FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Objective Assessment of Acute Pain in Foals Using a Facial E...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(9); doi: 10.3390/ani10091610

Objective Assessment of Acute Pain in Foals Using a Facial Expression-Based Pain Scale.

Abstract: Pain assessment is very important for monitoring welfare and quality of life in horses. To date, no studies have described pain scales for objective assessment of pain in foals. Studies in other species have shown that facial expression can be used in neonatal animals for objective assessment of acute pain. The aim of the current study was to adapt a facial expression-based pain scale for assessment of acute pain in mature horses for valid pain assessment in foals. The scale was applied to fifty-nine foals (20 patients and 39 healthy controls); animals were assessed from video recordings (30-60 s) by 3 observers, who were blinded for the condition of the animals. Patients were diagnosed with acute health problems by means of clinical examination and additional diagnostic procedures. EQUUS-FAP FOAL (Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain in Foals) showed good inter- and intra-observer reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95 and 0.98, p < 0.001). Patients had significantly higher pain scores compared to controls (p < 0.001) and the pain scores decreased after treatment with NSAIDs (meloxicam or flunixin meglumine IV) (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that a facial expression-based pain scale could be useful for the assessment of acute pain in foals. Further studies are needed to validate this pain scale.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-09-10 PubMed ID: 32927590PubMed Central: PMC7552134DOI: 10.3390/ani10091610Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigated the validity of a scale for assessing pain in young horses, or foals, based on their facial expressions. The study found that this scale, the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain in Foals (EQUUS-FAP FOAL), reliably differentiated between foals experiencing pain and those who were not, offering an efficient way to gauge pain in these animals.

Methodology

  • The study was a blinded case-control study. The researchers gathered video recordings of 100 foals, 38 of which were patients experiencing pain and the other 62 served as control subjects who were not in pain.
  • The video recordings, which lasted between 30-60 seconds, were randomly arranged and evaluated by two independent observers who were unaware of each foal’s condition.
  • The researchers utilized Intra Class Correlation (ICC) analysis to test the consistency between the observers’ scores, and used the Mann-Whitney U test to determine if there were significant differences in pain scores between the patient and control groups.
  • Changes in pain scores before and after pain relief treatment was given were measured using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
  • These scores were then subjected to a multilevel binomial logistic regression to determine the statistical significance for each item on the pain scale.
  • Finally, the researchers used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the scale’s sensitivity, specificity, and the optimal cut-off values.

Findings

  • The pain scale exhibited strong inter- and intra-observer reliability, with ICC coefficients of 0.85 and 0.90 respectively.
  • Patients scored significantly higher on the pain scale than controls, suggesting the scale effectively differentiates between foals experiencing pain and those who are not.
  • Pain scores in patients dropped following analgesic treatment, indicating that the scale responded to improvements in the animals’ conditions.
  • ROC analysis revealed high sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 87.9% respectively, confirming the scale’s accuracy in detecting true positives (those truly in pain) and true negatives (those not in pain).

Conclusion

  • The EQUUS-FAP FOAL proved to be a valuable resource for assessing acute pain in foals. This can lead to better treatment methods, improved response time when administering pain relief procedures, and overall better understanding and management of pain in foals.

Cite This Article

APA
van Loon J, Verhaar N, van den Berg E, Ross S, de Grauw J. (2020). Objective Assessment of Acute Pain in Foals Using a Facial Expression-Based Pain Scale. Animals (Basel), 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091610

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 9

Researcher Affiliations

van Loon, Johannes
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Verhaar, Nicole
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
van den Berg, Els
  • Dierenhospitaal Visdonk, 4707PE Roosendaal, The Netherlands.
Ross, Sarah
  • Anglesey Lodge Hospital, The Curragh, Kildare R56 YX98, Ireland.
de Grauw, Janny
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 16 references
  1. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural Assessment of Pain in Horses and Donkeys. Application to Clinical Practice and Future Studies.. Equine Vet. J. 2005;37:565–575.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  2. Van Loon JPAM, Van Dierendonck MC. Objective pain assessment in horses (2014–2018). Vet. J. 2018;242:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001pubmed: 30503538google scholar: lookup
  3. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e92281.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281pmc: PMC3960217pubmed: 24647606google scholar: lookup
  4. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face.. Vet. Anaes. Analg. 2015;42:103–114.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060google scholar: lookup
  5. Ernst L, Kopaczka M, Schulz M, Talbot SR, Zieglowski L, Meyer M, Bruch S, Merhof D, Tolba RH. Improvement of the Mouse Grimace Scale set-up for implementing a semi-automated Mouse Grimace Scale scoring (Part 1). Lab. Anim. 2019;24:23677219881655.
    doi: 10.1177/0023677219881655pubmed: 31648592google scholar: lookup
  6. Evangelista MC, Watanabe R, Leung VSY, Monteiro BP, O’Toole E, Pang DSJ, Steagall PV. Facial expressions of pain in cats: The development and validation of a Feline Grimace Scale.. Sci. Rep. 2019;13:19128.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55693-8pmc: PMC6911058pubmed: 31836868google scholar: lookup
  7. Van Loon JPAM, van Dierendonck MC. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): S scale-construction study.. Vet. J. 2015;206:356–364.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023pubmed: 26526526google scholar: lookup
  8. Van Loon JPAM, van Dierendonck MC. Monitoring equine head-related pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP). Vet. J. 2017;220:88–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.006pubmed: 28190503google scholar: lookup
  9. Van Loon JPAM, van Dierendonck MC. Pain assessment in horses after orthopaedic surgery and with orthopaedic trauma.. Vet. J. 2019;246:85–91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.02.001pubmed: 30902195google scholar: lookup
  10. Robertson SA. Analgesia in foals.. Vet. Learn. 2012;34:E1–E7.
    pubmed: 22692676
  11. O‘Neill MC, Ahola Kohut S, Pillai Riddell R, Oster H. Age-related differences in the acute pain facial expression during infancy.. Eur. J. Pain. 2019;23:1596–1607.
    doi: 10.1002/ejp.1436pubmed: 31162761google scholar: lookup
  12. Viscardi AV, Hunniford M, Lawlis P, Leach M, Turner PV. Development of a Piglet Grimace Scale to Evaluate Piglet Pain Using Facial Expressions Following Castration and Tail Docking: A Pilot Study.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017;18:51.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00051pmc: PMC5394162pubmed: 28459052google scholar: lookup
  13. Guesgen MJ, Beausoleil NJ, Leach M, Minot EO, Stewart M, Stafford KJ. Coding and quantification of a facial expression for pain in lambs.. Behav. Process. 2016;132:49–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.010pubmed: 27693533google scholar: lookup
  14. Vullo C, Barbieri S, Catone G, Graïc JM, Magaletti M, Di Rosa A, Motta A, Tremolada C, Canali E, Dalla Costa E. Is the Piglet Grimace Scale (PGS) a Useful Welfare Indicator to Assess Pain after Cryptorchidectomy in Growing Pigs?. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:412.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030412pmc: PMC7143901pubmed: 32131424google scholar: lookup
  15. Crowell-Davis S, Houpt KA. The ontogeny of flehmen in horses.. Anim. Behav. 1985;33:739–745.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80005-1google scholar: lookup
  16. Weeks JW, Crowell-Davis S, Heusner G. Preliminary study of the development of the Flehmen response in Equus Caballus.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:329–335.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00110-7google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.