Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint.
Abstract: To improve understanding of the interrelationships between injuries of the podotrochlear apparatus and deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT). Objective: There is a difference in frequency of different types of lesions at different anatomical sites of the DDFT. Lesions of the collateral sesamoidean ligament (CSL), distal sesamoidean impar ligament (DSIL), distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and navicular bursa are seen in association with lesions of the navicular bone. Methods: The magnetic resonance (MR) images of 264 horses with unilateral or bilateral foot pain were analysed and graded. Descriptive statistics were performed to establish the frequency of occurrence of DDFT lesion types at different anatomical levels, and lesions of the CSL, DSIL, navicular bursa, DIP joint and collateral ligaments (CLs) of the DIP joint. A Chi-square test was used to test for a difference in the proportion of navicular bone grades between limbs with and without DDFT lesions at each level, and to compare navicular bone grades for limbs with and without each of DSIL, CSL, navicular bursa or DIP joint lesions. Results: Lesions of the DDFT occurred in 82.6% of limbs, occurring most commonly at the level of the CSL (59.4%) and the navicular bone (59.0%). Core lesions predominated at the level of the proximal phalanx (90.3%), whereas at the level of the CSL and navicular bone core lesions, sagittal splits and dorsal abrasions were most common. There was a positive association between DDFT lesions and navicular bone pathology involving all aspects of the bone. Lesions of the DSIL (38.2% limbs) were more common than those of the CSL (10.5%), but the presence of either was associated with abnormalities of the navicular bone, especially involving the proximal or distal borders and the medulla. Conclusions: There are close interactions between injuries of the components of the podotrochlear apparatus, the DDFT, the navicular bursa and the DIP joint. Further knowledge about the biomechanical risk factors for injury may have importance for both disease prevention and management.
Publication Date: 2007-08-29 PubMed ID: 17722726DOI: 10.2746/042516407x185566Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study examines the link between injuries of the podotrochlear apparatus and deep digital flexor tendon in horses, using magnetic resonance imaging of 264 animals experiencing foot pain. The study seeks to understand the different types of injuries and their frequency across various parts of the tendon, revealing a positive association between such lesions and navicular bone damage.
Methodology
- The study used magnetic resonance imaging to analyze the feet of 264 horses which were either experiencing pain in one or both feet. The intent was to accurately diagnose their condition and grade the extent of the damage.
- Statistical analysis was performed to determine the frequency of various types of lesions occurring at different anatomical locations.
- The study further examined the collateral sesamoidean ligaments, distal sesamoidean impar ligament, navicular bursa, distal interphalangeal joint, and collateral ligaments alongside the investigation into DDFT lesions.
- A chi-square test was used to compare the navicular bone grades between limbs with and without DDFT lesions at each level. It was also used to compare navicular bone grades for limbs with and without each of DSIL, CSL, navicular bursa, or DIP joint lesions.
Results
- DDFT lesions were found in 82.6% of the limbs studied, most commonly occurring at the level of the collateral sesamoidean ligament (59.4%) and the navicular bone (59.0%).
- The type of lesion varied depending on the anatomical location. Core lesions were most common at the proximal phalanx level, while the level of the CSL and navicular bone saw a mixture of core lesions, sagittal splits, and dorsal abrasions.
- There was a significant relationship identified between the presence of DDFT lesions and navicular bone pathology involving all aspects of the bone.
- Lesions were more frequently observed in DSIL (38.2% of limbs) than CSL (10.5%). The occurrence of either DSIL or CSL lesions was linked to abnormalities in the navicular bone, especially involving the proximal or distal borders and the medulla.
Conclusion
- From the findings, the research concluded that there exists a close connection between the injuries on the podotrochlear apparatus, the DDFT, the navicular bursa, and the DIP joint.
- The study’s findings are important in the context of understanding the biomechanical risk factors for injury, which could help in both prevention and management of such diseases.
Cite This Article
APA
Dyson S, Murray R.
(2007).
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint.
Equine Vet J, 39(4), 340-343.
https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x185566 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Centre for Equine Studies, Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7UU, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Collateral Ligaments / pathology
- Foot Diseases / diagnosis
- Foot Diseases / pathology
- Foot Diseases / veterinary
- Hoof and Claw / pathology
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horse Diseases / pathology
- Horses
- Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
- Lameness, Animal / etiology
- Lameness, Animal / pathology
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
- Pain / etiology
- Pain / veterinary
- Severity of Illness Index
- Tendons / pathology
- Toe Joint / pathology
Citations
This article has been cited 9 times.- Barrett MF, Goorchenko GE, Frisbie DD. Comparison of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Identifying Soft Tissue Abnormalities in the Palmar Aspect of the Equine Digit.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 17;13(14).
- Trolinger-Meadows KD, Biedrzycki AH, He H, Werpy N. Three-Dimensional Segmentation and in silico Comparison of Equine Deep Digital Flexor Tendon Pathology in Horses Undergoing Repeated MRI Examination.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:706046.
- Evrard L, Joostens Z, Vandersmissen M, Audigié F, Busoni V. Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Podotrochlear Apparatus of Horses With Foot Pain.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:675180.
- Osborn ML, Cornille JL, Blas-Machado U, Uhl EW. The equine navicular apparatus as a premier enthesis organ: Functional implications.. Vet Surg 2021 May;50(4):713-728.
- van Zadelhoff C, Schwarz T, Smith S, Engerand A, Taylor S. Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:508.
- Ribitsch I, Gueltekin S, Keith MF, Minichmair K, Peham C, Jenner F, Egerbacher M. Age-related changes of tendon fibril micro-morphology and gene expression.. J Anat 2020 Apr;236(4):688-700.
- Seghrouchni M, Elkasraoui H, Piro M, Alyakine H, Bouayad H, Chakir J, Tligui N, Elallali K, Azrib R. Osteoarticular radiographic findings of the distal forelimbs in Tbourida Horses.. Heliyon 2019 Sep;5(9):e02514.
- Evrard L, Audigié F, Bertoni L, Jacquet S, Denoix JM, Busoni V. Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions.. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0211101.
- White NA 2nd, Barrett JG. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Treatment of Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Collateral Ligaments: 2009-2014.. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:73.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists