FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Pain severity scores for common equine disorders as provided...
Equine veterinary journal2022; 54(6); 1094-1102; doi: 10.1111/evj.13559

Pain severity scores for common equine disorders as provided by horse owners and equine veterinarians.

Abstract: Understanding factors influencing assessment of pain in horses will facilitate communication between veterinarians and horse owners. Objective: To compare estimates of pain experienced by horses as provided by veterinarians and horse owners and to determine factors associated with individuals who perceive horses to be experiencing extreme pain or minimal pain. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Internet-based questionnaires for horse owners and veterinarians included items related to recognition of pain in horses, estimated degree of pain experienced by horses, and demographic information. Variables associated with perception of a high or low degree of pain were investigated using logistic regression analyses. Results: Final data sets included responses from 553 horse owners and 263 veterinarians. Pain scores varied widely and differences in median scores from horse owners and veterinarians were small. Horse owners providing high pain ratings were more likely to have <10 horses (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.1-3.5) and to not have a college degree (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.2). Those providing low pain ratings were less likely to own <10 horses (OR = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-0.9). Veterinarians providing high pain ratings were more likely to be employed in a mixed animal practice (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.3-5.9) and to lack board-certification in a veterinary specialty (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-4.2). Veterinarians providing low pain ratings were more likely to be male (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3-4.2). Conclusions: The respondent population may be biased because of the method of questionnaire distribution and associated sampling bias. Respondents were primarily from the United States. Conclusions: Assessments of the degree of pain horses are experiencing vary widely among horse owners and equine veterinarians.
© 2022 EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-02-07 PubMed ID: 35034381DOI: 10.1111/evj.13559Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the perception of pain in horses from the viewpoints of both horse owners and equine veterinarians, revealing a wide range of assessments and identifying factors that influence high and low pain estimations.

Research Purpose and Methodology

The aim of this research was to compare estimations of pain experienced by horses as made by veterinarians and horse owners. The team also sought to identify characteristics linked with those who perceive horses to be suffering from extreme pain or minimal pain. For this, an Internet-based questionnaire was distributed to horse owners and veterinarians, retrieving information on their recognition of equine pain, their estimated degree of pain horses experience, and their own demographic details.

Data Analysis and Results

  • The study involved the analysis of responses from 553 horse owners and 263 equine veterinarians.
  • There was a wide variance in pain scores, although the difference in median scores from horse owners and veterinarians was small.
  • Horse owners more likely to give high pain ratings to horses had fewer than 10 horses or lacked a college degree.
  • Horse owners less likely to ascribe high pain ratings owned more than 10 horses.
  • Veterinarians who were more inclined to give high pain ratings were primarily employed in a mixed animal practice or lacked board-certification in a veterinary specialty.
  • Male veterinarians were more likely to give low pain scores.

Limitations and Conclusions

The research was subject to potential bias due to the mode of questionnaire distribution creating a sampling bias. The majority of respondents were from the United States, further limiting the breadth of the study. The findings showed that evaluations of the degree of pain horses experience can widely vary among horse owners and equine veterinarians. This highlights the need for improved communication and understanding in assessing and managing equine pain.

Cite This Article

APA
Sellon DC, Sanz M, Kopper JJ, Mattei D. (2022). Pain severity scores for common equine disorders as provided by horse owners and equine veterinarians. Equine Vet J, 54(6), 1094-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13559

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 6
Pages: 1094-1102

Researcher Affiliations

Sellon, Debra C
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Sanz, Macarena
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Kopper, Jamie J
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Mattei, Debora
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Horse Diseases
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pain / veterinary
  • Pain Measurement / veterinary
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Veterinarians

Grant Funding

  • Zoetis, Inc

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Bateson P. Assessment of pain in animals.. Anim Behav 1991;42:827-39.
  2. Dujardin CL, van Loon JP. Pain recognition and treatment in the horse: a survey of equine veterinarians in The Netherlands and Belgium.. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 2011;136:715-24.
  3. Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA. Perioperative use of analgesics in dogs and cats by Canadian veterinarians in 2001.. Can Vet J 2006;47:352-9.
  4. Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA, Barkema HW. Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics in cattle, pigs, and horses in 2004 and 2005.. Can Vet J 2007;48:155-64.
  5. Price J, Eager RA, Welsh EM, Waran NK. Current practice relating to equine castration in the UK.. Res Vet Sci 2005;78:277-80.
  6. Price J, Marques JM, Welsh EM, Waran NK. Pilot epidemiological study of attitudes towards pain in horses.. Vet Rec 2002;151:570-5.
  7. Waran N, Williams VM, Clarke N, Bridge IS. Recognition of pain and use of analgesia in horses by veterinarians in New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2010;58:274-80.
  8. Williams VM, Lascelles BD, Robson MC. Current attitudes to, and use of, peri-operative analgesia in dogs and cats by veterinarians in New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2005;53:193-202.
  9. Glajchen M. Chronic pain: treatment barriers and strategies for clinical practice.. J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:211-8.
  10. Misch LJ, Duffield TF, Millman ST, Lissemore KD. An investigation into the practices of dairy producers and veterinarians in dehorning dairy calves in Ontario.. Can Vet J 2007;48:1249-54.
  11. Bowden A, Burford JH, Brennan ML, England GCW, Freeman SL. Horse owners' knowledge, and opinions on recognising colic in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:262-7.
  12. Grint NJ, Murrell JC, Whay HR. Investigating the opinions of donkey owners and veterinary surgeons towards pain and analgesia in donkeys.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2015;27:365-71.
  13. Taschke AC, Folsch DW. Ethological, physiological and histological aspects of pain and stress in cattle when being dehorned.. Tierarztl Prax 1997;25:19-27.
  14. Vickers KJ, Niel L, Kiehlbauch LM, Weary DM. Calf response to caustic paste and hot-iron dehorning using sedation with and without local anesthetic.. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:1454-9.
  15. de Grauw JC, van Loon JP. Systematic pain assessment in horses.. Vet J 2016;209:14-22.
  16. Sutton GA, Paltiel O, Soffer M, Turner D. Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic.. Vet J 2013;197:646-50.
  17. Capner CA, Lascelles BD, Waterman-Pearson AE. Current British veterinary attitudes to perioperative analgesia for dogs.. Vet Rec 1999;145:95-9.
  18. Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA. Factors affecting the use of postincisional analgesics in dogs and cats by Canadian veterinarians in 2001.. Can Vet J 2006;47:453-9.
  19. Laven RA, Huxley JN, Whay HR, Stafford KJ. Results of a survey of attitudes of dairy veterinarians in New Zealand regarding painful procedures and conditions in cattle.. N Z Vet J 2009;57:215-20.
  20. Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA, Barkema HW. Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves.. Can Vet J 2007;48:1129-36.
  21. Lorena SERS, Luna SPL, Lascelles BDX, Corrente JE. Attitude of Brazilian veterinarians in the recognition and treatment of pain in horses and cattle.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013;40:410-8.
  22. van Loon JPAM, Jonckheer-Sheehy VSM, Back W, René van Weeren P, Hellebrekers LJ. Monitoring equine visceral pain with a composite pain scale score and correlation with survival after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.. Vet J 2014;200:109-15.
  23. van Loon JP, Van Dierendonck MC. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): a scale-construction study.. Vet J 2015;206:356-64.
  24. VanDierendonck MC, van Loon JP. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): a validation study.. Vet J 2016;216:175-7.
  25. Maskato Y, Dugdale AHA, Singer ER, Kelmer G, Sutton GA. Prospective feasibility and revalidation of the equine acute abdominal pain scale (EAAPS) in clinical cases of colic in horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(12):2242.
  26. Taffarel MO, Luna SPL, de Oliveira FA, Cardoso GS, Alonso JDM, Pantoja JC. Refinement and partial validation of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in horses.. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:83.
  27. Gleerup KB, Lindegaard C. Recognition and quantification of pain in horses: a tutorial review.. Equine Vet Educ 2016;28:47-57.
  28. Pritchett LC, Ulibarri C, Roberts MC, Schneider RK, Sellon DC. Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;80:31-43.
  29. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS One 2014;9:e92281.
  30. Dalla Costa E, Stucke D, Dai F, Minero M, Leach M, Lebelt D. Using the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) to assess pain associated with acute laminitis in horses (Equus caballus).. Animals (Basel) 2016;6(8):47.
  31. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015;42:103-14.
  32. Dyson S, Berger J, Ellis AD, Mullard J. Development of an ethogram for a pain scoring system in ridden horses and its application to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain.. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 2018;23:47-57.
  33. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the ridden horse pain ethogram to elite dressage horses competing in world cup grand prix competitions.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11(5):1187.
  34. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of a ridden horse pain ethogram and its relationship with gait in a convenience sample of 60 riding horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(6):1044.
  35. Mullard J, Berger JM, Ellis AD, Dyson S. Development of an ethogram to describe facial expressions in ridden horses (FEReq).. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 2017;18:7-12.
  36. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine discomfort ethogram.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11(2):580.
  37. Prkachin KM, Rocha EM. High levels of vicarious exposure bias pain judgments.. J Pain 2010;11:904-9.
  38. Marquié L, Raufaste E, Lauque D, Mariné C, Ecoiffier M, Sorum P. Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.. Pain 2003;102:289-96.
  39. Grégoire M, Coll MP, Tremblay M, Prkachin KM, Jackson PL. Repeated exposure to others' pain reduces vicarious pain intensity estimation.. Eur J Pain 2016;20:1644-52.
  40. Prkachin KM, Solomon P, Hwang T, Mercer SR. Does experience influence judgments of pain behaviour? Evidence from relatives of pain patients and therapists.. Pain Res Manag 2001;6:105-12.
  41. Ireland JL, Clegg PD, McGowan CM, McKane SA, Chandler KJ, Pinchbeck GL. Comparison of owner-reported health problems with veterinary assessment of geriatric horses in the United Kingdom.. Equine Vet J 2012;44:94-100.
  42. Malalana F, McGowan TW, Ireland JL, Pinchbeck GL, McGowan CM. Prevalence of owner-reported ocular problems and veterinary ocular findings in a population of horses aged ≥15 years.. Equine Vet J 2019;51:212-7.
  43. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Biquand V, Hausberger M. Comparison of clinical examinations of back disorders and humans' evaluation of back pain in riding school horses.. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:209.
  44. Lesimple C, Hausberger M. How accurate are we at assessing others' well-being? The example of welfare assessment in horses.. Front Psychol 2014;5:21.
  45. Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf FM. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD003030.
    doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2google scholar: lookup
  46. Gustafsson M, Borglin G. Can a theory-based educational intervention change nurses' knowledge and attitudes concerning cancer pain management? A quasi-experimental design.. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:328.
  47. Thomson O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;2:CD003030.
  48. Shuval K, Berkovits E, Netzer D, Hekselman I, Linn S, Brezis M. Evaluating the impact of an evidence-based medicine educational intervention on primary care doctors’ attitudes, knowledge and clinical behaviour: a controlled trial and before and after study.. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:581-98.

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.