Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(22); 3203; doi: 10.3390/ani14223203

Is Butyrate Concentration in the Equine Gastrointestinal Tract Altered During and After Surgery for Treatment of Large Colon Obstruction?

Abstract: A major cause of morbidity and mortality in horses with large colon obstructive lesions is injury to the colonic mucosal barrier from ischemic injury. Since butyrate has been shown to play a critical role in the maintenance of a healthy mucosal barrier, it may play a role in the recovery process. This study's objective was to determine whether the differences in butyrate concentrations existed between horses with surgical large colon obstructive lesions and healthy horses both during and after surgery. Eleven horses presenting with surgical colic lesions were enrolled; colonic samples were acquired during surgery, and fecal samples were obtained 36 h later. Colonic and fecal samples were also obtained from control groups. Samples were analyzed for butyrate, acetate, and propionate concentrations. There was no significant difference in butyrate content between surgical colonic or fecal samples and controls; however, an alteration in the proportion of SCFAs in relation to one another was noted. These changes in the individual SCFA levels were not statistically significant. The study findings demonstrated that there were no significant differences in butyrate proportions when comparing samples from horses with surgical colic lesions to healthy control horses.
Publication Date: 2024-11-08 PubMed ID: 39595256PubMed Central: PMC11591519DOI: 10.3390/ani14223203Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study examines if butyrate, which is crucial for maintaining the health of the mucosal barrier in horses’ colonic system, varies in horses undergoing surgery for large colon obstruction. The research found no significant difference in butyrate content between the operative samples and controls, indicating butyrate levels remain consistent during and after surgical intervention.

Research Objective

  • The primary aim of the research was to determine if there were differences in butyrate concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract of horses with large colon obstructive lesions undergoing surgery compared to healthy horses.

Methods

  • Eleven horses presenting with surgical colonic lesions participated in the study.
  • From these horses, colonic samples were collected during the surgery and fecal samples were taken 36 hours later.
  • For comparison, colonic and fecal samples were also collected from a set of control horses.
  • The samples were then analyzed for concentrations of butyrate, acetate, and propionate.

Results

  • The study reported that there was no significant difference in butyrate content between the surgical colonic and fecal samples when compared to the control group.
  • An alteration in the proportion of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) in relation to each other was observed, though these fluctuations in individual SCFA levels were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that there are no significant alterations in butyrate proportions in the gastrointestinal tract of horses with surgical colic lesions compared to healthy control horses.
  • This suggests that butyrate content, which is critical for colonic health, remains unchanged during and after the surgical treatment of large colon obstructions in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Barton CK, Hassel DM, Anders K, Weir TL. (2024). Is Butyrate Concentration in the Equine Gastrointestinal Tract Altered During and After Surgery for Treatment of Large Colon Obstruction? Animals (Basel), 14(22), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223203

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 22
PII: 3203

Researcher Affiliations

Barton, Charlotte K
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Hassel, Diana M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Anders, Kelly
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Weir, Tiffany L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Grant Funding

  • n.a / Young Investigator Grant program in the Center for Companion Animal Studies at Colorado State University

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 21 references
  1. Velazquez OC, Seto RW, Rombeau JL. The scientific rationale and clinical application of short-chain fatty acids and medium-chain triacylglycerols. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1996;55:49–78.
    doi: 10.1079/PNS19960011pubmed: 8832782google scholar: lookup
  2. Schumann A, Nutten S, Donnicola D, Comelli EM, Mansourian R, Cherbut C, Garcia-Rodenas C. Neonatal antibiotic treatment alters gastrointestinal tract developmental gene expression and intestinal barrier transcriptome. Physiol. Genom. 2005;23:235–245.
  3. Zhang L, Li J, Young LH, Caplan MJ. AMP-activated protein kinase regulates the assembly of epithelial tight junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:17272–17277.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608531103pmc: PMC1859922pubmed: 17088526google scholar: lookup
  4. Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr. 2009;139:1619–1625.
    doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638pmc: PMC2728689pubmed: 19625695google scholar: lookup
  5. Roediger WE. Utilization of nutrients by isolated epithelial cells of the rat colon. Gastroenterology 1982;83:424–429.
    doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80339-9pubmed: 7084619google scholar: lookup
  6. Segain JP, Raingeard de la Bletiere D, Bourreille A, Leray V, Gervois N, Rosales C, Ferrier L, Bonnet C, Blottiere HM, Galmiche JP. Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through NFkappaB inhibition: Implications for Crohn’s disease. Gut 2000;47:397–403.
    doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.397pmc: PMC1728045pubmed: 10940278google scholar: lookup
  7. Gaudier E, Rival M, Buisine MP, Robineau I, Hoebler C. Butyrate enemas upregulate Muc genes expression but decrease adherent mucus thickness in mice colon. Physiol. Res. 2009;58:111–119.
    doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931271pubmed: 18198997google scholar: lookup
  8. Swidsinski A, Loening-Baucke V, Theissig F, Engelhardt H, Bengmark S, Koch S, Lochs H, Dorffel Y. Comparative study of the intestinal mucus barrier in normal and inflamed colon. Gut 2007;56:343–350.
    doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.098160pmc: PMC1856798pubmed: 16908512google scholar: lookup
  9. Lewis K, Lutgendorff F, Phan V, Soderholm JD, Sherman PM, McKay DM. Enhanced translocation of bacteria across metabolically stressed epithelia is reduced by butyrate. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010;16:1138–1148.
    doi: 10.1002/ibd.21177pubmed: 20024905google scholar: lookup
  10. Stewart HL, Pitta D, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Hennessy ML, Engiles JB, Southwood LL. Changes in the faecal bacterial microbiota during hospitalisation of horses with colic and the effect of different causes of colic. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:1119–1131.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13389pubmed: 33222287google scholar: lookup
  11. Qiao Y, Qian J, Lu Q, Tian Y, Chen Q, Zhang Y. Protective effects of butyrate on intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. J. Surg. Res. 2015;197:324–330.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.031pubmed: 25976850google scholar: lookup
  12. Weir TL, Manter DK, Sheflin AM, Barnett BA, Heuberger AL, Ryan EP. Stool microbiome and metabolome differences between colorectal cancer patients and healthy adults. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e70803.
  13. Stewart HL, Southwood LL, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Engiles JB, Pitta D. Differences in the equine faecal microbiota between horses presenting to a tertiary referral hospital for colic compared with an elective surgical procedure. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:336–342.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13010pubmed: 30153353google scholar: lookup
  14. Kauter A, Epping L, Semmler T, Antao EM, Kannapin D, Stoeckle SD, Gehlen H, Lubke-Becker A, Gunther S, Wieler LH. The gut microbiome of horses: Current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives. Anim. Microbiome 2019;1:14.
    doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3pmc: PMC7807895pubmed: 33499951google scholar: lookup
  15. Brokner C, Austbo D, Naesset JA, Blache D, Bach Knudsen KE, Tauson AH. Metabolic response to dietary fibre composition in horses. Animal 2016;10:1155–1163.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731115003006pubmed: 26755337google scholar: lookup
  16. Hussein HS, Vogedes LA, Fernandez GC, Frankeny RL. Effects of cereal grain supplementation on apparent digestibility of nutrients and concentrations of fermentation end-products in the feces and serum of horses consuming alfalfa cubes. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;82:1986–1996.
    doi: 10.2527/2004.8271986xpubmed: 15309945google scholar: lookup
  17. Raspa F, Vervuert I, Capucchio MT, Colombino E, Bergero D, Forte C, Greppi M, Cavallarin L, Giribaldi M, Antoniazzi S. A high-starch vs. high-fibre diet: Effects on the gut environment of the different intestinal compartments of the horse digestive tract. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18:187.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03289-2pmc: PMC9118577pubmed: 35590319google scholar: lookup
  18. Fernandes KA, Kittelmann S, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Thomas DG. Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e112846.
  19. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0154037.
  20. Daly K, Proudman CJ, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Dyer J, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease. Br. J. Nutr. 2012;107:989–995.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003825pubmed: 21816118google scholar: lookup
  21. Willing B, Voros A, Roos S, Jones C, Jansson A, Lindberg JE. Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:908–914.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X447806pubmed: 20383990google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.