Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology2012; 159(3-4); 406-410; doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.014

Optimization of an in vitro assay to detect Streptococcus equi subsp. equi.

Abstract: Streptococcus equi is the etiologic agent of a highly infectious upper respiratory disease of horses known as strangles. Bacterial culture methods and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of nasopharyngeal washes and guttural pouch lavages are used routinely to test clinical and carrier animals for the presence of S. equi but no definitive or gold standard test method has been shown to be optimal. We hypothesized that (i) a flocked swab submerged in ten-fold serial dilution suspensions of S. equi prepared in 0.9% NaCl would detect more colony forming units (CFU) than a rayon swab when used to inoculate a blood agar plate, (ii) centrifugation of a 1 ml aliquot of each suspension would improve the limit of detection (LOD) by bacterial culture and PCR compared to the culture or PCR of submerged swab samples, (iii) PCR of the centrifuged samples from each suspension would be more sensitive than aerobic culture alone, and (iv) PCR of a 1 ml aliquot directly from a sample would be more sensitive than PCR of a sample following submersion of a flocked swab in 1 ml saline. Using 7 ten-fold serial dilutions of S. equi in 0.9% NaCl, the LOD for 4 bacterial culture methods and 3 PCR methods were compared. The LOD of direct PCR and flocked swab culture was determined at 1 cfu/ml. All PCR methods were equivalent to each other and were more sensitive than any of the culture methods at the lower dilutions. At higher cell densities (>100 cfu/ml) flocked swab culture was not statistically better than rayon swab culture, but it was superior to all other methods tested.
Publication Date: 2012-04-19 PubMed ID: 22560762DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.014Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on optimizing an in vitro testing method to detect Streptococcus equi, a bacteria causing upper respiratory illness in horses. The scientists propose and test different methods to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the detection.

Introduction and Hypothesis

  • The research is centered around Streptococcus equi, a bacterium causing ‘strangles’, a major respiratory infection in horses.
  • Although bacterial culture methods and PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) of nasopharyngeal washing and guttural pouch lavages are used conventionally to detect the bacteria, an optimal detection method remains undetermined.
  • The scientists hypothesize that using a flocked swab soaked in serially diluted suspensions of the bacteria will detect more colony-forming units (CFUs) than a rayon swab.
  • The researchers also believe that centrifuging a part of each suspension will improve the limit of detection (LOD) for bacterial culture and PCR compared to submerged swab samples.
  • The assumption is also made that PCR of centrifuged samples will be more sensitive than aerobic culture alone.
  • It’s also proposed that PCR of a direct sample would be more sensitive than one following the submersion of a swab in saline.

Methodology and Results

  • Seven ten-fold serial dilutions of S. equi in 0.9% NaCl was used, and LOD for 4 bacterial culture methods and 3 PCR methods were compared.
  • The research found that the LOD was the same for both direct PCR and flocked swab culture, at 1 cfu/ml.
  • All PCR methods were found to be equivalent in sensitivity and more sensitive than any of the culture methods for lower dilutions.
  • However, at higher cell densities (more than 100 cfu/ml), the flocked swab culture method was not statistically more effective than rayon swab culture, but it was notably superior to all other methods tested.

Conclusion

  • This article suggests new considerations for optimal methods to detect and assess the S. equi bacterial concentration in test samples. Gaining more accurate readings at various dilutions is crucial to managing this common equine disease.
  • The results give a valuable insight into the effectiveness of different testing methods and offer a springboard for further research into this area.

Cite This Article

APA
Boyle AG, Boston RC, O'Shea K, Young S, Rankin SC. (2012). Optimization of an in vitro assay to detect Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. Vet Microbiol, 159(3-4), 406-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.014

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2542
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 159
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 406-410

Researcher Affiliations

Boyle, Ashley G
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Rd., Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA. boylea@vet.upenn.edu
Boston, Ray C
    O'Shea, Kathleen
      Young, Sheri
        Rankin, Shelley C

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Bacteriological Techniques / methods
          • Bacteriological Techniques / veterinary
          • Carrier State / diagnosis
          • Carrier State / microbiology
          • Carrier State / veterinary
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horse Diseases / microbiology
          • Horses
          • Lymphadenitis / diagnosis
          • Lymphadenitis / microbiology
          • Lymphadenitis / veterinary
          • Nasopharynx / microbiology
          • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
          • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / microbiology
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / veterinary
          • Streptococcal Infections / diagnosis
          • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
          • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
          • Streptococcus equi / genetics
          • Streptococcus equi / growth & development
          • Streptococcus equi / isolation & purification

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Knox A, Zerna G, Beddoe T. Current and Future Advances in the Detection and Surveillance of Biosecurity-Relevant Equine Bacterial Diseases Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP).. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 18;13(16).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13162663pubmed: 37627456google scholar: lookup
          2. Brankston G, Rossi TM, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL. Diagnostic testing patterns for Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in Ontario horses during the years 2008 to 2018.. Can Vet J 2021 Jun;62(6):629-636.
            pubmed: 34219772
          3. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement.. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
          4. Boyle AG, Stefanovski D, Rankin SC. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch specimens to determine the optimal sampling site to detect Streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers by DNA amplification.. BMC Vet Res 2017 Mar 23;13(1):75.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0989-4pubmed: 28335829google scholar: lookup
          5. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, D○ L, Boston RC, Wheeler-Aceto H. Streptococcus equi Detection Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Equine Nasopharyngeal and Guttural Pouch Wash Samples.. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):276-81.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808pubmed: 26678318google scholar: lookup