH pathway: GLIA/R balance and cardinal phenotypes.. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:13060.
  44. Beste KJ, Whitfield‐Cargile CM. Considerations for surgical correction of polydactyly in horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31(9):468–471.
  45. Artigas R, Vazquez N, Mirazo J, Llambi S, König H‐E, Victoria S. Description and surgical resolution of a case of lateral polydactyly in a horse.. Vet Med Austria 2020;107:98–106.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.