Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2005; 65(12); 1674-1679; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1674

Observer variation in visual assessment of forelimb horseshoe characteristics on Thoroughbred racehorses.

Abstract: To assess the accuracy and reliability of a visual method of evaluating horseshoe characteristics. Methods: 1,199 Thoroughbred racehorses. Methods: Characteristics of 1 forelimb horseshoe were visually assessed on horses immediately prior to racing by 5 field observers at 5 major racetracks in California. Characteristics evaluated included horseshoe type; toe grab height; and the presence of a rim, pad, and heel traction devices. Sensitivity and specificity for observer assessment of horseshoe characteristics were calculated by comparing observer assessments to a postmortem laboratory standard for horses that died within 48 hours of a race. Intraobserver agreement was assessed in a subset of horses by comparing horseshoe observations made before and after the horse's race. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by comparing horseshoe assessment among observers who examined the same subset of horses prior to racing on select days. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of this visual method of evaluating horseshoe characteristics were good and ranged from 0.75 to 1 and 0.67 to 1, respectively. Agreement beyond chance (weighted kappa values) between observers and the laboratory standard for toe grab height was fair (0.60 to 0.62). Intraobserver and interobserver agreements (kappa values) were high (0.86 to 0.99 and 0.71 to 1, respectively). Conclusions: Visual observation of horseshoes can be a feasible and reproducible method for assessing horseshoe characteristics prospectively in a large cohort of horses under racing conditions.
Publication Date: 2005-01-06 PubMed ID: 15631032DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1674Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a project that tested the effectiveness and reliability of visually evaluating characteristics of horseshoes on Thoroughbred racehorses. The researchers concluded that this assessment method shows good sensitivity, specificity, and agreement.

Study Methods

The study involved a large sample of 1,199 Thoroughbred racehorses. The researchers selected five field observers who assessed characteristics of a single forelimb horseshoe on each horse just before they raced. This took place at five major racetracks in California.

  • The observers evaluated characteristics such as the type of horseshoe, the height of the toe grab, and whether the shoe had a rim, a pad, or heel traction devices.
  • The evaluation process also had a control: the results of the observer assessments were compared to a postmortem laboratory standard for horses that unfortunately died within 48 hours of racing. This comparison was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the visual assessment method.
  • Moreover, they investigated intraobserver agreement. This was done by comparing pre-race and post-race horseshoe observations made by the same observer.
  • Lastly, the assessments of different observers were compared to measure interobserver agreement.

Study Results

The outcomes of this research presented that the visual method was generally effective:

  • The sensitivity (ability to correctly identify positive cases) and specificity (ability to correctly identify negative cases) of the method ranged from good to perfect. Sensitivity values were between 0.75 and 1 and specificity values ranged from 0.67 to 1.
  • Agreement between observers and the laboratory standard for assessing toe grab height was considered fair, with weighted kappa values of 0.60 to 0.62.
  • The rate of agreement for the same observer’s pre and post-race evaluations (Intraobserver) and the rate of agreement among different observers who examined the same subset of horses (Interobserver) were high—yielding kappa values of between 0.86 to 0.99 and 0.71 to 1, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on this study’s findings, the visual observation of horseshoes appears to be a viable and replicable method for prospectively assessing the characteristics of horseshoes on a large number of racehorses under race conditions. This method can be crucial for maintaining horse health and safety, improving race conditions, and profiting from racing activities.

Cite This Article

APA
Gross DK, Stover SM, Hill AE, Gardner IA. (2005). Observer variation in visual assessment of forelimb horseshoe characteristics on Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res, 65(12), 1674-1679. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1674

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 65
Issue: 12
Pages: 1674-1679

Researcher Affiliations

Gross, Diane K
  • J D Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Stover, Susan M
    Hill, Ashley E
      Gardner, Ian A

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Foot / anatomy & histology
        • Forelimb / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Observer Variation
        • Reproducibility of Results
        • Sensitivity and Specificity
        • Shoes

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.