FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Infect Immun / Mucosal nasopharyngeal immune responses of horses to protein...
Infection and immunity1985; 47(3); 623-628; doi: 10.1128/iai.47.3.623-628.1985

Mucosal nasopharyngeal immune responses of horses to protein antigens of Streptococcus equi.

Abstract: Mucosal nasopharyngeal immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG responses to proteins of Streptococcus equi were studied in horses after the experimental production of strangles. S. equi-specific IgA and IgG titers in nasopharyngeal mucus were much higher in samples from animals 1 to 2 weeks after challenge than in samples from control animals. Although IgA was the major immunoglobulin in nasal mucus, there was more antibody activity associated with IgG as measured by radioimmunoassay. Great differences between the specificities of antibodies in nasal mucus and in serum were detected. IgA and IgG of mucus origin recognized only two major proteins with molecular weights of about 41,000 and 46,000 in acid extracts of S. equi and gave no detectable reaction with culture supernatant proteins. Only one protein of about 62,000 molecular weight was recognized in acid extracts of an equine strain of S. zooepidemicus. In contrast, immunoglobulins in serum recognized a great variety of proteins in culture supernatants and acid extracts of S. equi and S. zooepidemicus which did not include those proteins recognized by immunoglobulins in mucus. These findings provide good evidence for the independence of the local and systemic immune responses of the horse to S. equi. Horses rechallenged shortly after recovery from the first infection were resistant to challenge with an inoculum of S. equi 10 times greater than that to which they were originally susceptible. This resistance appeared to be independent of the levels of bactericidal antibody in serum. We therefore suggest that immunity to S. equi infection is mediated by locally produced nasopharyngeal antibodies.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1985-03-01 PubMed ID: 3972443PubMed Central: PMC261338DOI: 10.1128/iai.47.3.623-628.1985Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how horses’ immune systems respond at the nasopharyngeal level to proteins of the bacteria Streptococcus equi, which causes a disease known as strangles. The research reveals that following exposure to the bacterium, horses produce significant amounts of specific immunoglobulins (IgA and IgG) in their nasal mucus, suggesting localized immunity. The study also shows differences between local and systemic immune responses and proposes infection immunity is mediated by nasopharyngeal antibodies.

Studying Nasopharyngeal Immune Response

  • The health of horses was challenged by intentionally introducing them to the bacteria, Streptococcus equi, a cause of a common equine illness known as strangles.
  • After exposure to the bacteria, nasopharynx immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG responses were studied.
  • IgA and IgG titers were considerably higher in the nasopharyngeal mucus samples taken from the infected horses 1-2 weeks post-exposure compared to the samples taken from the control group.
  • Despite IgA making up the most significant proportion of nasal mucus, IgG was found to have stronger antibody activity, as shown through the use of a radioimmunoassay.

Differences Between Local and Systemic Immune Responses

  • Notably, it was found that the antibodies in nasal mucus and in serum significantly differed in the specificities they exhibited.
  • The IgA and IgG in the mucus only recognized two main proteins of the S. equi bacteria, with molecular weights of about 41,000 and 46,000, and did not respond noticeably to culture supernatant proteins.
  • In contrast, serum immunoglobulins recognized a vast array of proteins in the culture supernatants and acid extracts of S. equi as well as S. zooepidemicus, another equine bacterial strain, excluding the specific proteins that the mucus immunoglobulins recognized.

Immunity Mechanism Suggestion

  • This significant difference in the proteins identified by nasal and serum antibodies suggests separate local and systemic immune responses in horses exposed to S. equi.
  • The horses, when rechallenged with S. equi shortly following recovery from the first infection, exhibited resistance to bacterial doses ten times larger than the doses they were initially vulnerable to.
  • This resistance was found to be independent of bactericidal antibody levels found in the serum, leading researchers to suggest that immunity to S. equi infections might be mediated predominantly by nasopharyngeal antibodies.

Cite This Article

APA
Galan JE, Timoney JF. (1985). Mucosal nasopharyngeal immune responses of horses to protein antigens of Streptococcus equi. Infect Immun, 47(3), 623-628. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.47.3.623-628.1985

Publication

Infection and immunity
ISSN: 0019-9567
NlmUniqueID: 0246127
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 3
Pages: 623-628

Researcher Affiliations

Galan, J E
    Timoney, J F

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Antigens, Bacterial / immunology
      • Horse Diseases / immunology
      • Horses / immunology
      • Immunoglobulin A / immunology
      • Immunoglobulin G / immunology
      • Molecular Weight
      • Nasal Mucosa / immunology
      • Nasopharynx / immunology
      • Streptococcal Infections / immunology
      • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
      • Streptococcus / immunology

      References

      This article includes 25 references
      1. Engelbrecht H. Vaccination against strangles.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1969 Jul 15;155(2):425-7.
        pubmed: 5816127
      2. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.. Nature 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5.
        pubmed: 5432063doi: 10.1038/227680a0google scholar: lookup
      3. Srivastava SK, Barnum DA. Adherence of Streptococcus equi on tongue, cheek and nasal epithelial cells of ponies.. Vet Microbiol 1983 Oct;8(5):493-504.
        pubmed: 6649408doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(83)90043-3google scholar: lookup
      4. Engelbrecht H, Dolan M. Vaccination of swine for jowl abscesses. Oral administration of group E streptococcus vaccine (live culture-modified).. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 1968 Sep;63(9):872-5.
        pubmed: 5187258
      5. Smith CB, Purcell RH, Bellanti JA, Chanock RM. Protective effect of antibody to parainfluenza type 1 virus.. N Engl J Med 1966 Nov 24;275(21):1145-52.
        pubmed: 4288591doi: 10.1056/NEJM196611242752101google scholar: lookup
      6. Matthews JB, Basu MK. Oral tonsils: an immunoperoxidase study.. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1982;69(1):21-5.
        pubmed: 6809640doi: 10.1159/000233140google scholar: lookup
      7. Bienenstock J, Befus AD. Mucosal immunology.. Immunology 1980 Oct;41(2):249-70.
        pubmed: 7002769
      8. Ganguly R, Ogra PL, Regas S, Waldman RH. Rubella immunization of volunteers via the respiratory tract.. Infect Immun 1973 Oct;8(4):497-502.
        pubmed: 4200537doi: 10.1128/iai.8.4.497-502.1973google scholar: lookup
      9. Bey RF, Shade FJ, Goodnow RA, Johnson RC. Intranasal vaccination of dogs with liver avirulent Bordetella bronchiseptica: correlation of serum agglutination titer and the formation of secretory IgA with protection against experimentally induced infectious tracheobronchitis.. Am J Vet Res 1981 Jul;42(7):1130-2.
        pubmed: 7271029
      10. Mancini G, Carbonara AO, Heremans JF. Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion.. Immunochemistry 1965 Sep;2(3):235-54.
        pubmed: 4956917doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(65)90004-2google scholar: lookup
      11. Fox EN. M proteins of group A streptococci.. Bacteriol Rev 1974 Mar;38(1):57-86.
        pubmed: 4133030doi: 10.1128/br.38.1.57-86.1974google scholar: lookup
      12. Polly SM, Waldman RH, High P, Wittner MK, Dorfman A. Protective studies with a group A streptococcal M protein vaccine. II. Challange of volenteers after local immunization in the upper respiratory tract.. J Infect Dis 1975 Mar;131(3):217-24.
        pubmed: 1092765doi: 10.1093/infdis/131.3.217google scholar: lookup
      13. Woolcock JB. Immunity to Streptococcus equi.. Aust Vet J 1975 Dec;51(12):554-9.
        pubmed: 1222005doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1975.tb09379.xgoogle scholar: lookup
      14. HUNTER WM, GREENWOOD FC. Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity.. Nature 1962 May 5;194:495-6.
        pubmed: 14450081doi: 10.1038/194495a0google scholar: lookup
      15. van de Rijn I, Kessler RE. Growth characteristics of group A streptococci in a new chemically defined medium.. Infect Immun 1980 Feb;27(2):444-8.
        pubmed: 6991416doi: 10.1128/iai.27.2.444-448.1980google scholar: lookup
      16. Guirguis N, Fraser DW, Facklam RR, El Kholy A, Wannamaker LW. Type-specific immunity and pharyngeal acquisition of group A Streptococcus.. Am J Epidemiol 1982 Dec;116(6):933-9.
        pubmed: 6756129doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113495google scholar: lookup
      17. Perkins JC, Tucker DN, Knope HL, Wenzel RP, Hornick RB, Kapikian AZ, Chanock RM. Evidence for protective effect of an inactivated rhinovirus vaccine administered by the nasal route.. Am J Epidemiol 1969 Oct;90(4):319-26.
        pubmed: 4309899doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121076google scholar: lookup
      18. Gearhart PJ, Cebra JJ. Differentiated B lymphocytes. Potential to express particular antibody variable and constant regions depends on site of lymphoid tissue and antigen load.. J Exp Med 1979 Jan 1;149(1):216-27.
        pubmed: 105075doi: 10.1084/jem.149.1.216google scholar: lookup
      19. Greenberg H, Helms CM, Grizzard MB, James WD, Horswood RL, Chanock RM. Immunoprophylaxis of experimental Mycoplasma pneumoniae disease: effect of route of administration on the immunogenicity and protective effect of inactivated M. pneumoniae vaccine.. Infect Immun 1977 Apr;16(1):88-92.
        pubmed: 873618doi: 10.1128/iai.16.1.88-92.1977google scholar: lookup
      20. Ishikawa T, Wicher K, Arbesman CE. Distribution of immunoglobulins in palatine and pharyngeal tonsils.. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1972;43(6):801-12.
        pubmed: 4573837doi: 10.1159/000230898google scholar: lookup
      21. Ganguly R, Waldman RH. Local immunity and local immune responses.. Prog Allergy 1980;27:1-68.
        pubmed: 6986045
      22. Srivastava SK, Barnum DA. The serological response of foals to vaccination against strangles.. Can J Comp Med 1981 Jan;45(1):20-5.
        pubmed: 7272839
      23. LANCEFIELD RC, PERLMANN GE. Preparation and properties of type-specific M antigen isolated from a group A, type 1 hemolytic streptococcus.. J Exp Med 1952 Jul;96(1):71-82.
        pubmed: 14946330doi: 10.1084/jem.96.1.71google scholar: lookup
      24. LANCEFIELD RC. Current knowledge of type-specific M antigens of group A streptococci.. J Immunol 1962 Sep;89:307-13.
        pubmed: 14461914
      25. Griffith IP. Immediate visualization of proteins in dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels by prestaining with Remazol dyes.. Anal Biochem 1972 Apr;46(2):402-12.
        pubmed: 4112506doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90313-2google scholar: lookup

      Citations

      This article has been cited 13 times.
      1. Frosth S, Morris ERA, Wilson H, Frykberg L, Jacobsson K, Parkhill J, Flock JI, Wood T, Guss B, Aanensen DM, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Cohen ND, Waller AS. Conservation of vaccine antigen sequences encoded by sequenced strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. Equine Vet J 2023 Jan;55(1):92-101.
        doi: 10.1111/evj.13552pubmed: 35000217google scholar: lookup
      2. Casadei E, Salinas I. Comparative models for human nasal infections and immunity. Dev Comp Immunol 2019 Mar;92:212-222.
        doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2018.11.022pubmed: 30513304google scholar: lookup
      3. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
      4. Lewis MJ, Meehan M, Owen P, Woof JM. A common theme in interaction of bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins with immunoglobulins illustrated in the equine system. J Biol Chem 2008 Jun 20;283(25):17615-23.
        doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709844200pubmed: 18411272google scholar: lookup
      5. Lewis MJ, Wagner B, Woof JM. The different effector function capabilities of the seven equine IgG subclasses have implications for vaccine strategies. Mol Immunol 2008 Feb;45(3):818-27.
        doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.06.158pubmed: 17669496google scholar: lookup
      6. Timoney JF, Walker J, Zhou M, Ding J. Cloning and sequence analysis of a protective M-like protein gene from Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Infect Immun 1995 Apr;63(4):1440-5.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.63.4.1440-1445.1995pubmed: 7890407google scholar: lookup
      7. Galan JE, Timoney JF, Lengemann FW. Passive transfer of mucosal antibody to Streptococcus equi in the foal. Infect Immun 1986 Oct;54(1):202-6.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.54.1.202-206.1986pubmed: 3531013google scholar: lookup
      8. Galán JE, Timoney JF. Immunologic and genetic comparison of Streptococcus equi isolates from the United States and Europe. J Clin Microbiol 1988 Jun;26(6):1142-6.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1142-1146.1988pubmed: 3384926google scholar: lookup
      9. Galán JE, Timoney JF. Molecular analysis of the M protein of Streptococcus equi and cloning and expression of the M protein gene in Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 1987 Dec;55(12):3181-7.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.55.12.3181-3187.1987pubmed: 3316035google scholar: lookup
      10. Galán JE, Timoney JF. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of a protective antigen of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. Infect Immun 1990 Sep;58(9):3116-21.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.58.9.3116-3121.1990pubmed: 1696940google scholar: lookup
      11. He L, Khine NO, Song J, Loubière C, Butaye P. Geographic diversity of the Streptococcus equi subsp. equi accessory genome: implications for vaccines and global surveillance. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1721958.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1721958pubmed: 41394906google scholar: lookup
      12. Righetti F, Hentrich K, Flock M, Frosth S, Jacobsson K, Bjerketorp J, Pathak A, Ido N, Henriques-Normark B, Frykberg L, Paillot R, Guss B, Wood T, Flock JI, Waller AS. Neutralisation of the Immunoglobulin-Cleaving Activity of Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi IdeE by Blood Sera from Ponies Vaccinated with a Multicomponent Protein Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2025 Oct 17;13(10).
        doi: 10.3390/vaccines13101061pubmed: 41150447google scholar: lookup
      13. Kozłowska N, Borowska M, Jasiński T, Wierzbicka M, Domino M. Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Equine Pharyngeal Lymphoid Hyperplasia Using the Object Detection-Based Processing Technique of Digital Endoscopic Images. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 22;15(18).
        doi: 10.3390/ani15182758pubmed: 41008003google scholar: lookup
      Subscribe to our newsletter
      Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.