Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in endurance horses.
Abstract: Alteration of limb sensitivity is forbidden in equine sports but difficult to enforce. We aimed to develop an objective field method to assess mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) in endurance horses. Methods: A remotely controlled pneumatic actuator (1 mm tip) was used to measure forelimb pastern MNT in 108 endurance horses. Results: Median (IQR) MNT at rest was 1.9 N (0.9-3.5). Icing had no significant effect on limb sensitivity. MNT measured at weekly intervals increased from week 1 (1.2 N (0.6-1.8)) to week 3 (1.9 N (1.2-2.8)) (P<0.05). In 17 horses without impaired sensitivity, MNT increased from 1.2 N (0.6-2.3) before to 2.4 N (1.2-5.2) after racing (P=0.0017). In desensitised horses, MNT after racing was higher (8 limbs-23.1 N (21.4 to >25)) than in horses without impaired sensitivity (42 limbs-2.2 N (1.2-4.3)) (P<0.0001). Desensitisation with mepivacaine increased MNT to above the safety cut-off (25 N) at 10 minutes; sensitivity return to baseline varied between individuals but was restored by 330 minutes. None of the horses became averse to the technique. Conclusions: MNT was practical, non-traumatic, repeatable and well tolerated under field conditions in endurance horses. The technique differentiated postracing MNT in horses with normal sensitivity from those with impaired sensitivity.
© British Veterinary Association 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Publication Date: 2019-09-28 PubMed ID: 31563891DOI: 10.1136/vr.105499Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The researchers designed a method to measure how much force it takes to cause discomfort or pain in endurance horses’ forelimbs, also known as the mechanical nociceptive threshold. They found this method viable, safe, and well-received by the horses, it could distinguish between horses with typical sensitivity and those with impaired sensitivity.
Objective and Methodology
- The study aimed at developing an objective method useful in the field to determine the mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) or measure of pain in endurance horses. The team used a remotely controlled pneumatic actuator with a 1 mm tip to measure this threshold on the forelimb pastern of 108 endurance horses.
Key Findings
- The median MNT at rest was 1.9 N (Newton – unit of force) with a range between 0.9 and 3.5 N. This indicates that when at rest, it took a median force of 1.9N to cause discomfort or pain to the horses.
- The study found that icing had no significant effect on limb sensitivity, which contradicts a common belief that ice can lessen sensitivity.
- MNT measured weekly increased from week 1 to week 3, showing an increase in the horse’s tolerance to force over time.
- In 17 horses which were observed to not have impaired sensitivity, the MNT increased after a race.
- In comparison, horses found to have unnaturally low sensitivity, MNT following a race was considerably higher. The researchers can infer that these horses had been artificially desensitised.
- Desensitisation with a drug called mepivacaine increased MNT to above the safety cut-off at 10 minutes. However, the sensitivity returned to baseline varied between individuals but recovered by 330 minutes.
- None of the horses became averse to the technique, indicating it was well-tolerated.
Conclusion
- The researchers found the technique for measuring MNT to be practical, non-traumatic, repeatable, and well-tolerated under field conditions with endurance horses.
- Moreover, it was effective at differentiating between horses with normal sensitivity and those with impaired sensitivity, which could be beneficial for enforcing rules against altering limb sensitivity in equine sports.
Cite This Article
APA
Schambourg M, Taylor PM.
(2019).
Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in endurance horses.
Vet Rec, 186(4), 124.
https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105499 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Warsan Stables, Abu Dhabi, AD, United Arab Emirates mschambourg@hotmail.com.
- Topcat Metrology/Taylor Monroe, Ely, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Female
- Horses
- Male
- Nociception
- Pain Threshold
- Sports
Conflict of Interest Statement
Competing interests: PMT is a director of Topcat Metrology.
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- Rettore Andreis F, Mørch CD, Jensen W, Meijs S. On determining the mechanical nociceptive threshold in pigs: a reliability study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023;4:1191786.
- Haussler KK. Pressure Algometry for the Detection of Mechanical Nociceptive Thresholds in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 24;10(12).
- Taylor P. Remote Controlled Nociceptive Threshold Testing Systems in Large Animals. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 2;10(9).
- Blum S, Gisler J, Dalla Costa E, Montavon S, Spadavecchia C. Investigating conditioned pain modulation in horses: can the lip-twitch be used as a conditioning stimulus?. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2024;5:1463688.
- Gisler J, Chiavaccini L, Blum S, Montavon S, Spadavecchia C. Pressure pain mapping of equine distal joints: feasibility and reliability. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2024;5:1342954.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists