Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports2023; 40; 100856; doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2023.100856

Occurrence and control of equine strongyle nematode infections in Prince Edward Island, Canada.

Abstract: Widespread overuse of anthelmintics has produced a growing population of intestinal parasites resistant to control measures. A paradigm shift in equine parasite control is warranted to prevent continued resistance development and maintain equine health. Small strongyles, which are ubiquitous in horses, are currently the most important intestinal parasites of adult horses. Sustainable management programs consider the variation in egg shedding by individual horses, and varied risks associated with age, use, density, climate, and environment. To develop regional recommendations for Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada, it is important to first characterize strongyle egg shedding patterns and parasite management practices in use. Study objectives were to conduct a cross-sectional observational survey and risk factor analysis of parasite control programs, strongyle egg shedding and Strongylus vulgaris serology. A total of 339 horses from 40 PEI farms were sampled. Mean farm size was 8 horses and ranged from 2 to 30. Mean horse age was 11.6 years (Std. Dev. =7.2) and ranged from 2 months to 32 years. Mean fecal egg count (FEC) was 322 eggs per gram (EPG) (Std. Dev. =648). On average, 32% (Std. Dev. =16%) of horses shed 80% of strongyle eggs across 32 eligible farms. When considering all horses (n = 313) as one large herd, 18.7% of horses shed 80% of strongyle eggs. Use of FEC was identified in 4.6% of horses at 15% (n = 6) of PEI farms. Reported deworming intervals included 37.4% (n = 123) every 2-3 months and 58% (n = 191) every 3-4 months. Positive S. vulgaris titers were identified in 60% of horses (n = 200). Univariate analysis revealed that months since last deworming, age, and body condition score (BCS) were associated with strongyle shedding. The estimated odds of being in the high FEC category (>500 EPG) was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) times higher when last deworming increased by one month. Under-conditioned (BCS <4.5) horses had 3.6 (95% CI, 1.2-10.6) times odds of being in the higher FEC category than over-conditioned horses. Non-racing horses had 5.4 times odds of having a positive S. vulgaris titer than racehorses. This cross-sectional observational study is the first to report on the occurrence, risk factors and control of equine strongyle nematode infections in PEI, Canada. We conclude that the 80:20 rule can be used to develop control recommendations in PEI. Very few farms in PEI currently use FEC to guide parasite management. These findings provide a basis for future client education and investigations aimed at providing region specific recommendations.
Publication Date: 2023-03-16 PubMed ID: 37068859DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2023.100856Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Observational Study
  • Observational Study
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the patterns and control measures for horse intestinal parasites, specifically equine strongyle nematodes, on farms in Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada. Overuse of anthelmintics has led to an increase in resistant parasites, necessitating a change in control protocols.

Overview of the Research

  • The study undertakes a cross-sectional observational survey and risk factor analysis of strongyle egg shedding, parasite management practices, and serology of Strongylus vulgaris, a specific type of equine strongyle.
  • The survey involved a sample size of 339 horses from 40 PEI farms.
  • The research aimed to develop regional recommendations for sustainable parasitic control and management, considering factors like horse age, use, density, climate, and the environmental setting on the island.

Key Findings

  • On an average farm, 32% of the horses shed 80% of strongyle eggs.
  • When the total sample of horses was considered as one large herd, 18.7% of horses were responsible for 80% of strongyle egg shedding.
  • Fecal egg count (FEC), a key diagnostic measure to guide parasite management, is used in only 4.6% of horses across 15% of farms.
  • Over half of the horse population is dewormed every 3-4 months, while just under 40% receive treatment every 2-3 months.
  • Positive Strongylus vulgaris titers, indicating exposure to this specific parasite, were identified in 60% of the horses.

Analysis and Insights

  • The study found that the pattern of strongyle shedding is associated with factors like the period since the last deworming, age of the horse, and its body condition score.
  • Particularly, horses that were dewormed longer ago had higher odds of being in the high FEC category than those dewormed recently.
  • Under-conditioned horses, or those with a body score less than 4.5, had a higher risk of being in the high FEC category compared to over-conditioned horses.
  • Racehorses were found less likely to have positive Strongylus vulgaris titers than non-racing horses.

Implications and Conclusion

  • The research concludes that the ’80:20 rule,’ a theory implying that about 80% of effects come from about 20% of the causes, can be applied to equine parasite management in PEI.
  • The study also highlights the lack of FEC usage in parasite management, reinforcing the need for more regional-focused recommendations and the education of horse owners and caretakers.
  • The findings provide a strong foundation to guide future research aiming at improving the control of equine strongyle nematode infections in Canada.

Cite This Article

APA
Stoughton WB, Begin S, Outman S, Stryhn H, Yu J, Conboy G, Nielsen MK. (2023). Occurrence and control of equine strongyle nematode infections in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports, 40, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2023.100856

Publication

ISSN: 2405-9390
NlmUniqueID: 101680410
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 40
Pages: 100856
PII: S2405-9390(23)00026-6

Researcher Affiliations

Stoughton, William B
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada. Electronic address: wbstoughton@upei.ca.
Begin, Samantha
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Outman, Susan
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Stryhn, Henrik
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Yu, Jenny
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Conboy, Gary
  • Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Nielsen, Martin K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, 1400 Nicholasville Rd, Lexington, KY 40546-0099, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Prince Edward Island / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / epidemiology
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / prevention & control
  • Canada
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.