Analyze Diet

Needle electromyographic activity of myofascial trigger points and control sites in equine cleidobrachialis muscle–an observational study.

Abstract: Myofascial trigger points are commonly described in humans, and many studies have shown abnormal spontaneous electrical activity, spike activity and local twitch responses at these sites. Myofascial trigger points have only rarely been described in horses, and studies of their electrophysiological characteristics have not previously been published. The objective of this study was to explore the electromyographic (EMG) and other characteristics of myofascial trigger points in equine muscle, and to compare them with normal muscle tissue. Methods: Four horses with chronic pain signs and impaired performance were examined. They had previously been examined at the second author's practice, and showed signs compatible with the diagnosis of myofascial trigger points in their cleidobrachialis (brachiocephalic) muscle, ie localised tender spots in a taut band of skeletal muscle which produced a local twitch response on snapping palpation. They had therefore been selected for treatment with acupuncture. Needle EMG activity and twitch responses were recorded at 25 positions at the trigger point and at a nearby control point during the course of each horse's acupuncture treatment. Results: All subjects demonstrated objective signs of spontaneous electrical activity, spike activity and local twitch responses at the myofascial trigger point sites within taut bands. The frequency of these signs was significantly greater at myofascial trigger points than at control sites (P<0.05). Conclusions: Equine myofascial trigger points can be identified, and have similar objective signs and electrophysiological properties to those documented in human and rabbit skeletal muscle tissue. The important differences from findings in human studies are that referred pain patterns and the reproduction of pain profile cannot be determined in animals.
Publication Date: 2006-06-20 PubMed ID: 16783281DOI: 10.1136/aim.24.2.61Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the characteristics of myofascial trigger points in horses, comparing them to normal muscle tissue using electromyographic (EMG) techniques. The study concludes that equine myofascial trigger points exhibit similar signs and electrophysiological properties to those found in human and rabbit skeletal muscle tissues.

Understanding Myofascial Trigger Points

Myofascial trigger points are hypersensitive points found in taut bands of skeletal muscle that cause chronic pain. These trigger points are common in humans and have characteristic signs such as abnormal spontaneous electrical activity, spike activity and local twitch responses. The presence of myofascial trigger points in horses is less studied and their electrophysiological characteristics are not well documented.

Study Design and Methods

  • The study involved four horses that showed chronic pain signs and impaired performance. These horses showed symptoms that were consistent with myofascial trigger points in their cleidobrachialis muscle or brachiocephalic muscle.
  • The horses were selected for acupuncture treatment. During the acupuncture sessions, EMG activity and twitch responses were recorded at 25 positions at the suspected trigger point and at a nearby control point.

Results and Findings

  • The horses demonstrated the key signs associated with myofascial trigger points – spontaneous electrical activity, spike activity, and local twitch responses within taut bands of muscle at the suspected trigger points.
  • The frequency of these signs was significantly greater at the trigger points compared to the control sites, providing evidence that these were indeed myofascial trigger points.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Like humans and rabbits, horses can also have myofascial trigger points. The study established that these trigger points in horses have similar electrophysiological properties and signs as those documented in human and rabbit skeletal muscle tissue.
  • Despite the parallels drawn, the study notes some limitations with its findings particularly in the case of pain patterns. Unlike in human studies, referred pain patterns and the reproduction of pain profiles cannot be determined in animals, which might hinder a comprehensive understanding of myofascial trigger points in the equine population.

Cite This Article

APA
Macgregor J, Graf von Schweinitz D. (2006). Needle electromyographic activity of myofascial trigger points and control sites in equine cleidobrachialis muscle–an observational study. Acupunct Med, 24(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.24.2.61

Publication

ISSN: 0964-5284
NlmUniqueID: 9304117
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 61-70

Researcher Affiliations

Macgregor, Joanne
  • Equine Veterinary Clinic, Greyfriars Farm, Puttenham, Guildford, UK.
Graf von Schweinitz, Dietrich

    MeSH Terms

    • Acupuncture Therapy / methods
    • Animals
    • Electromyography / methods
    • Horse Diseases / therapy
    • Horses
    • Muscle Contraction / physiology
    • Myofascial Pain Syndromes / veterinary
    • Physical Conditioning, Animal

    Citations

    This article has been cited 9 times.
    1. Calatayud-Bonilla M, Carmona JU, Prades M. Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Myofascial Trigger Points in Horses: A Prospective Algometric Controlled Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 27;15(15).
      doi: 10.3390/ani15152207pubmed: 40804997google scholar: lookup
    2. Portier K, Schiesari C, Gauthier L, Yeng LT, Tabacchi Fantoni D, Formenton MR. Comparison of the Prevalence and Location of Trigger Points in Dressage and Show-Jumping Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 27;15(11).
      doi: 10.3390/ani15111558pubmed: 40509024google scholar: lookup
    3. Resano-Zuazu M, Carmona JU, Argüelles D. Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial Pain on Equine Biomechanics Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Gait Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 22;15(11).
      doi: 10.3390/ani15111517pubmed: 40508982google scholar: lookup
    4. Halski T, Ptaszkowski K, Słupska L, Paprocka-Borowicz M, Dymarek R, Taradaj J, Bidzińska G, Marczyński D, Cynarska A, Rosińczuk J. Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping and Cross Taping Application in the Treatment of Latent Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:191925.
      doi: 10.1155/2015/191925pubmed: 26491458google scholar: lookup
    5. Lancaster LS, Bowker RM. Acupuncture Points of the Horse's Distal Thoracic Limb: A Neuroanatomic Approach to the Transposition of Traditional Points. Animals (Basel) 2012 Sep 17;2(3):455-71.
      doi: 10.3390/ani2030455pubmed: 26487033google scholar: lookup
    6. Robinson NG. One Medicine, One Acupuncture. Animals (Basel) 2012 Aug 29;2(3):395-414.
      doi: 10.3390/ani2030395pubmed: 26487029google scholar: lookup
    7. Dommerholt J. Dry needling - peripheral and central considerations. J Man Manip Ther 2011 Nov;19(4):223-7.
    8. Perez-Palomares S, Oliván-Blázquez B, Arnal-Burró AM, Mayoral-Del Moral O, Gaspar-Calvo E, de-la-Torre-Beldarraín ML, López-Lapeña E, Pérez-Benito M, Ara-Loriente V, Romo-Calvo L. Contributions of myofascial pain in diagnosis and treatment of shoulder pain. A randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 Jul 24;10:92.
      doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-92pubmed: 19630975google scholar: lookup
    9. Bablis P, Pollard H, Bonello R. Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of trigger point sensitivity in chronic neck pain sufferers: a controlled clinical trial. Chiropr Osteopat 2008 May 21;16:4.
      doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-4pubmed: 18495042google scholar: lookup