Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2020; 36(3); 641-658; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2020.08.004

Minimizing Equine Tooth Extraction Complications.

Abstract: Oral extraction has become the most popular extraction technique owing to its high rate of success with minimal major complication. Repulsion continues to produce unacceptably high iatrogenic complication rates. To avoid tooth repulsion, veterinary dentists have introduced procedures to facilitate difficult intraoral extractions and surgical extraction techniques. Minimizing complications is best achieved preoperatively. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation and treatment plan allows the dentist to predict intraoperative complication and prepare for procedures to produce the best outcome. With proper case selection and adherence to extraction principles, the primary veterinarian and the veterinary dentist can perform equine tooth extractions with minimal complications.
Publication Date: 2020-11-16 PubMed ID: 33189234DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2020.08.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article suggests that oral extraction of equine teeth is perceived as the preferred method due to its successful statistics and fewer critical complications, compared to the traditional repulsion method. The research points out that preoperative assessments help reduce complications and improve surgical outcomes.

Overview of the Research Article

The research paper discusses the comparative benefits of oral extraction in equine tooth extraction over the conventional repulsion method. Its main focus is on showcasing how a thorough preoperative evaluation can help minimize potential complications during and after the procedure.

  • The article first outlines the popularity and success of oral extraction as an extraction technique. This method reduces the risk of major complications and has a high success rate, hence being the preferred choice among veterinary dentists.
  • Repulsion, the previously popular technique, is shown to have a high rate of iatrogenic complications, emphasizing the reason to abandon its usage.
  • As a way to further minimize complications especially in challenging intraoral extractions, the paper highlights the need to introduce and adopt novel techniques that would make surgical extraction more manageable and safer.
  • The emphasis is given on comprehensive preoperative evaluation and treatment planning as key steps to avoid possible complications during and after extraction. By predicting potential complications before plunging into the actual procedure, a veterinary dentist can make proper arrangements or adjustments to ensure the best outcome.
  • The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of proper case selection and adherence to extraction principles for the primary veterinarian and the veterinary dentist. By doing so, they can perform equine tooth extractions successfully with minimal complications.

Implications and Contributions

The research implies that the veterinary field needs to pivot towards more effective approaches in the face of high complication rates, such as oral extraction techniques. More emphasis should be put on the role of preoperative evaluation, asserting that this can drastically decrease complication rates while increasing the chance for successful surgeries. This paper contributes to the current body of knowledge by providing guidance and shedding light on better practices in equine tooth extractions.

Cite This Article

APA
Galloway SS, Earley ET. (2020). Minimizing Equine Tooth Extraction Complications. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 36(3), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2020.08.004

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 36
Issue: 3
Pages: 641-658

Researcher Affiliations

Galloway, Stephen S
  • Animal Dental Care Specialist, 8565 Highway 64, Somerville, TN 38068, USA. Electronic address: achvet@yahoo.com.
Earley, Edward T
  • Large Animal Dentistry, Equine Farm Animal Hospital, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Dental Care / adverse effects
  • Dental Care / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
  • Tooth Diseases / surgery
  • Tooth Diseases / veterinary
  • Tooth Extraction / adverse effects
  • Tooth Extraction / methods
  • Tooth Extraction / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

Disclosure No funding sources, financial interests, or conflicts of interest to disclose.