Analyze Diet

Limitations of immunofluorescence tests in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.

Abstract: The relative value of heterophil agglutinins (HA) and of specific EBV antibodies in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM) was assessed in 108 cases of the disease and in 280 controls. Among the 108 cases 93 were HA-positive by sheep cells in at least one of their sera, while 15 were HA-negative by the same test. Among the 280 controls false-positive HA tests were not encountered except in eight cases with the horse cell microtitre tests. With one of the two slide tests at least two false-positive tests and 12 false-negative tests were also found but these sera had low titres in microtitre tests. The HA life-span was found to be unexpectedly long in a few cases, sheep cell HA lasting up to 8 to 10 months and horse cell HA up to 21 to 23 months.Many false-positive tests may therefore not be true false-positives and may result from the persistence of HA following unrecognized mononucleosis months before. Virtually all cases of IM had (or developed) antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus, viral capsid antigen (EBV-VCA), whereas only half of the controls were EBV-VCA-positive. The comparative analysis of nonspecific and specific test results in mononucleosis allows the following conclusions: (1) horse cell microtitre tests and the monospot test are more sensitive than sheep cell microtitre tests and the monotest; (2) false-negative results are occasionally seen with the latter tests but not with the former; (3) more false-positive results, however, are probably seen with the former tests; and (4) specific EBV-IgM and EBV-EA antibody tests are useful in the diagnosis of selected borderline cases of mononucleosis.
Publication Date: 1974-04-06 PubMed ID: 4363398PubMed Central: PMC1947468
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the efficacy of different diagnostic tests for infectious mononucleosis (IM) by examining the presence of specific antibodies in patients and control groups. The researchers found that the antibody lifespan in some cases could last significantly longer than previously assumed. Additionally, while the horse cell microtitre tests and the monospot test were more sensitive, they also produced more false-positive results. Using specific Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibodies tests proved helpful in diagnosing borderline cases of mononucleosis.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted the study on 108 cases and 280 controls. They assessed the relative effectiveness of heterophil agglutinins (HA) and specific EBV antibodies as diagnostic measures for infectious mononucleosis (IM).
  • Among the 108 cases, 93 were HA-positive through testing with sheep cells, while 15 were HA-negative. Meanwhile, false-positive HA tests within the control group were rare, barring eight cases when tested with horse cells.

Findings on HA Lifespan and Prevalence of False Positives

  • The researchers uncovered longer HA lifespans in some cases, with sheep cell HA lasting up to 8 to 10 months and horse cell HA lasting up to 21 to 23 months.
  • The higher prevalence of false-positive tests may not be genuinely false-positives but could be resulting from the retention of HA following unrecognized mononucleosis months earlier.

Analysis of EBV-IgM antibodies

  • Almost all cases of IM had or developed antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), specifically the viral capsid antigen (EBV-VCA), while only half of the control group was EBV-VCA-positive.
  • Specific EBV-IgM and EBV-EA antibody tests were found to be useful in diagnosing borderline cases of mononucleosis.

Comparison of Tests

  • Comparative analysis of the non-specific and specific test results led to several conclusions. This included the observation that horse cell microtitre tests and the monospot test are more sensitive than sheep cell microtitre tests and the monotest.
  • However, the more sensitive tests (horse cell microtitre tests and the monospot test) may result in more false-positive results.
  • False-negative results were occasionally observed with the less sensitive tests (sheep cell microtitre tests and the monotest) but not with the more sensitive tests.

Cite This Article

APA
Joncas JH, Gilker JC, Chagnon A. (1974). Limitations of immunofluorescence tests in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. Can Med Assoc J, 110(7), 793-802.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-4409
NlmUniqueID: 0414110
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 110
Issue: 7
Pages: 793-802

Researcher Affiliations

Joncas, J H
    Gilker, J C
      Chagnon, A

        MeSH Terms

        • Adult
        • Agglutinins / analysis
        • Animals
        • Antibodies, Heterophile / analysis
        • Antibodies, Viral / analysis
        • Antibody Formation
        • Antigens, Viral / analysis
        • Burkitt Lymphoma / immunology
        • Burkitt Lymphoma / pathology
        • Cell Line
        • Cytomegalovirus / immunology
        • Erythrocytes / immunology
        • False Negative Reactions
        • False Positive Reactions
        • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
        • Goats / immunology
        • Herpesvirus 4, Human / immunology
        • Horses / immunology
        • Humans
        • Immunoglobulin M / analysis
        • Infectious Mononucleosis / blood
        • Infectious Mononucleosis / diagnosis
        • Infectious Mononucleosis / immunology
        • Lymphocytes / immunology
        • Rabbits / immunology
        • Sheep / immunology

        References

        This article includes 24 references
        1. Vonka V, Benyesh-Melnick M, McCombs RM. Antibodies in human sera to soluble and viral antigens found in Burkitt lymphoma and other lymphoblastoid cell lines.. J Natl Cancer Inst 1970 Apr;44(4):865-72.
          pubmed: 11515054
        2. Klemola E, Kääriäinen L. Cytomegalovirus as a possible cause of a disease resembling infectious mononucleosis.. Br Med J 1965 Nov 6;2(5470):1099-102.
          pubmed: 4284491doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5470.1099google scholar: lookup
        3. Henle G, Henle W. Immunofluorescence in cells derived from Burkitt's lymphoma.. J Bacteriol 1966 Mar;91(3):1248-56.
          pubmed: 4160230doi: 10.1128/jb.91.3.1248-1256.1966google scholar: lookup
        4. Klemola E, Kääriäinen L, von Essen R, Haltia K, Koivuniemi A, von Bonsdorff CH. Further studies on cytomegalovirus mononucleosis in previously healthy individuals.. Acta Med Scand 1967 Sep;182(3):311-22.
        5. Niederman JC, McCollum RW, Henle G, Henle W. Infectious mononucleosis. Clinical manifestations in relation to EB virus antibodies.. JAMA 1968 Jan 15;203(3):205-9.
          pubmed: 4864269doi: 10.1001/jama.203.3.205google scholar: lookup
        6. Epstein MA, Achong BG. Observations on the nature of the herpes-type EB virus in cultured Burkitt lymphoblasts, using a specific immunofluorescence test.. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968 Mar;40(3):609-21.
          pubmed: 4296211
        7. Evans AS, Niederman JC, McCollum RW. Seroepidemiologic studies of infectious mononucleosis with EB virus.. N Engl J Med 1968 Nov 21;279(21):1121-7.
          pubmed: 4879667doi: 10.1056/NEJM196811212792101google scholar: lookup
        8. Lee CL, Zandrew F, Davidsohn I. Horse agglutinins in infectious mononueleosis. 3. riterion for differential diagnosis.. J Clin Pathol 1968 Sep;21(5):631-4.
          pubmed: 5697368doi: 10.1136/jcp.21.5.631google scholar: lookup
        9. Pope JH, Horne MK, Wetters EJ. Significance of a complement-fixing antigen associated with herpes-like virus and detected in the Raji cell line.. Nature 1969 Apr 12;222(5189):186-7.
          pubmed: 4304930doi: 10.1038/222186a0google scholar: lookup
        10. Klemola E, von Essen R, Wager O, Haltia K, Koivuniemi A, Salmi I. Cytomegalovirus mononucleosis in previously healthy individuals. Five new cases and follow-up of 13 previously published cases.. Ann Intern Med 1969 Jul;71(1):11-9.
          pubmed: 4307178doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-71-1-11google scholar: lookup
        11. Strannegård O, Holm SE, Hermodsson S, Norrby R, Lycke E. Case of apparent reinfection with rubella.. Lancet 1970 Jan 31;1(7640):240-1.
          pubmed: 4189032doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90595-7google scholar: lookup
        12. Joncas J, Mitnyan C. Serological response of the EBV antibodies in pediatric cases of infectious mononucleosis and in their contacts.. Can Med Assoc J 1970 Jun 6;102(12):1260-3.
          pubmed: 4315636
        13. Ogra PL, Kerr-Grant D, Umana G, Dzierba J, Weintraub D. Antibody response in serum and nasopharynx after naturally acquired and vaccine-induced infection with rubella virus.. N Engl J Med 1971 Dec 9;285(24):1333-9.
          pubmed: 4107718doi: 10.1056/NEJM197112092852401google scholar: lookup
        14. Henle G, Henle W, Klein G. Demonstration of two distinct components in the early antigen complex of Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells.. Int J Cancer 1971 Sep 15;8(2):272-82.
          pubmed: 4332368doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910080212google scholar: lookup
        15. Gerber P. Activation of Epstein-Barr virus by 5-bromodeoxyuridine in "virus-free" human cells (complement-fixing antigen-immunofluorescence-leukocytes).. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1972 Jan;69(1):83-5.
          pubmed: 4550512doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.83google scholar: lookup
        16. Henle W, Henle G, Niederman JC, Klemola E, Haltia K. Antibodies to early antigens induced by Epstein-Barr virus in infectious mononucleosis.. J Infect Dis 1971 Jul;124(1):58-67.
          pubmed: 4335450doi: 10.1093/infdis/124.1.58google scholar: lookup
        17. Hanshaw JB, Niederman JC, Chessin LN. Cytomegalovirus macroglobulin in cell-associated herpesvirus infections.. J Infect Dis 1972 Mar;125(3):304-6.
          pubmed: 4335794doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.3.304google scholar: lookup
        18. Banatvala JE, Best JM, Waller DK. Epstein-Barr virus-specific IgM in infectious mononucleosis, Burkitt lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma.. Lancet 1972 Jun 3;1(7762):1205-8.
          pubmed: 4113190doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90925-7google scholar: lookup
        19. Joncas JH. Clinical significance of the EB herpesvirus infection in man.. Prog Med Virol 1972;14:200-40.
          pubmed: 4338189
        20. Schmitz H, Scherer M. IgM antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in infectious mononucleosis.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1972;37(4):332-9.
          pubmed: 4339106doi: 10.1007/BF01241456google scholar: lookup
        21. Joncas J, Boucher J, Boudreault A, Granger-Julien M. Effect of hydrocortisone on cell viability, Epstein-Barr virus genome expression, and interferon synthesis in human lymphoblastoid cell lines.. Cancer Res 1973 Sep;33(9):2142-8.
          pubmed: 4353485
        22. Jordan MC, Rousseau W, Stewart JA, Noble GR, Chin TD. Spontaneous cytomegalovirus mononucleosis. Clinical and laboratory observations in nine cases.. Ann Intern Med 1973 Aug;79(2):153-60.
          pubmed: 4353663doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-79-2-153google scholar: lookup
        23. Reedman BM, Klein G. Cellular localization of an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated complement-fixing antigen in producer and non-producer lymphoblastoid cell lines.. Int J Cancer 1973 May;11(3):499-520.
          pubmed: 4133943doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910110302google scholar: lookup
        24. DAVIDSOHN I, LEE CL. The laboratory in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis, with additional notes on epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis.. Med Clin North Am 1962 Jan;46:225-44.
          pubmed: 13883779doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)33758-0google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Joncas JH, Wills A, Reece E, Fox Z. Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia and other immunodeficiency diseases.. Can Med Assoc J 1981 Oct 15;125(8):845-9.
          pubmed: 6272957
        2. Joncas JH, Granger-Julien M, Gervais F. Improved Epstein-Barr virus immunoglobulin M antibody test.. J Clin Microbiol 1975 Feb;1(2):192-5.
          doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.192-195.1975pubmed: 170305google scholar: lookup