Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine1996; 10(5); 326-329; doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02071.x

Magnetic motor evoked potentials in ponies.

Abstract: Magnetic stimulation of motor pathways was used to effect motor unit action potential recordings from forelimb and hindlimb muscles in unanesthetized ponies. Motor pathway conduction velocities to the forelimb and hindlimb were determined to be 53.8 +/- 9.6 m/s-1 and 63.4 +/- 8.3 m/s-1, respectively. This noninvasive technique will enable more precise evaluation of motor deficits in clinical patients than is possible with the neurological examination.
Publication Date: 1996-09-01 PubMed ID: 8884720DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02071.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study applies magnetic stimulation to create motor unit action potential readings from the fore and hind limbs of conscious ponies. The researchers have found that this non-invasive technique delivers more detailed evaluations of motor deficiencies than traditional neurological examinations.

Comprehensive Explanation of the Research Paper

  • This research paper focuses on mapping the magnetic motor evoked potentials in ponies via noninvasive means. By stimulating the motor pathways using a magnetic field, the researchers were able to record motor unit action potentials from the ponies’ forelimb and hindlimb muscles. These ponies were unanesthetized, meaning they were conscious during the entire procedure.
  • The primary goal was to measure motor pathway conduction velocities, essentially, the speed at which electrical signals travel along the motor pathways in the ponies’ bodies. The researchers found that these speeds were approximately 53.8 m/s for the forelimbs and 63.4 m/s for the hindlimbs.
  • One of the primary benefits of this technique, as stated in the abstract, is that it’s noninvasive, therefore reducing any potential harm or discomfort to the animals. This method also negates the need for anaesthesia, which could potentially introduce variables that might interfere with the results.
  • Another major advantage of this method is its accuracy. The researchers state that this technique could allow for more precise evaluation of motor deficits in clinical patients. This precision surpasses what is usually possible with a standard neurological examination.
  • In conclusion, this research provided valuable insights into the use and benefits of magnetic stimulation in mapping motor evoked potentials. The technique outlined in this study is not only noninvasive and safe but is also more effective in diagnosing motor deficits, ultimately increasing the utility of clinical evaluations for such issues in veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Mayhew IG, Washbourne JR. (1996). Magnetic motor evoked potentials in ponies. J Vet Intern Med, 10(5), 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02071.x

Publication

ISSN: 0891-6640
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 5
Pages: 326-329

Researcher Affiliations

Mayhew, I G
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Washbourne, J R

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Evoked Potentials, Motor
    • Forelimb / innervation
    • Frontal Lobe / physiology
    • Frontal Lobe / radiation effects
    • Hindlimb / innervation
    • Horses / physiology
    • Magnetics
    • Muscle, Skeletal / innervation
    • Neural Conduction

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Journée SL, Journée HL, Berends HI, Reed SM, Bergmann W, de Bruijn CM, Delesalle CJG. Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses. Front Neurosci 2022;16:851463.
      doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.851463pubmed: 35573305google scholar: lookup
    2. Journée SL, Journée HL, Berends HI, Reed SM, de Bruijn CM, Delesalle CJG. Comparison of Muscle MEPs From Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation and Appearance of Reflexes in Horses. Front Neurosci 2020;14:570372.
      doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.570372pubmed: 33122992google scholar: lookup
    3. Journée SL, Journée HL, Reed SM, Berends HI, de Bruijn CM, Delesalle CJG. Extramuscular Recording of Spontaneous EMG Activity and Transcranial Electrical Elicited Motor Potentials in Horses: Characteristics of Different Subcutaneous and Surface Electrode Types and Practical Guidelines. Front Neurosci 2020;14:652.
      doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00652pubmed: 32765207google scholar: lookup
    4. Journée SL, Journée HL, de Bruijn CM, Delesalle CJG. Multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation (TES): normative data for motor evoked potentials in healthy horses. BMC Vet Res 2018 Apr 3;14(1):121.
      doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1447-7pubmed: 29615034google scholar: lookup
    5. Journée SL, Journée HL, Bergmann W, Chantziaras I, Vanderperren K, Raes E, Reed SM, de Bruijn CM, Berends HI, Delesalle CJG. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess neuronal functional integrity in horses. Front Neurosci 2024;18:1342803.
      doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1342803pubmed: 38665290google scholar: lookup