Analyze Diet

Long-term methods and effects of remotely treating wildlife with immunocontraception.

Abstract: The development of sophisticated delivery equipment, as well as safer and more effective drugs, has made remote delivery of animal drugs a standard and readily available tool for wildlife professionals, veterinarians, ranchers, and animal control officers. In the 1980s, researchers began treating a wide variety of wildlife with injectable porcine zona pellucida immunocontraceptive vaccines. Remote delivery of immunocontraceptives has been proven effective at the individual and population level for wild horses and urban deer. However, it took only a short time at each study site to understand that each time an animal was treated with remotely delivered darts, it became more difficult to re-treat; researchers were required to adjust to the increased wariness of their targets. Multiyear vaccines will not reduce the need for researchers who can adapt to the many challenges of applying these nonlethal methods of population control in the field. Training, experience, and persistence are required for field personnel to adapt and develop new techniques for continued retreatment of previously treated free-ranging animals.
Publication Date: 2014-01-21 PubMed ID: 24437095DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S138Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the use of immunocontraception in wildlife population control, focussed on the challenges associated with re-treatment of wild horses and urban deer.

Study Overview

In the paper, the authors talk about how remote delivery has been used for treating animals since the 1980s, primarily using injectable porcine zona pellucida immunocontraceptive vaccines. The key focus of the study revolves around examining the impact and effectiveness of these treatments amongst wild horses and urban deer, two species of wildlife that have experienced successful population control through these means.

  • The article suggests that although the method has been proven to be effective at the individual and population level for these species, there are associated challenges.
  • Researchers found that immunocontraceptive treatments can result in animals developing increased wariness, making subsequent treatments difficult.

Application Challenges

The paper also touches upon some of the difficulties encountered when applying these population control methods. Treating animals remotely implies certain technical and methodological demands that require thorough preparation and training.

  • Researchers need to adapt to the evolving behaviours of the treated animals, which over time tend to become more wary and elusive.
  • These behavioural changes demand field personnel to continuously develop and adapt techniques to ensure the animal can be retreated successfully.

Need for Multiyear Vaccines and Skilled Personnel

While the paper mentions the development of multiyear vaccines, it also emphasises the requirement of skilled personnel to accomplish successful wildlife population control missions.

  • Multiyear vaccines provide a certain degree of convenience but do not completely offset the necessity of well-trained and experienced researchers.
  • Training, experience and persistence are underlined as essential attributes for field personnel to overcome the challenges associated with the application of immunocontraceptive methods.
  • For the continued retreatment of free-ranging animals, developing and adapting new techniques is a key to success in this field.

Cite This Article

APA
Naugle R, Grams K. (2014). Long-term methods and effects of remotely treating wildlife with immunocontraception. J Zoo Wildl Med, 44(4 Suppl), S138-S140. https://doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S138

Publication

ISSN: 1042-7260
NlmUniqueID: 8915208
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 4 Suppl
Pages: S138-S140

Researcher Affiliations

Naugle, Ricky
  • The Humane Society of the United States, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879, USA. rnaugle@humanesociety.org
Grams, Kayla
  • The Humane Society of the United States, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Wild
  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • Contraception, Immunologic / veterinary
  • Injections / instrumentation
  • Injections / methods
  • Injections / veterinary
  • Swine
  • Time Factors
  • Vaccines, Contraceptive / administration & dosage
  • Vaccines, Contraceptive / pharmacology
  • Zona Pellucida / immunology

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.