Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2025; 239; 106490; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106490

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors of animal fascioliasis in Eastern and Southern Africa between 2000 and 2023.

Abstract: Fascioliasis is a zoonotic disease of public health and economic importance. It is caused by trematodes species Fasciola hepatica, and Fasciola gigantica. The parasites infest the liver particularly the bile ducts, and cause harm to the host. The economic loss to both dairy and meat industry is attributed to emaciation, reduction in milk production, death, infertility, and losses to liver condemnation. However, fascioliasis remains poorly studied and limited data is available to guide appropriate interventions especially in low- and middle-income countries. This paper aimed to review the prevalence and risk factors of animal fascioliasis in Eastern and Southern Africa between 2000 and 2023. Globally recognized databases including Science Direct, PubMed and Google scholar were used to search the related studies on fascioliasis conducted between 2000 and 2023 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A review of papers was done for risk factors of fascioliasis, and data was extracted. A total of 106 articles met the inclusion criteria, data was extracted, analyzed using meta package in R software (version 4.21), and presented both quantitatively and qualitatively. Forest plots at a 95 % confidence interval were generated to show the prevalence estimate of different subgroups and Cochran's Q statistic was used to measure the level of heterogeneity between studies. The prevalence estimates for different animal species in Eastern and Southern Africa were 47.5 % (95 % CI: 38.0-57.2 %) in mules, 23.3 % (95 % CI: 17.0-31.1 %) in sheep, 23.4 % (95 % CI: 19.2-28.2 %) in cattle, 23.2 % (95 % CI: 19.3-27.6 %) in donkeys, 12.2 % (95 % CI: 9.9-14.8 %) in horses, and 7.9 % (95 % CI: 5.4-11.5 %) in goats. These findings clearly demonstrate the high prevalence of fascioliasis in animals in Eastern and Southern Africa. We therefore recommend enhanced awareness and promotion of effective prevention measures for the Fasciola infection control to maximize benefits from livestock production.
Publication Date: 2025-03-01 PubMed ID: 40054336DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106490Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the prevalence and risk factors of animal fascioliasis in Eastern and Southern Africa from 2000 to 2023.
  • The research highlights the significant burden of fascioliasis across various livestock species in the region and the need for improved control measures.

Background

  • Fascioliasis is a zoonotic disease caused by two species of liver flukes: Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica.
  • The parasites primarily infest the liver, especially the bile ducts, causing damage that leads to clinical and economic consequences.
  • Economic losses include:
    • Emaciation of animals
    • Reduction in milk production
    • Death and infertility
    • Losses due to liver condemnation during meat inspection
  • Despite its impact, fascioliasis remains understudied in low- and middle-income countries, with sparse data to inform interventions.

Objective

  • To analyze and summarize the prevalence of fascioliasis in different animal species across Eastern and Southern Africa over the period 2000–2023.
  • To identify and review known risk factors associated with fascioliasis in the studied regions.

Methodology

  • A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted through databases including Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar.
  • Studies published between 2000 and 2023 relevant to animal fascioliasis in Eastern and Southern Africa were included.
  • A total of 106 eligible studies were identified and selected based on inclusion criteria.
  • Data extracted from these studies were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively using the R software meta package (version 4.21).
  • Prevalence estimates and confidence intervals were calculated, and forest plots were generated to visualize subgroup data.
  • The Cochran’s Q statistic was used to assess heterogeneity across studies.

Key Findings

  • The overall prevalence of fascioliasis varied by animal species, with the following estimates (with 95% confidence intervals):
    • Mules: 47.5% (38.0–57.2%) – highest prevalence observed
    • Sheep: 23.3% (17.0–31.1%)
    • Cattle: 23.4% (19.2–28.2%)
    • Donkeys: 23.2% (19.3–27.6%)
    • Horses: 12.2% (9.9–14.8%)
    • Goats: 7.9% (5.4–11.5%) – lowest prevalence observed
  • These prevalence rates underscore fascioliasis as a significant parasitic disease affecting a wide range of domestic animals in the region.
  • The study aggregated various risk factors, although specific factors were not detailed in the abstract, it typically includes environmental, management, and host-related factors identified from the literature.

Interpretation and Importance

  • The high prevalence in mules is notable and may indicate differences in husbandry practices, exposure, or biological susceptibility.
  • Moderate prevalence in common livestock such as cattle, sheep, and donkeys indicates sustained transmission and economic impact.
  • The relatively lower prevalence in goats and horses might reflect species-specific susceptibility or different management conditions.
  • These findings highlight the necessity of developing targeted control programs adapted to local epidemiological situations.

Recommendations

  • Increased awareness campaigns regarding fascioliasis and its impact should be promoted among livestock owners and veterinarians.
  • Implementation of effective prevention and control measures, including strategic deworming, improved management, and environmental interventions.
  • Further research is needed to better characterize risk factors and to develop context-appropriate, evidence-based interventions.
  • Policy support in low- and middle-income countries to allocate resources for fascioliasis control is essential to improve the productivity and welfare of livestock.

Cite This Article

APA
Nambuya S, Kalinda C, Vudriko P, Adriko M, Phiri M, Mindu T, Wagaba D, Mugisha L. (2025). Meta-analysis and systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors of animal fascioliasis in Eastern and Southern Africa between 2000 and 2023. Prev Vet Med, 239, 106490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106490

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 239
Pages: 106490
PII: S0167-5877(25)00075-3

Researcher Affiliations

Nambuya, Stellah
  • Research Centre for Tropical Diseases and Vector Control (RTC), Department of Veterinary Pharmacy, Clinic and Comparative Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda; National Animal Genetic Resource Centre and Data Bank, Plot 96-108, Nsamizi Road, P. O. BOX 183, Entebbe, Uganda.
Kalinda, Chester
  • Bill and Joyce Cummings Institute of Global Health, University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), 6955, Kigali 20093, Rwanda; Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Electronic address: ckalinda@ughe.org.
Vudriko, Patrick
  • Research Centre for Tropical Diseases and Vector Control (RTC), Department of Veterinary Pharmacy, Clinic and Comparative Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Adriko, Moses
  • Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Plot 15 Bombo Road, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda.
Phiri, Million
  • Department of Population Studies, University of Zambia, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Demography and Population Studies, Schools of Public Health and Social Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mindu, Tafadzwa
  • Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Wagaba, David
  • Department of Wildlife and Aquatic Resources, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Mugisha, Lawrence
  • Department of Wildlife and Aquatic Resources, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda; Eco Health Research Group, Conservation and Ecosystem Health Alliance (CEHA), Kampala, Uganda.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Fascioliasis / veterinary
  • Fascioliasis / epidemiology
  • Fascioliasis / parasitology
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Factors
  • Africa, Southern / epidemiology
  • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
  • Cattle Diseases / parasitology
  • Sheep Diseases / epidemiology
  • Sheep Diseases / parasitology
  • Africa, Eastern / epidemiology
  • Sheep
  • Cattle
  • Goat Diseases / epidemiology
  • Goat Diseases / parasitology
  • Fasciola hepatica
  • Goats
  • Horses

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competitive, financial or any other interest in this publication.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Wang H, Guo J, Chen X. Comparative Profiling of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Microbial Communities in Pig and Cow Dung from Rural China: Insights into Environmental Dissemination and Public Health Risks.. Biology (Basel) 2025 Nov 19;14(11).
    doi: 10.3390/biology14111623pubmed: 41300413google scholar: lookup