FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Preliminary Behavioural Observations of Horseback Safaris: I...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(4); 441; doi: 10.3390/ani12040441

Preliminary Behavioural Observations of Horseback Safaris: Initial Insights into the Welfare Implications for Horses and Herbivorous Plains Game Species.

Abstract: In Africa, wildlife-watching experiences create substantial revenue from tourists that can finance wildlife conservation. Horseback safaris, where an experienced guide takes guests through the bush on horseback to observe plains game species, are a popular activity. Close encounters between ridden horses and game species are unnatural and potentially stressful situations, and horseback safaris may have adverse impacts on both the horses and the wildlife they have come to observe. This study aims to provide a preliminary insight into the behavioural responses of horses and herbivorous plains game species, including giraffe, zebra and impala, as a proxy measure of the potential welfare implications of horseback safaris. Seventeen group safari rides were observed encompassing 72 encounters with plains game species. Game species differed in their response to encounters with the horseback safari ride. Equine response behaviour appeared to be influenced by the species of game encountered. Horses seemed more wary of giraffe than other species, with a higher percentage of horses showing stationary and retreat behaviour at the start of giraffe encounters. They were also most likely to shy at giraffe. The behavioural responses suggest that game encounters can elicit a stress response in both animal groups, although it is not usually extreme, potentially indicating that some degree of habituation has occurred. Balancing the welfare of both the horses and the plains game species along with tourist preferences may be challenging in this context.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-02-11 PubMed ID: 35203149PubMed Central: PMC8868349DOI: 10.3390/ani12040441Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the behavior of horses and certain wildlife species during horseback safaris in Africa as a way of gauging potential welfare implications for both parties involved. The study provides early insight into how these animals react in these scenarios, emphasizing the need for balance between tourism and animal welfare.

Context and Significance of the Study

  • This study is conducted in the African setting, where wildlife-watching experiences generate significant revenue towards wildlife conservation efforts. Specifically, the study focuses on horseback safaris where tourists get the opportunity to observe plains game species up close.
  • While profitable, this common tourist activity could potentially stress both the horses used for the ride and the game species observed, given these unnatural and close encounters.
  • Hence, the research is significant as it initiates an investigation into the welfare implications of horseback safaris from behavioral responses of horses and herbivorous game species (for instance, zebra, giraffe, and impala).

Research Methodology and Observations

  • The researchers observed seventeen group safari rides, recording details of 72 encounters with plains game species to glean insight into the behavior of both the horses and the game species during these meetups.
  • It was found that the species of wildlife encountered influence the response behavior of the horses. For instance, horses were particularly wary of giraffes, showing behaviors indicating fear or apprehension such as staying stationary or retreating at the onset of a giraffe encounter or shyly reacting.

Findings and Implications

  • The behavior of both horses and game species suggested the possibility of stress responses during their encounters, although not extreme. This could potentially imply some degree of habituation over time.
  • This leads to the conclusion that ensuring the welfare of the involved parties, alongside catering to tourist preferences, can be a challenging task in the context of horseback safaris.
  • The study underscores the need for further research and effective strategies in order to balance the concerns of wildlife conservation and animal welfare with the profitable sector of ecotourism.

Cite This Article

APA
Hodgson E, Rooney NJ, Hockenhull J. (2022). Preliminary Behavioural Observations of Horseback Safaris: Initial Insights into the Welfare Implications for Horses and Herbivorous Plains Game Species. Animals (Basel), 12(4), 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040441

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 4
PII: 441

Researcher Affiliations

Hodgson, Evelyn
  • Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Rooney, Nicola J
  • Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Hockenhull, Jo
  • Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Buckley R, Mossaz A. Private conservation funding from wildlife tourism enterprises in sub-Saharan Africa: Conservation marketing beliefs and practices.. Biol. Conserv. 2018;218:57–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.001google scholar: lookup
  2. Shannon G, Larson C.L, Reed S.E, Crooks K.R, Angeloni L.M. Ecological Consequences of Ecotourism for Wildlife Populations and Communities.. In: Blumstein D., Geffroy B., Samia D., Bessa E., editors. Ecotourism’s Promise and Peril. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2017. pp. 29–46.
  3. Krüger O. The role of ecotourism in conservation: Panacea or Pandora’s box?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005;14:579–600.
    doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-3917-4google scholar: lookup
  4. Shutt K, Heistermann M, Kasim A, Todd A, Kalousova B, Profosouva I, Petzelkova K, Fuh T, Dicky J.-F, Bopalanzognako J.-B. Effects of habituation, research and ecotourism on faecal glucocorti-coid metabolites in wild western lowland gorillas: Implications for conservation management.. Biol. Conserv. 2014;172:72–79.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.014google scholar: lookup
  5. Zhou Y, Buesching C.D, Newman C, Kaneko Y, Xie Z, Macdonald D.W. Balancing the benefits of eco-tourism and development: The effects of visitor trail-use on mammals in a Protected Area in rapidly develop-ing China.. Biol. Conserv. 2013;165:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.007google scholar: lookup
  6. Bhandari M. Is Tourism Always Beneficial? A Case Study from Masai Mara National Reserve, Narok, Kenya.. Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 2014;15:458–483.
  7. Szott I.D, Pretorius Y, Ganswindt A, Koyama N.F. Physiological stress response of African elephants to wildlife tourism in Madikwe Game Reserve, South Africa.. Wildl. Res. 2020;47:34.
    doi: 10.1071/WR19045google scholar: lookup
  8. Behie AM, Pavelka MS, Chapman CA. Sources of variation in fecal cortisol levels in howler monkeys in Belize.. Am J Primatol 2010 Jun;72(7):600-6.
    doi: 10.1002/ajp.20813pubmed: 20166191google scholar: lookup
  9. Thiel D, Jenni-Eiermann S, Braunisch V, Palme R, Jenni L. Ski tourism affects habitat use and evokes a physiological stress response in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: A new methodological approach.. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007;45:845–853.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01465.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Rehnus M, Wehrle M, Palme R. Mountain haresLepus timidusand tourism: Stress events and reactions.. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013;51:6–12.
    doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12174google scholar: lookup
  11. Ranaweerage E, Ranjeewa A.D, Sugimoto K. Tourism-induced disturbance of wildlife in protected areas: A case study of free ranging elephants in Sri Lanka.. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2015;4:625–631.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.10.013google scholar: lookup
  12. McGreevy P. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists.. Saunders; Edinburgh, UK: 2004. pp. 169–337.
  13. Simpson H.I, Rands S.A, Nicol C.J. Social structure, vigilance and behaviour of plains zebra (Equus burchellii): A 5-year case study of individuals living on a managed wildlife reserve.. Acta Thériol. 2012;57:111–120.
    doi: 10.1007/s13364-011-0061-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  14. Tarakini T, Crosmary W.-G, Fritz H, Mundy P. Flight Behavioural Responses to Sport Hunting by Two African Herbivores.. South Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2014;44:76–83.
    doi: 10.3957/056.044.0110google scholar: lookup
  15. Yamashita T, Gaynor K.M, Kioko J, Brashares J, Kiffner C. Antipredator behaviour of African ungulates around human settlements.. Afr. J. Ecol. 2018;56:528–536.
    doi: 10.1111/aje.12489google scholar: lookup
  16. Schmitt M.H, Stears K, Wilmers C.C, Shrader A.M. Determining the relative importance of dilution and detection for zebra foraging in mixed-species herds.. Anim. Behav. 2014;96:151–158.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.012google scholar: lookup
  17. Schmitt M.H, Stears K, Shrader A.M. Zebra reduce predation risk in mixed-species herds by eavesdrop-ping on cues from giraffe.. Behav. Ecol. 2016;27:1073–1077.
    doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw015google scholar: lookup
  18. Nakahashi W, Ohtsuki H. Evolution of emotional contagion in group-living animals.. J Theor Biol 2018 Mar 7;440:12-20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.12.015pubmed: 29253506google scholar: lookup
  19. Helgadóttir G, Sigurðardóttir I. Horse-based Tourism: Community, Quality and Disinterest in Eco-nomic Value.. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2008;8:106–121.
    doi: 10.1080/15022250802088149google scholar: lookup
  20. Fennell D.A. Tourism and Animal Welfare.. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2013;38:325–340.
    doi: 10.1080/02508281.2013.11081757google scholar: lookup
  21. Notzke C. Equestrian tourism: Animal agency observed.. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019;22:948–966.
    doi: 10.1080/13683500.2017.1349081google scholar: lookup
  22. Munsters C, Visser K, Broek J.V.D, Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M.S. Quantifying stress in experienced and inexperienced mounted police horses, using heart rate, heart rate variability, behavior score and suitability score.. J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:e16–e17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2012.12.037google scholar: lookup
  23. Pritchard JC, Lindberg AC, Main DC, Whay HR. Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters.. Prev Vet Med 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):265-83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.002pubmed: 15907574google scholar: lookup
  24. Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Environmental and demographic risk factors for poor welfare in working horses, donkeys and mules in developing countries.. Vet J 2010 Dec;186(3):385-92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.09.016pubmed: 19926316google scholar: lookup
  25. Witkowska-Piłaszewicz O, Grzędzicka J, Seń J, Czopowicz M, Żmigrodzka M, Winnicka A, Cywińska A, Carter C. Stress response after race and endurance training sessions and competitions in Arabian horses.. Prev Vet Med 2021 Mar;188:105265.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105265pubmed: 33497894google scholar: lookup
  26. Björlinger K, Johansson S. Equestrian Tourism in Trinidad.. Undergraduate Thesis. Linnaeus University; Växjö, Sweden: 2016.
  27. Giampiccoli A. The effect of the use of mules in tourism: A historical perspective.. Afr. J. Hosp. Tour. Leis. 2017;6:1–12.
  28. Hunninck L, May R, Jackson CR, Palme R, Røskaft E, Sheriff MJ. Consequences of climate-induced vegetation changes exceed those of human disturbance for wild impala in the Serengeti ecosystem.. Conserv Physiol 2020;8(1):coz117.
    doi: 10.1093/conphys/coz117pmc: PMC7246078pubmed: 32477568google scholar: lookup
  29. Muposhi V.K, Muvengwi J, Mandima L. Vigilance and foraging behaviour of impala (Aepyceros melampus) in an isolated and insularised ecosystem, Mukuvisi Woodlands, Zimbabwe.. Ann. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016;2:44–56.
  30. Crosmary W.-G, Valeix M, Fritz H, Madzikanda H, Côté S.D. African ungulates and their drinking problems: Hunting and predation risks constrain access to water.. Anim. Behav. 2012;83:145–153.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.019google scholar: lookup
  31. Schuette P, Creel S, Christianson D. Ungulate distributions in a rangeland with competitors, predators and pastoralists.. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016;53:1066–1077.
    doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12610google scholar: lookup
  32. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet J 1983 Oct;15(4):371-2.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xpubmed: 6641685google scholar: lookup
  33. . Different Levels of Riding Ability.. The Long Riders Guild Academic Foundation 2014 [(accessed on 7 August 2018)]. Available online: http://www.lrgaf.org/guide/ability.htm.
  34. Schenkel R. On sociology and behaviour in impala (Aepyceros melampus Lichenstein). Afr. J. Ecol. 1966;4:99–114.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1966.tb00887.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  35. McDonnell S. A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behaviour: The Equid Ethogram.. Eclipse Press; Lexington, KY, USA: 2003.
  36. Brubaker A.S, Coss R.G. Effects of Single- and Mixed-Species Group Composition on the Flight Initiation Distances of Plains and Grevy’s Zebras.. Int. J. Behav. Biol. 2016;122:531–541.
    doi: 10.1111/eth.12500google scholar: lookup
  37. Goodwin D. The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):15-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05150.xpubmed: 11314229google scholar: lookup
  38. Van Klink L. Ungulate Response Behaviour to Tourist Activities in a South African Private Game Reserve.. Master’s Thesis. University of Bristol; Bristol, UK: 2016.
  39. Young T, Creighton E, Smith T, Hosie C. A novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;140:33–43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.008google scholar: lookup
  40. Hunter L.T.B, Skinner J.D. Vigilance Behaviour in African Ungulates: The Role of Predation Pressure.. Behaviour. 1998;135:195–211.
  41. Knight J. Making Wildlife Viewable: Habituation and Attraction.. Soc. Anim. 2009;17:167–184.
    doi: 10.1163/156853009X418091google scholar: lookup
  42. Squibb K, Griffin K, Favier R, Ijichi C. Poker Face: Discrepancies in behaviour and affective states in horses during stressful handing procedures.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;202:34–38.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.003google scholar: lookup
  43. Lloyd A, Martin J, Bornett-Gauci H, Wilkinson R. Horse personality: Variation between breeds.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;112:369–383.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.010google scholar: lookup
  44. Freestone JF, Wolfsheimer KJ, Kamerling SG, Church G, Hamra J, Bagwell C. Exercise induced hormonal and metabolic changes in Thoroughbred horses: effects of conditioning and acepromazine.. Equine Vet J 1991 May;23(3):219-23.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb02760.xpubmed: 1884706google scholar: lookup
  45. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan MP, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 28;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  46. Christensen J.W, Munk R, Hawson L, Palme R, Larsen T, Egenvall A, von Borstel U.U.K, Rørvang M.V. Rider effects on horses’ conflict behaviour, rein tension, physiological measures and rideability scores.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;234:105184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105184google scholar: lookup
  47. Keeling LJ, Jonare L, Lanneborn L. Investigating horse-human interactions: the effect of a nervous human.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):70-1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.013pubmed: 19394879google scholar: lookup
  48. Yarnell K, Hall C, Billett E. An assessment of the aversive nature of an animal management procedure (clipping) using behavioral and physiological measures.. Physiol Behav 2013 Jun 13;118:32-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.013pubmed: 23685232google scholar: lookup
  49. Bateman P, Fleming P.A. Are negative effects of tourist activities on wildlife over-reported? A review of assessment methods and empirical results.. Biol. Conserv. 2017;211:10–19.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.003google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.