Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2025; 15(1); 31942; doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01062-7

Isolation of major bacterial species associated with equine skin wounds and in-vitro antibacterial activities of selected medicinal plants.

Abstract: Wounds on the skin are a common health issue affecting working equines. This study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro antibacterial properties of crude methanolic extracts from selected medicinal plants against pathogens isolated from equine skin wounds in Merti district. Agar well and disc diffusion tests were used to determine the mean zone of inhibition, while broth dilution methods were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), further confirming the potent antibacterial effects of the selected medicinal plant extracts. One way analysis of variance was used to compute the mean zone of inhibition (mm ± SEM) using SPSS version 20. The results showed that Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen. The medicinal plants Zingiber officinale (ginger), Allium sativum (garlic), Croton macrostachyus, and Solanum incanum exhibited significant antibacterial activity against S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. On agar well diffusion method, the highest and lowest zone of inhibition was recorded in C. macrostachyus (28.0 ± 1.2 mm for S. aureus standard strain) and Z. officinale (12.7 ± 0.7 mm for K. pneumoniae wound isolate), respectively at 780 mg/mL concentration. Similarly, C. macrostachyus showed the highest (28.3 ± 0.9) zone of inhibition using the disc diffusion test for S. aureus standard strain. In combined extracts, the highest zone of inhibition was found against standard strain of S. aureus with Croton macrostachyus + Zingiber officinale (33.0 ± 0.6), followed by both Allium sativum + Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum + Croton macrostachyus at 32 ± 1.2 mm at 780 mg/mL concentration. The minimum inhibitory concentration ranged from 12.18 mg/mL for A. sativum (against standard S. aureus) to 390 mg/mL for S. incanum (against P. aeruginosa), while MBC ranged from 24.38 mg/mL for A. sativum (against S. aureus and E. coli) to > 390 mg/mL for S. incanum against K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. The findings demonstrate the potential of these natural resources as alternative or complementary treatments for managing bacterial infections associated with equine skin wounds, which is particularly relevant in the context of the growing global challenge of antibiotic resistance, and provide valuable baseline information for future in-vivo investigations and the potential development of herbal-based wound management strategies in equine veterinary practice, warranting further in-vivo studies.
Publication Date: 2025-08-29 PubMed ID: 40883320PubMed Central: PMC12397356DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-01062-7Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study investigated the types of bacteria found in equine skin wounds and tested how effective certain medicinal plant extracts are at killing these bacteria in laboratory conditions.

Background and Objectives

  • Equine skin wounds are common health issues that can be complicated by bacterial infections.
  • The study was conducted in the Merti district, focusing on working equines which are frequently affected by wounds.
  • The main aim was to isolate major bacterial pathogens from these wounds and evaluate the antibacterial activity of selected medicinal plants against these bacteria.

Methods Used

  • Bacterial isolation and identification from equine skin wounds.
  • Preparation of crude methanolic extracts from selected medicinal plants:
    • Zingiber officinale (ginger)
    • Allium sativum (garlic)
    • Croton macrostachyus
    • Solanum incanum
  • Antibacterial activity assessed using:
    • Agar well diffusion method
    • Disc diffusion test
    • Broth dilution method to determine Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)
  • Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA with SPSS software to compare the zones of inhibition (measures of antibacterial effectiveness).

Key Findings on Bacterial Isolates

  • The most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus.
  • Other isolated pathogens included:
    • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    • Escherichia coli
    • Klebsiella pneumoniae

Antibacterial Activity of Medicinal Plants

  • All four medicinal plant extracts showed significant antibacterial effects against the isolated bacteria.
  • Specific observations from agar well diffusion:
    • Croton macrostachyus had the largest zone of inhibition (28.0 ± 1.2 mm) against the standard strain of S. aureus at 780 mg/mL concentration.
    • Zingiber officinale showed the smallest zone (12.7 ± 0.7 mm) against K. pneumoniae wound isolates at the same concentration.
  • Disc diffusion results confirmed a strong antibacterial effect of C. macrostachyus, particularly against standard S. aureus (28.3 ± 0.9 mm zone of inhibition).
  • Combined extracts exhibited even greater antibacterial activity:
    • Combination of C. macrostachyus and Z. officinale showed the highest zone (33.0 ± 0.6 mm) against standard S. aureus.
    • Other combinations such as A. sativum + Z. officinale and A. sativum + C. macrostachyus also had high inhibition zones (32 ± 1.2 mm).

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

  • MIC values:
    • Lowest MIC was 12.18 mg/mL for A. sativum against standard S. aureus.
    • Highest MIC was 390 mg/mL for S. incanum against P. aeruginosa.
  • MBC values:
    • Lowest MBC was 24.38 mg/mL for A. sativum against both S. aureus and E. coli.
    • MBC for S. incanum was greater than 390 mg/mL against K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, indicating lower bactericidal potency.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The study demonstrated that these medicinal plants have significant potential as natural antibacterial agents for treating bacterial infections in equine wounds.
  • Such alternatives are particularly valuable given the growing global concern over antibiotic resistance.
  • The results provide a foundation for:
    • Future in-vivo studies to assess effectiveness and safety in live animals.
    • Possible development of herbal-based wound management products for veterinary use in equines.
  • Overall, the work supports integrating traditional medicinal plants into modern veterinary care, especially for hard-to-treat infections.

Cite This Article

APA
Beshir A, Kemal J, Abraha B, Tola EH. (2025). Isolation of major bacterial species associated with equine skin wounds and in-vitro antibacterial activities of selected medicinal plants. Sci Rep, 15(1), 31942. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01062-7

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 31942
PII: 31942

Researcher Affiliations

Beshir, Aliy
  • Livestock and Fishery Office, Chiro, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.
Kemal, Jelalu
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Abraha, Bruk
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Tola, Eyob Hirpa
  • Addis Ababa University College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Bishoftu, Ethiopia. eyob.hirpa@aau.edu.et.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Equidae
  • Horses
  • Wounds and Injuries / complications
  • Wounds and Injuries / microbiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary
  • Bacterial Infections / drug therapy
  • Bacterial Infections / microbiology
  • Plants, Medicinal / chemistry
  • Plants, Medicinal / classification
  • Bacteria / drug effects
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Ethiopia
  • Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
  • Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / drug effects
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / isolation & purification
  • Escherichia coli / drug effects
  • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae / drug effects
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae / isolation & purification
  • Plant Extracts / pharmacology
  • Zingiber officinale / chemistry
  • Garlic / chemistry
  • Apocynaceae / chemistry
  • Solanum / chemistry
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. FDRE-CSA (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency). Agricultural sample survey, Report on Livestock and Livestock characteristics: Private peasant holdings, Vol. 2, statistical bulletin no. 587, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2020).
  2. Mekuria S, Matusala M, Rahmeto A. Management practices and welfare problems encountered on working equids in Hawassa Town, Southern Ethiopia.. (9), 243–250 (2013).
  3. Getachew M, Trawford A, Feseha G, Reid SWJ. Gastrointestinal parasites of working donkeys of Ethiopia.. 27–33 (2010).
    pubmed: 19548106
  4. Seifu T. Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmaceutical studies on medicinal plants of Chifra district, Afar region, north eastern Ethiopia.. Addis Ababa University (2004).
  5. Giday M, Asfaw Z, Elmqvist T, Woldu Z. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Zay people in Ethiopia.. (1), 43–52 (2003).
    pubmed: 12576201
  6. Devrajani K et al. Occurrence and prevalence of bacterial species identified from camel wounds.. (4), 96–104 (2001).
  7. Westgate SJ, Percival SL, Knottenbelt DC, Clegg PD, Cochrane CA. Microbiology of equine wounds and evidence of bacterial biofilms.. 152–159 (2011).
    pubmed: 21273008
  8. Sumbria D, Singla LD, Sharma A, Bal MS. Prevalence and haematobiochemical observations of common infectious diseases in equines from Punjab.. (3), 368–374 (2017).
  9. Ibrahim S. Application of medicinal plants to overcome antibiotic resistance in some selected multi-drug resistant clinical isolates.. (4), 48–52 (2014).
  10. Adetutu A, Morgan WA, Corcoran O. Ethno-pharmacological survey and in-vitro evaluation of wound healing plants used in Southwestern Nigeria.. (1), 50–56 (2011).
    pubmed: 21501678
  11. Abera B. Medicinal plant used in traditional medicine in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.. 85–94 (2003).
  12. Yineger H, Yewhalaw D, Teketa D. Ethno-medicinal plant knowledge and practice of the Oromo ethnic group in Southwestern Ethiopia.. 11–18 (2008).
    pmc: PMC2390512pubmed: 18445249
  13. Kuda T, Iwai A, Yano T. Effect of red pepper var. conoides and on plasma lipid levels and cecal microflora in mice fed beef tallow.. 1695–1700 (2004).
    pubmed: 15354321
  14. Carlet J et al. Ready for a world without antibiotics? The pensieres antibiotic resistance calls to action.. 11 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3436635pubmed: 22958833
  15. Bekele B, Ashenafi M. Distribution of drug resistance among enterococci and salmonella from poultry and cattle in Ethiopia.. 857–864 (2010).
    pubmed: 19921457
  16. Quinn, P. J. et al. Vol. 95 (Blackwell Science, 2002).
  17. CLSI. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Approved standard. CLSI USA, 30th edition (2020).
  18. Usman H, Osuji JC. Phytochemical and in vitro antimicrobial assay of the leaf extract of newbouldia laevis. 476–480 (2007).
    pmc: PMC2816502pubmed: 20161915
  19. Njimoh DL. Antimicrobial activities of a plethora of medicinal plant extracts and hydrolates against human pathogens and their potential to reverse antibiotic resistance. 1–15 (2015).
    pmc: PMC4477429pubmed: 26180528
  20. Yassir A. Bacteria associated with skin wounds of equines and their antimicrobial susceptibility in Sharg Alneel, Khartoum State. (2), 140–146 (2016).
  21. Tiwari R, Yadav SK, Singh S, Gangwar NK. Bacterial etiology of skin and wound infections along with antibiogram profiling in reference to emerging antibiotic resistance in animals. (5), 259–268 (2015).
  22. Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P. Characterization of virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus: novel function of known virulence factors that are implicated in activation of airway epithelial proinflammatory response. (1), 601905 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3335658pubmed: 22567334
  23. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infection. 520–532 (1998).
    pubmed: 9709046
  24. Mahima A, Rahal R. Immunomodulatory and therapeutic potentials of herbal, traditional/indigenous and ethnoveterinary medicines. (16), 754–774 (2012).
    pubmed: 24175417
  25. Divya N, Thenmozhi S, Sureshkumar BT, Selvan M. Antibacterial activity of medicinal plant against wound infected pathogens. (11), 4942–4947 (2014).
  26. Emmanuel SE, Ehinmitan EO, Bodunde RS, Joseph JC. Antimicrobial activity of Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum on some drug resistant bacterial isolates. (6), 1053–1058 (2021).
  27. Aliyu AM, Suleman SS, Aliyu MY. Synergistic effect of and against and . (9), 1350–1356 (2015).
  28. Mboto CI. Phytochemical properties and antimicrobial activities of combined effect of extracts of the leaves of Garcinia kola, and honey on some medically important microorganisms. (9), 557–559 (2009).
  29. Sendeku W. Antibacterial activity of against some selected pathogenic bacteria. (1), 11–20 (2015).
  30. Desta, B. & Haftom, B. (Mekelle University, 2020).
    pmc: PMC6996673pubmed: 32063983
  31. Bahar M, Ashebr A, Teka F, Adugna N, Solomon A. In-vitro antibacterial activity of selected medicinal plants in the traditional treatment of skin and wound infections in eastern Ethiopia. 1–8 (2018).
    pmc: PMC6069697pubmed: 30079345
  32. Aiyegoro OA, Okoh AI. Use of bioactive plant products in combination with standard antibiotics: Implications in antimicrobial chemotherapy. (13), 1147–1152 (2009).
  33. Bassole I, Juliani H. Essential oils in combination and their antimicrobial properties. (4), 3989–4006 (2012).
    pmc: PMC6268925pubmed: 22469594
  34. Srinivasan C, Kawatra A, Muetzel S. Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids: Review. (8), 326–329 (2005).
    pubmed: 18069740

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.