Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2023; 37(1); 282-291; doi: 10.1111/jvim.16614

Palatability, glycemic, and insulinemic responses to various carbohydrate formulations: Alternatives for the diagnosis of insulin dysregulation in horses?

Abstract: Oral glycemic challenge (GC) tests are recommended for diagnosis of insulin dysregulation (ID). Various protocols are used, but all have limitations in terms of palatability, ease of use, variable composition, geographic availability, or some combination of these. Objective: To evaluate newly developed formulations with defined carbohydrate composition for use as oral GCs. Methods: Thirty-four horses and ponies in various metabolic states. Methods: Our objectives were carried out in 2 separate cross-over experiments. First, the palatability and acceptance of various GCs (2 syrups, 1 granulate) offered for free intake were compared to glucose mixed in a chaff-based diet. Subsequently, syrups were administered by syringe and compared to an oral glucose test using naso-gastric tubing (tube OGT) to investigate the glycemic and insulinemic responses. Second, these variables were compared in the best performing GC-formulations (granulate further optimized to pelleted formulation and 1 syrup) and a tube OGT. All GCs were administered with equivalent amounts of 0.5 g glycemic carbohydrates per kg body weight. Results: Only the GC pellets were consumed completely by all horses (consumption time 5 ± 2 min). When administered by syringe, the GC syrup also was well accepted. The insulin concentrations at 120 min correlated significantly between tube OGT and GC pellets (r = .717; P < .001) or GC syrup (r = .913; P < .001). The new GC syrup and GC pellets discriminate between healthy and ID horses. Conclusions: The GC pellets (DysChEq)™ and GC syrup can be used as palatable and well-accepted oral GC tests for assessment of ID in horses.
Publication Date: 2023-01-10 PubMed ID: 36625459PubMed Central: PMC9889704DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16614Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studies the efficacy of new oral glycemic challenge (GC) tests designed for diagnosing insulin dysregulation in horses. These new tests are developed to overcome existing limitations such as palatability and ease of use, among others. The study concluded that two new formulations of GC-tests (syrup and pellets) could successfully diagnose insulin dysregulation in horses.

Study Method

  • The researchers conducted this study in two separate crossover experiments involving 34 horses and ponies in varied metabolic states.
  • The first experiment assessed the palatability and acceptance of various GC tests, offering them for free intake to horses. The provided GCs ranged from two syrups to one granulate type, and a comparison was drawn with glucose mixed in a chaff-based diet.
  • After the free intake, the syrups were administered by syringe and compared to an oral glucose test using naso-gastric tubing to study the glycemic and insulinemic responses.
  • The second experiment compared the glycemic and insulinemic responses in the best performing GC-formulations from the first experiment (granulate further optimized to pelleted formulation and one syrup) with a tube OGT test.
  • All GCs were provided in equivalent amounts which was 0.5 g glycemic carbohydrates per kg body weight to maintain consistency.

Results and Conclusion

  • The GC pellets were the most accepted type of GCs among the horses. Every horse consumed the pellets completely within an average of 5 ± 2 minutes.
  • Apart from pellets, GC syrup was also well accepted when administered through a syringe.
  • The insulin levels at 120 minutes correlated significantly between tube OGT and GC pellets (r = .717; P < .001) or GC syrup (r = .913; P < .001). It indicates that the responses to GC pellets and GC syrup were similar to the responses from an oral glucose test.
  • Both the new GC syrup and GC pellets yielded results that could differentiate between healthy horses and those showing signs of insulin dysregulation.
  • The study concluded that the GC pellets (DysChEq)™ and GC syrup can be considered palatable, well-accepted, and effective oral GC test options for detecting insulin dysregulation in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Warnken T, Schaub C, Delarocque J, Frers F, Feige K, Sonntag J, Reiche DB. (2023). Palatability, glycemic, and insulinemic responses to various carbohydrate formulations: Alternatives for the diagnosis of insulin dysregulation in horses? J Vet Intern Med, 37(1), 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16614

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
Pages: 282-291

Researcher Affiliations

Warnken, Tobias
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Schaub, Claudia
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Delarocque, Julien
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Frers, Florian
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Feige, Karsten
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Sonntag, Johanna
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Binger Straße 173, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Reiche, Dania Birte
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Binger Straße 173, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Insulin / metabolism
  • Blood Glucose
  • Glucose
  • Glucose Tolerance Test / veterinary
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism

Grant Funding

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH

Conflict of Interest Statement

The study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH. Tobias Warnken has consulted for and received research funding related to the EMS from Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH. Dania Reiche and Johanna Sonntag are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH. At the time of study execution and manuscript preparation Tobias Warnken was employed at the Clinic for Horses at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Meier AD, de Laat MA, Reiche DB, Pollitt CC, Walsh DM, McGree JM, Sillence MN. The oral glucose test predicts laminitis risk in ponies fed a diet high in nonstructural carbohydrates.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2018 Apr;63:1-9.
  2. Frank N, Tadros EM. Insulin dysregulation.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jan;46(1):103-12.
    pubmed: 24033478doi: 10.1111/evj.12169google scholar: lookup
  3. Tadros EM, Fowlie JG, Refsal KR, Marteniuk J, Schott HC 2nd. Association between hyperinsulinaemia and laminitis severity at the time of pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction diagnosis.. Equine Vet J 2019 Jan;51(1):52-56.
    pubmed: 29761574doi: 10.1111/evj.12963google scholar: lookup
  4. Karikoski NP, Horn I, McGowan TW, McGowan CM. The prevalence of endocrinopathic laminitis among horses presented for laminitis at a first-opinion/referral equine hospital.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2011 Oct;41(3):111-7.
  5. Menzies-Gow NJ, Harris PA, Elliott J. Prospective cohort study evaluating risk factors for the development of pasture-associated laminitis in the United Kingdom.. Equine Vet J 2017 May;49(3):300-306.
    pubmed: 27363591doi: 10.1111/evj.12606google scholar: lookup
  6. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):335-349.
    pmc: PMC6430910pubmed: 30724412doi: 10.1111/jvim.15423google scholar: lookup
  7. Bertin FR, de Laat MA. The diagnosis of equine insulin dysregulation.. Equine Vet J 2017 Sep;49(5):570-576.
    pubmed: 28543410doi: 10.1111/evj.12703google scholar: lookup
  8. nThe Equine Endocrinology Groupn, Frank N, Bailey S. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of equine metabolic syndrome (EMS). 2020.
  9. Van Den Wollenberg L, Vandendriessche V, van Maanen K, Counotte GHM. Comparison of Two Diagnostic Methods to Detect Insulin Dysregulation in Horses Under Field Conditions.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 May;88:102954.
    pubmed: 32303301doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102954google scholar: lookup
  10. Schuver A, Frank N, Chameroy KA, Elliott SB. Assessment of insulin and glucose dynamics by using an oral sugar test in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:465‐470.
  11. Manfredi JM. Identifying Breed Differences in Insulin Dynamics, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue Histology and Biology. 2016.
  12. Jacob SI, Geor RJ, Weber PSD, Harris PA, McCue ME. Effect of age and dietary carbohydrate profiles on glucose and insulin dynamics in horses.. Equine Vet J 2018 Mar;50(2):249-254.
    pubmed: 28833406doi: 10.1111/evj.12745google scholar: lookup
  13. Jocelyn NA, Harris PA, Menzies-Gow NJ. Effect of varying the dose of corn syrup on the insulin and glucose response to the oral sugar test.. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):836-841.
    pubmed: 29504630doi: 10.1111/evj.12826google scholar: lookup
  14. Lyn Macon E, Harris P, Partridge E, Day Barker V, Adams A. Effect of Dose and Fasting on Oral Sugar Test Responses in Insulin Dysregulated Horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Dec;107:103770.
    pubmed: 34802623doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103770google scholar: lookup
  15. Lindåse S, Nostell K, Bröjer J. A modified oral sugar test for evaluation of insulin and glucose dynamics in horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2016 Oct 20;58(Suppl 1):64.
    pmc: PMC5073908pubmed: 27766982doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0246-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Moser K, Banse H. Comparison of the glucose and insulin responses of horses to 2 formulations of corn syrup.. Can Vet J 2019 Jun;60(6):637-643.
    pmc: PMC6515809pubmed: 31156265
  17. de Laat MA, Sillence MN. The repeatability of an oral glucose test in ponies.. Equine Vet J 2017 Mar;49(2):238-243.
    pubmed: 27038020doi: 10.1111/evj.12579google scholar: lookup
  18. Smith S, Harris PA, Menzies-Gow NJ. Comparison of the in-feed glucose test and the oral sugar test.. Equine Vet J 2016 Mar;48(2):224-7.
    pubmed: 25582152doi: 10.1111/evj.12413google scholar: lookup
  19. Warnken T, Delarocque J, Schumacher S, Huber K, Feige K. Retrospective analysis of insulin responses to standard dosed oral glucose tests (OGTs) via naso-gastric tubing towards definition of an objective cut-off value.. Acta Vet Scand 2018 Jan 19;60(1):4.
    pmc: PMC5775575pubmed: 29351765doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0358-8google scholar: lookup
  20. Ralston SL. Insulin and glucose regulation.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2002 Aug;18(2):295-304, vii.
    pubmed: 15635909doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(02)00014-7google scholar: lookup
  21. Warnken T, Huber K, Feige K. Comparison of three different methods for the quantification of equine insulin.. BMC Vet Res 2016 Sep 9;12(1):196.
    pmc: PMC5016943pubmed: 27613127doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0828-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Hackett ES, McCue PM. Evaluation of a veterinary glucometer for use in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 May-Jun;24(3):617-21.
  23. Delarocque J, Frers F, Huber K, Feige K, Warnken T. Weight loss is linearly associated with a reduction of the insulin response to an oral glucose test in Icelandic horses.. BMC Vet Res 2020 May 24;16(1):151.
    pmc: PMC7245939pubmed: 32448298doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02356-wgoogle scholar: lookup
  24. Delarocque J, Frers F, Huber K, Jung K, Feige K, Warnken T. Metabolic impact of weight variations in Icelandic horses.. PeerJ 2021;9:e10764.
    pmc: PMC7847705pubmed: 33575132doi: 10.7717/peerj.10764google scholar: lookup
  25. Delarocque J, Frers F, Feige K, Huber K, Jung K, Warnken T. Metabolic changes induced by oral glucose tests in horses and their diagnostic use.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jan;35(1):597-605.
    pmc: PMC7848347pubmed: 33277752doi: 10.1111/jvim.15992google scholar: lookup
  26. Leung YH, Kenéz Á, Grob AJ, Feige K, Warnken T. Associations of plasma sphingolipid profiles with insulin response during oral glucose testing in Icelandic horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jul;35(4):2009-2018.
    pmc: PMC8295691pubmed: 34105193doi: 10.1111/jvim.16200google scholar: lookup
  27. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet J 1983 Oct;15(4):371-2.
  28. Carter RA, Geor RJ, Burton Staniar W, Cubitt TA, Harris PA. Apparent adiposity assessed by standardised scoring systems and morphometric measurements in horses and ponies.. Vet J 2009 Feb;179(2):204-10.
    pubmed: 18440844doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.029google scholar: lookup
  29. Dühlmeier R, Deegen E, Fuhrmann H, Widdel A, Sallmann HP. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and the enteroinsular axis in equines (Equus caballus).. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001 Jun;129(2-3):563-75.
    pubmed: 11423326doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00295-1google scholar: lookup
  30. de Graaf-Roelfsema E. Glucose homeostasis and the enteroinsular axis in the horse: a possible role in equine metabolic syndrome.. Vet J 2014 Jan;199(1):11-8.
    pubmed: 24287206doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.064google scholar: lookup
  31. de Laat MA, McGree JM, Sillence MN. Equine hyperinsulinemia: investigation of the enteroinsular axis during insulin dysregulation.. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2016 Jan 1;310(1):E61-72.
    pubmed: 26530154doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00362.2015google scholar: lookup
  32. Björck I, Granfeldt Y, Liljeberg H, Tovar J, Asp NG. Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates.. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 Mar;59(3 Suppl):699S-705S.
    pubmed: 8116553doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.3.699sgoogle scholar: lookup
  33. Bellisle F, Louis-Sylvestre J, Demozay F, Blazy D, Le Magnen J. Cephalic phase of insulin secretion and food stimulation in humans: a new perspective.. Am J Physiol 1985 Dec;249(6 Pt 1):E639-45.
  34. Mattes RD, Considine RV. Oral processing effort, appetite and acute energy intake in lean and obese adults.. Physiol Behav 2013 Aug 15;120:173-81.
  35. Cvijanovic N, Feinle-Bisset C, Young RL, Little TJ. Oral and intestinal sweet and fat tasting: impact of receptor polymorphisms and dietary modulation for metabolic disease.. Nutr Rev 2015 May;73(5):318-34.
    pubmed: 26011905doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuu026google scholar: lookup
  36. Miquel-Kergoat S, Azais-Braesco V, Burton-Freeman B, Hetherington MM. Effects of chewing on appetite, food intake and gut hormones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Physiol Behav 2015 Nov 1;151:88-96.
    pubmed: 26188140doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.017google scholar: lookup
  37. Dyer J, Salmon KS, Zibrik L, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Expression of sweet taste receptors of the T1R family in the intestinal tract and enteroendocrine cells.. Biochem Soc Trans 2005 Feb;33(Pt 1):302-5.
    pubmed: 15667333doi: 10.1042/bst0330302google scholar: lookup
  38. Teff KL, Levin BE, Engelman K. Oral sensory stimulation in men: effects on insulin, C-peptide, and catecholamines.. Am J Physiol 1993 Dec;265(6 Pt 2):R1223-30.
  39. Teff KL, Levin BE, Engelman K. Oral sensory stimulation in men: effects on insulin, C-peptide, and catecholamines.. Am J Physiol 1993 Dec;265(6 Pt 2):R1223-30.
  40. Knowles EJ, Harris PA, Elliott J, Menzies-Gow NJ. Use of the oral sugar test in ponies when performed with or without prior fasting.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jul;49(4):519-524.
    pubmed: 27381044doi: 10.1111/evj.12607google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.