Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(6); 889; doi: 10.3390/ani14060889

Nutrient Composition and Feed Hygiene of Alfalfa, Comparison of Feed Intake and Selected Metabolic Parameters in Horses Fed Alfalfa Haylage, Alfalfa Hay or Meadow Hay.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the nutrient composition and feed hygiene of alfalfa as well as investigate the feed intake, blood, urine and faecal parameters of horses fed alfalfa haylage (AS) compared with alfalfa hay (AH) and meadow hay (MH). A total of 11 geldings were fed ad libitum (2.1% dry matter (DM) of body weight (BW)) with alfalfa haylage, alfalfa hay and meadow hay (MH) in a Latin square design. On days 0 and 21 of the feeding period, blood samples were analysed for kidney and liver parameters. Faecal samples were analysed for pH, DM and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Spontaneous urine was collected during the feeding period to analyse selected parameters. Forage was analysed in terms of feed hygiene and crude nutrients. In several feed samples of AS, AH and MH, the microbial reference ranges were exceeded for product-typical and spoilage-indicating bacteria and fungi. Crude nutrient analyses revealed a median crude protein content of 139 (138/142) g/kg DM for AS, which was similar to that in AH (127-135 g/kg DM) and substantially higher than in MH (79.1-87.7 g/kg DM). The calcium level in AS (11.3 g/kg DM) was significantly higher than that in MH (4.00-4.95 g/kg DM) but not compared with that in AH (9.80-10.4 g/kg DM). All blood parameters were within the reference ranges. Fractional excretion (FE) for AS-fed horses ranged from 8.13 to 22.0%; the FE for AH-fed horses ranged from 6.48 to 24.8%; the FE for MH-fed horses ranged from 6.69 to 53.2%. No significant differences were found in faecal pH or SCFA content in AS-fed horses compared with AH-fed and MH-fed horses. We concluded that alfalfa haylage provides an alternative forage for equine nutrition.
Publication Date: 2024-03-13 PubMed ID: 38539987DOI: 10.3390/ani14060889Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigated the nutritional components and health effects of feeding horses alfalfa haylage in comparison to alfalfa hay and meadow hay. The research found that alfalfa haylage offers a viable alternative for horse feed due to its similar nutrient content and no notable adverse effects on horses’ metabolic parameters.

Methodology

  • Eleven geldings were used in this study. These horses were fed alfalfa haylage (AS), alfalfa hay (AH), and meadow hay (MH) in a Latin square design. This means that each horse had access to and consumed each type of feed in turn.
  • Researchers collected blood, urine, and fecal samples from the horses throughout the course of the study in order to evaluate their metabolic health.
  • The research team also analyzed aspects of feed hygiene and crude nutrients in each forage type, along with any microbial content that could indicate product degradation or contamination.

Results

  • The study found excessive bacterial and fungal activity in numerous feed samples, suggesting potential spoilage or contamination. However, these findings did not differ markedly among samples of AS, AH, and MH.
  • The median crude protein content of AS was found to be comparable to that of AH and significantly greater than that of MH. Hence, AS seemed to provide at least as much protein as AH, possibly making it a good alternative horse feed.
  • Calcium levels in AS were considerably greater than those in MH but not AH, indicating the potential for higher calcium intake for horses fed AS.
  • All metabolic parameters analyzed from the blood samples remained within the reference ranges, demonstrating that the feeding regimens did not adversely affect the horses’ metabolic health.
  • The difference in fractional excretion (FE) percentages between different forages was insignificant, suggesting similar absorption and digestion patterns across the three forage types.

Conclusion

  • This study concluded that alfalfa haylage offers a viable alternative for equine nutrition. Despite the microbiological concerns raised in relation to feed hygiene, all three forages were tolerated by the horses, as evidenced by their metabolic parameters.

Please note that it would be important to monitor microbiological levels and take any necessary preventative measures to ensure feed hygiene, regardless of the type of hay being fed.

Cite This Article

APA
Köninger M, von Velsen-Zerweck A, Eiberger C, Löffler C, Töpper A, Visscher C, Reckels B, Vervuert I. (2024). Nutrient Composition and Feed Hygiene of Alfalfa, Comparison of Feed Intake and Selected Metabolic Parameters in Horses Fed Alfalfa Haylage, Alfalfa Hay or Meadow Hay. Animals (Basel), 14(6), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060889

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 6
PII: 889

Researcher Affiliations

Köninger, Marlene
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 9, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Main and State Stud Marbach, Gestütshof 1, 72532 Gomadingen-Marbach, Germany.
von Velsen-Zerweck, Astrid
  • Main and State Stud Marbach, Gestütshof 1, 72532 Gomadingen-Marbach, Germany.
Eiberger, Carolin
  • Main and State Stud Marbach, Gestütshof 1, 72532 Gomadingen-Marbach, Germany.
Löffler, Christof
  • Agricultural Center Baden-Württemberg of Cattle, Grassland Management, Dairy Farming, Fisheries and Wildlife (LAZBW), Atzenberger Weg 99, 88326 Aulendorf, Germany.
Töpper, Anja
  • Agricultural Technology Center Augustenberg, Neßlerstraße 25, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Visscher, Christian
  • Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Reckels, Bernd
  • Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Vervuert, Ingrid
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 9, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.