Analyze Diet

Intraocular silicone prostheses in a dog and a horse with corneal lacerations.

Abstract: Intraocular silicone prostheses were implanted in the eyes of a horse and a dog with traumatic corneal lacerations and protrusion of intraocular contents. Several months after surgery, the horse and dog were tolerating the intraocular prostheses, and the appearance was cosmetically acceptable. This contradicts earlier reports that have cited corneal disease as a contraindication for implantation of intraocular silicone prostheses.
Publication Date: 1990-02-15 PubMed ID: 2303385
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the successful implementation of intraocular silicone prostheses in a horse and a dog that had suffered corneal lacerations, which contradicts previous beliefs that corneal disease was a hindrance to such procedures.

About the Research

  • The study revolves around the implantation of intraocular silicone prostheses within the eyes of a horse and a dog. These animals had undergone traumatic corneal lacerations and displacement of intraocular contents, which led to the need for this sort of treatment.
  • The researchers chiefly focused on the after-effects of the surgery conducted several months ago and investigated how the animals were handling the intraocular prostheses.
  • Also, the research looked into the visual aesthetic of the animals post-surgery to judge whether or not the appearance after the implantation was cosmetically acceptable.

Findings of the Research

  • A notable finding from the research was that contrary to prior assumptions, this study found that corneal disease does not pose a risk or inhibit the implantation of silicone prostheses. Previously, it was believed that corneal disease presented a contraindication, i.e., a condition or factor that serves as a reason to withhold a particular medical treatment due to the harm it would cause, for the implantation of these prostheses.
  • Both the horse and the dog were tolerating the silicone prostheses in their eyes months after the surgery was performed showing no signs of serious complication or distress that could be directly associated with the implantation.
  • The implantation of the silicone prostheses did not noticeably change the appearance of the animals’ eyes, thus making it a cosmetically acceptable solution.

Significance of the Research

  • The research broadens the scope of treatment for animals suffering from traumatic corneal lacerations. It opens the possibility of using intraocular silicone prostheses as a sustainable and cosmetically acceptable solution.
  • It also challenges previous studies that have cited corneal disease as a contraindication for this type of treatment and encourages further studies to confirm these findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Riggs C, Whitley RD. (1990). Intraocular silicone prostheses in a dog and a horse with corneal lacerations. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 196(4), 617-619.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 196
Issue: 4
Pages: 617-619

Researcher Affiliations

Riggs, C
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0126.
Whitley, R D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cornea / surgery
    • Corneal Injuries
    • Dogs / injuries
    • Dogs / surgery
    • Eye, Artificial / veterinary
    • Horses / injuries
    • Horses / surgery
    • Male
    • Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
    • Silicones