Analyze Diet
Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)2026; 35; e26; doi: 10.1017/awf.2026.10085

Opportunities for agency in domestic horses: Applying the behavioural domain to increase equine welfare.

Abstract: Giving animals the opportunity to exercise agency can improve their welfare, but horse owners and researchers may not be aware of the growing body of agency research in other animals, and studies on agency and choice in horses are scattered across disciplines and not connected to each other or to broader theory. This paper summarises research findings on management of domestic horses through the lens of animal agency and explores the potential applications of research on choice, control, and challenge in animals to improve the welfare of horses.
Publication Date: 2026-04-07 PubMed ID: 42028318PubMed Central: PMC13101025DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10085Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article examines how giving domestic horses opportunities to exercise agency—meaning the ability to make choices and exert control over their environment—can enhance their welfare.
  • It synthesizes scattered studies about horse behaviour and management from various disciplines and connects them to broader theories of animal agency, aiming to provide practical applications to improve equine welfare.

Introduction to Agency and Equine Welfare

  • Agency refers to an animal’s ability to make choices, have control, and engage in meaningful challenges within their environment.
  • Providing animals agency has been shown to improve mental and physical well-being by allowing them to fulfill natural behaviours and reduce stress.
  • While agency research is well-established in some species, horse owners and researchers may not be fully aware of these findings or how they relate specifically to horses.

Current Challenges in Equine Research and Management

  • Studies on horse agency and choice are scattered across numerous fields such as ethology, veterinary science, psychology, and animal husbandry.
  • This fragmentation makes it difficult for horse caretakers and researchers to access a cohesive understanding of how agency can be leveraged in horse management.
  • Many standard horse management practices may limit horses’ choices, such as restrictive stabling, regimented feeding schedules, and limited social interaction.

The Behavioural Domain and Its Use in Equine Welfare

  • The behavioural domain framework organizes animal behaviours and their underlying motivations to help researchers understand what kinds of choices are meaningful for welfare.
  • By applying this framework to domestic horses, the paper:
    • Identifies key opportunities where horses can be given control and choice (e.g., feeding, movement, social interactions).
    • Explores how these choices relate to natural horse behaviours and needs.
    • Considers the role of challenges—tasks that require problem-solving or physical effort—in promoting mental stimulation and satisfaction.

Research Findings and Applications

  • Evidence suggests that horses allowed to choose aspects of their environment or management show:
    • Reduced stress indicators such as lower cortisol levels and decreased stereotypic behaviours.
    • Enhanced positive behaviours such as exploration, play, and social bonding.
    • Increased engagement and improved cognitive function.
  • Examples of practical applications include:
    • Allowing horses to regulate their own feeding patterns through self-feeders or scattered feeding areas.
    • Providing opportunities for voluntary exercise, such as pastures or choice of turnout areas.
    • Facilitating social interactions by allowing horses to choose companions or interact freely in groups.
    • Using enriched environments that encourage problem-solving and exploration, such as obstacle courses or interactive toys.

Implications for Future Research and Horse Management

  • The paper encourages integration of agency theory into equine welfare research to foster a multidisciplinary approach.
  • It suggests that horse management practices should shift from controlling every aspect of the horse’s life toward allowing meaningful choices whenever possible.
  • Future research could focus on:
    • Quantifying the specific welfare benefits of agency in horses.
    • Developing standardized methods for assessing horse agency and welfare outcomes.
    • Creating innovative management systems that embed choice and control as core features.

Conclusion

  • Offering domestic horses opportunities for agency aligns with their natural behaviours and psychological needs, enhancing overall welfare.
  • This paper provides a valuable synthesis of behavioural theory and empirical findings, serving as a foundation for better equine care practices that prioritize animal choice, control, and challenge.
  • By bridging gaps between disciplines and connecting theory with practice, equine welfare can be significantly improved through intentional support of horse agency.

Cite This Article

APA
Goodale L. (2026). Opportunities for agency in domestic horses: Applying the behavioural domain to increase equine welfare. Anim Welf, 35, e26. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2026.10085

Publication

ISSN: 2054-1538
NlmUniqueID: 9214272
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 35
Pages: e26
PII: e26

Researcher Affiliations

Goodale, Lindsay
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

None.

References

This article includes 195 references
  1. Auer U, Kelemen Z, Engl V, Jenner F. Activity Time Budgets—A Potential Tool to Monitor Equine Welfare?. Animals 11: 850.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030850pmc: PMC8002676pubmed: 33802908google scholar: lookup
  2. Badihi I. The effects of complexity, choice and control on the behaviour and the welfare of captive common marmosets. 2006.
  3. Baumgartner M, Boisson T, Erhard MH, Zeitler-Feicht MH. Common feeding practices pose a risk to the welfare of horses when kept on non-edible bedding. Animals 10: 411.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030411pmc: PMC7142811pubmed: 32131415google scholar: lookup
  4. Bell C, Rogers S, Taylor J, Busby D. Improving the recognition of equine affective states. Animals 9: 1124.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121124pmc: PMC6941154pubmed: 31835886google scholar: lookup
  5. Benhajali H, Richard-Yris M-A, Ezzaouia M, Charfi F, Hausberger M. Foraging opportunity: a crucial criterion for horse welfare?. Animal 3: 1308–1312.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731109004820pubmed: 22444907google scholar: lookup
  6. Birke L. Talking about horses: Control and freedom in the world of ‘natural horsemanship’. Society & Animals 16: 107–126.
    doi: 10.1163/156853008X291417google scholar: lookup
  7. Birke L, Thompson K. (Un)Stable Relations: Horses, Humans and Social Agency. .
  8. Borthwick EJ, Preshaw L, Wheeler-Launder C, Challinor C, Housby-Skeggs N, Boalch E, Brown SM, Pearson G. Stable design influences relaxation and affiliative behavior in horses during short isolation bouts. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 69–70: 1–7.
  9. Boyd LE, Carbonaro DA, Houpt KA. The 24-hour time budget of Przewalski horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21: 5–17.
  10. Boyer V, Shepley E, McPherson SE, St John J, Vasseur E. Housing of dairy cattle: Enhancing movement opportunity in housing systems. .
  11. Bradshaw-Wiley E, Randle H. The effect of stabling routines on potential behavioural indicators of affective state in horses and their use in assessing quality of life. Animals 13: 1065.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13061065pmc: PMC10044549pubmed: 36978606google scholar: lookup
  12. Briefer Freymond S, Briefer EF, Von Niederhäusern R, Bachmann I. Pattern of social interactions after group integration: a possibility to keep stallions in group. PloS One 8: e54688.
  13. Browning H, Veit W. Freedom and animal welfare. Animals 11: 1148.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11041148pmc: PMC8073385pubmed: 33920520google scholar: lookup
  14. Buchanan-Smith HM, Badihi I. The psychology of control: Effects of control over supplementary light on welfare of marmosets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 137: 166–174.
  15. Budzyńska M. Stress reactivity and coping in horse adaptation to environment. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 34: 935–941.
  16. Cameron L, Challinor M, Armstrong S, Kennedy A, Hollister S, Fletcher K. Tracking the track: The impact of different grazing strategies on managing equine obesity. Animals 15: 874.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15060874pmc: PMC11939410pubmed: 40150403google scholar: lookup
  17. Campbell M. Freedoms and frameworks: How we think about the welfare of competition horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 48: 540–542.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12598pubmed: 27515500google scholar: lookup
  18. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Moving toward Fear-Free Husbandry and Veterinary Care for Horses. Animals 12: 2907.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212907pmc: PMC9653666pubmed: 36359031google scholar: lookup
  19. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Understanding and treating equine behavioural problems. The Veterinary Journal 296–297: 105985.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105985pubmed: 37127134google scholar: lookup
  20. Chaplin SJ, Gretgrix L. Effect of housing conditions on activity and lying behaviour of horses. Animal 4: 792–795.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731109991704pubmed: 22444135google scholar: lookup
  21. Chaya L, Cowan E, McGuire B. A note on the relationship between time spent in turnout and behaviour during turnout in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 155–160.
  22. Cheung E, Mills D, Ventura BA. “But my horse is well cared for”: A qualitative exploration of cognitive dissonance and enculturation in equestrian attitudes toward performance horses and their welfare. Animal Welfare 34: e50.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10028pmc: PMC12304784pubmed: 40735428google scholar: lookup
  23. Christensen JW. Object habituation in horses: The effect of voluntary versus negatively reinforced approach to frightening stimuli. Equine Veterinary Journal 45: 298–301.
  24. Christensen JW, Andersen AG, Skovbo KN, Skovgard H. Shelter use by horses during summer in relation to weather conditions and horsefly (Tabanidae) prevalence. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 253: 105676.
  25. Christensen JW, Ladewig J, Søndergaard E, Malmkvist J. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75: 233–248.
  26. Christensen JW, Søndergaard E, Thodberg K, Halekoh U. Effects of repeated regrouping on horse behaviour and injuries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133: 199–206.
  27. Clarke A. Environmental enrichment for the resting horse. Equine Health 2017: 22–25.
    doi: 10.12968/eqhe.2017.34.22google scholar: lookup
  28. Coulter K. Horses’ labour and work-lives: New intellectual and ethical directions. .
  29. Cussen V, Reid PJ. Mental health issues in shelter animals. pp 257–276.
  30. Da Luz MPF, Maia CM, Puoli Filho JNP. Equine Rolling Behavior: Thermoregulation Mechanism After Exercise and Substrate Preference. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 27: 477–486.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2022.2132825pubmed: 36217635google scholar: lookup
  31. Dai F, Costa ED, Minero M, Briant C. Does housing system affect horse welfare? The AWIN welfare assessment protocol applied to horses kept in an outdoor group-housing system: The ‘parcours’. Animal Welfare 32: e22.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.9pmc: PMC10936357pubmed: 38487418google scholar: lookup
  32. Dashper K. Listening to Horses: Society & Animals. Society & Animals 25: 207–224.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341426google scholar: lookup
  33. Daw F, Burn C, Y-M Chang, Nicol C. Effect of turnout rugs on the behaviour of horses under mild autumn conditions in the United Kingdom. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 288: 106661.
  34. Decker S, Lavery JM, Mason GJ. Don’t use it? Don’t lose it! Why active use is not required for stimuli, resources or “enrichments” to have welfare value. Zoo Biology 42: 467–475.
    doi: 10.1002/zoo.21756pubmed: 36779682google scholar: lookup
  35. DeSilvey C, Bartolini N. Where horses run free? Autonomy, temporality and rewilding in the Côa Valley, Portugal. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44: 94–109.
    doi: 10.1111/tran.12251google scholar: lookup
  36. Dierendonck MC and Goodwin Dn2005. nnhttps://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/social-contact-in-horses-implications-for-human-horse-interaction (accessed 20 March 2026).
  37. Doherty O, McGreevy PD, Pearson G. The importance of learning theory and equitation science to the veterinarian. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 190: 111–122.
  38. Dyson S, Bondi A, Routh J, Pollard D, Preston T, McConnell C, Kydd J. Do owners recognise abnormal equine behaviour when tacking-up and mounting? A comparison between responses to a questionnaire and real-time observations. Equine Veterinary Education 34: e375–e384.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13471google scholar: lookup
  39. Elia JB, Erb HN, Houpt KA. Motivation for hay: Effects of a pelleted diet on behavior and physiology of horses. Physiology & Behavior 101: 623–627.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.010pubmed: 20869976google scholar: lookup
  40. Ellis AD, Hall C. Chapter 9 - Environmental enrichment. In: Koch VW (ed) Equine Welfare in Clinical Practice, pp 169–194. Academic Press: London, UK.
  41. Endenburg N. Perceptions and attitudes towards horses in European societies. Equine Veterinary Journal (Supplement): 38–41.
  42. Englund MD, Cronin KA. Choice, control, and animal welfare: definitions and essential inquiries to advance animal welfare science. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10.
    pmc: PMC10433213pubmed: 37601746
  43. Fader C, Sambraus H. The resting behaviour of horses in loose housing systems. Tierärztliche Umschau 59: 320–327.
  44. Fenner K, Mclean AN, McGreevy PD. Cutting to the chase: How round-pen, lunging, and high-speed liberty work may compromise horse welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 29: 88–94.
  45. Fernandez EJ. Training as enrichment: A critical review.. Animal Welfare 2022;31:1–12.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.31.1.001google scholar: lookup
  46. Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD. Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants’ attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being.. Animal Welfare 2025;34:e6.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.69pmc: PMC11811708pubmed: 39935777google scholar: lookup
  47. Flamand A, Robinet L, Raskin A, Braconnier M, Bouhamidi A, Derolez G, Lochin C, Helleu C, Petit O. The social dimension of equine welfare: social contact positively affects the emotional state of stalled horses.. Animal Behaviour 2025:123055.
  48. Fletcher KA, Cameron LJ, Freeman M. Contemplating the Five Domains model of animal welfare assessment: UK horse owner perceptions of equine well-being.. Animal Welfare 2021;30:259–268.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.30.3.003google scholar: lookup
  49. Fraser Ln2012. nnhttps://www.equinebehaviorist.ca/post/the-3-f-s-friends-forage-freedom-pt-1 (accessed 16 March 2026).
  50. Freire R, Buckley P, Cooper JJ. Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41:487–492.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X383883pubmed: 19642410google scholar: lookup
  51. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses.. PloS One 2012;7:e39280.
  52. Galinelli N, Wambacq W, Broeckx BJG, Hesta M. High intake of sugars and starch, low number of meals and low roughage intake are associated with Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in a Belgian cohort.. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2021;105:18–23.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.13215pubmed: 31637798google scholar: lookup
  53. Girard TL, Bork EW, Neilsen SE, Alexander MJ. Landscape-Scale Factors Affecting Feral Horse Habitat Use During Summer Within The Rocky Mountain Foothills.. Environmental Management 2013;51:435–447.
    doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9987-2pubmed: 23183796google scholar: lookup
  54. Goodwin D. The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse.. Equine Veterinary Journal. Supplement 1999:15–19.
  55. Goodwin D. Horse Behaviour: Evolution, Domestication and Feralisation.. .
  56. Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34:686–691.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776250450pubmed: 12455839google scholar: lookup
  57. Gorecka-Bruzda A, Jastrzebska E, Muszynska A, Jedrzejewska E, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T, Murphy J. To jump or not to jump? Strategies employed by leisure and sport horses.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research 2013;8:253–260.
  58. Greening L, McBride S. A Review of Equine Sleep: Implications for Equine Welfare.. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2022;9:916737.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.916737pmc: PMC9428463pubmed: 36061116google scholar: lookup
  59. Hall C, Goodwin D, Heleski C, Randle H and Waran Nn2008. nnhttps://www-tandfonline-com.proxy.library.cornell.edu/doi/full/10.1080/10888700802101130 (accessed 16 March 2026).
    pubmed: 18569222
  60. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G, Preshaw L, Waran N. Assessing equine emotional state. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2018 205: 183–193.
  61. Hampson B, Morton J, Mills P, Trotter M, Lamb D, Pollitt C. Monitoring distances travelled by horses using GPS tracking collars. Australian Veterinary Journal 2010 88: 176–181.
  62. Harrison Jn2019. nnhttps://www.equitopiacenter.com/choice-for-your-horse/ (accessed 16 March 2026).
  63. Hartmann E, Bøe KE, Christensen JW, Hyyppä S, Jansson H, Jørgensen GHM, Ladewig J, Mejdell CM, Norling Y, Rundgren M, Särkijärvi S, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ. A Nordic survey of management practices and owners’ attitudes towards keeping horses in groups1. Journal of Animal Science 2015 93: 4564–4574.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9233pubmed: 26440355google scholar: lookup
  64. Hartmann E, Christensen JW, Keeling LJ. Social interactions of unfamiliar horses during paired encounters: Effect of pre-exposure on aggression level and so risk of injury. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2009 121: 214–221.
  65. Hartmann E, Christensen JW, McGreevy PD. Dominance and Leadership: Useful Concepts in Human–Horse Interactions?. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017 52: 1–9.
  66. Hartmann E, Rehn T, Christensen JW, Nielsen PP, McGreevy P. From the Horse’s Perspective: Investigating Attachment Behaviour and the Effect of Training Method on Fear Reactions and Ease of Handling-A Pilot Study. Animals 2021 11: 457.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020457pmc: PMC7916092pubmed: 33572351google scholar: lookup
  67. Hartmann E, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ. Keeping horses in groups: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2012 136: 77–87.
  68. Harvey AM, Beausoleil NJ, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Mental Experiences in Wild Animals: Scientifically Validating Measurable Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses. Animals 2023 13: 1507.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091507pmc: PMC10177449pubmed: 37174544google scholar: lookup
  69. Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals 2022 12: 3385.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233385pmc: PMC9736110pubmed: 36496906google scholar: lookup
  70. Hawson LA, McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Variability of scores in the 2008 Olympic dressage competition and implications for horse training and welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2010 5: 170–176.
  71. Hemsworth LM, Jongman E, Coleman GJ. Recreational horse welfare: The relationships between recreational horse owner attributes and recreational horse welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2015 165: 1–16.
  72. Henderson AJZ. Pampered prisoners: Meeting the ethological needs of the modern sport horse to enhanced equine welfare. Domestic Animals, Humans, and Leisure .
  73. Henderson AJZ. Chapter 8 - Between the horses ears: Equine cognition, welfare implications, and why it matters for equine practitioners. Equine Welfare in Clinical Practice pp 147–167.
  74. Henry S, Sigurjónsdóttir H, Klapper A, Joubert J, Montier G, Hausberger M. Domestic Foal Weaning: Need for Re-Thinking Breeding Practices?. Animals 10: 361.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020361pmc: PMC7070483pubmed: 32102206google scholar: lookup
  75. Henshall C, McGreevy PD. The role of ethology in round pen horse training—A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155: 1–11.
  76. Hildebrandt F, Büttner K, Salau J, Krieter J, Czycholl I. Area and Resource Utilization of Group-Housed Horses in an Active Stable. Animals 11: 2777.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102777pmc: PMC8532945pubmed: 34679799google scholar: lookup
  77. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. Management practices associated with owner-reported stable-related and handling behaviour problems in UK leisure horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155: 49–55.
  78. Hoffmann G, Wagels E and Kraft Sn2012. nnhttps://www.pferdeheilkunde.de/10.21836/PEM20120608 (accessed 16 March 2026).
  79. Holcomb KE, Stull CL. Effect of time and weather on preference, frequency, and duration of shade use by horses1. Journal of Animal Science 94: 1653–1661.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0160pubmed: 27136024google scholar: lookup
  80. Holcomb KE, Tucker CB, Stull CL. Shade use by small groups of domestic horses in a hot, sunny environment1. Journal of Animal Science 93: 5455–5464.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9520pubmed: 26641064google scholar: lookup
  81. Holzer S, Herholz C, Tanadini LG, Ineichen S, Julliand S. Hay preferences in horses versus selection by their owners. Livestock Science 258: 104896.
  82. Hothersall B, Casey R. Undesired behaviour in horses: A review of their development, prevention, management and association with welfare. Equine Veterinary Education 24: 479–485.
  83. Houpt KA, Houpt TR. Social and Illumination Preferences of Mares. Journal of Animal Science 66: 2159–2164.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1988.6692159xgoogle scholar: lookup
  84. Hunter L, Houpt KA. Bedding Material Preferences of Ponies1. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1986–1991.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1989.6781986xgoogle scholar: lookup
  85. Ijichi C, Wilkinson A, Riva MG, Sobrero L, Dalla Costa E. Work it out: Investigating the effect of workload on discomfort and stress physiology of riding school horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 267: 106054.
  86. Janczarek I, Stachurska A, Wilk I, Wisniewska A, Rozanska-Boczula M, Kaczmarek B, Luszczynski J, Kedzierski W. Horse Preferences for Insolation, Shade or Mist Curtain in the Paddock under Heat Conditions: Cardiac and Behavioural Response Analysis. Animals 11: 933.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11040933pmc: PMC8064440pubmed: 33805989google scholar: lookup
  87. Janczarek I, Wilk I, Pietrzak S, Liss M, Tkaczyk S. Taste Preferences of Horses in Relation to Their Breed and Sex. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 64: 59–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.02.010pubmed: 30973154google scholar: lookup
  88. Jones B, McGreevy PD. Ethical equitation: Applying a cost-benefit approach. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 5: 196–202.
  89. Jørgensen GHM, Aanensen L, Mejdell CM, Bøe KE. Preference for shelter and additional heat in horses exposed to Nordic winter conditions. Equine Veterinary Journal 48: 720–726.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12522pubmed: 26509636google scholar: lookup
  90. Jørgensen GHM, Borsheim L, Mejdell CM, Søndergaard E, Bøe KE. Grouping horses according to gender—Effects on aggression, spacing and injuries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 94–99.
  91. Jorgensen GHM, Mejdell CM, Boe KE. The effect of blankets on horse behaviour and preference for shelter in Nordic winter conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 218: 104822.
  92. Joshuan2018. nnhttps://journal.iaabcfoundation.org/cooperative-care/ (accessed 16 March 2026).
  93. Karkulehto S, Schuurman N. Learning to Read Equine Agency: Sense and Sensitivity at the Intersection of Scientific, Tacit and Situated Knowledges. Animal Studies Journal 10: 111–139.
    doi: 10.14453/asj.v10i2.6google scholar: lookup
  94. Kelemen Z, Grimm H, Vogl C, Long M, Cavalleri JMV, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Activity Time Budgets: The Effect of Housing and Management Conditions on Geriatric Horses and Horses with Chronic Orthopaedic Disease. Animals 11: 1867.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071867pmc: PMC8300227pubmed: 34201584google scholar: lookup
  95. Kellershohn JJ, Blum S, Montavon S, De Sales NAA, Costa ED, Spadavecchia C. Are indicators of stress and pain recognizable during lip twitch in horses? A behavioral investigation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior .
  96. Kelly KJ, McDuffee LA, Mears K. The Effect of Human–Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review. Animals 11: 2782.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102782pmc: PMC8532845pubmed: 34679804google scholar: lookup
  97. Kienapfel K, Piccolo L, Cockburn M, Gmel A, Rueß D, Bachmann I. Comparison of head–neck positions and conflict behaviour in ridden elite dressage horses between warm-up and competition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 272: 106202.
  98. Kieson E, Felix C, Webb S, Abramson CI. The effects of a choice test between food rewards and human interaction in a herd of domestic horses of varying breeds and experiences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 231: 105075.
  99. Kieson E, Goma AA, Radi M. Tend and Befriend in Horses: Partner Preferences, Lateralization, and Contextualization of Allogrooming in Two Socially Stable Herds of Quarter Horse Mares. Animals 13: 225.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020225pmc: PMC9854972pubmed: 36670764google scholar: lookup
  100. Kirton R, Sandford I, Raffan E, Hallsworth S, Burman OHP, Morgan R. The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour and welfare of ponies. Equine Veterinary Journal 57: 737–744.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14411pmc: PMC11982426pubmed: 39275860google scholar: lookup
  101. Kjærulff LNR, Lindegaard C. Performance and rideability issues in horses as a manifestation of pain: A review of differential diagnosis and diagnostic approach. Equine Veterinary Education 34: 103–112.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13400google scholar: lookup
  102. Knubben JM, Fürst A, Gygax L, Stauffacher M. Bite and kick injuries in horses: Prevalence, risk factors and prevention.. Equine Veterinary Journal 40: 219–223.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X253118pubmed: 18086579google scholar: lookup
  103. König von Borstel U, Keil J. Horses’ behavior and heart rate in a preference test for shorter and longer riding bouts.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 7: 362–374.
  104. König von Borstel U, Kienapfel K, McLean A, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. Hyperflexing the horse’s neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Scientific Reports 14: 22886.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5pmc: PMC11446961pubmed: 39358404google scholar: lookup
  105. Krueger K, Esch L, Farmer K, Marr I. Basic Needs in Horses?—A Literature Review.. Animals 11: 1798.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061798pmc: PMC8235049pubmed: 34208615google scholar: lookup
  106. Lamanna M, Buonaiuto G, Colleluori R, Raspa F, Valle E, Cavallini D. Time-activity budget in horses and ponies: A systematic review and meta-analysis on feeding dynamics and management implications.. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 154: 105684.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105684pubmed: 40912378google scholar: lookup
  107. Lansade L, Lévy F, Parias C, Reigner F, Górecka-Bruzda A. Weaned horses, especially females, still prefer their dam after five months of separation.. Animal 16: 100636.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100636pubmed: 36183430google scholar: lookup
  108. Lansade L, Valenchon M, Foury A, Neveux C, Cole SW, Layé S, Cardinaud B, Lévy F, Moisan M-P. Behavioral and Transcriptomic Fingerprints of an Enriched Environment in Horses. PLOS ONE 9: e114384.
  109. Lee J, Floyd T, Erb H, Houpt K. Preference and demand for exercise in stabled horses.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 130: 91–100.
  110. Leotti LA, Delgado MR. The Inherent Reward of Choice.. Psychological Science 22: 1310–1318.
    doi: 10.1177/0956797611417005pmc: PMC3391581pubmed: 21931157google scholar: lookup
  111. Leotti LA, Iyengar SS, Ochsner KN. Born to Choose: The Origins and Value of the Need for Control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 457–463.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001pmc: PMC2944661pubmed: 20817592google scholar: lookup
  112. Lesimple C, Gautier E, Benhajali H, Rochais C, Lunel C, Bensaïd S, Khalloufi A, Henry S, Hausberger M. Stall architecture influences horses’ behaviour and the prevalence and type of stereotypies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 219: 104833.
  113. Lesimple C, Hausberger M. How accurate are we at assessing others’ well-being? The example of welfare assessment in horses. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00021pmc: PMC3900850pubmed: 24478748google scholar: lookup
  114. Lesimple C, Reverchon-Billot L, Galloux P, Stomp M, Boichot L, Coste C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Free movement: A key for welfare improvement in sport horses?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 225: 104972.
  115. Littlewood K, Beausoleil N, Mellor D. Chapter 1 - Assessing equine welfare: Operationalizing the Five Domains Model for veterinary practitioners. In: Koch VW (ed) Equine Welfare in Clinical Practice, pp. 1–20. Academic Press: London, UK.
  116. Littlewood KE, Heslop MV, Cobb ML. The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the Five Domains Model. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10: 1284869.
    pmc: PMC10656766pubmed: 38026638
  117. Loftus L, Newman A, Leach M, Asher L. Exploring the induction and measurement of positive affective state in equines through a personality-centred lens. Scientific Reports 15: 18550.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98034-8pmc: PMC12116887pubmed: 40425817google scholar: lookup
  118. Losonci Z, Berry J, Paddison J. Do stabled horses show more undesirable behaviors during handling than field-kept ones?. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 15: 93.
  119. Luke KL, McAdie T, Warren-Smith AK, Smith BP. Untangling the Complex Relationships between Horse Welfare, Rider Safety, and Rider Satisfaction. Anthrozoos .
  120. Luz MPF, Maia CM, Arruda L a. S, Delagracia MF, Filho J. Preference for heights of feeding troughs in mares: a pilot study. Animal Welfare 28: 205–214.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.28.2.205google scholar: lookup
  121. Marchant-Forde JN. The Science of Animal Behavior and Welfare: Challenges, Opportunities, and Global Perspective. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2: 16.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00016pmc: PMC4672293pubmed: 26664945google scholar: lookup
  122. Marlin D, Randle H, Pal L, Williams J. Do equestrians have insight into their equine-related knowledge (or lack of knowledge)?. p 66. September 2018, Rome, Italy.
  123. Mazzola SM, Colombani C, Pizzamiglio G, Cannas S, Palestrini C, Costa ED, Gazzonis AL, Bionda A, Crepaldi P. Do You Think I Am Living Well? A Four-Season Hair Cortisol Analysis on Leisure Horses in Different Housing and Management Conditions. Animals 11: 2141.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072141pmc: PMC8300697pubmed: 34359269google scholar: lookup
  124. McAfee LM, Mills DS, Cooper JJ. The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 159–173.
  125. McDonnell S. The Equid Ethogram: A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behaviour. Eclipse Press: UK.
  126. McGreevy P, Berger J, De Brauwere N, Doherty O, Harrison A, Fiedler J, Jones C, McDonnell S, McLean A, Nakonechny L, Nicol C, Preshaw L, Thomson P, Tzioumis V, Webster J, Wolfensohn S, Yeates J, Jones B. Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare. Animals 8: 41.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8030041pmc: PMC5867529pubmed: 29562654google scholar: lookup
  127. McGreevy PD, Cripps PJ, French NP, Green LE, Nicol CJ. Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: 86–91.
  128. McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Punishment in horse-training and the concept of ethical equitation. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 4: 193–197.
  129. McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse–human dyad: Can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram?. The Veterinary Journal 181: 12–18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005pubmed: 19375965google scholar: lookup
  130. McLean AN. Overshadowing: A Silver Lining to a Dark Cloud in Horse Training. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11: 236–248.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101064pubmed: 18569221google scholar: lookup
  131. McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 190: 18–27.
  132. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 5: 187–195.
  133. Mejdell CM, Bøe KE, Jørgensen GHM. Caring for the horse in a cold climate—Reviewing principles for thermoregulation and horse preferences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 231: 105071.
  134. Mejdell CM, Buvik T, Jørgensen GHM, Bøe KE. Horses can learn to use symbols to communicate their preferences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 184: 66–73.
  135. Mejdell CM, Jørgensen GHM, Buvik T, Torp T, Bøe KE. The effect of weather conditions on the preference in horses for wearing blankets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 212: 52–57.
  136. Mellor DJ. Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. 7: 60.
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080060pmc: PMC5575572pubmed: 28792485google scholar: lookup
  137. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ. Extending the ‘Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 24: 241–253.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.241google scholar: lookup
  138. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, Wilkins C. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals 10: 1870.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pmc: PMC7602120pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup
  139. Mendonça RS, Pinto P, Inoue S, Ringhofer M, Godinho R, Hirata S. Social determinants of affiliation and cohesion in a population of feral horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 245: 105496.
  140. Merkies K, Visneski M, Danel J, Carson J, Elu ED, Fritsch L. Taking the Bitter with the Sweet-A Preliminary Study of the Short-Term Response of Horses to Various Tastants in Solutions. International Journal of Equine Science 3: 12–20.
  141. Mills D. Putting the Horse Before the Cart: the Ethical Case for Animal Patient Values in EBVM. Veterinary Evidence 2.
    doi: 10.18849/ve.v2i2.112google scholar: lookup
  142. Moon LE, Lodahl TM. The Reinforcing Effect of Changes in Illumination on Lever-Pressing in the Monkey. The American Journal of Psychology 69: 288–290.
    doi: 10.2307/1418162pubmed: 13327094google scholar: lookup
  143. Mouncey R, Arango-Sabogal JC, de Mestre A, Verheyen KL. Associations between turn out practices and rates of musculoskeletal disease and injury in Thoroughbred foals and yearlings on stud farms in the United Kingdom. Equine Veterinary Journal 56: 892–901.
    pubmed: 38146768
  144. Musial F, Weiss T. What if Horses Were Humans? Comparing Rein Tension and Bit Pressures to Human Pressure Pain Thresholds. Animals 15: 2989.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15202989pmc: PMC12560900pubmed: 41153916google scholar: lookup
  145. Napolitano F, De Rosa G, Braghieri A, Grasso F, Bordi A, Wemelsfelder F. The qualitative assessment of responsiveness to environmental challenge in horses and ponies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 342–354.
  146. Noble GK. Horse Husbandry–Nutrition, Management and Welfare. Animals 13: 169.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13010169pmc: PMC9817810pubmed: 36611777google scholar: lookup
  147. Pearson Gn2022. nn10.7488/era/2300
    doi: 10.7488/era/2300google scholar: lookup
  148. Pearson G. Welfare considerations for management of horses on prolonged periods of box rest. Equine Veterinary Education 36: 342–346.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13972google scholar: lookup
  149. Pearson G, Waran N, Reardon RJM, Keen J, Dwyer C. A Delphi study to determine expert consensus on the behavioural indicators of stress in horses undergoing veterinary care. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 237: 105291.
  150. Pedersen G, Søndergaard E, Ladewig J. The influence of bedding on the time horses spend recumbent. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 24: 153–158.
  151. Perdue BM, Evans TA, Washburn DA, Rumbaugh DM, Beran MJ. Do monkeys choose to choose?. Learning & Behavior 42: 164–175.
    doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0135-0pmc: PMC4196680pubmed: 24567075google scholar: lookup
  152. Phelipon R, Hennes N, Ruet A, Bret-Morel A, Górecka-Bruzda A, Lansade L. Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 11.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116pmc: PMC11615640pubmed: 39634765google scholar: lookup
  153. Puttkammer N, Hildebrandt F, Krieter J, Czycholl I. How should one design and position straw feeders in group-housed horses? A case study on occupancy and agonistic interactions at straw feeders in a large group of horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 280: 106423.
  154. Rankins EM, Wickens CL. A systematic review of equine personality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 231: 105076.
  155. Rault J-L, Bateson M, Boissy A, Forkman B, Grinde B, Gygax L, Harfeld JL, Hintze S, Keeling LJ, Kostal L, Lawrence AB, Mendl MT, Miele M, Newberry RC, Sandøe P, Špinka M, Taylor AH, Webb LE, Whalin L, Jensen MB. A consensus on the definition of positive animal welfare. Biology Letters 21: 20240382.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0382pmc: PMC11883819pubmed: 39837489google scholar: lookup
  156. Redgate SE, Cooper JJ, Hall S, Eady P, Harris PA. Dietary experience modifies horses’ feeding behavior and selection patterns of three macronutrient rich diets.. Journal of Animal Science 92: 1524–1530.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5579pubmed: 24496846google scholar: lookup
  157. Reilly AC, Bryk-Lucy JA. Incidence of soft tissue injury and hours of daily paddock turnout in non-elite performance horses.. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 100: 103606.
  158. Rioja-Lang FC, Connor M, Bacon H, Dwyer CM. Determining a Welfare Prioritization for Horses Using a Delphi Method.. Animals 10: 647.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040647pmc: PMC7222753pubmed: 32283607google scholar: lookup
  159. Rose-Meierhöfer S, Klaer S, Ammon C, Brunsch R, Hoffmann G. Activity Behavior of Horses Housed in Different Open Barn Systems.. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 30: 624–634.
  160. Ruckebusch Y. The hypnogram as an index of adaptation of farm animals to changes in their environment.. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 3–18.
  161. Ruet A, Arnould C, Levray J, Lemarchand J, Mach N, Moisan M-P, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Effects of a temporary period on pasture on the welfare state of horses housed in individual boxes.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 228: 105027.
  162. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Briant C, Arnould C, Lansade L. A field approach to observing changes in behavioural welfare indicators over 2 years in stabled horses.. Animal 18: 101120.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101120pubmed: 38520772google scholar: lookup
  163. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan M-P, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare.. Animals 9: 621.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  164. Rust K, Clegg I, Fernandez EJ. The voice of choice: A scoping review of choice-based animal welfare studies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 275: 106270.
  165. Sarrafchi A, Lassallette E, Merkies K. The effect of choice on horse behaviour, heart rate and heart rate variability during human-horse touch interactions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 290: 106698.
  166. Schatzmann U. Winter pasturing of sport horses in Switzerland–an experimental study. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 27: 53–54.
  167. Scheibe KM, Eichhorn K, Kalz B, Streich WJ, Scheibe A. Water consumption and watering behavior of Przewalski horses () in a semireserve. Zoo Biology 17: 181–192.
  168. Schmucker S, Preisler V, Marr I, Krüger K, Stefanski V. Single housing but not changes in group composition causes stress-related immunomodulations in horses. PLoS ONE 17: e0272445.
  169. Scofield RM. Groundwork and foundation training. Solving Equine Behaviour Problems: An Equitation Science Approach pp 72–109.
  170. Sigurjónsdóttir H, van Dierendonck M, Snorrason S, Thórhallsdóttir A. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion. Behaviour 140: 783–804.
  171. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals 9: 14.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9010014pmc: PMC6356279pubmed: 30621272google scholar: lookup
  172. Smith AV, Wilson C, McComb K, Proops L. Domestic horses () prefer to approach humans displaying a submissive body posture rather than a dominant body posture.. Animal Cognition 21: 307–312.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1140-4pmc: PMC5818628pubmed: 29030725google scholar: lookup
  173. Smith BL, Jones JH, Carlson GP, Pascoe JR. Body position and direction preferences in horses during road transport.. Equine Veterinary Journal 26: 374–377.
  174. Søndergaard E, Jensen MB, Nicol CJ. Motivation for social contact in horses measured by operant conditioning.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132: 131–137.
  175. Špinka M. Animal agency, animal awareness and animal welfare.. Animal Welfare 28: 11–20.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.28.1.011google scholar: lookup
  176. Špinka M, Wemelsfelder F. Environmental Challenge and Animal Agency.. Sentience Collection .
  177. Squibb K, Griffin K, Favier R, Ijichi C. Poker Face: Discrepancies in behaviour and affective states in horses during stressful handling procedures.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 202: 34–38.
  178. Sydänheimo A, Freeman M, Hunt K. Cooperative Care Does Not Scare – Use of Cooperative Care Training in Routine Husbandry in Dogs.. Animal Behaviour and Welfare Cases 2023: abwcases20230010.
  179. Taylor DEF, Lancaster BE, Ellis AD. Time Budgets in Domesticated Male Icelandic Horses on Pasture Turnout in Winter and Spring.. Animals 15: 3206.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15213206pmc: PMC12610192pubmed: 41227536google scholar: lookup
  180. Thompson SC. Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question.. Psychological Bulletin 90: 89–101.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89pubmed: 7267899google scholar: lookup
  181. Thorne JB, Goodwin D, Kennedy MJ, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for individually housed horses: Practicality and effects on behaviour.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 149–164.
  182. Torcivia C, McDonnell SM. Case series report: Systematic rehabilitation of specific health care procedure aversions in 5 ponies.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 25: 41–51.
  183. Torres Borda L, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Social Behaviour: Love, War and Tolerance.. Animals 13: 1473.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091473pmc: PMC10177386pubmed: 37174510google scholar: lookup
  184. Torres Borda L, Auer U, Jenner F. The role of space availability and affiliation in shaping equine social distances and dynamics.. Scientific Reports 15: 10273.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92943-4pmc: PMC11937558pubmed: 40133443google scholar: lookup
  185. Van Dierendonck MC, Spruijt BM. Coping in groups of domestic horses – Review from a social and neurobiological perspective.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138: 194–202.
  186. Visser EK, Van Wijk-Jansen EEC. Diversity in horse enthusiasts with respect to horse welfare: An explorative study.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 7: 295–304.
  187. von Essen UE, Bornemark J. Between behaviourism, posthumanism, and animal rights theory: Negative and positive reinforcement in liberty dressage.. Equine Cultures in Transition Routledge: London, UK.
  188. Waran N, McGreevy P, Casey RA. Training Methods and Horse Welfare. In: Waran N (ed) The Welfare of Horses, pp 151–180. Springer; Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  189. Waran NK. Can studies of feral horse behaviour be used for assessing domestic horse welfare?. Equine Veterinary Journal 29: 249–251.
  190. Warren-Smith AK, McGreevy PD. Equestrian coaches’ understanding and application of learning theory in horse training. Anthrozoos 21: 153–162.
    doi: 10.2752/175303708X305800google scholar: lookup
  191. Werhahn H, Hessel EF, Schulze H, Van den Weghe HFA. Temporary Turnout for Free Exercise in Groups: Effects on the Behavior of Competition Horses Housed in Single Stalls. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 31: 417–425.
  192. Winwright D, Elston H, Hall C, Hall C. The impact of paddock design on the behaviour of the domestic horse. In: Krueger K (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd International Equine Science Meeting. Xenophon Publishing: Wald, UK.
  193. Wolframm I, Engels T, Lindström M, Forssman K. Landscape of Choice: The Influence of Landscape Features on the Behavior of Sport Horses. International Journal of Equine Science 4: 3–16.
    doi: 10.64292/j2jkvt50google scholar: lookup
  194. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing. Physiology & Behavior 143: 51–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  195. Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bardou D, Bachmann I. Social Box: A New Housing System Increases Social Interactions among Stallions. Animals 13: 1408.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081408pmc: PMC10135302pubmed: 37106974google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.