‘It’s only a flesh wound’ – Understanding the safety culture in equine, production animal and mixed veterinary practices.
Abstract: The veterinary industry has some of the highest rates of non-fatal work-related injuries, yet safety culture remains unexplored. Utilising a survey distributed to all UK employees of a consolidated group of veterinary practices, this study aimed to describe the prevalence of work-related injuries in equine, production animal, and mixed veterinary practices, and to understand the behaviours of injured persons. There were 144 respondents. Over 90 % of clinicians experienced injury during their careers, versus a third of non-clinical staff. Injuries to equine veterinarians were predominately kicks to the leg or head, and usually involved the examination of a horse's distal limb, with most not wearing hard hats. Production animal veterinarians' injuries included crushed hands and feet, and kicks to legs. Injuries often lead to hospital attendance (>25 % equine, >40 % production animal), yet few took time off work. Veterinarians avoided taking time off work after injuries. Reasons included; minimisation of injury severity, not wanting to 'let the team down', and feelings of guilt. Many planned behaviour change post-injury, including using protective headwear, increasing awareness of surroundings, and using better restraint. Most injuries went unreported due to lack of awareness, acceptance of injury risk, time constraints, and believing reporting would have no impact. This study exposes a culture in large animal veterinary workplaces that normalises injuries and undervalues safety. The lack of protective measures and the tendency to continue working despite serious injuries, highlight a need for urgent cultural and systemic change. Improved safety practices, practice leadership commitment, and comprehensive training are essential to address this deep-seated issue and fostering a safer work environment.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2025-04-22 PubMed ID: 40286392DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106541Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research focuses on the high incidence of non-fatal work-related injuries in the veterinary industry, particularly amongst those dealing with large animals such as horses and livestock, and the prevailing workplace culture that tends to normalize these injuries and undervalue safety. It uncovers reasons behind the underreporting of injuries and the reluctance to adopt protective measures, pointing to an urgent need for enhanced safety protocols, leadership commitment, and training.
Study Participants and Research Method
- The research relied on survey data collected from employees of a consolidated group of veterinary practices based in the UK. These surveys covered equine, production animal, and mixed veterinary practices. A total of 144 individuals responded.
Findings on Injury Prevalence
- According to the study, over 90% of clinicians had suffered injuries during their careers, compared to a third of non-clinical employees.
- In the case of equine veterinarians, most injuries came in the form of kicks to the legs or head during examination of a horse’s distal limb. Notably, most of these professionals did not wear hard hats at the time of injury.
- Production animal veterinarians experienced crush injuries to their hands and feet, as well as kicks to their legs.
- These injuries often necessitated a visit to the hospital but rarely resulted in taking time off work. Over 25% of equine related and over 40% of production animal related injuries led to hospital attendance.
Veterinarians’ Response to Injuries
- The study found a commonality amongst veterinarians to continue with work even after sustaining injuries. Reasons for this included downplaying the severity of the injury, fear of disappointing the team, and feelings of guilt.
- Many professionals planned changes to their behaviour post-injury, such as wearing protective headgear, being more aware of their surroundings, or using better restraint methods.
Issues with Injury Reporting
- The research indicates a widespread problem of underreporting of injuries due to factors like ignorance about the necessity to report, a general acceptance of injury risk as part of the nature of the job, time limitations, and the belief that reporting would not effect a change.
Addressing the Safety Culture in Veterinary Practices
- The study underscores the predominant culture in large animal veterinary workplaces that normalizes injuries and devalues safety. The lack of adoption of protective measures and the prevalence of working despite injuries signal a pressing need for a cultural and systemic shift.
- Improving safety measures, instilling commitment to safety at the leadership level, and comprehensive education and training are key in resolving this issue and promoting a safe work environment.
Cite This Article
APA
Tulloch JSP, Schofield I, Jackson R, Whiting M.
(2025).
‘It’s only a flesh wound’ – Understanding the safety culture in equine, production animal and mixed veterinary practices.
Prev Vet Med, 241, 106541.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106541 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, CH64 7TE, UK. Electronic address: jtulloch@liverpool.ac.uk.
- CVS UK Ltd, CVS House, Owen Road, Diss IP22 4ER, UK.
- CVS UK Ltd, CVS House, Owen Road, Diss IP22 4ER, UK.
- CVS UK Ltd, CVS House, Owen Road, Diss IP22 4ER, UK.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists