Analyze Diet
Annual review of physiology1993; 55; 547-569; doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002555

Limits to maximal performance.

Abstract: Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (alpha Mb-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (alpha Mb0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (alpha Mb-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to VO2max can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. VO2max is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.
Publication Date: 1993-01-01 PubMed ID: 8466184DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002555Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores how body size affects the maximum speed and performance in mammals. The study indicates that different-sized animals produce differing results based on whether measurements are made on a relative or absolute scale. The paper also suggests that smaller animals have a higher cost of transport than larger ones.

Body Size and Locomotor Performance

  • The research posits that body size plays a significant role in determining the maximum speed and performance of mammals. This is because numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and elastic energy storage during locomotion change with different body sizes.
  • Comparing performances of different-sized animals may yield varying results depending on whether the measurement scales used are relative or absolute. Absolute speed seems to be a reliable method for animals whose survival depends on evading predators in real-time.

Metabolic Power and Body Size

  • The comparison of metabolic power in animals of differing sizes needs to consider the mass-specific basis. Small mammals tend to have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis and higher specific aerobic capacities compared to their larger counterparts.
  • The research suggests that the energetic cost of locomotion is typically more expensive for smaller mammals than larger ones, explaining why smaller animals generally run slower than larger ones. This difference is attributed to the higher ratio of cost to available power in smaller mammals.

Maximal Aerobic Capacity and Body Size

  • The maximum aerobic capacity is related to the body size of mammals. Limits to VO2max can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, illustrated by goats, or by the oxygen transport system, shown in humans and horses.
  • No single step in the oxygen transport system can limit the oxygen flow itself. However, in an average non-athletic mammal species, any step in the transport system might appear as the weakest link.
  • In highly aerobic athletic species and potentially elite athletic individuals in other species, like humans, the flexible elements of the oxygen transport system might develop to such an extent that their oxygen transport capacities approach that of the least flexible element in the system, such as the lung.
  • The study notes that maximum oxygen consumption is very high in these individuals and seems to be limited by the simultaneous failure of all components of the oxygen transport system.

Cite This Article

APA
Jones JH, Lindstedt SL. (1993). Limits to maximal performance. Annu Rev Physiol, 55, 547-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002555

Publication

ISSN: 0066-4278
NlmUniqueID: 0370600
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 55
Pages: 547-569

Researcher Affiliations

Jones, J H
  • Department of Physiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
Lindstedt, S L

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Exercise / physiology
    • Humans
    • Physical Endurance / physiology
    • Physical Exertion / physiology
    • Running

    Grant Funding

    • R01 HL4196 / NHLBI NIH HHS

    References

    This article includes 112 references