Analyze Diet

Methane output of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed a hay-only diet: implications for the scaling of methane production with body mass in non-ruminant mammalian herbivores.

Abstract: It is assumed that small herbivores produce negligible amounts of methane, but it is unclear whether this is a physiological peculiarity or simply a scaling effect. A respiratory chamber experiment was conducted with six rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus, 1.57±0.31 kg body mass) and six guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus, 0.79±0.07 kg) offered grass hay ad libitum. Daily dry matter (DM) intake and DM digestibility were 50±6 g kg⁻⁰·⁷⁵ d⁻¹ and 55±6% in rabbits and 59±11 g kg⁻⁰·⁷⁵ d⁻¹ and 61±3% in guinea pigs, respectively. Methane production was similar for both species (0.20±0.10 L d⁻¹ and 0.22±0.08L d⁻¹ and represented 0.69±0.32 and 1.03±0.29% of gross energy intake in rabbits and guinea pigs, respectively. In relation to body mass (BM) guinea pigs produced significantly more methane. The data on methane per unit of BM obtained in this study and from the literature on the methane output of elephant, wallabies and hyraxes all lay close to a regression line derived from roughage-fed horses, showing an increase in methane output with BM. The regression, including all data, was nearly identical to that based on the horse data only (methane production in horses [L d⁻¹]=0.18 BM [kg]⁰·⁹⁷(⁹⁵%CI ⁰·⁹²⁻¹·⁰²)) and indicates linear scaling. Because feed intake typically scales to BM⁰·⁷⁵, linear scaling of methane output translates into increasing energetic losses at increasing BM. Accordingly, the data collection indicates that an increasing proportion of ingested gross energy is lost because relative methane production increases with BM. Different from ruminants, such losses (1%-2% of gross energy) appear too small in non-ruminant herbivores to represent a physiologic constraint on body size. Nevertheless, this relationship may represent a physiological disadvantage with increasing herbivore body size.
Publication Date: 2010-10-30 PubMed ID: 20971203DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.10.019Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims at understanding the methane production of small non-ruminant herbivores, particularly rabbits and guinea pigs, and whether it correlates with their body mass. The findings suggest that the assumption about small herbivores producing a negligible amount of methane may not hold true, and highlight a possibility of increasing methane production with an increase in body mass in non-ruminant herbivores.

Experiment Details and Results

  • The study was conducted on six rabbits and six guinea pigs that were offered grass hay ad libitum in a respiratory chamber. Their body mass, food intake, digestion, and methane production were carefully monitored and recorded.
  • Daily dry matter intake and digestibility reflected similar patterns in both animals. While rabbits had numbers of 50±6 g kg⁻⁰·⁷⁵ d⁻¹ and 55±6%, guinea pigs stood at 59±11 g kg⁻⁰·⁷⁵ d⁻¹ and 61±3%, respectively.
  • Methane production in both species was closely matched. Rabbits produced 0.20±0.10 L d⁻¹ – or about 0.69±0.32% of their gross energy intake, while guinea pigs had slightly higher numbers at 0.22±0.08L d⁻¹ and 1.03±0.29% of their gross energy intake.

Comparative Study and Conclusions

  • When methane production was analyzed against body mass, guinea pigs were found to produce significantly more methane than rabbits.
  • Data from this study was compared with available literature on elephants, wallabies, and hyraxes’ methane output. A similar pattern was observed, suggesting an increase in methane output with an increase in body mass.
  • Analysis indicates a linear scaling between body mass (BM) and methane production. This suggests that more energy is lost in the form of methane as the body mass increases, implying that a larger proportion of the ingested gross energy is lost as the herbivore’s body size increases.
  • Compared to ruminants, the percentage of lost energy (1%-2% of gross energy) seems small in non-ruminant herbivores. However, this data could signify a physiological disadvantage with an increase in the herbivore’s body size.

Cite This Article

APA
Franz R, Soliva CR, Kreuzer M, Hummel J, Clauss M. (2010). Methane output of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed a hay-only diet: implications for the scaling of methane production with body mass in non-ruminant mammalian herbivores. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol, 158(1), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.10.019

Publication

ISSN: 1531-4332
NlmUniqueID: 9806096
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 158
Issue: 1
Pages: 177-181

Researcher Affiliations

Franz, Ragna
  • Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Soliva, Carla R
    Kreuzer, Michael
      Hummel, Jürgen
        Clauss, Marcus

          MeSH Terms

          • Animal Feed
          • Animals
          • Body Weight
          • Diet
          • Guinea Pigs / metabolism
          • Methane / biosynthesis
          • Methane / metabolism
          • Rabbits / metabolism
          • Regression Analysis
          • Species Specificity

          Citations

          This article has been cited 12 times.
          1. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.. Microorganisms 2022 Dec 19;10(12).
          2. Chen X, Fan L, Qiu L, Dong X, Wang Q, Hu G, Meng S, Li D, Chen J. Metagenomics Analysis Reveals Compositional and Functional Differences in the Gut Microbiota of Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, Grown on Two Different Culture Environments.. Front Microbiol 2021;12:735190.
            doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.735190pubmed: 34733252google scholar: lookup
          3. Liu S, Yuan M, Jin D, Wang Z, Zou H, Wang L, Xue B, Wu D, Tian G, Cai J, Yan T, Peng Q. Effects of the particle of ground alfalfa hay on the growth performance, methane production and archaeal populations of rabbits.. PLoS One 2018;13(9):e0203393.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203393pubmed: 30222733google scholar: lookup
          4. Tejada-Lara JV, MacFadden BJ, Bermudez L, Rojas G, Salas-Gismondi R, Flynn JJ. Body mass predicts isotope enrichment in herbivorous mammals.. Proc Biol Sci 2018 Jun 27;285(1881).
            doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1020pubmed: 30051854google scholar: lookup
          5. Codron D, Clauss M, Codron J, Tütken T. Within trophic level shifts in collagen-carbonate stable carbon isotope spacing are propagated by diet and digestive physiology in large mammal herbivores.. Ecol Evol 2018 Apr;8(8):3983-3995.
            doi: 10.1002/ece3.3786pubmed: 29721273google scholar: lookup
          6. Mi L, Yang B, Hu X, Luo Y, Liu J, Yu Z, Wang J. Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:575.
            doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00575pubmed: 29662480google scholar: lookup
          7. Yang C, Mi L, Hu X, Liu J, Wang J. Investigation into Host Selection of the Cecal Acetogen Population in Rabbits after Weaning.. PLoS One 2016;11(7):e0158768.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158768pubmed: 27379387google scholar: lookup
          8. Kieft TL, Simmons KA. Allometry of animal-microbe interactions and global census of animal-associated microbes.. Proc Biol Sci 2015 Jul 7;282(1810).
            doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0702pubmed: 26108631google scholar: lookup
          9. Miśta D, Króliczewska B, Marounek M, Pecka E, Zawadzki W, Nicpoń J. In vitro study and comparison of caecal methanogenesis and fermentation pattern in the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0117117.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117117pubmed: 25629411google scholar: lookup
          10. Bäuerl C, Collado MC, Zúñiga M, Blas E, Pérez Martínez G. Changes in cecal microbiota and mucosal gene expression revealed new aspects of epizootic rabbit enteropathy.. PLoS One 2014;9(8):e105707.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105707pubmed: 25147938google scholar: lookup
          11. Clauss M, Steuer P, Müller DW, Codron D, Hummel J. Herbivory and body size: allometries of diet quality and gastrointestinal physiology, and implications for herbivore ecology and dinosaur gigantism.. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e68714.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068714pubmed: 24204552google scholar: lookup
          12. Franz R, Soliva CR, Kreuzer M, Hatt JM, Furrer S, Hummel J, Clauss M. Methane output of tortoises: its contribution to energy loss related to herbivore body mass.. PLoS One 2011 Mar 9;6(3):e17628.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017628pubmed: 21408074google scholar: lookup