Analyze Diet

Microdilution antimicrobial susceptibilities of selected gram-negative veterinary bacterial isolates.

Abstract: Gram-negative bacterial isolates (635) obtained from routine submissions to the Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory during 1983-1987 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for the following antimicrobials using commercially prepared microdilution assay materials: ampicillin, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, oxytetracycline, penicillin G, spectinomycin, sulfachlorpyridazine, sulfadimethoxine, and tylosin. Results for isolates from cattle, dogs, horses, and pigs are presented. In only a few instances were differences in MICs apparent among bacterial isolates from different tissues. Aminocyclitol MICs for equine uterine isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae differed from MICs for isolates from other tissues, and ampicillin, kanamycin, and spectinomycin MICs for bovine fecal isolates of Escherichia coli differed from MICs for isolates obtained from other tissues. In several instances, bimodal distribution of susceptibilities was apparent for ampicillin, kanamycin, and/or oxytetracycline. There was also a bimodal distribution pattern for erythromycin against Pasteurella haemolytica of bovine origin.
Publication Date: 1993-10-01 PubMed ID: 8286452DOI: 10.1177/104063879300500407Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of various antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria found in animals. The bacteria were extracted from various tissue samples of different animal species. The study found variances in the microbes’ susceptibility, indicating the necessity to choose antibiotics accordingly for distinct bacterial strains and tissues.

Methodology and Antimicrobials Tested

  • The study examined 635 Gram-negative bacterial isolates that the Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory received between 1983 and 1987.
  • The targeted bacteria were subjected to an array of antimicrobial susceptibility tests. They ware tested for their Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs), which indicate the least amount of the antimicrobial substance required to restrict bacterial growth.
  • The antimicrobials used in the study were ampicillin, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, oxytetracycline, penicillin G, spectinomycin, sulfachlorpyridazine, sulfadimethoxine, and tylosin.

Results and Insights

  • The research presented the results of bacterial isolates from various animals – cattle, dogs, horses, and pigs.
  • The results displayed that the MICs did not considerably vary among bacterial isolates from different tissues, with only a few exceptions.
  • For example, the aminocyclitol MICs for Klebsiella pneumoniae from equine uterine tissue differed from those found in other tissues. Also, the MICs for ampicillin, kanamycin, and spectinomycin in bovine fecal Escherichia coli isolates were different from isolates obtained from other tissues.
  • The research observed a bimodal distribution in susceptibility for certain antimicrobials like ampicillin, kanamycin, and oxytetracycline. This indicates that two distinct groups of bacteria were either highly affected or barely affected by these drugs.
  • A similar bimodal pattern was observed for erythromycin when used against Pasteurella haemolytica originated from cattle.

Significance of the Study

  • This research provides valuable insights into the susceptibility of various Gram-negative bacterial isolates towards different antimicrobials.
  • Understanding such differences is essential to enable physicians and researchers to select the most effective treatments based on the bacterial strains and the tissues infected.
  • The bimodal distribution observed for some drugs could be indicative of resistance mechanisms and can aid in the understanding and development of efficient strategies against antimicrobial resistance.

Cite This Article

APA
Burrows GE, Morton RJ, Fales WH. (1993). Microdilution antimicrobial susceptibilities of selected gram-negative veterinary bacterial isolates. J Vet Diagn Invest, 5(4), 541-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879300500407

Publication

ISSN: 1040-6387
NlmUniqueID: 9011490
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 5
Issue: 4
Pages: 541-547

Researcher Affiliations

Burrows, G E
  • Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078.
Morton, R J
    Fales, W H

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / toxicity
      • Bacterial Infections / microbiology
      • Bacterial Infections / veterinary
      • Cattle
      • Cattle Diseases
      • Dog Diseases
      • Dogs
      • Enterobacter / drug effects
      • Enterobacter / isolation & purification
      • Escherichia coli / drug effects
      • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification
      • Gram-Negative Bacteria / drug effects
      • Gram-Negative Bacteria / isolation & purification
      • Klebsiella pneumoniae / drug effects
      • Klebsiella pneumoniae / isolation & purification
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
      • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / drug effects
      • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / isolation & purification
      • Salmonella / drug effects
      • Salmonella / isolation & purification
      • Swine
      • Swine Diseases

      Citations

      This article has been cited 7 times.
      1. Mun C, Cai J, Hu X, Zhang W, Zhang N, Cao Y. Clostridium butyricum and Its Culture Supernatant Alleviate the Escherichia coli-Induced Endometritis in Mice. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 10;12(19).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12192719pubmed: 36230459google scholar: lookup
      2. Umrao S, S A, Jain V, Chakraborty B, Roy R. Smartphone-based kanamycin sensing with ratiometric FRET. RSC Adv 2019 Feb 18;9(11):6143-6151.
        doi: 10.1039/c8ra10035gpubmed: 35517283google scholar: lookup
      3. Vance NR, Witkin KR, Rooney PW, Li Y, Pope M, Spies MA. Elucidating the Catalytic Power of Glutamate Racemase by Investigating a Series of Covalent Inhibitors. ChemMedChem 2018 Dec 6;13(23):2514-2521.
        doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201800592pubmed: 30264520google scholar: lookup
      4. Durham AE. An evaluation of serum gentamicin concentrations and bacterial susceptibility to gentamicin in equine practice. J Vet Intern Med 2018 May;32(3):1194-1201.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15078pubmed: 29575239google scholar: lookup
      5. Stevens DC, Conway KR, Pearce N, Villegas-Peñaranda LR, Garza AG, Boddy CN. Alternative sigma factor over-expression enables heterologous expression of a type II polyketide biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e64858.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064858pubmed: 23724102google scholar: lookup
      6. Jacks SS, Giguère S, Nguyen A. In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other common equine pathogens to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003 May;47(5):1742-5.
      7. Hariharan H, McPhee L, Heaney S, Bryenton J. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can Vet J 1995 Mar;36(3):166-8.
        pubmed: 7757922