FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Irish Equine Industry Stakeholder Perspectives of Objective ...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2019; 9(8); 539; doi: 10.3390/ani9080539

Irish Equine Industry Stakeholder Perspectives of Objective Technology for Biomechanical Analyses in the Field.

Abstract: Wearable sensing technologies are increasingly used in human and equine gait research to improve ecological validity of research findings. It is unclear how these tools have penetrated the equine industry or what perspectives industry stakeholders' hold in relation to these relatively new devices. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Irish equine industry stakeholders to understand their perception of objective tools for biomechanical analysis in the field. The study participants came from professional/elite backgrounds in both the sport horse ( = 6) and thoroughbred ( = 6) sectors. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis, resulting in four analytical themes. The first theme conveys the importance of tacit knowledge and experience in the holistic analysis of a horse. Theme two highlights that the perfect horse does not exist therefore, equine athlete management is complex and requires a multi-layered problem-solving approach. Theme three describes an awareness among stakeholders of technologies, however they are sceptical of their value. The final theme identified that one of the key barriers to technology adoption is the economic value of the horse and the cost of implementing technology herd-wide. Our findings highlight the need for a user-centred design in this domain, which requires greater consultation and learning between technology developers and equine stakeholders to develop fit-for-purpose analysis and monitoring tools.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-08-08 PubMed ID: 31398822PubMed Central: PMC6720583DOI: 10.3390/ani9080539Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focused on a study on the perspectives of Irish equine industry stakeholders towards the use of wearable sensor technologies for biomechanical analysis of horses in the field. The research highlighted the stakeholders’ emphasis on traditional expertise, the uniqueness of each horse, their skepticism towards technologies, and the cost as the main barriers to technology adoption.

Study Design and Participants

  • The study employed a qualitative investigation method using semi-structured interviews to collect primary data on the perceived value and barriers of using sensing technologies in the equine industry.
  • The participants of the study were from professional and elite backgrounds in the sport horse and thoroughbred sectors of the Irish equine industry.

Findings and Themes

  • The study identified four main themes derived from the interview data. These themes reflected the stakeholders’ insight on the use of sensing technology in the equine industry.
  • The first theme emphasized the importance of experiential or tacit knowledge in the holistic analysis of horses. The respondents asserted that knowledge and experience cannot be fully replaced by technology in understanding the health and performance of horses.
  • The second theme underscored the complexity of managing equine athletes due to their individual uniqueness. This suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach using technology might not appropriately address the needs of each horse.
  • The third theme revealed an awareness of the available wearable sensing technologies among the participants, but they also expressed skepticism about their usefulness and reliability.
  • The fourth theme pointed to the economic concerns as one of the biggest barriers towards the adoption of sensing technology in the equine industry. The cost of implementing this technology on a larger scale across herds could be prohibitive.

Implications and Recommendations

  • The study findings highlighted a need for technology developers to engage more with industry stakeholders. This engagement could ensure that the design and development of wearable technology for biomechanical analysis is user-centered.
  • More insights could be drawn through consultations and learning sessions between technology developers and industry stakeholders to create tools that are appropriate for individual horse needs and the realities of the equine industry.

Cite This Article

APA
Egan S, Brama P, McGrath D. (2019). Irish Equine Industry Stakeholder Perspectives of Objective Technology for Biomechanical Analyses in the Field. Animals (Basel), 9(8), 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080539

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 8
PII: 539

Researcher Affiliations

Egan, Sonja
  • Institute for Sport and Health, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. sonja.egan@ucdconnect.ie.
Brama, Pieter
  • Section Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
McGrath, Denise
  • Institute for Sport and Health, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Grant Funding

  • (GOIPG/2017/1611) / Irish Research Council

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 63 references
  1. Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RJ. Equine Exercise Physiology: The Science of Exercise in the Athletic Horse. Elsevier Health Sciences; Edinburgh, UK: 2008.
  2. Aviad AD. The use of the standing force plate as a quantitative measure of equine lameness. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1988;8:460–462.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(88)80095-9google scholar: lookup
  3. Back W, MacAllister CG, van Heel MC, Pollmeier M, Hanson PD. The use of force plate measurements to titrate the dosage of a new COX-2 inhibitor in lame horses.. Equine Vet J 2009 Mar;41(3):309-12.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397118pubmed: 19469242google scholar: lookup
  4. Hobbs SJ, Richards J, Clayton HM. The effect of centre of mass location on sagittal plane moments around the centre of mass in trotting horses.. J Biomech 2014 Apr 11;47(6):1278-86.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.024pubmed: 24636530google scholar: lookup
  5. Janicek J, Lopes MA, Wilson DA, Reed S, Keegan KG. Hindlimb kinematics before and after laser fibrotomy in horses with fibrotic myopathy.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2012 Dec;(43):126-31.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00681.xpubmed: 23447892google scholar: lookup
  6. Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context.. Am J Occup Ther 1994 Jul;48(7):595-607.
    doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.7.595pubmed: 7943149google scholar: lookup
  7. Jobson SA, Nevill AM, Palmer GS, Jeukendrup AE, Doherty M, Atkinson G. The ecological validity of laboratory cycling: Does body size explain the difference between laboratory- and field-based cycling performance?. J Sports Sci 2007 Jan 1;25(1):3-9.
    doi: 10.1080/02640410500520526pubmed: 17127577google scholar: lookup
  8. Davids K. Ecological validity in understanding sport performance: Some problems of definition. Quest 1988;40:126–136.
    doi: 10.1080/00336297.1988.10483894google scholar: lookup
  9. Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, van Weeren PR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet J 2018 Apr;234:11-23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006pubmed: 29680381google scholar: lookup
  10. Starke SD, Oosterlinck M. Reliability of equine visual lameness classification as a function of expertise, lameness severity and rater confidence.. Vet Rec 2019 Jan 12;184(2):63.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105058pubmed: 30242083google scholar: lookup
  11. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Haubro Andersen P, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner.. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176253.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176253pmc: PMC5404851pubmed: 28441406google scholar: lookup
  12. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Vet J 2017 Sep;49(5):567-569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12715pubmed: 28804943google scholar: lookup
  13. Egan S, Brama P, McGrath D. Research trends in equine movement analysis, future opportunities and potential barriers in the digital age: A scoping review from 1978 to 2018.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):813-824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13076pubmed: 30659639google scholar: lookup
  14. Pfau T, Fiske-Jackson A, Rhodin M. Quantitative assessment of gait parameters in horses: Useful for aiding clinical decision making?. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:209–215.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12372google scholar: lookup
  15. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pmc: PMC5877382pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
  16. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Pai PF. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Mar;73(3):368-74.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.3.368pubmed: 22369528google scholar: lookup
  17. Donnell JR, Frisbie DD, King MR, Goodrich LR, Haussler KK. Comparison of subjective lameness evaluation, force platforms and an inertial-sensor system to identify mild lameness in an equine osteoarthritis model.. Vet J 2015 Nov;206(2):136-42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.004pubmed: 26361749google scholar: lookup
  18. Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC. Equine Locomotion. 2nd ed. Saunders; London, UK: 2001. Measurement techniques for gait analysis; pp. 31–66.
  19. Pfau T. Sensor-based equine gait analysis: More than meets the eye?. UK Vet Equine 2019;3:102–112.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2019.3.3.102google scholar: lookup
  20. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care.. J Biomed Inform 2010 Feb;43(1):159-72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002pmc: PMC2814963pubmed: 19615467google scholar: lookup
  21. Dermody G, Fritz R. A conceptual framework for clinicians working with artificial intelligence and health-assistive Smart Homes.. Nurs Inq 2019 Jan;26(1):e12267.
    doi: 10.1111/nin.12267pmc: PMC6342619pubmed: 30417510google scholar: lookup
  22. Collins J, Hanlon A, More S, Duggan V. The structure and regulation of the Irish equine industries: Links to considerations of equine welfare.. Ir Vet J 2008 Nov 1;61(11):746-56.
    doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-11-746pmc: PMC3113872pubmed: 21851704google scholar: lookup
  23. Horse Racing Ireland. Horse Racing Ireland Factbook 2017. Horse Racing Ireland; Ballymaney, Ireland: 2017. p. 76.
  24. Corbally AF, Fahey AG. The Contribution of the Sport Horse Industry to the Irish Economy. University College Dublin; Dublin, Ireland: 2017. p. 77.
  25. Latimer J, Birke L. Natural relations: Horses, knowledge, technology. Sociol. Rev. 2009;57:1–27.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.01802.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Weary DM, Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MA. Societal views and animal welfare science: understanding why the modified cage may fail and other stories.. Animal 2016 Feb;10(2):309-17.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001160pubmed: 26206166google scholar: lookup
  27. Ormerod R. The history and ideas of pragmatism. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006;57:892–909.
    doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602065google scholar: lookup
  28. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança F, Weishaupt MA. What is lameness and what (or who) is the gold standard to detect it?. Equine Vet J 2018 Sep;50(5):549-551.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12970pubmed: 29953639google scholar: lookup
  29. van Weeren PR. How long will equestrian traditionalism resist science?. Vet J 2008 Mar;175(3):289-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.06.017pubmed: 17851100google scholar: lookup
  30. Adair S, Baus M, Belknap J, Bell R, Boero M, Bussy C, Cardenas F, Casey T, Castro J, Davis W, Erskine M, Farr R, Fischer T, Forbes B, Ford T, Genovese R, Gottschalk R, Hoge M, Honnas C, Hunter G, Joyce J, Kaneps A, Keegan K, Kramer J, Lischer C, Marshall J, Oosterlinck M, Radue P, Redding R, Reed SK, Rick M, Santschi E, Schoonover M, Schramme M, Schumacher J, Stephenson R, Thaler R, Vedding Neilsen J, Wilson DA. Response to Letter to the Editor: Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis.. Equine Vet J 2018 May;50(3):415-417.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12820pubmed: 29633362google scholar: lookup
  31. Dyson S. Can lameness be graded reliably?. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):379-82.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00391.xpubmed: 21631579google scholar: lookup
  32. Bathe AP, Judy CE, Dyson S. Letter to the Editor: Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Vet J 2018 Mar;50(2):273.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12791pubmed: 29281124google scholar: lookup
  33. Smith B, Sparkes AC. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. Routledge; London, UK: 2016.
    doi: 10.4324/9781315762012.ch3google scholar: lookup
  34. Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Living the 'Best Life' or 'One Size Fits All'-Stakeholder Perceptions of Racehorse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 31;9(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9040134pmc: PMC6523604pubmed: 30935137google scholar: lookup
  35. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
    doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oagoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 Jul 10;8:45.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45pmc: PMC2478656pubmed: 18616818google scholar: lookup
  37. Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature.. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009 Jul;14(3):156-64.
    doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120pmc: PMC2933505pubmed: 19541874google scholar: lookup
  38. van Weeren PR, Crevier-Denoix N. Equine conformation: clues to performance and soundness?. Equine Vet J 2006 Nov;38(7):591-6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X159007pubmed: 17228571google scholar: lookup
  39. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. Expertise and Tacit Knowledge in Medicine. Psychology Press; New York, NY, USA: 1999. pp. 75–99.
  40. Brockmann EN, Anthony WP. Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group Organ. Manag. 2002;27:436–455.
    doi: 10.1177/1059601102238356google scholar: lookup
  41. Butler D. Regaining a ‘feel for the game’through interspecies sport. Sociol. Sport J. 2017;34:124–135.
    doi: 10.1123/ssj.2016-0091google scholar: lookup
  42. Nash C, Collins D. Tacit knowledge in expert coaching: Science or art?. Quest 2006;58:465–477.
    doi: 10.1080/00336297.2006.10491894google scholar: lookup
  43. Jönsson L, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Näsholm A, Dalin G, Philipsson J. Associations of health status and conformation with longevity and lifetime competition performance in young Swedish Warmblood riding horses: 8,238 cases (1983-2005).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014 Jun 15;244(12):1449-61.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.244.12.1449pubmed: 24871069google scholar: lookup
  44. O'Grady SE. Basic farriery for the performance horse.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008 Apr;24(1):203-18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.12.002pubmed: 18314044google scholar: lookup
  45. Peters D. Farriery for the Sport Horse—Principles and Techniques. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners; Baltimore, MD, USA. 4–8 December 2010; pp. 505–511.
  46. Landman MA, de Blaauw JA, van Weeren PR, Hofland LJ. Field study of the prevalence of lameness in horses with back problems.. Vet Rec 2004 Aug 7;155(6):165-8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.155.6.165pubmed: 15357376google scholar: lookup
  47. Uprichard K. A Clinical Survey Study of the Recognition and Impact of Equine Lameness on the Great British Horse Owning Population. Master’s Thesis. University of Glasgow; Glasgow, UK: 2017.
  48. Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Oct;66(10):1805-15.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1805pubmed: 16273915google scholar: lookup
  49. Delello JA, McWhorter RR. Reducing the Digital Divide: Connecting Older Adults to iPad Technology.. J Appl Gerontol 2017 Jan;36(1):3-28.
    doi: 10.1177/0733464815589985pubmed: 26084479google scholar: lookup
  50. Tacken M, Marcellini F, Mollenkopf H, Ruoppila I, Szeman Z. Use and acceptance of new technology by older people. Findings of the international MOBILATE survey:‘Enhancing mobility in later life’. Gerontechnology 2005;3:126–137.
    doi: 10.4017/gt.2005.03.03.002.00google scholar: lookup
  51. Dickinson A, Smith MJ, Arnott JL, Newell AF, Hill RL. Approaches to web search and navigation for older computer novices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; San Jose, CA, USA. 28 April–3 May 2007; pp. 281–290.
  52. Campling NC, Pitts DG, Knight PV, Aspinall R. A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices.. BMC Health Serv Res 2017 Jul 6;17(1):466.
    doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2270-8pmc: PMC5501529pubmed: 28683733google scholar: lookup
  53. Hersh W. Health care information technology: progress and barriers.. JAMA 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2273-4.
    doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2273pubmed: 15536117google scholar: lookup
  54. Christodoulakis C, Asgarian A, Easterbrook S. Barriers to adoption of information technology in healthcare. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering; Toronto, ON, Canada. 6–8 November 2017; p. 10.
  55. Ross DJ, Roberts JL. Equine Calming Products: A Short Survey Into Their Use, Effect, and Knowledge Using a Small Sample of Horse Owners in the North of Scotland, UK.. J Equine Vet Sci 2018 Sep;68:63-67.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.05.208pubmed: 31256891google scholar: lookup
  56. Higler MH, Brommer H, L'Ami JJ, de Grauw JC, Nielen M, van Weeren PR, Laverty S, Barneveld A, Back W. The effects of three-month oral supplementation with a nutraceutical and exercise on the locomotor pattern of aged horses.. Equine Vet J 2014 Sep;46(5):611-7.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12182pubmed: 24011144google scholar: lookup
  57. Murray JMD, Hanna E, Hastie P. Equine dietary supplements: an insight into their use and perceptions in the Irish equine industry.. Ir Vet J 2018;71:4.
    doi: 10.1186/s13620-018-0115-3pmc: PMC5789549pubmed: 29423172google scholar: lookup
  58. Richardson H, Collins R, Williams J. Sport science relevance and integration in horseracing: Perceptions of UK racehorse trainers. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2019:1–16.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190003google scholar: lookup
  59. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 2000;11:342–365.
    doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872google scholar: lookup
  60. Tao D. Intention to use and actual use of electronic information resources: further exploring Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009 Nov 14;2009:629-33.
    pmc: PMC2815463pubmed: 20351931
  61. Rönnby S, Lundberg O, Fagher K, Jacobsson J, Tillander B, Gauffin H, Hansson PO, Dahlström Ö, Timpka T. mHealth Self-Report Monitoring in Competitive Middle- and Long-Distance Runners: Qualitative Study of Long-Term Use Intentions Using the Technology Acceptance Model.. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Aug 13;6(8):e10270.
    doi: 10.2196/10270pmc: PMC6111145pubmed: 30104183google scholar: lookup
  62. Gagnon MP, Payne-Gagnon J, Breton E, Fortin JP, Khoury L, Dolovich L, Price D, Wiljer D, Bartlett G, Archer N. Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records in Canada: Perceptions of Stakeholders.. Int J Health Policy Manag 2016 Jul 1;5(7):425-433.
    doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.36pmc: PMC4930348pubmed: 27694670google scholar: lookup
  63. Liebowitz J. Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Syst. Appl. 2001;20:1–6.
    doi: 10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00044-0google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.