Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology2013; 166(3-4); 670-675; doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.006

Mutant prevention concentration and mutant selection window for 10 antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi.

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to determine the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), time above the MPC and mutant selection window for 10 antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi and to determine if the combination of a macrolide with rifampin would decrease emergence of resistant mutants. Antimicrobial agents investigated (erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, rifampin, amikacin, gentamicin, enrofloxacin, vancomycin, imipenem, and doxycycline) were selected based on in vitro activity and frequency of use in foals or people infected with R. equi. Each antimicrobial agent or combination of agents was evaluated against four virulent strains of R. equi. MPC were determined using an agar plate assay. Pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated using published plasma and pulmonary pharmacokinetic variables. There was a significant (P<0.001) effect of the type of antimicrobial agent on the MPC. The MPC of clarithromycin (1.0 μg/ml) was significantly lower and the MPC of rifampin and amikacin (512 and 384 μg/ml, respectively) were significantly higher than that of all other antimicrobial agents tested. Combining erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin with rifampin resulted in a significant (P≤0.005) decrease in MPC and MPC/MIC ratio. When MIC and MPC were combined with pharmacokinetic variables, only gentamicin and vancomycin were predicted to achieve plasma concentrations above the MPC for any given periods of time. Only clarithromycin and the combination clarithromycin-rifampin were predicted to achieve concentrations in bronchoalveolar cells and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid above the MPC for the entire dosing interval. In conclusion, the combination of a macrolide with rifampin considerably decreases the emergence of resistant mutants of R. equi.
Publication Date: 2013-07-17 PubMed ID: 23915992DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.006Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the efficiency of 10 different antimicrobial drugs and their combinations on Rhodococcus equi bacteria. The study found that the combination of a macrolide with rifampin is most effective at preventing the emergence of resistant mutants.

Research Context

  • The research focuses on assessing the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) and mutant selection window for various antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi, a bacterium broadly affecting foals and people worldwide.
  • The tested agents – erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, rifampin, amikacin, gentamicin, enrofloxacin, vancomycin, imipenem, and doxycycline – were chosen based on their in vitro activity and frequency of usage in treating infections caused by R. equi.

Methods and Techniques

  • An agar plate assay was used to determine the MPC of each antimicrobial drug and combination, applying them against four virulent strains of R. equi.
  • Pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated using available plasma and pulmonary pharmacokinetic variables.
  • The bacterium’s response to each agent was observed, specifically focusing on any emerging drug resistance.

Key Findings

  • The type of antimicrobial agent significantly affected the MPC. For instance, the MPC of clarithromycin was significantly lower, and the MPC of rifampin and amikacin were significantly higher than other tested agents.
  • A combination of macrolides – erythromycin, clarithromycin, or azithromycin – with rifampin led to a considerable decrease in MPC and MPC/MIC ratio, suggesting it is more potent at preventing the development of resistant mutants.
  • When combining minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC with pharmacokinetic variables, only gentamicin and vancomycin were expected to maintain plasma concentrations above the MPC for a period of time.
  • Only clarithromycin and the clarithromycin-rifampin combination were predicted to maintain concentrations in bronchoalveolar cells and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid above the MPC for the entire dosing interval.

Conclusion

  • This research indicates that the combination of a macrolide with rifampin holds significant promise in decreasing the emergence of R. equi mutants resistant to treatment.
  • Knowledge of each drug’s MPC can inform better treatment strategies, contributing to improving health outcomes in both veterinary and human medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Berghaus LJ, Giguère S, Guldbech K. (2013). Mutant prevention concentration and mutant selection window for 10 antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi. Vet Microbiol, 166(3-4), 670-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.006

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2542
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 166
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 670-675
PII: S0378-1135(13)00368-4

Researcher Affiliations

Berghaus, Londa J
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Giguère, Steeve
    Guldbech, Kristen

      MeSH Terms

      • Actinomycetales Infections / microbiology
      • Actinomycetales Infections / veterinary
      • Animals
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
      • Azithromycin / pharmacology
      • Clarithromycin / pharmacology
      • Erythromycin / pharmacology
      • Gentamicins / pharmacology
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Macrolides / pharmacology
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
      • Mutation
      • Rhodococcus equi / drug effects
      • Rhodococcus equi / genetics
      • Rhodococcus equi / isolation & purification
      • Rifampin / pharmacology
      • Vancomycin / pharmacology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 13 times.
      1. Yi H, Yuan G, Li S, Xu X, Guan Y, Zhang L, Yan Y. Drug Combinations to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance: Various Correlations and Laws, and Their Verifications, Thus Proposing Some Principles and a Preliminary Scheme.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022 Sep 20;11(10).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101279pubmed: 36289938google scholar: lookup
      2. Erol E, Scortti M, Fortner J, Patel M, Vázquez-Boland JA. Antimicrobial Resistance Spectrum Conferred by pRErm46 of Emerging Macrolide (Multidrug)-Resistant Rhodococcus equi.. J Clin Microbiol 2021 Sep 20;59(10):e0114921.
        doi: 10.1128/JCM.01149-21pubmed: 34319806google scholar: lookup
      3. Cunha E, Janela R, Costa M, Tavares L, Veiga AS, Oliveira M. Nisin Influence on the Antimicrobial Resistance Ability of Canine Oral Enterococci.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020 Dec 10;9(12).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120890pubmed: 33321973google scholar: lookup
      4. Rakowska A, Cywinska A, Witkowski L. Current Trends in Understanding and Managing Equine Rhodococcosis.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 18;10(10).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10101910pubmed: 33081047google scholar: lookup
      5. Rampacci E, Marenzoni ML, Chiaradia E, Passamonti F, Ricci M, Pepe M, Coletti M, Giovagnoli S. In vitro performances of novel co-spray-dried azithromycin/rifampicin microparticles for Rhodococcus equi disease treatment.. Sci Rep 2018 Aug 14;8(1):12149.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30715-zpubmed: 30108265google scholar: lookup
      6. Baker CM, Ferrari MJ, Shea K. Beyond dose: Pulsed antibiotic treatment schedules can maintain individual benefit while reducing resistance.. Sci Rep 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5866.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24006-wpubmed: 29650999google scholar: lookup
      7. Rutenberg D, Venner M, Giguère S. Efficacy of Tulathromycin for the Treatment of Foals with Mild to Moderate Bronchopneumonia.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 May;31(3):901-906.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.14717pubmed: 28421633google scholar: lookup
      8. Yu G, Baeder DY, Regoes RR, Rolff J. Combination Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016 Jan 4;60(3):1717-24.
        doi: 10.1128/AAC.02434-15pubmed: 26729502google scholar: lookup
      9. Cohen ND, Giguère S, Burton AJ, Rocha JN, Berghaus LJ, Brake CN, Bordin AI, Coleman MC. Use of Liposomal Gentamicin for Treatment of 5 Foals with Experimentally Induced Rhodococcus equi Pneumonia.. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):322-5.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.13810pubmed: 26692327google scholar: lookup
      10. Fenton CS, Buckley TC. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of erythromycin and rifampin for Rhodococcus equi during the years 2007-2014.. Ir Vet J 2015;68:23.
        doi: 10.1186/s13620-015-0051-4pubmed: 26445669google scholar: lookup
      11. Cohen ND, Slovis NM, Giguère S, Baker S, Chaffin MK, Bernstein LR. Gallium maltolate as an alternative to macrolides for treatment of presumed Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals.. J Vet Intern Med 2015 May-Jun;29(3):932-9.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.12595pubmed: 25868480google scholar: lookup
      12. Burton AJ, Giguère S, Berghaus LJ, Hondalus MK. Activity of clarithromycin or rifampin alone or in combination against experimental Rhodococcus equi infection in mice.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59(6):3633-6.
        doi: 10.1128/AAC.04941-14pubmed: 25824218google scholar: lookup
      13. Hildebrand F, Venner M, Giguère S. Efficacy of gamithromycin for the treatment of foals with mild to moderate bronchopneumonia.. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):333-8.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.12504pubmed: 25619521google scholar: lookup