Analyze Diet
British journal of anaesthesia2010; 104(3); 330-337; doi: 10.1093/bja/aep377

Pharmacokinetic profile in relation to anaesthesia characteristics after a 5% micellar microemulsion of propofol in the horse.

Abstract: To define the pharmacokinetic profile of propofol 5% microemulsion formulation in horses. Methods: First, propofol was administered as bolus injection (2 mg kg(-1)) to six xylazine-sedated horses. Secondly, after sedation and bolus injection, propofol was maintained with continuous infusion for 3 h [8.1 (sd 3.2) mg kg(-1) h(-1)] to the same six horses. Thirdly, in two horses, a commercial propofol was used for comparison. Response to noxious stimulation was used to evaluate analgesia. Venous blood samples were obtained to measure propofol plasma concentration using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. The plasma concentrations were related to the anaesthesia characteristics to determine the ED(50). Results: The pharmacokinetic profile of propofol is best characterized by a non-compartmental model. The mean (confidence interval) for area under plasma concentration-time curve, elimination half-life, mean residence time, and clearance was 41 min microg ml(-1) (+/-7.7), 44.8 min (+/-21.3), 13.7 min (+/-3.2), and 45.8 ml min(-1) kg(-1) (+/-6.5), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between plasma concentration and infusion rate (r(2)=0.47). Most propofol infusion rates did not inhibit the response to noxious stimulation and rates above 11.9 mg kg(-1) h(-1) caused involuntary muscle contractions. Better recoveries were associated with lower propofol plasma concentrations. Propofol plasma concentration frequently increased when horses woke from anaesthesia. Conclusions: Caution is warranted when propofol is used for continuous infusion due to variable kinetics, myoclonal activity, poor analgesia, and less desirable recovery quality.
Publication Date: 2010-01-05 PubMed ID: 20053624DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep377Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the pharmacokinetic behaviour of a 5% micellar microemulsion formulation of propofol in horses. It tries to correlate the propofol plasma concentrations with anesthetic characteristics in horses to inform about its safe usage in equine anaesthesia.

Research Methodology

  • The experiment was first carried out on six xylazine-sedated horses by giving them a bolus (large volume) injection of propofol administered in a defined dosage of 2 mg per kg.
  • After the initial bolus, a dosage of 8.1 (standard deviation 3.2) mg per kg per hour of propofol was continuously infused into the same six horses for a period of three hours.
  • Further, propofol sold commercially was used on two horses for comparative analysis.
  • Venous blood samples were collected periodically from the horses to measure the plasma concentration of propofol, using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, a technique that separates and identifies the components of a mixture.
  • The horse’s response to noxious stimulation (painful stimuli) was used to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of propofol.

Results and Observations

  • The pharmacokinetic profile of propofol best fits a non-compartmental model, which describes the behaviour of drugs in the body without assuming it’s partitioned into compartments.
  • Mean measurements of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (measuring the total drug exposure over time), elimination half-life of propofol (time it takes for half of the drug to be eliminated from the body), mean residence time (average time the drug spends in the body), and clearance rate (rate at which the drug is removed from the body) were calculated.
  • There was a correlation found between the plasma concentration of propofol and the infusion rate, but this was weak (represented by r-square value of 0.47).
  • Most propofol infusion rates didn’t prevent the response to noxious stimulation, meaning they didn’t provide sufficient pain relief. Higher doses led to involuntary muscle contractions.
  • Lower plasma propofol concentrations yielded better recovery and the concentration often increased when horses woke from anaesthesia.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that careful administration of the propofol should be adhered to due to variable kinetics, the potential of inducing unwanted muscle activity, insufficient pain relief, and less desirable recovery quality.

Cite This Article

APA
Boscan P, Rezende ML, Grimsrud K, Stanley SD, Mama KR, Steffey EP. (2010). Pharmacokinetic profile in relation to anaesthesia characteristics after a 5% micellar microemulsion of propofol in the horse. Br J Anaesth, 104(3), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep377

Publication

ISSN: 1471-6771
NlmUniqueID: 0372541
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 104
Issue: 3
Pages: 330-337

Researcher Affiliations

Boscan, P
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. pboscan@colostate.edu
Rezende, M L
    Grimsrud, K
      Stanley, S D
        Mama, K R
          Steffey, E P

            MeSH Terms

            • Anesthesia Recovery Period
            • Anesthesia, Intravenous / methods
            • Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary
            • Anesthetics, Intravenous / administration & dosage
            • Anesthetics, Intravenous / blood
            • Animals
            • Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
            • Drug Administration Schedule
            • Emulsions
            • Female
            • Half-Life
            • Horses / blood
            • Infusions, Intravenous
            • Male
            • Micelles
            • Propofol / administration & dosage
            • Propofol / blood

            Citations

            This article has been cited 3 times.
            1. Liu J, Peng F, Kang Y, Gong D, Fan J, Zhang W, Qiu F. High-Loading Self-Assembling Peptide Nanoparticles as a Lipid-Free Carrier for Hydrophobic General Anesthetics. Int J Nanomedicine 2021;16:5317-5331.
              doi: 10.2147/IJN.S315310pubmed: 34408412google scholar: lookup
            2. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 14;11(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
            3. Tokushige H, Okano A, Arima D, Ito H, Kambayashi Y, Minamijima Y, Ohta M. Clinical effects of constant rate infusions of medetomidine-propofol combined with sevoflurane anesthesia in Thoroughbred racehorses undergoing arthroscopic surgery. Acta Vet Scand 2018 Nov 5;60(1):71.
              doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0426-0pubmed: 30396363google scholar: lookup