Analyze Diet
Drug testing and analysis2026; doi: 10.1002/dta.70144

Population Pharmacokinetics and Detection Times of Betamethasone After Intravenous, Intramuscular, and Intranasal Jet Administration of Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate in Horses.

Abstract: Betamethasone sodium phosphate (BETP) is a glucocorticosteroid used in humans. The primary objective was to estimate irrelevant plasma (IPC) and urine (IUC) concentrations using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach based on systemic clearance estimated from intravenous (IV) pharmacokinetic data. As a secondary objective, detection times (DTs) following IV, intramuscular (IM), and intranasal jet (INJ) administration were estimated for medication control. Plasma and urine concentrations were obtained from a total of 20 horses in Japan and Germany, with some horses contributing to more than one route after single IV (0.06 mg/kg, n = 7; 0.04 mg/kg, n = 8), single IM (20 mg/horse, n = 7), and multiple INJ (4 mg/horse for 5 days, n = 6) administration. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. The plasma clearance was 276 mL/kg/h, and the steady-state urine-to-plasma ratio was 25.8. For IV administration at 0.06 and 0.04 mg/kg every 24 h, the IPCs were 0.018 and 0.012 ng/mL, and the corresponding IUCs were 0.47 and 0.31 ng/mL, with the latter IUC close to the current International Federation of Horseracing Authorities international screening limit (ISL) (0.2 ng/mL). All horses fell below the ISL within 72 h after single IV administration at 0.06 and 0.04 mg/kg and after single IM administration, whereas all horses fell below the ISL within 48 h after INJ administration. The applicability of the estimated DTs should be interpreted according to the regulatory framework governing the use of human BETP formulations and their routes of administration in the relevant jurisdiction.
Publication Date: 2026-09-03 PubMed ID: 42693754DOI: 10.1002/dta.70144Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how betamethasone sodium phosphate (BETP), a corticosteroid, is processed and cleared from horses’ bodies when administered intravenously, intramuscularly, or via an intranasal jet.
  • It aimed to determine plasma and urine concentration thresholds and estimate detection times for medication control, which are critical for regulating its use in equine sports.

Background and Purpose

  • Betamethasone sodium phosphate (BETP) is commonly used as an anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid in humans and can also be used off-label in horses.
  • Understanding BETP’s pharmacokinetics—how it is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated—is essential for detecting its presence in horse plasma and urine and for proper medication regulation.
  • The study focused on three administration routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and intranasal jet (INJ), since different routes may affect drug absorption and elimination times.
  • The primary goal was to derive “irrelevant plasma concentrations” (IPC) and “irrelevant urine concentrations” (IUC), which are low concentration thresholds meant to help regulators distinguish between therapeutic drug use and doping.
  • The secondary goal was to estimate detection times (DTs)—the period after dosing during which betamethasone remains detectable above internationally recognized screening limits (ISL) in plasma and urine.

Methods

  • Subjects: 20 horses from Japan and Germany; some horses received more than one administration route.
  • Dosing regimens:
    • IV administration: Single doses of 0.06 mg/kg (n=7) and 0.04 mg/kg (n=8).
    • IM administration: Single dose of 20 mg per horse (n=7).
    • INJ administration: Multiple doses of 4 mg per horse daily for 5 days (n=6).
  • Sampling: Plasma and urine samples were collected post-administration to measure betamethasone concentrations over time.
  • Data Analysis: A nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate drug clearance and compartmental distribution parameters.
  • Estimates:
    • Plasma clearance rate (the volume of plasma cleared of the drug per kilogram of body weight per hour).
    • Steady-state urine-to-plasma concentration ratio to relate urine measurements to plasma levels.
    • IPC and IUC values based on estimated systemic clearance and dosing schedules.
    • Detection times based on when drug concentrations fall below the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA) ISL of 0.2 ng/mL in urine.

Key Results

  • Plasma clearance was calculated to be 276 mL/kg/h, indicating a relatively rapid elimination of BETP from plasma.
  • The steady-state urine-to-plasma concentration ratio was high at 25.8, meaning urine concentrations are substantially higher than plasma concentrations for the same drug exposure.
  • Irrelevant plasma concentrations (IPC) for daily IV administrations were:
    • 0.018 ng/mL for 0.06 mg/kg
    • 0.012 ng/mL for 0.04 mg/kg
  • Corresponding irrelevant urine concentrations (IUC) were:
    • 0.47 ng/mL (close to ISL of 0.2 ng/mL) for 0.06 mg/kg dosing
    • 0.31 ng/mL for 0.04 mg/kg dosing
  • Detection times relative to ISL:
    • After single IV doses (both 0.06 and 0.04 mg/kg), all horses had urine concentrations below the ISL within 72 hours.
    • Following single IM administration, horses similarly fell below the ISL within 72 hours.
    • After multiple intranasal jet doses (4 mg daily for 5 days), the detection time shortened, with horses below ISL within 48 hours.

Interpretation and Implications

  • The rapid clearance and relatively short detection times suggest that betamethasone sodium phosphate, when used at typical therapeutic doses, clears from horse plasma and urine within a few days.
  • The high urine-to-plasma ratio confirms urine sampling is a sensitive method for detecting BETP presence.
  • Detection times can guide regulatory bodies in enforcing medication withdrawal times before competitions to avoid positive doping tests.
  • Use of human BETP products in horses must be closely regulated, considering differences in dosing and administration routes can influence detection windows.
  • The study’s model-based IPC and IUC values can help define thresholds for regulatory screening and confirmatory testing in equine sports.
  • However, the authors note that the applicability of detection times should be interpreted within the specific regulatory framework and jurisdictional rules governing BETP use.

Conclusions

  • This pharmacokinetic study provides valuable data on betamethasone elimination in horses across three administration routes.
  • The derived thresholds and detection times can assist horseracing authorities and veterinarians in managing BETP use and controlling medication to maintain fair competition and horse welfare.
  • The findings underscore the importance of route-specific pharmacokinetics in understanding drug residues and optimizing doping control strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Kuroda T, Machnik M, Thevis M, Minamijima Y, Leung GN, Nomura M, Mizobe F, Ishikawa Y, Kamiya K, Toutain PL. (2026). Population Pharmacokinetics and Detection Times of Betamethasone After Intravenous, Intramuscular, and Intranasal Jet Administration of Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate in Horses. Drug Test Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.70144

Publication

ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Kuroda, Taisuke
  • Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
  • Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan.
Machnik, Marc
  • Institute of Biochemistry, Center for Preventive Doping Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thevis, Mario
  • Institute of Biochemistry, Center for Preventive Doping Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Minamijima, Yohei
  • Drug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Leung, Gary Ngai-Wa
  • Drug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Nomura, Motoi
  • Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Mizobe, Fumiaki
  • Racehorse Hospital, Miho Training Center, Japan Racing Association, Inashiki, Japan.
Ishikawa, Yuhiro
  • Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Kamiya, Kazuhiro
  • Equine Department Main Office, Japan Racing Association, Tokyo, Japan.
Toutain, Pierre-Louis
  • Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Cole TJ, Short KL, Hooper SB. The Science of Steroids. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 24, no. 3 (2019): 170–175.
  2. Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L. A Practical Guide to the Monitoring and Management of the Complications of Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 9, no. 1 (2013): 30.
  3. L. L. Brunton and B. C. Knollmann, Goodman & Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (McGraw Hill, 2023).
  4. Pimenta RP, Takahashi CM, Barberato‐Filho S. Preemptive Use of Anti‐Inflammatories and Analgesics in Oral Surgery: A Review of Systematic Reviews. Frontiers in Pharmacology 14 (2023): 1303382.
  5. Williams MJ, Ramson JA, Brownfoot FC. Different Corticosteroids and Regimens for Accelerating Fetal Lung Maturation for Babies at Risk of Preterm Birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8, no. 8 (2022): Cd006764.
  6. Flenley DC. New Drugs in Respiratory Disorders: I. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 286, no. 6368 (1983): 871–875.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6368.871google scholar: lookup
  7. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. Intraarticular Corticosteroid for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2 (2006): Cd005328.
  8. Taylor A, Singh R, Feldman SR. Review of Calcipotriene and Betamethasone Dipropionate Cream in the Treatment of Psoriasis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 57, no. 3 (2023): 341–347.
    doi: 10.1177/10600280221105508google scholar: lookup
  9. Foland JW, McIlwraith CW, Trotter GW, Powers BE, Lamar CH. Effect of Betamethasone and Exercise on Equine Carpal Joints With Osteochondral Fragments. Veterinary Surgery 23, no. 5 (1994): 369–376.
  10. Cuming RS, Groover ES, Wooldridge AA, Caldwell FJ. Review of Glucocorticoid Therapy in Horses. Part 1: Pharmacology. Equine Veterinary Education 30, no. 3 (2018): 141–150.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12555google scholar: lookup
  11. Sullivan J, Blea J, McKemie DS, Kass PH, Knych HK. Pharmacokinetics and Anti‐Inflammatory Effects of Intramuscular Betamethasone in Exercised Thoroughbred Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 49, no. 3 (2026): 295–305.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.70052google scholar: lookup
  12. Toutain PL. Veterinary Medicines and Competition Animals: The Question of Medication Versus Doping Control. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology vol. 199 (2010), 315–339.
  13. Whitton RC, Jackson MA, Campbell AJ. Musculoskeletal Injury Rates in Thoroughbred Racehorses Following Local Corticosteroid Injection. Veterinary Journal 200, no. 1 (2014): 71–76.
  14. Racing Medication and Testing Consortium. Controlled Therapeutic Substances Lists. (2020).
  15. International Federation of Horseracing Authorities. (2025) accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.ifhaonline.org/default.asp?section=iabrw&area=1.
  16. Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, “Controlled Prohibited Lists,” (2025), https://assets.hiwu.org/a/hisa_controlledprohibitedlist_report_2.02.23_opt.pdf?updated_at=2023‐02‐13T14:41:22.400Z.
  17. Toutain PL, Lassourd V. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach to Assess Irrelevant Plasma or Urine Drug Concentrations in Postcompetition Samples for Drug Control in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 34, no. 3 (2002): 242–249.
  18. Toutain PL, Lassourd V. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Irrelevant Drug Concentrations in Horse Plasma or Urine for a Selection of Drugs. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Racing Analysts and Veterinarians. Orlando, Florida, USA. (2002): 19–28.
  19. Japan Racing Association, “Medication and Drugs,” (2026), https://japanracing.jp/en/horsemen/rule/medication.html.
  20. D. C. Knottenbelt, Equine Formulary (Saunders, 2006).
  21. van Wijk RC, Imperial MZ, Savic RM, Solans BP. Pharmacokinetic Analysis Across Studies to Drive Knowledge‐Integration: A Tutorial on Individual Patient Data Meta‐Analysis (IPDMA). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 12, no. 9 (2023): 1187–1200.
    doi: 10.1002/psp4.13002google scholar: lookup
  22. Woodward A, Whittem T. The Lower Limit of Quantification in Pharmacokinetic Analyses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 42, no. 6 (2019): 585–587.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12778google scholar: lookup
  23. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, no. 430 (1995): 773–795.
  24. Menendez MI, Phelps MA, Bertone AL. Pharmacokinetics of Intra‐Articular Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate and Betamethasone Acetate and Endogenous Hydrocortisone Suppression in Exercising Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 39, no. 1 (2016): 22–26.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12229google scholar: lookup
  25. Bessonnat A, Picotte K, Lavoie JP. Intra‐Articular Triamcinolone Acetonide Improves Lung Function in Horses With Severe Asthma. Equine Veterinary Journal 52, no. 1 (2020): 131–135.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13128google scholar: lookup
  26. Knych HK, Stanley SD, Harrison LM, McKemie DS. Pharmacokinetics of Betamethasone in Plasma, Urine, and Synovial Fluid Following Intra‐Articular Administration to Exercised Thoroughbred Horses. Drug Testing and Analysis 9, no. 9 (2017): 1385–1391.
    doi: 10.1002/dta.2170google scholar: lookup
  27. Ekstrand C, Bondesson U, Giving E. Disposition and Effect of Intra‐Articularly Administered Dexamethasone on Lipopolysaccharide Induced Equine Synovitis. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 61, no. 1 (2019): 28.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-019-0464-2google scholar: lookup
  28. Authie EC, Garcia P, Popot MA, Toutain PL, Doucet M. Effect of an Endurance‐Like Exercise on the Disposition and Detection Time of Phenylbutazone and Dexamethasone in the Horse: Application to Medication Control. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, no. 3 (2010): 240–247.
  29. Derendorf H, Möllmann H, Grüner A, Haack D, Gyselby G. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Glucocorticoid Suspensions After Intra‐Articular Administration. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 39, no. 3 (1986): 313–317.
    doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.45google scholar: lookup
  30. Haspel AD, Giguère S, Hart KA, Berghaus LJ, Davis JL. Bioavailability and Tolerability of Nebulised Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate in Adult Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 50, no. 1 (2018): 85–90.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12724google scholar: lookup
  31. Nomura M, Kuroda T, Ohta M, Kusano K, Minamijima Y, Nagata S. Pharmacokinetics of Salbutamol in Thoroughbred Horses After a Single Intravenous or Inhaled Administration. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 48, no. 2 (2024): 76–85.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.13491google scholar: lookup
  32. Toutain PL. How to Extrapolate a Withdrawal Time From an EHSLC Published Detection Time: A Monte Carlo Simulation Appraisal. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, no. 3 (2010): 248–254.
  33. Toutain PL. Why the Racing Industry and Equestrian Disciplines Need to Implement Population Pharmacokinetics: To Learn, Explain, Summarize, Harmonize, and Individualize. Drug Testing and Analysis 17, no. 2 (2025): 250–258.
    doi: 10.1002/dta.3706google scholar: lookup
  34. Kuroda T, Knych HK, Noble GK. A Meta‐Analysis of International Flunixin Pharmacokinetics in Horses: Toward Regulatory Harmonization and Individualized Detection Times Using Bayesian Paradigm. Drug Testing and Analysis 18, no. 1 (2026): 32–50.
    doi: 10.1002/dta.3961google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.