FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Possible association of short-term complications and antimic...
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14563

Possible association of short-term complications and antimicrobial use in standing equine cheek tooth extractions 2018-2022.

Abstract: Despite growing concerns about antimicrobial resistance, prophylactic antimicrobials continue to be routinely administered in many procedures, including dental extractions. Further evidence-based research is needed on whether their use influences post-operative complication rates. Objective: To identify risk factors for short-term complications, associations between complications and antimicrobial use as well as factors leading to antimicrobial use in equine (standing) cheek tooth extractions. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical records. Methods: Data were extracted from records of horses undergoing cheek tooth extractions (2018-2022). Multi-variable logistic regression models examined associations between clinical variables and the occurrence of complications and antimicrobial use. Results: Three hundred and five cases undergoing 447 dental extractions were included. Of these, 197 cases (64.6%) received antimicrobials. Complications occurred in 56 cases (18.4%); these were considered mild and transient in 39 cases (12.7%) and severe, requiring veterinary treatment, in 18 cases (5.6%). Occurrence of complications demonstrated an association with increased antimicrobial use (OR 2.69; CI 1.20-6.04; p = 0.02), presence of concurrent diseases (OR 4.32, CI 1.89-9.84; p = 0.001), extraction of mandibular teeth compared to maxillary teeth (OR 2.20; CI 1.14-4.23; p = 0.018), warmer seasons (OR 1.97; CI 1.03-3.76; p = 0.04) and the reason for extraction being either dental infection (OR 6.37; CI 2.39-16.97; p < 0.001) or dental fracture (OR 3.90; CI 1.53-9.91; p = 0.004) versus periodontal diseases. Antimicrobials were more frequently used when more than 2 teeth were extracted (OR 5.96; CI 2.26-15.70; p < 0.001), when dental infection was the reason for extraction (OR 3.75; CI 1.76-8.02; p = 0.001) or when the extraction was performed in warmer seasons (OR 1.96; CI 1.17-3.29; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Complication rates were comparable to previous studies and in large numbers of horses antimicrobials were not administered, which did not result in higher complication rates. Antimicrobials might be justified in horses suffering from concurrent diseases.
© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-13 PubMed ID: 40653684DOI: 10.1111/evj.14563Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study aims to identify risk factors and possible associations between short-term complications and the use of antimicrobials in the extraction of cheek teeth in standing horses, with the aim of determining whether the outcome is influenced by their use.

Methodology

  • The study conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical records of horses that underwent cheek tooth extractions between 2018 and 2022.
  • Variables such as the use of antimicrobials, occurrence of complications, concurrent diseases, the reason for tooth extraction and complicating factors such as the number of teeth extracted and seasonality were examined using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

  • Out of 305 cases involving 447 tooth extractions, 64.6% of cases were given antimicrobials.
  • Short-term complications occurred in 18.4% of cases. These were mild and transient in 12.7% of cases, but were severe and required veterinary treatment in 5.6% of cases.
  • The study found a significant association between the occurrence of complications and the use of antimicrobials, presence of concurrent diseases, extraction of mandibular teeth as opposed to maxillary teeth, warmer seasons, and the reason for extraction being either because of dental infection or dental fracture.
  • Antimicrobials were more commonly used when more than 2 teeth were extracted, when dental infection was the reason for extraction, or when the extraction was conducted in warmer seasons.

Conclusions

  • The rate of complications was similar to those reported in previous studies.
  • Despite the absence of antimicrobials in a large number of cases, there did not appear to be an increase in complication rates, suggesting prophylactic antimicrobial use may not be universally necessary in equine dental extractions.
  • Nevertheless, the use of antimicrobials might be justified for horses suffering from concurrent diseases to reduce the risk of complications.

Cite This Article

APA
Schnierer M, Nekouei O, Huber LC, Jehle M, Biermann N. (2025). Possible association of short-term complications and antimicrobial use in standing equine cheek tooth extractions 2018-2022. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14563

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Schnierer, Marlies
  • University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Nekouei, Omid
  • Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Science, Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Huber, Lisa Christina
  • University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Jehle, Matthias
  • Equine Clinic Gessertshausen, Gessertshausen, Germany.
Biermann, Nora
  • University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Southwood LL. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: current standards of care.. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35(11):607–616.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13864google scholar: lookup
  2. Båverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Lindholm A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile associated with acute colitis in mature horses treated with antibiotics.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(4):279–284.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03124.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  3. Stack A, Schott HC. Suspect novel adverse drug reactions to trimethoprim‐sulphonamide combinations in horses: a case series.. Equine Vet J 2011;43(1):117–120.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00158.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  4. Khusro A, Aarti C, Buendía‐Rodriguez G, Arasu MV, Al‐Dhabi NA, Barbabosa‐Pliego A. Adverse effect of antibiotics administration on horse health: an overview.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021;97:103339.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103339google scholar: lookup
  5. Borg H, Carmalt JL. Postoperative septic arthritis after elective equine arthroscopy without antimicrobial prophylaxis.. Vet Surg 2013;42(3):262–266.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2013.01106.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  6. Vlaminck L. Complications following oral extraction of cheek teeth: what's next?. Equine Vet Educ 2017;29(11):600–602.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12706google scholar: lookup
  7. Duncanson GR. A case study of 125 horses presented to a general practitioner in the UK for cheek tooth removal.. Equine Vet Educ 2004;16(3):166–168.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2004.tb00289.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. O'Neill HD, Boussauw B, Bladon BM, Fraser BS. Extraction of cheek teeth using a lateral buccotomy approach in 114 horses (1999–2009).. Equine Vet J 2011;43(3):348–353.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00169.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  9. Christiansen MS, Rosenmeier JG, Jensen DB, Lindegaard C. Standing equine cheek tooth extraction: a multivariate analysis of the effect of antibiotics on the risk of post‐operative complications.. Equine Vet J 2023;55(6):968–978.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13905google scholar: lookup
  10. Kennedy R, Reardon RJM, James O, Wilson C, Dixon PM. A long‐term study of equine cheek teeth post‐extraction complications: 428 cheek teeth (2004–2018).. Equine Vet J 2020;52(6):811–822.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13255google scholar: lookup
  11. Dixon PM, Dacre I, Dacre K, Tremaine WH, McCann J, Barakzai S. Standing oral extraction of cheek teeth in 100 horses (1998–2003).. Equine Vet J 2005;37(2):105–112.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223822google scholar: lookup
  12. Gergeleit H, Bienert‐Zeit A. Complications following mandibular cheek tooth extraction in 20 horses.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:504.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00504google scholar: lookup
  13. Lydiksen CV, Christensen JI, Rosenmeier JG, Jensen DB, Lindegaard C. Equine dental sinusitis—a statistical analysis of the effect of antibiotics on dental sinusitis following dental extraction.. Equine Vet Educ 2024;36(7):357–365.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13911google scholar: lookup
  14. Barbosa M, Prada‐López I, Álvarez M, Amaral B, los Angeles C‐D‐CM d, Tomás I. Post‐tooth extraction bacteraemia: a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of chlorhexidine prophylaxis.. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0124249.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124249google scholar: lookup
  15. Nieves MA, Hartwig P, Kinyon JM, Riedesel DH. Bacterial isolates from plaque and from blood during and after routine dental procedures in dogs.. Vet Surg 1997;26(1):26–32.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01459.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Kern I, Bartmann CP, Verspohl J, Rohde J, Bienert‐Zeit A. Bacteraemia before, during and after tooth extraction in horses in the absence of antimicrobial administration.. Equine Vet J 2017;49(2):178–182.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12581google scholar: lookup
  17. Sykes JE, Kittleson MD, Pesavento PA, Byrne BA, MacDonald KA, Chomel BB. Evaluation of the relationship between causative organisms and clinical characteristics of infective endocarditis in dogs: 71 cases (1992–2005).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228(11):1723–1734.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.11.1723google scholar: lookup
  18. Zetterström S, Groover E, Lascola K, Cole R, Velloso A, Boone L. Meningitis after tooth extraction and sinus lavage in a horse.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021;97:103323.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103323google scholar: lookup
  19. Arndt S, Kilcoyne I, Heney CM, Wong TS, Magdesian KG. Bacterial meningitis after dental extraction in a 17‐year‐old horse.. Can Vet J [Serial Online] 2021;62(4):403–407.
  20. Horbal AA, Reardon RJM, Froydenlund T, Jago RC, Dixon PM. Head and neck abscessation and thrombophlebitis following cheek tooth extraction in a pony.. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31(10):523–529.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12900google scholar: lookup
  21. Harding PG, Smith RL, Barakzai SZ. Comparison of two approaches to performing an inferior alveolar nerve block in the horse.. Aust Vet J 2012;90(4):146–150.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00897.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Staszyk C, Bienert A, Bäumer W, Feige K, Gasse H. Simulation of local anaesthetic nerve block of the infraorbital nerve within the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical landmarks defined by computed tomography.. Res Vet Sci 2008;85(3):399–406.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.02.008google scholar: lookup
  23. Gomez D, Toribio R, Caddey B, Costa M, Vijan S, Dembek K. Longitudinal effects of oral administration of antimicrobial drugs on fecal microbiota of horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2023;37(6):2562–2572.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16853google scholar: lookup
  24. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.. Am J Health‐Syst Pharm 2013;70(3):195–283.
    doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568google scholar: lookup
  25. AGISAR (WHO). Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine: ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non‐human use [6th Revision 2018].. .
  26. Silver JG, Martin L, McBride BC. Recovery and clearance rates of oral microorganisms following experimental bacteraemias in dogs.. Arch Oral Biol 1975;20(10):675–679.
    doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(75)90136-3google scholar: lookup
  27. Townsend KS, Johnson PJ, LaCarrubba AM, Martin LM, Ericsson AC. Exodontia associated bacteremia in horses characterized by next generation sequencing.. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):6314.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85484-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. American Veterinary Dental College (AVDC), Board of Directors. Position statement on ‘The use of antibiotics in veterinary dentistry’.. Providence, Rhode Island: AVDC Board of Directors; 2019 [cited 2024 Jun 6].
  29. Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Clinicians' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review.. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177(3):407–419.
    doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8254google scholar: lookup
  30. O'Sullivan ED, Schofield SJ. Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2018;48(3):225–232.
    doi: 10.4997/jrcpe.2018.306google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.