Microbial populations vary between the upper and lower respiratory tract, but not within biogeographic regions of the lung of healthy horses.
Abstract: Understanding normal microbial populations within areas of the respiratory tract is essential, as variable regional conditions create different niches for microbial flora, and proliferation of commensal microbes likely contributes to clinical respiratory disease. The objective was to describe microbial population variability between respiratory tract locations in healthy horses. Samples were collected from four healthy adult horses by nasopharyngeal lavage (NPL), transtracheal aspirate (TTA), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of six distinct regions within the lung. Full-length 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing and microbial profiling analysis was performed. There was a large amount of diversity, with over 1797 ASVs identified, reduced to 94 taxa after tip agglomeration and prevalence filtering. Number of taxa and diversity were highly variable across horses, sample types, and BAL locations. Firmicutes, proteobacteria, and actinobacteria were the predominant phyla. There was a significant difference in richness (Chao1, p = 0.02) and phylogenetic diversity (FaithPD, p = 0.01) between NPL, TTA, and BAL. Sample type (p = 0.03) and horse (p = 0.005) contributed significantly to Bray-Curtis compositional diversity, while Weighted Unifrac metric was only affected by simplified sample type (NPL and TTA vs BAL, p = 0.04). There was no significant effect of BAL locations within the lung with alpha or beta diversity statistical tests. Overall findings support diverse microbial populations that were variable between upper and lower respiratory tract locations, but with no apparent difference in microbial populations of the six biogeographic regions of the lung, suggesting that BAL fluid obtained blindly by standard clinical techniques may be sufficient for future studies in healthy horses.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2024-06-27 PubMed ID: 38944129DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105141Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article examines the diversity of microbial populations in different areas of the respiratory tract in healthy horses, showing differences between upper and lower respiratory locations, but not within different regions of the lung.
Objective and Methodology
- The study aimed to understand the variability and distribution of microbial populations across distinct locations within a horse’s respiratory tract.
- The researchers utilized samples from four healthy adult horses. Samples were obtained using nasopharyngeal lavage (NPL), transtracheal aspirate (TTA), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) techniques, with six distinct regions within the lung sampled via BAL.
- The samples underwent full-length 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing and microbial profiling analysis to identify and compare the microbial populations present.
Findings
- The analysis revealed a significant diversity in the microbial populations, with over 1797 ASVs identified across all samples. This number was reduced to 94 taxa following tip agglomeration and prevalence filtering.
- Variability was observed in the number and diversity of taxa across different horses, types of samples, and BAL locations. The predominant phyla were Firmicutes, proteobacteria, and actinobacteria.
Variations Between Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract
- Significant differences were discovered in microbial richness and phylogenetic diversity between samples from NPL, TTA, and BAL, manifesting the distinct microbial populations in the upper and lower respiratory tracts.
- The type of sample (NPL, TTA, or BAL) and the specific horse from which the sample was taken contributed significantly to the Bray-Curtis compositional diversity.
- The Weighted Unifrac metric, a type of beta-diversity measure comparing community composition, was only affected by whether the sample was from the upper (NPL and TTA) or lower (BAL) respiratory tract.
No Variations Within Lung Regions
- Despite the variability between upper and lower respiratory tract, the research found no significant variation in microbial populations within different biogeographic regions of the lung – the distinct segments sampled via BAL.
- This finding indicates that bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained using standard clinical techniques, effectively a “blind” sample without targeting a specific lung region, can be sufficient for future studies in healthy horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Bishop RC, Migliorisi A, Holmes JR, Kemper AM, Band M, Austin S, Aldridge B, Wilkins PA.
(2024).
Microbial populations vary between the upper and lower respiratory tract, but not within biogeographic regions of the lung of healthy horses.
J Equine Vet Sci, 140, 105141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105141 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA. Electronic address: rb17@illinois.edu.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
- High Performance Computing in Biology, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Functional Genomics Unit, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA; Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Israel.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists