Analyze Diet
Parasite (Paris, France)2015; 22; 34; doi: 10.1051/parasite/2015034

Oviposition site selection by Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae) in its habitat in Kalamaili Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China.

Abstract: Oviposition site selection is an important aspect of the behavioural ecology of insects. A comparison of the habitats used by a species enhances our understanding of their adaptation to altered environments. We collected data on the oviposition behaviours of Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae) in its habitat in Kalamaili Nature Reserve (KNR), Xinjiang, China between March and October 2014. We found 91 quadrats were used by G. pecorum for oviposition. Examining 13 ecological factors using the t-test, chi-square test, and principal component analysis showed that G. pecorum's oviposition habitat was preferentially on slopes with inclinations of 10-30° that were semi-sunny, semi-cloudy slopes, in positions high or low on the slopes, with preferences for total plants lower than 10% and Stipa capillata coverage lower than 10% on the low slopes, but Ceratoides latens coverage on the high and intermediate slopes, when the numbers of plant species and families were lower than five. G. pecorum often selected sites at a distance < 2000 m from a water source and average altitude 900-1000 m. The oviposition site selection by G. pecorum may be correlated with the behaviour of Przewalski's horses (Equus ferus przewalskii), and water and food resources may strongly influence oviposition site selection, as Przewalski's horses rest and forage in these areas. Le choix du site de ponte est un aspect important de l’écologie comportementale des insectes. Une comparaison des habitats utilisés par une espèce améliore notre compréhension de son adaptation à des environnements modifiés. Nous avons recueilli des données sur les comportements de ponte de (Diptera, Gasterophilidae) dans son habitat dans la Réserve Naturelle Kalamaili (KNR), Xinjiang, Chine, entre mars et Octobre 2014. Nous avons trouvé 91 quadrats qui étaient utilisés par pour la ponte. Un examen de treize facteurs écologiques en utilisant le test , le test du chi carré et une analyse en composantes principales a montré que l’habitat de ponte de était préférentiellement des pentes avec des inclinaisons de 10–30° qui étaient semi-ensoleillées, semi-nuageuses, dans des positions haute ou basse sur les pentes, avec des préférences pour une couverture totale par les plantes inférieure à 10 % et inférieure à 10 % pour sur les pentes basses, et pour une couverture par sur les pentes hautes et intermédiaires où le nombre d’espèces et de familles de plantes étaient inférieur à cinq. sélectionne souvent des sites à une distance inférieure à 2000 m d’une source d’eau et une altitude moyenne de 900–1000 m. Le choix du site de ponte par peut être corrélé avec le comportement des chevaux de Prjevalski (), et les ressources en eau et de nourriture peuvent influer fortement sur le choix du site de ponte, car les chevaux de Prjevalski se reposent et paissent dans ces zones.
Publication Date: 2015-11-30 PubMed ID: 26621549PubMed Central: PMC4664853DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2015034Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the breeding area choices of a type of fly called Gasterophilus pecorum in Kalamaili Nature Reserve, China. Particularly, the investigators found that specific environmental factors play a crucial role in the fly’s preference for breeding locations.

Objective of the Research

  • The study aims to understand the oviposition habits — where a female insect chooses to lay her eggs — of the Gasterophilus pecorum (a type of fly) and its adaptation to the environment in the Kalamaili Nature Reserve in Xinjiang, China.

Research Methodology

  • The research was conducted between March and October of 2014.
  • Researchers carefully observed and studied the behaviour of these insects and their chosen oviposition sites.
  • The preference of these flies for certain environments was evaluated based on 13 different ecological factors.
  • These factors were analyzed using statistical tests such as the t-test, chi-square test, and principal component analysis.

Key Findings

  • The researchers discovered that G. pecorum preferred to lay eggs on slopes with inclinations between 10-30°. These areas were typically semi-sunny, semi-cloudy, and could be either high or low on the slopes.
  • The flies had a preference for areas with less than 10% plant coverage, particularly Stipa capillata on the lower slopes and Ceratoides latens on the higher and intermediate slopes.
  • Moreover, the preferred areas usually had a plant species diversity of less than five.
  • The flies often picked sites less than 2000m from a water source and at an average altitude of 900-1000m. This may be due to the behaviour of Przewalski’s horses — which are likely hosts or food sources for the flies — that rest and forage in these areas.
  • The research also indicates that the selection of oviposition sites by G. pecorum might be heavily influenced by resource availability, particularly water and food.

Implications of the Research

  • This research can enhance each understanding of the behavioural ecology of G. pecorum and contribute to the wider field of insect research.
  • The findings may also have implications for future management and conservation strategies within the Kalamaili Nature Reserve.

Cite This Article

APA
Liu SH, Hu DF, Li K. (2015). Oviposition site selection by Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae) in its habitat in Kalamaili Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Parasite, 22, 34. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2015034

Publication

ISSN: 1776-1042
NlmUniqueID: 9437094
Country: France
Language: English
Volume: 22
Pages: 34
PII: 34

Researcher Affiliations

Liu, Shan-Hui
  • Key Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083 Beijing, P.R. China.
Hu, De-Fu
  • Key Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083 Beijing, P.R. China.
Li, Kai
  • Key Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083 Beijing, P.R. China.

MeSH Terms

  • Altitude
  • Animal Migration
  • Animals
  • China
  • Climate
  • Diptera / physiology
  • Ecosystem
  • Female
  • Food Supply
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses / parasitology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Host-Parasite Interactions
  • Life Cycle Stages
  • Male
  • Myiasis / parasitology
  • Myiasis / veterinary
  • Oviposition
  • Plants
  • Water Supply

References

This article includes 61 references
  1. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.. Behaviour 1974;49(3):227-67.
    pubmed: 4597405doi: 10.1163/156853974x00534google scholar: lookup
  2. Altmann SA. Baboons, space, time and energy. American Zoologist 14, 221–248.
  3. Bernays EA. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation.. Annu Rev Entomol 2001;46:703-27.
    pubmed: 11112184doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.703google scholar: lookup
  4. Bolger DT, Newmark WD, Morrison TA, Doak DF. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates.. Ecol Lett 2008 Jan;11(1):63-77.
  5. Bouman I. The Tale of the Przewalski’s Horse. KNNV Publishers: Utrecht, The Netherlands: p. 82–161.
  6. Brandt M, Fischer-Blass B, Heinze J, Foitzik S. Population structure and the co-evolution between social parasites and their hosts.. Mol Ecol 2007 May;16(10):2063-78.
  7. Brocard P, Pfister K. [The epidemiology of gasterophilosis of horses in Switzerland].. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1991;133(9):409-16.
    pubmed: 1771404
  8. Chapman RF, Simpson SJ, Douglas AE. The insects: structure and function, 5th edn. Elsevier North Holland, Inc: New York: p. 543–635.
  9. Charles D. Constrained PCA techniques for the identification of common factors in data. Neurocomputing 22, 145–156.
  10. Chen JL. Utilization of food, water and space by released Przewalski horse (Equus przewalski) with reference to survival strategies analysis. Beijing Forestry University: Beijing, China.
  11. CHERESHNEV NA. [Biologic properties of the gadfly Gastrophilus pecorum Fabr. (Diptera, Gastrophillidae)].. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 1951 Apr;77(4):765-8.
    pubmed: 14822865
  12. Chu HJ. The feeding, population and habitat research between (Equus hemionus) and geese antelope (Gazella subgutturosa) in KalamaiLi wild ungulates nature reserve. Chinese Academy of Sciences University: Beijing, China.
  13. Chu HJ, Jiang ZG, Ge Y, Jiang F, Tao YS, Wang C. Population densities and number of khulan and goitered gazelle in Mt. Kalamaili Ungulate Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science 17, 414–422.
  14. Cogley TP, Cogley MC. Field observations of the host-parasite relationship associated with the common horse bot fly, Gasterophilus intestinalis.. Vet Parasitol 2000 Feb 29;88(1-2):93-105.
    pubmed: 10681026doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00191-0google scholar: lookup
  15. Colwell DD, Hall MJR, Scholl PJ. The oestrid flies: biology, host-parasite relationships, impact and management. Oxford University Press: London.
  16. Drudge JH, Lyons ET, Wyant ZN, Tolliver SC. Occurrence of second and third instars of Gasterophilus intestinalis and Gasterophilus nasalis in stomachs of horses in Kentucky.. Am J Vet Res 1975 Nov;36(11):1585-8.
    pubmed: 1190600
  17. Dukas R. Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1539-47.
    pmc: PMC1693070pubmed: 12495511doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1063google scholar: lookup
  18. Fryxell JM, Sinclair AR. Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores.. Trends Ecol Evol 1988 Sep;3(9):237-41.
    pubmed: 21227239doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90166-8google scholar: lookup
  19. Gandon S, Michalakis Y. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, 451–462.
  20. Gaylard A, Owen-smith N, Redfern J. Surface water availability: implications for heterogeneity and ecosystem processes, in The Kruger Experience: Ecology and Management of Savanna Heterogeneity. du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, Editors Island Press: Washington, DC, USA: p. 171–188.
  21. Hagemoen RIM, Reimer E. Reindeer summer activity pattern in relation to weather and insect harassment. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 883–892.
  22. Hummel J, Steuer P, Südekum KH, Hammer S, Hammer C, Streich WJ, Clauss M. Fluid and particle retention in the digestive tract of the addax antelope (Addax nasomaculatus)--adaptations of a grazing desert ruminant.. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2008 Feb;149(2):142-9.
    pubmed: 18083600doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.11.001google scholar: lookup
  23. Ibrayev B, Lider L, Bauer C. Gasterophilus spp. infections in horses from northern and central Kazakhstan.. Vet Parasitol 2015 Jan 15;207(1-2):94-8.
    pubmed: 25522954doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.015google scholar: lookup
  24. Kaczensky P, Ganbaatar O, Von-Wehrden H, Walzer C. Resource selection by sympatric wild equids in the Mongolian Gobi. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1762–1769.
  25. Kaczensky P, Ganbaatar O, von Wehrden H, Enksaikhan N, Lkhagvasuren D, Walzer C. Przewalski's Horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) Re-introduction in the Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area: from Species to Ecosystem Conservation.. Mong J Biol Sci 2007 Dec;5(1-2):13-18.
    pmc: PMC3207201pubmed: 22064815doi: 10.22353/mjbs.2007.05.03google scholar: lookup
  26. King SRB, Gurnell J. Effects of fly disturbance on the behaviour of a population of reintroduced Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Mongolia. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 125, 22–29.
  27. Lechowicz MJ. The sampling characteristics of electivity indices.. Oecologia 1982 Jan;52(1):22-30.
    pubmed: 28310104doi: 10.1007/bf00349007google scholar: lookup
  28. Li K, Wu Z, Hu DF. A report on new causative agent (Gasterophilus spp.) of the myiasis of Przewalski’s horse occurred in China. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 38(8), 837–840.
  29. Liu S. Study on habitat selection and community protection awareness of the reintroducted Equrus przewalskii in Mt. Kalamaili Ungulate Nature Reserve. Xinjiang University: Xinjiang, China.
  30. Liu SH. Morphology and epidemiological investigation and the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) and 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic of Gasterophilus. Beijing Forestry University: Beijing, China.
  31. Lozano GA. Optimal foraging theory: a possible role for parasites. Oikos 60, 391–395.
  32. Mayhew PJ. Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood.. Trends Ecol Evol 2001 Apr 1;16(4):165-167.
    pubmed: 11245932doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)02099-1google scholar: lookup
  33. Meng YP. Studies on the food plants, food preference and foraging strategy of released Przewalski’s horses. Beijing Forestry University: Beijing, China.
  34. Mo F. The Gasterophilus myiasis research of Przewalski’s horses (Equus przewalskii). Beijing Forestry University: Beijing, China.
  35. Mohr E. The Asiatic wild horse. Allen: London.
  36. Niedźwiedź A, Borowicz H, Nicpoń JM. Prevalence study in horses infected by Gasterophilus sp. in an eastern region of Poland.. Vet Parasitol 2013 Jan 16;191(1-2):94-6.
    pubmed: 22998809doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.08.023google scholar: lookup
  37. Ostrowski S, Williams JB, Ismael K. Heterothermy and the water economy of free-living Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx).. J Exp Biol 2003 May;206(Pt 9):1471-8.
    pubmed: 12654886doi: 10.1242/jeb.00275google scholar: lookup
  38. Otranto D, Milillo P, Capelli G, Colwell DD. Species composition of Gasterophilus spp. (Diptera, Oestridae) causing equine gastric myiasis in southern Italy: parasite biodiversity and risks for extinction.. Vet Parasitol 2005 Oct 10;133(1):111-8.
    pubmed: 15978726doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.015google scholar: lookup
  39. Painer J, Kaczensky P, Ganbaatar O, Huber K, Walzer C. Comparative parasitological examination on sympatric equids in the great Gobi “B” strictly protected area, Mongolia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57, 225–232.
  40. Pandey VS, Ouhelli H, Elkhalfane A. Observations on the epizootiology of Gasterophilus intestinalis and G. nasalis in horses in Morocco. Veterinary Parasitology 7, 347–356.
  41. Pilo C, Altea A, Fois MP, Scala A. Equine Gasterophilosis in Sardinia: annual trend of bot eggs laying in different topographic regions of the horse.. Vet Res Commun 2009 Sep;33 Suppl 1:149-51.
    pubmed: 19585259doi: 10.1007/s11259-009-9261-0google scholar: lookup
  42. Principato M. Observations on the occurrence of five species of Gasterophilus larvae in free-ranging horses in Umbria, central Italy.. Vet Parasitol 1989 May;31(2):173-7.
    pubmed: 2741303doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90032-0google scholar: lookup
  43. Principato M. Classification of the main macroscopic lesions produced by larvae of Gasterophilus spp. (Diptera:Gasterophilidae) in free-ranging horses in Umbria.. Cornell Vet 1988 Jan;78(1):43-52.
    pubmed: 3335129
  44. ROGERS WP, SOMMERVILLE RI. THE INFECTIVE STAGE OF NEMATODE PARASITES AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN PARASITISM.. Adv Parasitol 1963;1:109-77.
    pubmed: 14117619doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60503-5google scholar: lookup
  45. Romaniuk K, Snarska A. Existence of horse botfly Gasterophilus intestinalis eggs on coats of mares, suckling colts and young mores and colt of primitive Polish horses. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2002(58), 641–643.
  46. Saltz D, Rowen M, Rubenstein DI. The impact of space use patterns of reintroduced Asiatic wild ass on effective population size. Conservation Biology 14, 1852–1862.
  47. Sandin A, Skidell J, Häggström J, Girma K, Nilsson G. Post-mortem findings of gastric ulcers in Swedish horses up to one year of age: a retrospective study 1924-1996.. Acta Vet Scand 1999;40(2):109-20.
    pmc: PMC8043222pubmed: 10605127doi: 10.1186/bf03547028google scholar: lookup
  48. Sarah R, King B, Gurnell J. Effects of fly disturbance on the behaviour of a population of reintroduced Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Mongolia. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 125, 22–29.
  49. Scheibe KM, Eichhorn K, Kalz B, Streich WJ, Scheibe A. Water consumption and watering behavior of przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in a semireserve. Zoo Biology 17, 181–192.
  50. Scheirs J, De Bruyn L. Integrating optimal foraging and optimal oviposition theory in plant-insect research. Oikos 96, 187–191.
  51. Sequeira JL, Tostes RA, Oliveira-Sequeira TC. Prevalence and macro- and microscopic lesions produced by Gasterophilus nasalis (Diptera: Oestridae) in the Botucatu Region, SP, Brazil.. Vet Parasitol 2001 Dec 13;102(3):261-6.
    pubmed: 11777606doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00536-2google scholar: lookup
  52. Sievers G, Weber B. Egg laying period of Gasterophilus nasalis and G. intestinalis on horses. 8th Region, Chile. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria 37, 169–172.
  53. Studzinska MB, Wojcieszak K. Gasterophilus sp. botfly larvae in horses from the south-eastern part of Poland. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 53, 651–655.
  54. Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ. The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon: Oxford.
  55. Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Veterinary Parasitology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, UK.
  56. Wang SZ, Xu XZ. The geographical distribution of Gasterophilus in Xinjiang. China Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 21, 14–16.
  57. Wang W, Zhang D, Hu D, Chu H, Cao J, Ente M, Jiang G, Li K. Population genetic structure of Gasterophilus pecorum in the Kalamaili Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COI) gene sequence.. Med Vet Entomol 2014 Aug;28 Suppl 1:75-82.
    pubmed: 25171609doi: 10.1111/mve.12073google scholar: lookup
  58. Wang Y. Study on habitats, populations and home ranges of the reintroduced Przewalski’s horses and activities rhythms of coexistence wolves. Xinjiang University: Xinjiang, China.
  59. Xia C, Cao J, Zhang H, Gao X, Yang W, Blank D. Reintroduction of Przewalski’s horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) in Xinjiang, China: the status and experience. Biological Conservation 177, 142–147.
  60. Zaheri BA, Ronaghi H, Youssefi MR, Hoseini SM, Omidzahir S, Dozouri R, Eshkevari SR, Mousapour A. Gasterophilus pecorum and Habronema muscae in Persian onager (Equus hemionus onager), histopathology and parasitology survey. Journal of Comparative Clinical Pathology 24, 1009–1013.
  61. Zumpt F. Myiasis in man and animals in the old world. Butterworths: London: p. 110–129.

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Zhang K, Zhou R, Huang H, Ma W, Qi Y, Li B, Zhang D, Li K, Chu H. Host feces, olfactory beacon guiding aggregation of intestinal parasites Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae). Parasitol Res 2022 Sep;121(9):2601-2613.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07577-6pubmed: 35788769google scholar: lookup
  2. Huang H, Zhang K, Shao C, Wang C, Ente M, Wang Z, Zhang D, Li K. Spatial distribution of Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera) eggs in the desert steppe of the Kalamaili Nature Reserve (Xinjiang, China). BMC Ecol Evol 2021 Sep 6;21(1):169.
    doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01897-4pubmed: 34488639google scholar: lookup
  3. Zhou R, Yang J, Zhang K, Qi Y, Ma W, Wang Z, Ente M, Li K. Analysis of volatiles from feces of released Przewalski's horse (Equus przewalskii) in Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae) spawning habitat. Sci Rep 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15671.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95162-9pubmed: 34341455google scholar: lookup
  4. Huang H, Zhang K, Zhang B, Liu S, Chu H, Qi Y, Zhang D, Li K. Analysis on the relationship between winter precipitation and the annual variation of horse stomach fly community in arid desert steppe, Northwest China (2007-2019). Integr Zool 2022 Jan;17(1):128-138.
    doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12578pubmed: 34254452google scholar: lookup
  5. Hu D, Chao Y, Zhang B, Wang C, Qi Y, Ente M, Zhang D, Li K, Mok KM. Effects of Gasterophilus pecorum infestation on the intestinal microbiota of the rewilded Przewalski's horses in China. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251512.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251512pubmed: 33974667google scholar: lookup
  6. Zhang K, Huang H, Zhou R, Zhang B, Wang C, Ente M, Li B, Zhang D, Li K. The impact of temperature on the life cycle of Gasterophilus pecorum in northwest China. Parasit Vectors 2021 Mar 1;14(1):129.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04623-7pubmed: 33648570google scholar: lookup
  7. Zhou R, Zhang K, Zhang T, Zhou T, Chu H, Ge Y, Wang C, Li K. Identification of volatile components from oviposition and non-oviposition plants of Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Gasterophilidae). Sci Rep 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15731.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72378-9pubmed: 32978441google scholar: lookup
  8. Hoseini SM, Zaheri BA, Adibi MA, Ronaghi H, Moshrefi AH. Histopathological Study of Esophageal Infection with Gasterophilus pecorum (Diptera: Oestridae) in Persian Onager (Equus hemionus onager). J Arthropod Borne Dis 2017 Sep;11(3):441-445.
    pubmed: 29322061
  9. Huang H, Zhang B, Chu H, Zhang D, Li K. Gasterophilus (Diptera, Gasterophilidae) infestation of equids in the Kalamaili Nature Reserve, China. Parasite 2016;23:36.
    doi: 10.1051/parasite/2016036pubmed: 27593434google scholar: lookup