Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2024; 56(6); 1193-1200; doi: 10.1111/evj.14202

Management of paracondylar process fracture in three horses.

Abstract: Fractures of the paracondylar process of the occipital bone may cause headshaking, neck pain and neurologic deficits. The condition is being recognised more frequently with increasing availability of computed tomography. However, to date only limited information is available as to presentation, treatment, surgical approach and outcome. Objective: To describe the clinical signs, imaging findings, treatment, surgical approach and outcome in three horses diagnosed with paracondylar process fracture. Methods: Retrospective case series. Methods: Clinical records and diagnostic images of affected cases were reviewed. Results: Two cases had ventral nonunion fractures-one of these presented with neck pain, headshaking and behavioural changes, while in the other the fracture was a suspected incidental finding in a case of poor performance. A third case with a more dorsal fracture presented with acute facial nerve paralysis. Diagnosis was by computed tomography in all cases, although imaging of ventral fractures by radiography was found to be feasible. Where clinical signs could be associated confidently with the fracture, conservative management resulted in improvement but not complete resolution. Repeated recurrence of clinical signs after prolonged periods of remission necessitated surgical removal in one case, which was readily accomplished with the aid of ultrasound guidance, and led to rapid resolution of clinical signs without significant post-operative complications. The surgical approach is described. Conclusions: Limited follow-up was available. Conclusions: Paracondylar process fracture should be considered as a differential diagnosis for headshaking, neck pain, poor performance and facial paresis, and is a justification for performing computed tomography in such cases. A multi-disciplinary approach is beneficial due to the potential for orthopaedic, neurologic, ophthalmologic and behavioural clinical signs, with additional need for expertise in diagnostic imaging and pain management. Surgical fragment removal should be considered for ventral fractures.
Publication Date: 2024-07-18 PubMed ID: 39023084DOI: 10.1111/evj.14202Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the management treatment of paracondylar process fractures in horses, a condition causing headshaking, neck pain, and neurologic deficits. The study describes the clinical signs, diagnostic findings, and treatment approaches used in three specific cases.

Objective & Methodology

The main goal of the research was to offer a detailed description of the symptoms, diagnosis findings, treatment strategies and possible outcomes in three specific horses diagnosed with paracondylar process fractures. This study was based on retrospectively reviewing clinical records and diagnostic images of affected cases.

Findings & Results

  • Two horses in the study showed ventral nonunion fractures, which means the fractures were not joining together as they should for proper healing. One horse displayed symptoms such as headshaking, neck pain, and behavioral changes. In contrast, it was suspected the fracture was an unrelated finding in the other horse showing poor performance.
  • A third horse diagnosed with a more dorsal fracture (located towards the back) displayed acute facial nerve paralysis.
  • The study utilized computed tomography (CT scan) for all cases to diagnose the paracondylar process fractures. Interestingly, ventral fractures could also be identified via radiography (X-rays).
  • When it was possible to directly correlate clinical signs with the fractures, conservative management led to symptom improvement, but symptoms remained unresolved.
  • One horse required surgical removal of the fracture due to repeated recurrence of symptoms, leading to quick symptom resolution without significant post-operative complications.

Surgical Approach & Conclusion

The researchers provide a description of the surgical approach employed in the study. However, the limited availability of follow-up data is acknowledged. They conclude by noting that paracondylar process fracture should be considered a potential cause in cases of headshaking, neck pain, poor performance, and facial paresis in horses. Further, they justify the use of CT scans in the diagnosis. The research suggests that a team of experts spanning multiple disciplines – including orthopedics, neurology, ophthalmology and behavior studies – is beneficial for managing this condition due to its array of potential clinical signs and necessary diagnostic imaging and pain management. In cases of ventral fractures, the study advocates considering surgical fragment removal.

Cite This Article

APA
Beldeanu S, Tay MCA, Daniel C, Dosi MCM, Hahn CN, James O, Townsend NB, Liuti T, Schwarz T, Parkinson NJ. (2024). Management of paracondylar process fracture in three horses. Equine Vet J, 56(6), 1193-1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14202

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 56
Issue: 6
Pages: 1193-1200

Researcher Affiliations

Beldeanu, Sabina
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tay, M C Aaron
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Daniel, Carola
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dosi, Miranda C M
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Hahn, Caroline N
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
James, Oliver
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Townsend, Neil B
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liuti, Tiziana
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Schwarz, Tobias
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Parkinson, Nicholas J
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / injuries
  • Animals
  • Male
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary

References

This article includes 17 references
  1. Ragle CA. Head trauma. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1993;9(1):171–183.
  2. Tremaine H. Management of skull fractures in the horse. In Pract 2004;26(4):214–222.
    doi: 10.1136/inpract.26.4.214google scholar: lookup
  3. Lischer CJ, Walliser U, Witzmann P, Wehrli Eser M, Ohlerth S. Fracture of the paracondylar process in four horses: advantages of CT imaging. Equine Vet J 2005;37(5):483–487.
  4. Freiwein JWK, Wilkens H. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere. Band I Bewegungsapparat. 6th ed. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke; 1992.
  5. Getty R. Sisson and Grossman's the anatomy of the domestic mammals. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: W.B. Saunders; 1975.
  6. International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. 6th ed. Hannover (Germany), Ghent (Belgium), Columbia, MO (U.S.A.), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): World Association of Veterinary Anatomists; 2017.
  7. Schaller O. Illustrated veterinary anatomic nomenclature. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke; 1992.
  8. Fairburn AJ, Meehan LJ, Roberts VLH. Computed tomographic findings in 101 horses presented for the investigation of headshaking. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35(4):e339–e345.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13718google scholar: lookup
  9. Perrier M, Manso‐Díaz G, Dunkel B. Computed tomography findings in horses presented with signs of head‐shaking. Equine Vet J 2023;55(4):649–655.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13889google scholar: lookup
  10. Boorman S, Scherrer NM, Stefanovski D, Johnson AL. Facial nerve paralysis in 64 equids: clinical variables, diagnosis, and outcome. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34(3):1308–1320.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15767google scholar: lookup
  11. Pfister BJ, Gordon T, Loverde JR, Kochar AS, Mackinnon SE, Cullen DK. Biomedical engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair: surgical applications, state of the art, and future challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2011;39(2):81–124.
  12. Bregger MDK, Koch C, Zimmermann R, Sangiorgio D, Schweizer‐Gorgas D. Cone‐beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids. BMC Vet Res 2019;15(1):289.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2045-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  13. Morrow KL, Park RD, Spurgeon TL, Stashak TS, Arceneaux B. Computed tomographic imaging of the equine head. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41(6):491–497.
  14. Ramirez O III, Jorgensen JS, Thrall DE. Imaging basilar skull fractures in the horse: a review. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39(5):391–395.
  15. Piat P, Cadoré J‐L. Endoscopic anatomy of the equine guttural pouch: an anatomic observational study. Vet Sci 2023;10(9):542.
  16. Terry RL, McDonnell SM, Van Eps AW, Soma LR, Liu Y, Uboh CE. Pharmacokinetic profile and behavioral effects of gabapentin in the horse. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2010;33(5):485–494.
  17. Young JM, Schoonover MJ, Kembel SL, Taylor JD, Bauck AG, Gilliam LL. Efficacy of orally administered gabapentin in horses with chronic thoracic limb lameness. Vet Anaesth Analg 2020;47(2):259–266.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.11.003google scholar: lookup