Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; 55(2); 468-475; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70019

Modified stapled jejunocecostomy in horses.

Abstract: To develop a modified stapled (MS) jejunocecostomy (JC) in healthy horses. Methods: In vivo experimental study. Methods: Six healthy adult horses underwent ventral midline celiotomy, a jejunal resection, and an MS. Methods: Time to complete anastomosis and anastomotic length at necropsy were recorded. Horses were assessed by physical examination every 6 h for 5 days after surgery, then once daily until euthanasia at 7 days. A group of seven horses that had a stapled side-to-side JC and were euthanized 28 days postoperatively was used as an historical control (SS). Results: All MS horses recovered well, although one developed transient mild colic and another had a brief period of pyrexia and diarrhea. Postoperative heart rates returned to preoperative values shortly after surgery. At necropsy, the MS anastomoses appeared grossly to be healing well and formed a wide triangulated stoma. Times to complete the anastomosis (p = .49) and lumen size at necropsy (p = .32) were similar for both groups. Conclusions: The MS method was performed with ease and appeared to function effectively. It produced a triangulated stoma that could facilitate flow and reduce the risk of impaction. Conclusions: This study supports the use of MS for JC in horses. Although the study size was small, the results compared favorably with historical data for a SS for JC in healthy horses. The elimination of oversewn ends simplifies the MS technique and allows a single application of the stapler, minimizing cost.
Publication Date: 2025-10-02 PubMed ID: 41036656DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70019Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study developed and evaluated a modified stapled jejunocecostomy (MS) surgical technique in healthy horses to improve the procedure’s ease and effectiveness compared to the traditional stapled side-to-side (SS) approach.
  • The research compared the MS technique outcomes to historical results from the SS method, focusing on healing, anastomosis time, and postoperative recovery.

Background and Purpose

  • Jejunocecostomy (JC) is a surgical procedure to connect the jejunum (part of the small intestine) to the cecum (a pouch connected to the large intestine) in horses, often done to bypass a diseased intestinal segment.
  • Traditional stapled side-to-side (SS) techniques can be complex and costly due to multiple applications of the stapler and oversewing of bowel ends to prevent leakage or narrowing.
  • This study aimed to develop and assess a modified stapled (MS) JC technique that simplifies the procedure by eliminating oversewn ends and using a single stapler application, potentially reducing surgical time and cost.

Methods

  • The study was an in vivo experimental trial involving six healthy adult horses undergoing ventral midline celiotomy (a surgical incision into the abdomen).
  • Each horse had a resection of a segment of the jejunum followed by the MS jejunocecostomy.
  • Key measurements included:
    • Time taken to complete the anastomosis (surgical connection).
    • Anastomotic length assessed at necropsy.
    • Postoperative monitoring, including physical examinations every 6 hours for the first 5 days, then daily until euthanasia at day 7.
  • For comparison, data were taken from a historical control group of seven horses that had undergone the traditional stapled side-to-side (SS) JC and were euthanized 28 days after surgery.

Results

  • All six MS horses recovered without major complications, although:
    • One horse experienced transient mild colic (abdominal pain).
    • Another horse had a brief episode of pyrexia (fever) and diarrhea.
  • Postoperative heart rates quickly returned to normal, indicating stable recovery.
  • At necropsy (7 days post-surgery), the MS anastomoses showed good gross healing and formed a wide, triangulated stoma (opening), which is beneficial for intestinal flow.
  • Statistical comparison showed no significant differences between MS and SS techniques in:
    • Time to complete anastomosis (p=0.49).
    • Lumen size of the anastomosis at necropsy (p=0.32), suggesting comparable functional opening sizes.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The modified stapled (MS) jejunocecostomy was easy to perform and appeared effective in promoting healing and maintaining intestinal flow in healthy horses.
  • The triangulated shape of the stoma created by the MS technique may reduce the risk of intestinal impaction by facilitating better flow through the anastomosis.
  • Compared with the traditional SS technique, MS offers comparable outcomes while simplifying the procedure by:
    • Eliminating the need to oversew the bowel ends after stapling.
    • Allowing completion of the anastomosis with a single stapler application.
    • Potentially reducing surgical time and material costs.
  • Although the sample size in this study was small and involved healthy horses, the promising results support considering the MS technique for clinical use in equine surgery.
  • Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up would be valuable to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Freeman DE, Smith B, Bauck AG, Denagamage T, Moyer EK, Chanutin S. (2025). Modified stapled jejunocecostomy in horses. Vet Surg, 55(2), 468-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70019

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 2
Pages: 468-475

Researcher Affiliations

Freeman, David E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Smith, Bryana
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Bauck, Anje G
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Denagamage, Thomas
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Moyer, Elizabeth K
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Chanutin, Sierra
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / surgery
  • Surgical Stapling / veterinary
  • Surgical Stapling / methods
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / veterinary
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods
  • Male
  • Female
  • Jejunostomy / veterinary
  • Jejunostomy / methods
  • Jejunum / surgery

Grant Funding

  • Arden and Claudia Sims

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Rudnick MJ, Denagamage TN, Freeman DE. Effects of age, disease and anastomosis on short‐ and long‐term survival after surgical correction of small intestinal strangulating diseases in 89 horses. Equine Vet J 2022;54(6):1031‐1038.
  2. Röcken M, Ross MW. Vergleichsstudie über die Jejunocecostomie als End‐zu‐Seitanastomose und Seit‐zu‐Seitanastomose. Pferdheilkunde 1994;10:311‐315.
  3. Rendle DI, Woodt JL, Summerhays GE, Walmsley JP, Boswell JC, Phillips TJ. End‐to‐end jejuno‐ileal anastomosis following resection of strangulated small intestine in horses: a comparative study. Equine Vet J 2005;37(4):356‐359.
  4. Proudman CJ, Edwards GB, Barnes J, French NR. Factors affecting long‐term survival of horses recovering from surgery of the small intestine. Equine Vet J 2005;37(4):360‐365.
  5. Garcia‐Seco E, Wilson DA, Kramer J. Prevalence and risk factors associated with outcome of surgical removal of pedunculated lipomas in horses: 102 cases (1987‐2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226(9):1529‐1537.
  6. Morton AJ, Blikslager AT. Surgical and postoperative factors influencing short‐term survival of horses following small intestinal resection: 92 cases (1994‐2001). Equine Vet J 2002;34(5):450‐454.
  7. Espinosa P, Le Jeune SS, Cenani A, Kass PH, Brosnan RJ. Investigation of perioperative and anesthetic variables affecting short‐term survival of horses with small intestinal strangulating lesions. Vet Surg 2017;46(3):345‐353.
  8. Stewart S, Southwood LL, Aceto HW. Comparison of short‐ and long‐term complications and survival following jejunojejunostomy, jejunoileostomy and jejunocaecostomy in 112 horses: 2005‐2010. Equine Vet J 2014;46(3):333‐338.
  9. van Bergen T, Haspeslagh M, Wiemer P, Swagemakers M, van Loon G, Martens A. Surgical treatment of epiploic foramen entrapment in 142 horses (2008‐2016). Vet Surg 2019;48(3):291‐298.
  10. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. A comparison of handsewn versus stapled jejunocecostomy in horses – complications and long‐term survival: 32 cases (1994–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;237:1060‐1067.
  11. Donawick WJ, Christie BA, Stewart JV. Resection of diseased ileum in the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1971;159(9):1146‐1149.
  12. Mason TA, Johnston DE, Wallace CE, Christie BA. Laparotomy in equine colic – a report of thirteen clinical cases. Aust Vet J 1970;46(8):349‐355.
  13. Brown JA, Holcombe SJ, Southwood LL, Byron CR, Embertson RM, Hauptmann JG. End‐to‐side versus side‐to‐side jejunocecostomy in horses: a retrospective analysis of 150 cases. Vet Surg 2015;44(4):527‐533.
  14. Blackwell RB. Jejunocaecostomy in the horse: A comparison of two techniques. Proceedings of the Equine Colic Research Symposium 1982:288‐289.
  15. Moyer EK, Bauck AG, Denagamage T, Freeman DE. Comparison of end‐to‐side versus side‐to‐side jejunocecostomy in horses. Vet Surg 2025;54(2):410‐419.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.14200google scholar: lookup
  16. Chanutin S, Bauck AG, Roberts JF, Denagamage TN, Freeman DE. Comparison of two techniques to blind end jejunum and ileum for jejunocaecostomy in horses.. Equine Vet J 2025.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14466google scholar: lookup
  17. Peterson FB, Stewart JV. Experimental ileocecal anastomosis in the horse.. Eq Med Surg 1978;2:461‐464.
  18. Hocking MP, Carlson RG, Courington KR, Bland KI. Altered motility and bacterial flora after functional end‐to‐end anastomosis.. Surgery 1990;108:384‐392.
  19. Huskamp B. Diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal conditions in the horse; various types and frequency as seen at the animal hospital in Hochmoor.. Proceedings of the Equine Colic Research Symposium 1982:61‐272.
  20. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Clinical comparison between a continuous Lembert pattern wrapped in a carboxymethylcellulose and hyaluronate membrane with an interrupted Lembert pattern for one‐layer jejunojejunostomy in horses.. Equine Vet J 2011;43:708‐713.
  21. Seitz‐Cherner E, Bauck AG, Denagamage T, Freeman DE. Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of a modified interrupted Lembert pattern for small intestinal anastomoses in horses.. Vet Surg 2022;52:407‐415.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13881google scholar: lookup
  22. Mendez‐Angulo JL, Ernst NS, Mudge MC. Clinical assessment and outcome of a single‐layer technique for anastomosis of the small intestine in horses.. Vet Rec 2010;167:652‐655.
  23. Archer RM, Parsons JC, Lindsay WA. A comparison of enterotomies through the antimesenteric band and the sacculation of the small (descending) colon of ponies.. Equine Vet J 1988;20:406‐413.
  24. Beard WL, Robertson JT, Getzy DM. Enterotomy technique in the descending colon of the horse. Effect of location and suture pattern.. Vet Surg 1989;18:135‐140.
  25. Gandini M. Handsewn semiclosed single‐layer jejunocecal side‐to‐side anastomosis in the horse.. Vet Surg 2010;39:771‐775.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.