Analyze Diet
Zoology (Jena, Germany)2013; 117(3); 163-170; doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.004

Motion camouflage induced by zebra stripes.

Abstract: The functional significance of the zebra coat stripe pattern is one of the oldest questions in evolutionary biology, having troubled scientists ever since Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace first disagreed on the subject. While different theories have been put forward to address this question, the idea that the stripes act to confuse or 'dazzle' observers remains one of the most plausible. However, the specific mechanisms by which this may operate have not been investigated in detail. In this paper, we investigate how motion of the zebra's high contrast stripes creates visual effects that may act as a form of motion camouflage. We simulated a biologically motivated motion detection algorithm to analyse motion signals generated by different areas on a zebra's body during displacements of their retinal images. Our simulations demonstrate that the motion signals that these coat patterns generate could be a highly misleading source of information. We suggest that the observer's visual system is flooded with erroneous motion signals that correspond to two well-known visual illusions: (i) the wagon-wheel effect (perceived motion inversion due to spatiotemporal aliasing); and (ii) the barber-pole illusion (misperceived direction of motion due to the aperture effect), and predict that these two illusory effects act together to confuse biting insects approaching from the air, or possibly mammalian predators during the hunt, particularly when two or more zebras are observed moving together as a herd.
Publication Date: 2013-12-04 PubMed ID: 24368147DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper investigates the unique pattern of zebra stripes and offers a theory that the pattern’s blurring motion serves a camouflage purpose, confusing predators and biting insects by inducing visual illusions.

Background

The study sheds light on the ongoing debate in the realm of evolutionary biology concerning the purpose of the zebra’s striped coat pattern. This [the zebra’s striping] is a topic of interest that has puzzled scientists since the time of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. Several theories have been posed, one of the most compelling being that the stripes serve to ‘dazzle’ or confuse onlookers or predators. This research delves into the mechanism behind this confusion tactic.

Motion Camouflage Through Stripes

  • The basis of the study was to scrutinize the effects caused by the movement of zebra’s distinct high contrast stripes, hypothesizing that these stripes could create a form of motion camouflage.
  • In order to test this idea, a motivated motion detection algorithm was simulated to analyze the motion signals produced by different parts of the zebra’s body as they move.
  • The simulation demonstrated that the motion signals generated by the animal’s stripe patterns could produce highly misleading visual information.

Visual Illusions

  • The research suggests that the stripes’ motion causes the observer’s visual system to be overloaded with erroneous motion signals.
  • These misleading signals mirror two known visual illusions. The first is the wagon-wheel effect, where motion appears to invert due to an anomaly called spatiotemporal aliasing. The second is the barber-pole illusion, where the direction of motion is misperceived due to something known as the aperture effect.
  • The study predicts that these illusions work in tandem to confuse any onlookers. This could be particularly effective against biting insects approaching from the air, or possible mammalian predators during a pursuit, especially when observing multiple zebras moving together as a group.

Cite This Article

APA
How MJ, Zanker JM. (2013). Motion camouflage induced by zebra stripes. Zoology (Jena), 117(3), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.004

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2720
NlmUniqueID: 9435608
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 117
Issue: 3
Pages: 163-170
PII: S0944-2006(13)00097-4

Researcher Affiliations

How, Martin J
  • Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4000, Australia. Electronic address: m.how@uq.edu.au.
Zanker, Johannes M
  • Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Cats
  • Computer Simulation
  • Equidae / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Insecta / physiology
  • Models, Biological
  • Motion Perception / physiology
  • Pigmentation / physiology
  • Visual Fields

Citations

This article has been cited 29 times.
  1. Robledo-Ospina LE, Morehouse N, Escobar F, Tapia-McClung H, Narendra A, Rao D. Visual antipredator effects of web flexing in an orb web spider, with special reference to web decorations.. Naturwissenschaften 2023 May 23;110(3):23.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-023-01849-6pubmed: 37219696google scholar: lookup
  2. Caro T, Fogg E, Stephens-Collins T, Santon M, How MJ. Why don't horseflies land on zebras?. J Exp Biol 2023 Feb 15;226(4).
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.244778pubmed: 36700395google scholar: lookup
  3. Imani N, Vale B. Biomimetic Design for Building Energy Efficiency 2021.. Biomimetics (Basel) 2022 Aug 5;7(3).
    doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7030106pubmed: 35997426google scholar: lookup
  4. Takács P, Száz D, Vincze M, Slíz-Balogh J, Horváth G. Sunlit zebra stripes may confuse the thermal perception of blood vessels causing the visual unattractiveness of zebras to horseflies.. Sci Rep 2022 Aug 4;12(1):10871.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14619-7pubmed: 35927437google scholar: lookup
  5. Yu C, Chen L, Ning S, Ullah S, Li Z. Do bovids evolve hindquarter markings for anti-predation?. Curr Zool 2022 Apr;68(2):143-148.
    doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab048pubmed: 35355942google scholar: lookup
  6. Santacà M, Bisazza A, Agrillo C. Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation.. Biol Lett 2022 Feb;18(2):20210548.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0548pubmed: 35193367google scholar: lookup
  7. Ryan LA, Slip DJ, Chapuis L, Collin SP, Gennari E, Hemmi JM, How MJ, Huveneers C, Peddemors VM, Tosetto L, Hart NS. A shark's eye view: testing the 'mistaken identity theory' behind shark bites on humans.. J R Soc Interface 2021 Oct;18(183):20210533.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0533pubmed: 34699727google scholar: lookup
  8. Perricone V, Santulli C, Rendina F, Langella C. Organismal Design and Biomimetics: A Problem of Scale.. Biomimetics (Basel) 2021 Sep 28;6(4).
    doi: 10.3390/biomimetics6040056pubmed: 34698083google scholar: lookup
  9. Hughes AE, Griffiths D, Troscianko J, Kelley LA. The evolution of patterning during movement in a large-scale citizen science game.. Proc Biol Sci 2021 Jan 13;288(1942):20202823.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2823pubmed: 33434457google scholar: lookup
  10. How MJ, Gonzales D, Irwin A, Caro T. Zebra stripes, tabanid biting flies and the aperture effect.. Proc Biol Sci 2020 Aug 26;287(1933):20201521.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1521pubmed: 32811316google scholar: lookup
  11. Kojima T, Oishi K, Matsubara Y, Uchiyama Y, Fukushima Y, Aoki N, Sato S, Masuda T, Ueda J, Hirooka H, Kino K. Cows painted with zebra-like striping can avoid biting fly attack.. PLoS One 2019;14(10):e0223447.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223447pubmed: 31581218google scholar: lookup
  12. Daly IM, How MJ, Partridge JC, Roberts NW. Gaze stabilization in mantis shrimp in response to angled stimuli.. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2019 Aug;205(4):515-527.
    doi: 10.1007/s00359-019-01341-5pubmed: 31093738google scholar: lookup
  13. Caro T, Argueta Y, Briolat ES, Bruggink J, Kasprowsky M, Lake J, Mitchell MJ, Richardson S, How M. Benefits of zebra stripes: Behaviour of tabanid flies around zebras and horses.. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0210831.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210831pubmed: 30785882google scholar: lookup
  14. Cowley BU. Studying the integrated functional cognitive basis of sustained attention with a Primed Subjective-Illusory-Contour Attention Task.. Sci Rep 2018 Sep 10;8(1):13514.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31876-7pubmed: 30202119google scholar: lookup
  15. Horváth G, Pereszlényi Á, Száz D, Barta A, Jánosi IM, Gerics B, Åkesson S. Experimental evidence that stripes do not cool zebras.. Sci Rep 2018 Jun 19;8(1):9351.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27637-1pubmed: 29921931google scholar: lookup
  16. Hughes AE, Jones C, Joshi K, Tolhurst DJ. Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.. Proc Biol Sci 2017 Mar 15;284(1850).
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0015pubmed: 28275144google scholar: lookup
  17. Hogan BG, Cuthill IC, Scott-Samuel NE. Dazzle camouflage and the confusion effect: the influence of varying speed on target tracking.. Anim Behav 2017 Jan;123:349-353.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.022pubmed: 28123185google scholar: lookup
  18. Somveille M, Marshall KL, Gluckman TL. A global analysis of bird plumage patterns reveals no association between habitat and camouflage.. PeerJ 2016;4:e2658.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.2658pubmed: 27867762google scholar: lookup
  19. Hogan BG, Cuthill IC, Scott-Samuel NE. Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect.. Behav Ecol 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):1547-1551.
    doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw081pubmed: 27656087google scholar: lookup
  20. Vinther J, Nicholls R, Lautenschlager S, Pittman M, Kaye TG, Rayfield E, Mayr G, Cuthill IC. 3D Camouflage in an Ornithischian Dinosaur.. Curr Biol 2016 Sep 26;26(18):2456-2462.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.065pubmed: 27641767google scholar: lookup
  21. Hogan BG, Scott-Samuel NE, Cuthill IC. Contrast, contours and the confusion effect in dazzle camouflage.. R Soc Open Sci 2016 Jul;3(7):160180.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.160180pubmed: 27493775google scholar: lookup
  22. Murali G, Kodandaramaiah U. Deceived by stripes: conspicuous patterning on vital anterior body parts can redirect predatory strikes to expendable posterior organs.. R Soc Open Sci 2016 Jun;3(6):160057.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.160057pubmed: 27429765google scholar: lookup
  23. Britten KH, Thatcher TD, Caro T. Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat.. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0154504.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154504pubmed: 27223616google scholar: lookup
  24. Caro T, Stankowich T. Concordance on zebra stripes: a comment on Larison et al. (2015).. R Soc Open Sci 2015 Sep;2(9):150323.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.150323pubmed: 26473053google scholar: lookup
  25. Hughes AE, Magor-Elliott RS, Stevens M. The role of stripe orientation in target capture success.. Front Zool 2015;12:17.
    doi: 10.1186/s12983-015-0110-4pubmed: 26269704google scholar: lookup
  26. Yin J, Gong H, An X, Chen Z, Lu Y, Andolina IM, McLoughlin N, Wang W. Breaking cover: neural responses to slow and fast camouflage-breaking motion.. Proc Biol Sci 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20151182.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1182pubmed: 26269500google scholar: lookup
  27. Larison B, Harrigan RJ, Thomassen HA, Rubenstein DI, Chan-Golston AM, Li E, Smith TB. How the zebra got its stripes: a problem with too many solutions.. R Soc Open Sci 2015 Jan;2(1):140452.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.140452pubmed: 26064590google scholar: lookup
  28. Marshall KL, Gluckman TL. The evolution of pattern camouflage strategies in waterfowl and game birds.. Ecol Evol 2015 May;5(10):1981-91.
    doi: 10.1002/ece3.1482pubmed: 26045950google scholar: lookup
  29. Hughes AE, Troscianko J, Stevens M. Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success.. BMC Evol Biol 2014 Sep 13;14:201.
    doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0201-4pubmed: 25213150google scholar: lookup