Analyze Diet
Journal of food protection1996; 59(4); 420-425; doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-59.4.420

Methods for the Detection of Trichinellosis in Horses.

Abstract: Twelve horses were infected with various doses of Trichinella spiralis and then tested for infection using direct (artificial digestion) and indirect (enzyme immunoassay) methods. Horses became infected in a dose-dependent manner. Larvae accumulated preferentially in the tongue, followed by the masseter, neck, supraspinatus, trapezius, and diaphragm. At lower infection levels, the tongue harbored several times more parasites than were found in other tissues. The sensitivity of artificial digestion methods for detecting infections was directly related to sample size. One-gram samples were not reliable for detecting infection levels of <3 larvae per g (LPG). In sample sizes of 5 or 10 g the technique allowed infections as low as 1 LPG to be detected. The enzyme immunoassay (EIA) detected all infected horses; the times following infection at which horses became seropositive varied in a dose-dependent manner, but 11 of 12 horses were positive in the EIA by 4 weeks postinoculation. One horse, with a larval density in the tongue of 0.39 LPG, did not become seropositive until 7 weeks postinoculation. The results suggest that artificial digestion of horse carcasses for trichinae should concentrate on tissue samples from the tongue or masseter muscles. Sample sizes should be a minimum of 5 g using pooled-sample digestion methods to assure detection of all infections which might pose a human health risk. The EIA is a potential substitute for artificial digestion methods and could also be useful for antemortem testing and for epidemiological studies.
Publication Date: 1996-04-01 PubMed ID: 31158990DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-59.4.420Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the effectiveness of two methods in detecting Trichinellosis, a parasitic disease, in horses. It concludes that both direct and indirect methods can detect the infection, with sensitivity related to sample size and the tongue identified as the most infected area of the horse’s body.

Research Methodology

  • The research involved infecting twelve horses with varying doses of Trichinella spiralis, a roundworm that causes Trichinellosis.
  • Direct and Indirect methods were then used to detect the presence of the infection. Direct methods involved artificial digestion while indirect methods utilized an enzyme immunoassay (EIA).

Findings from the Research

  • The findings revealed that infection in horses depends on the dosage of Trichinella spiralis they receive. As the dosage increases, so does the chance of infection in horses.
  • The study found larvae, the immature form of the roundworm, to preferentially accumulate in specific parts of a horse’s body. They were found most in the tongue, followed by the masseter (a jaw muscle), neck, supraspinatus (a shoulder muscle), trapezius (a neck and shoulder muscle), and the diaphragm.
  • At low infection levels, the tongue proved to be the most prominent host for the parasites compared to other body parts.

Efficacy of Detection Methods

  • The direct method of artificial digestion showed that reliability in detecting infections was tied to the sample size. Smaller samples of 1-gram didn’t prove reliable in detecting infection levels of less than 3 larvae per gram.
  • The larger samples, however, of 5 or 10 grams made it possible to detect infections as low as 1 larva per gram.
  • The indirect method: the EIA, successfully detected all infected horses. Moreover, the times following infections indicating positive results varied in a dose-dependent manner. By the fourth week post-inoculation, 11 out of 12 horses tested positive in the EIA.
  • One horse, which showed a larval density of 0.39 larvae per gram in the tongue, didn’t test seropositive for Trichinella until seven weeks post-inoculation.

Conclusion of the Study

  • Based on the research, artificial digestion of horse carcasses for checking trichinae infestation should specifically focus on tissue samples from the tongue or masseter muscles.
  • The recommended sample size for such tests should be at least 5 grams as smaller sample sizes may not detect all infections posing a human health risk.
  • The research positions the EIA as a potential replacement for the artificial digestion method. Furthermore, it may prove beneficial for testing before death (antemortem) and conducting epidemiological studies.

Cite This Article

APA
Gamble HR, Gajadhar AA, Solomon MB. (1996). Methods for the Detection of Trichinellosis in Horses. J Food Prot, 59(4), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-59.4.420

Publication

ISSN: 1944-9097
NlmUniqueID: 7703944
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 59
Issue: 4
Pages: 420-425

Researcher Affiliations

Gamble, H Ray
  • USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 1Parasite Biology and Epidemiology Laboratory.
Gajadhar, Alvin A
  • USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Health of Animals Laboratory; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Solomon, Morse B
  • USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 2Meat Science Research Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA.

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Scandrett B, Konecsni K, Lalonde L, Boireau P, Vallée I. Detection of natural Trichinella murrelli and Trichinella spiralis infections in horses by routine post-slaughter food safety testing. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2018 Jun;11:1-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2018.06.001pubmed: 32095599google scholar: lookup
  2. Dubey JP, Thompson PC, Fournet V, Hill DE, Zarlenga D, Gamble HR, Rosenthal BM. Over a century of progress on Trichinella research in pigs at the United States Department of Agriculture: Challenges and solutions. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2024 Sep;36:e00239.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2024.e00239pubmed: 39247629google scholar: lookup
  3. Yang Y, Cai YN, Tong MW, Sun N, Xuan YH, Kang YJ, Vallée I, Boireau P, Cheng SP, Liu MY. Serological tools for detection of Trichinella infection in animals and humans. One Health 2016 Dec;2:25-30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.11.005pubmed: 28616474google scholar: lookup
  4. Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009 Jan;22(1):127-45, Table of Contents.
    doi: 10.1128/CMR.00026-08pubmed: 19136437google scholar: lookup