FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Frontiers in veterinary science2022; 9; 954046; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.954046

Low seroprevalence of equine piroplasmosis in horses exported from the Netherlands between 2015 and 2021.

Abstract: Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a tick-borne disease affecting horses, donkeys, mules and zebras, caused by the intracellular apicomplexan protozoa and . The geographical distribution of EP is closely related to the distribution of its vector tick species belonging to the genera of and . Since the discovery of ticks in 2007 and the first reported autochthonous cases in the South of the Netherlands in 2012, no data on the (sero)prevalence of EP in horses in the Netherlands have been reported and it remains unclear whether and have been able to establish themselves in the Netherlands. This study aims to give an update on the current status of EP in horses in the Netherlands using data from serological tests performed in the context of export and screening of 12,881 horses from 2015 through 2020. Horses were categorized as "Dutch," "Foreign," or "Unknown" based on microchip number. The overall seroprevalence of EP in Dutch horses was found to be 0.5% (95% exact CI [0.4-0.7]), compared to 1.9% (95% exact CI [1.3-2.6]) in horses in the category "Foreign" and 1.7% (95% exact CI [1.2-2.3]) in horses in the category "Unknown." In addition, the seroprevalence per country in the category "Foreign" ranged from 0% (0.95% exact CI [0-2.8]) for Ireland to 6.0% (0.95% exact CI [3.5-9.3]) for Spain. In light of the reports on the seroprevalence during the outbreak of autochthonous EP reported in 2012 and on seroprevalences of EP in other countries in Northwestern Europe, the seroprevalence of EP in horses exported from the Netherlands is very low. However, the higher seroprevalence of EP in horses from abroad warrants the need for the monitoring of EP, as tick vectors are present in the Netherlands and the import of horses from endemic areas increases the chances of EP becoming more prevalent in the Netherlands.
Copyright © 2022 Graham, van Kalsbeek, van der Goot and Koene.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-10-10 PubMed ID: 36299627PubMed Central: PMC9588945DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.954046Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the current prevalence of equine piroplasmosis, a tick-borne disease, in horses in the Netherlands. Using data from blood tests taken from over 12,000 horses between 2015 and 2020, the researchers observed a low rate of the disease in Dutch horses, highlighting a need for ongoing monitoring, particularly considering the presence of disease-carrying tick species in the country and the potential for disease spread from imported horses.

Research Background

  • Equine piroplasmosis (EP) is a disease seen in horses, donkeys, mules, and zebras, caused by two types of protozoa.
  • These organisms spread through tick species within certain geographical locations.
  • The Netherlands reported EP cases in 2012 but no prevalence data have been shared since then.
  • The purpose of this study was to assess the current status of EP in Dutch horses, with relevance to the export and screening of these animals.

Methods

  • Data was gathered from blood tests performed on 12,881 horses from 2015 to 2020.
  • Horses were classified as “Dutch,” “Foreign,” or “Unknown” based on their microchipped number.

Findings

  • The overall rate of EP in Dutch horses was discovered to be 0.5%.
  • Comparatively, the rate in “Foreign” horses was 4 times higher (1.9%), while “Unknown” horses had a rate of 1.7%.
  • Country-specific prevalence in the “Foreign” category ranged from 0% for Ireland to 6.0% for Spain.

Implications

  • Compared to previous reports and observations from other European countries, the prevalence of EP in Dutch horses is quite low.
  • However, the higher incidence in non-domestic horses indicates a need for continuous monitoring.
  • Since Netherlands has the tick species that can potentially spread the disease, imported horses from regions where the disease is endemic could increase the prevalence of EP in the country.

Cite This Article

APA
Graham H, van Kalsbeek P, van der Goot J, Koene MGJ. (2022). Low seroprevalence of equine piroplasmosis in horses exported from the Netherlands between 2015 and 2021. Front Vet Sci, 9, 954046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.954046

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 954046
PII: 954046

Researcher Affiliations

Graham, Heather
  • Department of Diagnostics and Crisis Organization, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.
van Kalsbeek, Paul
  • Department of Diagnostics and Crisis Organization, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.
van der Goot, Jeanet
  • Department of Diagnostics and Crisis Organization, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.
Koene, Miriam G J
  • Department of Bacteriology, Host Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. de Waal DT. Equine piroplasmosis: a review.. Br Vet J 1992 Jan-Feb;148(1):6-14.
    doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90061-5pubmed: 1551016google scholar: lookup
  2. Wise LN, Kappmeyer LS, Mealey RH, Knowles DP. Review of equine piroplasmosis.. J Vet Intern Med 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):1334-46.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12168pubmed: 24033559google scholar: lookup
  3. Allsopp MT, Lewis BD, Penzhorn BL. Molecular evidence for transplacental transmission of Theileria equi from carrier mares to their apparently healthy foals.. Vet Parasitol 2007 Sep 1;148(2):130-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.05.017pubmed: 17601669google scholar: lookup
  4. Onyiche TE, Suganuma K, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Thekisoe O. A Review on Equine Piroplasmosis: Epidemiology, Vector Ecology, Risk Factors, Host Immunity, Diagnosis and Control.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 May 16;16(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101736pmc: PMC6572709pubmed: 31100920google scholar: lookup
  5. Rothschild CM. Equine piroplasmosis. J Equine Vet Sci (2013) 33:497–508.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.03.189google scholar: lookup
  6. Grause JF, Ueti MW, Nelson JT, Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Bunn TO. Efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate in eliminating Theileria equi from experimentally infected horses.. Vet J 2013 Jun;196(3):541-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.025pubmed: 23199699google scholar: lookup
  7. Kumar S, Gupta AK, Pal Y, Dwivedi SK. In-vivo therapeutic efficacy trial with artemisinin derivative, buparvaquone and imidocarb dipropionate against Babesia equi infection in donkeys.. J Vet Med Sci 2003 Nov;65(11):1171-7.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.65.1171pubmed: 14665744google scholar: lookup
  8. Schwint ON, Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Kappmeyer LS, Hines MT, Cordes RT, Knowles DP, Scoles GA. Imidocarb dipropionate clears persistent Babesia caballi infection with elimination of transmission potential.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009 Oct;53(10):4327-32.
    doi: 10.1128/AAC.00404-09pmc: PMC2764191pubmed: 19620328google scholar: lookup
  9. Dautel H, Dippel C, Oehme R, Hartelt K, Schettler E. Evidence for an increased geographical distribution of Dermacentor reticulatus in Germany and detection of Rickettsia sp. RpA4.. Int J Med Microbiol 2006 May;296 Suppl 40:149-56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.013pubmed: 16524777google scholar: lookup
  10. Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Peña A, Kahl O, Lindgren E. Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in europe.. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009;2009:593232.
    doi: 10.1155/2009/593232pmc: PMC2648658pubmed: 19277106google scholar: lookup
  11. Nijhof AM, Bodaan C, Postigo M, Nieuwenhuijs H, Opsteegh M, Franssen L, Jebbink F, Jongejan F. Ticks and associated pathogens collected from domestic animals in the Netherlands.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2007 Winter;7(4):585-95.
    doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0130pubmed: 17979540google scholar: lookup
  12. Butler CM, Stout TE, Jongejan F, Werners AH, Houwers DJ. Classification of ticks collected from horses in the Netherlands in 2008–2009 and identification of the (zoonotic) agents they contain. Pferdeheilkunde (2016) 32:6.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160405google scholar: lookup
  13. Butler CM, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Stout TA, van der Kolk JH, Wollenberg Lv, Nielen M, Jongejan F, Werners AH, Houwers DJ. Prevalence of the causative agents of equine piroplasmosis in the South West of The Netherlands and the identification of two autochthonous clinical Theileria equi infections.. Vet J 2012 Aug;193(2):381-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.12.014pubmed: 22266019google scholar: lookup
  14. OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. (2021).
  15. Kappmeyer LS, Perryman LE, Hines SA, Baszler TV, Katz JB, Hennager SG, Knowles DP. Detection of equine antibodies to babesia caballi by recombinant B. caballi rhoptry-associated protein 1 in a competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. J Clin Microbiol 1999 Jul;37(7):2285-90.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.7.2285-2290.1999pmc: PMC85139pubmed: 10364599google scholar: lookup
  16. Scoles GA, Ueti MW. Vector ecology of equine piroplasmosis.. Annu Rev Entomol 2015 Jan 7;60:561-80.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021110pubmed: 25564746google scholar: lookup
  17. Jongejan F, Ringenier M, Putting M, Berger L, Burgers S, Kortekaas R, Lenssen J, van Roessel M, Wijnveld M, Madder M. Novel foci of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks infected with Babesia canis and Babesia caballi in the Netherlands and in Belgium.. Parasit Vectors 2015 Apr 17;8:232.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0841-2pmc: PMC4404102pubmed: 25889392google scholar: lookup
  18. Sprong H, Fonville M, Docters van Leeuwen A, Devillers E, Ibañez-Justicia A, Stroo A, Hansford K, Cull B, Medlock J, Heyman P, Cochez C, Weis L, Silaghi C, Moutailler S. Detection of pathogens in Dermacentor reticulatus in northwestern Europe: evaluation of a high-throughput array.. Heliyon 2019 Feb;5(2):e01270.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01270pmc: PMC6401523pubmed: 30891514google scholar: lookup
  19. Uiterwijk M, Ibáñez-Justicia A, van de Vossenberg B, Jacobs F, Overgaauw P, Nijsse R, Dabekaussen C, Stroo A, Sprong H. Imported Hyalomma ticks in the Netherlands 2018-2020.. Parasit Vectors 2021 May 7;14(1):244.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04738-xpmc: PMC8106226pubmed: 33962655google scholar: lookup
  20. Tirosh-Levy S, Gottlieb Y, Fry LM, Knowles DP, Steinman A. Twenty Years of Equine Piroplasmosis Research: Global Distribution, Molecular Diagnosis, and Phylogeny.. Pathogens 2020 Nov 8;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110926pmc: PMC7695325pubmed: 33171698google scholar: lookup
  21. Coultous RM, Phipps P, Dalley C, Lewis J, Hammond TA, Shiels BR, Weir W, Sutton DGM. Equine piroplasmosis status in the UK: an assessment of laboratory diagnostic submissions and techniques.. Vet Rec 2019 Jan 19;184(3):95.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104855pubmed: 30413675google scholar: lookup
  22. Sigg L, Gerber V, Gottstein B, Doherr MG, Frey CF. Seroprevalence of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in the Swiss horse population.. Parasitol Int 2010 Sep;59(3):313-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.02.005pubmed: 20178863google scholar: lookup
  23. Coultous RM, Leadon DP, Shiels BR, Sutton D, Weir W. Investigating the presence of equine piroplasmosis in Ireland.. Vet Rec 2020 Nov 28;187(11):e97.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105937pubmed: 32887846google scholar: lookup
  24. Pikalo J. Vorkommen von Antikörpern gegen Babesia caballi und Theileria equi bei Pferden in Mitteldeutschland. Pferdeheilkunde (2016) 32:6.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160309google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Duaso J, Perez-Ecija A, Navarro A, Martínez E, De Las Heras A, Mendoza FJ. True Prevalence and Seroprevalence of Piroplasmosis in Horses in Southwestern Europe. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 11;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142047pubmed: 40723509google scholar: lookup
  2. Duaso J, Perez-Ecija A, Navarro A, Martínez E, De Las Heras A, Mendoza FJ. Evaluation of Blood Biochemical Parameters and Ratios in Piroplasmosis-Infected Horses in an Endemic Region. Vet Sci 2025 Jul 5;12(7).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12070643pubmed: 40711303google scholar: lookup
  3. Duaso J, Perez-Ecija A, Martínez E, Navarro A, De Las Heras A, Mendoza FJ. Assessment of Common Hematologic Parameters and Novel Hematologic Ratios for Predicting Piroplasmosis Infection in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 20;15(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15101485pubmed: 40427362google scholar: lookup
  4. Mendoza FJ, Pérez-Écija A, Kappmeyer LS, Suarez CE, Bastos RG. New insights in the diagnosis and treatment of equine piroplasmosis: pitfalls, idiosyncrasies, and myths. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1459989.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459989pubmed: 39205808google scholar: lookup
  5. Axt CW, Springer A, Strube C, Jung C, Naucke TJ, Müller E, Schäfer I. Molecular and Serological Detection of Vector-Borne Pathogens Responsible for Equine Piroplasmosis in Europe between 2008 and 2021. Microorganisms 2024 Apr 17;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040816pubmed: 38674760google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.