Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106055; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106055

Morbidity associated with inhalation anesthesia in horses: the role of opioid use in a university teaching hospital.

Abstract: Despite concerns among equine practitioners, the effects of opioid administration on intraoperative complications during inhalation anesthesia remain incompletely characterized. This retrospective study evaluated intraoperative complications and perianesthetic mortality in horses undergoing inhalation anesthesia according to opioid use. Medical records from a university veterinary hospital were reviewed (2014-2025) and grouped based on opioid inclusion in anesthetic protocols and surgery type (colic vs. non-colic). Intraoperative hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg), hypothermia (temperature 65 mmHg), and hypoxemia (PaO < 60 mmHg or SpO < 90%) were recorded. Perianesthetic mortality included deaths from premedication to seven days post-operatively. Proportions were compared using chi-squared tests (P 3 hours, and hypothermia was more prevalent in these procedures (P < 0.0001). Overall perianesthetic mortality was 7.9% (34/426) and was higher in colic cases (27/219 [12.3%]) than in non-colic cases (7/207 [3.3%]) (P < 0.001), as well as in horses with elevated ASA classifications (2/173 [1.1%] in ASA I-II vs. 32/253 [12.6%] in ASA III-V; P < 0.001). Opioid administration during equine inhalation anesthesia does not appear to increase intraoperative complications or perianesthetic mortality, and the association with hypothermia was likely influenced by anesthesia duration.
Publication Date: 2026-06-05 PubMed ID: 42250827DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106055Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examined whether using opioids during inhalation anesthesia in horses increases the risk of complications or death around the time of surgery at a university teaching hospital.

Background and Purpose

  • Equine veterinarians have concerns about potential side effects and risks associated with opioid use during anesthesia, but prior data on intraoperative complications linked to opioids is limited.
  • The study aimed to clarify the relationship between opioid use during inhalation anesthesia and the rates of complications and mortality in horses.

Methods

  • Retrospective review of medical records from 2014 to 2025 at a university veterinary hospital.
  • 426 cases of horses undergoing inhalation anesthesia were evaluated.
  • Cases were categorized by whether opioids were included in the anesthetic protocol and by surgery type: colic (intestinal disease requiring urgent surgery) vs. non-colic procedures.
  • Intraoperative complications monitored included:
    • Hypotension – Mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 70 mmHg
    • Hypoxemia – low blood oxygen measured by PaO2 below 60 mmHg or oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 90%
    • Hypothermia – lowered body temperature, although exact criteria not specified in abstract
  • Perianesthetic mortality was defined as deaths occurring from premedication until seven days post-operation.
  • Statistical analysis compared proportions using chi-squared tests, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

  • Intraoperative hypotension occurred in 57.4% of cases, hypoxemia in 11.4%, and hypothermia in 77.0%.
  • Opioids were used more often in colic surgeries and in longer anesthesia times (greater than 3 hours), and hypothermia was more common in longer procedures (P < 0.0001).
  • Overall perianesthetic mortality rate was 7.9% (34 out of 426 horses).
  • Mortality was significantly higher in colic cases (12.3%) compared to non-colic (3.3%) (P < 0.001).
  • Horses with higher ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classifications (III-V) had higher mortality (12.6%) than those with lower risk (I-II) at 1.1% (P < 0.001).
  • The use of opioids during anesthesia did not increase the frequency of intraoperative complications (hypotension, hypoxemia) or perianesthetic death.
  • Hypothermia was more frequently observed in procedures involving opioids, but this was likely due to longer anesthesia durations rather than direct opioid effects.

Conclusions

  • Administering opioids in horses during inhalation anesthesia is not associated with increased risk of commonly observed complications or death around the time of surgery.
  • The relationship between opioids and hypothermia appears to be indirectly related to longer surgeries where opioids are more often used.
  • These findings may help reassure veterinarians about the safety of opioid use in equine anesthesia at university teaching hospitals.
  • High mortality rates in colic surgeries and sicker horses highlight the importance of patient factors over opioid use in influencing outcomes.

Implications for Veterinary Practice

  • Opioids can be considered a safe component of anesthetic protocols during equine inhalation anesthesia without increasing intraoperative adverse events or death risk.
  • Careful management of anesthesia duration and patient status remain critical to mitigate hypothermia and other complications.
  • Further prospective studies might confirm these findings and investigate optimal opioid dosages and protocols.

Cite This Article

APA
Cardoso GS, Justo AA, Henriques MAAD, Ferreira MA, Rusch E, Costa FA, Dória RGS, Carregaro AB. (2026). Morbidity associated with inhalation anesthesia in horses: the role of opioid use in a university teaching hospital. J Equine Vet Sci, 106055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106055

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106055
PII: S0737-0806(26)00290-X

Researcher Affiliations

Cardoso, G S
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Justo, A A
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Henriques, M A A D
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Ferreira, M A
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Rusch, E
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Costa, F A
  • Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rd. Ulysses Gaboardi, Km 3, Curitibanos, SC, 89.520-000, Brazil.
Dória, R G S
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Carregaro, A B
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil. Electronic address: carregaro@usp.br.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.