Analyze Diet
Injury2021; 53(1); 171-175; doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.033

Occupational vs. non-occupational equestrians: Differences in demographics and injury patterns.

Abstract: Nineteen million people participate in horseback riding activities in the US, and the horse industry employs more than 460,000 full-time workers. Emergency department data suggest young female amateurs and male professionals are most at risk of death from horse-related injuries. However, there has been no investigation into factors that may increase severe injury and mortality risk in these populations. This study investigates demographics and injury pattern differences between occupational and non-occupational horse-related injuries in the US. Methods: The 2017 American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank (ACS NTDB) was analyzed for horse-related injury using ICD 10 codes. Demographics, injury data, protective device use, and hospital procedures were analyzed. Occupational versus non-occupational injuries based on incident location (farm, sports, recreational, residential) were compared using ANOVA or Pearson's Chi-squared test. Results: Of 3911 incidents, the most common injury mechanism was falling from the horse, but occupational and non-occupational farm injuries showed higher incidence of being struck by a horse. One-third required surgery. Upper extremity injuries were most common. Occupational injuries more often affected upper extremities of working age, minority males with commercial insurance. Non-occupational injuries most often affected heads of women at the extremes of age. Helmet use was higher in occupational, non-occupational sports, and non-occupational recreation injuries, and severe head injury incidence was decreased in these groups. Complications and discharge dispositions were not different across groups. Conclusions: In the largest trauma center study to date, we have shown equine-related trauma to be common and affect a predictable demographic that may permit injury prevention initiatives. Helmets may reduce severe head injury, but the efficacy of protective clothing remains to be validated.
Publication Date: 2021-11-01 PubMed ID: 34794802DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.033Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the differences in injury patterns and demographics between professional and amateur horse riders in the U.S, using the 2017 National Trauma Databank data. The goal is to better understand potential factors that may increase the risk of severe injuries and deaths in these populations.

Dataset and Methodology

  • The study uses the 2017 American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank (ACS NTDB) analytics to investigate horse-related injuries in the U.S.
  • Injury data included in the research are demographics, injury patterns, protective device usage, and hospital procedures. The source of injury is classified into occupational vs. non-occupational based on the incident location (farm, sports area, recreation area, or residential space).
  • The researchers applied the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and Pearson’s Chi-squared tests to compare these injuries from different sources.

Findings

  • Out of 3,911 incidents, falling off the horse was the most common cause of injury, but occupational and non-occupational farm injuries showed a higher incidence of being struck by a horse.
  • One-third of reported injuries required surgery, with upper extremity injuries, e.g., arm injuries, being the most common.
  • Occupational injuries more often affected upper extremities of working-age, minority males with commercial insurance. In contrast, non-occupational injuries most often affected the heads of females at various ages.
  • Helmet use was more common among those suffering occupational and non-occupational sports injuries, and non-occupational recreation injuries. The use of helmets was linked with a lower incidence of severe head injuries among these groups.
  • There was no significant difference in patient complication rates and hospital discharge dispositions (patient condition upon discharge) across groups.

Conclusion

  • The study, being the largest of its kind to date, provides valuable data regarding equine-related injuries and their demographic prevalence, prepping the stage for injury prevention initiatives.
  • Helmet usage prominently reduces the risk of severe head injuries. However, the effectiveness of other protective clothing needs further research validation.

Cite This Article

APA
Samuels K, Bettis A, Davenport DL, Bernard AC. (2021). Occupational vs. non-occupational equestrians: Differences in demographics and injury patterns. Injury, 53(1), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.033

Publication

ISSN: 1879-0267
NlmUniqueID: 0226040
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 1
Pages: 171-175
PII: S0020-1383(21)00906-2

Researcher Affiliations

Samuels, Kaitlyn
  • University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bettis, Amber
  • Department of Surgery, Division of Health Outcomes and Optimal Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Davenport, Daniel L
  • Department of Surgery, Division of Health Outcomes and Optimal Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bernard, Andrew C
  • Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, University of Kentucky College of Medicine and UK Healthcare, 800 Rose Street, C207, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA. Electronic address: andrew.bernard@uky.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Athletic Injuries / epidemiology
  • Craniocerebral Trauma
  • Demography
  • Female
  • Head Protective Devices
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Sports

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Riley CB, Padalino B, Rogers CW, Thompson KR. Human Injuries Associated with the Transport of Horses by Road. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13101594pubmed: 37238024google scholar: lookup
  2. Loder RT, Walker AL, Blakemore LC. Spinal Injuries from Equestrian Activity: A US Nationwide Study. J Clin Med 2025 Jun 26;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/jcm14134521pubmed: 40648895google scholar: lookup
  3. Stigson H, Klingegård M. Characteristics of equestrian accidents and injuries leading to permanent medical impairment. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2024 Sep 4;16(1):184.
    doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00973-8pubmed: 39232810google scholar: lookup
  4. Meyer C, Gabriel F, Schrum K, Hollis M, Short M, Gould S. Airbag Vests in Equestrian Sports: Is Use Associated with Harm?. Ann Biomed Eng 2024 Nov;52(11):2916-2922.
    doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03507-ypubmed: 38955889google scholar: lookup
  5. Neville EK, Hicks H, Neville CC. Epidemiology of horse trauma: a literature review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024 Jun;50(3):741-754.
    doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02436-0pubmed: 38265443google scholar: lookup